Dominic Lawson: We should have no reason to be surprised when a doctor turns out to be a murderer
Friday, 25 July 2008
What should a genocidal mass-murderer look like? And what professional qualifications should he have? Of the two men indicted by the Hague war crimes tribunal as masterminds of the planned massacre of thousands of Bosnian Muslim adults and children, Ratko Mladic fits all our preconceptions.
General Mladic was a man drawn to the sound of gunfire from an early age. His is a face that seems to exude brutality. Yet his boss, Radovan Karadzic, does not conform to this stereotype. As this newspaper's former Balkans correspondent wrote this week, he struck his western interlocutors as "amiable and disarming ... quite unlike the effect of a conversation with the screaming psychopathic Mladic".
Karadzic, sorry, that should be Dr Karadzic, was a respected psychiatrist, who trained with our very own Tavistock Centre (he specialised in paranoia, in case you were wondering). He was also a poet, with a number of published collections to his name. Indeed he looked as a poet should look, with sensitive, spaniel-like eyes, and very creative hair.
In fact Karadzic's poetry is so dreadful that it alone would merit indictment by a tribunal – for crimes against literature. Yet it also gives a much clearer insight into the character of a mass-murderer than any of his political statements. One stanza in a poem about Sarajevo is absolutely explicit: "Let's go down to the cities to kill the scumbags." Or try this: "Now that I am in this crazy fervour of mine I could do just about anything/So your stupid rotten vain souls wouldn't stare at me with their stupid peaceful eyes."
The man's raging megalomania is also given free rein in verse: "It is only I who sprouted from the Universe like the morning star/And the Universe blushed with envy and changed colours." So when you see accounts of a two-year-old Bosnian Muslim child impaled on a wooden pole with a sign reading "This is what we are going to do to all Albanians because I am God and Nato means nothing to me," you are almost certainly reading the words of a killer directly inspired by Karadzic's rhetoric.
Karadzic the poet and Karadzic the maniac are thus easily reconciled; but where does that leave Dr Karadzic, the qualified doctor and psychiatrist? We like to think of doctors as people motivated solely by concern for the well-being of all their patients; but it shouldn't take a Harold Shipman – whom Karadzic eerily resembles in his disguise of beard and big glasses – to inform us that this cannot be true in every instance.
If you read Michael Burleigh's Death and Deliverance, an account of how German doctors actively participated in the murder of over 100,000 handicapped people as part of the Nazis' eugenic exercise, then you can not be altogether surprised to learn of more modern medical monsters.
Those German doctors claimed that they were improving the genetic health of their race. Karadzic, like the Nazis, was a believer in ethnic purity, and above all, the innate superiority of the Christian Orthodox Serbs over their Muslim neighbours. He felt the killing of a bumble bee to be more regrettable than the slaughter of any number of Muslims – a distinct echo of the animal-loving Adolf Hitler, who regarded the eating of meat as barbaric.
It is serendipitous that the arrest of Dr Karadzic came on the same day that the British government revealed its plans for an annual audit of doctors, to weed out the bad 'uns. Most of the reports illustrated this story with a photo of the late Harold Shipman. The chairman of the British Medical Association, Dr Hamish Meldrum, observed that "Harold Shipman wasn't necessarily a badly-performing doctor in the sense of his clinical practice, but he was a murderer. We are not really devising a system purely to pick up murderers."
Dr Meldrum speaks with disarming honesty: greater invigilation of medical practice might expose doctors who treat patients rudely or capriciously. What it won't do is find the one-off mass murderer – any more than Sarajevo University Hospital could have detected from Dr Karadzic's medical practice that he would end up consigning thousands of his fellow-citizens to grotesquely imaginative forms of torture, mutilation and death.
Similarly, the American doctors at the Rockefeller Institute in the 1940s could not have guessed that their Haitian colleague Dr François Duvalier, a noted researcher into tropical diseases, would become the terrifying dictator known as "Papa Doc", feared throughout Haiti not just for his murderous militia known as Tontons Macoutes, but also for his claims to semi-divine status – a kind of voodoo Jesus Christ.
A doctor friend of mine who had visited Haiti under François Duvalier's rule had asked himself why it was that while the vast majority of his colleagues in the medical profession were indeed good men and women, that a few developed into truly dangerous people. He came to two conclusions.
The first was that there must be a handful of men who are attracted in exactly the wrong way to the absolute power over life and death that doctors traditionally wield. These doctors often have an exceptionally odd relationship with the opposite sex, as some women find out to their pain and distress; again, Dr Shipman was a very extreme example of this.
His second conclusion was that part of the training of doctors – at least for those of his generation – involved learning how to "steel yourself" against disgust or distress. So they would be required to participate in dissections and autopsies, events which are sickening when first experienced. Indeed, it is essential for all doctors to have a high degree of emotional detachment; when you think what distress is daily witnessed in our hospitals, it would be very dangerous to their own peace of mind to empathise fully with every bereaved family.
However, according to my friend, there will be a handful of doctors in whom this necessary professional detachment mutates into complete indifference or even a form of sadism. Perhaps that is one reason – quite apart from a virulent ethnic hatred – why the good Dr Karadzic was so immune to feelings of pity towards even the children whose slaughter he instigated.
In this context, it is especially revolting that in his disguise as the Alternative Health guru "Dr Dragan Dabic", Karadzic chose to operate under the webmail address of healingwounds@dragandabic.com. Those of us who have long regarded the field of "alternative" therapy as a fairground for medical imposters can however derive some bleak satisfaction from the fact that Karadzic decided to impersonate such an imposter – not just a quack, but a quack quack.
One of "Dr Dabic's" claims was that by the use of "Quantum human energy", he could demonstrate that all humans "are programmed to live to up to 130 years of age". Well, if things go as the prosecutors at the Hague tribunal intend, Dr Radovan Karadzic will never again be a free man, even if he should live to 130.




Comments
24 Comments
.. Yes, being a doctor does NOT create a religious terrorist. RELIGION creates religious terrorists. ALL religions foment terrorists. Karadzic is a religic who also happens to be a medical doctor.
.. Karadzic prolly originally became a pschologist/psychiatrist in an attempt to figure out what was wrong with his own thinking, why he was so different from some people, and/or why Normal People didn't like him all his life!! Despite all his obvious intelligence, he apparently never realized it was basically his religious addiction/brain washing that was distorting his thinking.
.. In the Judeo/Christian/Moslem religious teachings, the evil story of Noah's Ark is used to brain wash children early into the religious concept that it is O.K. to kill over 99% of the people on the planet if they don't believe EXACTLY what you/Noah believe. Think about it. The real moral of the Noah Story. In Deuteronomy of the Jews entering the so-called 'Promised Land' also says it's O.K. to kill !!
Posted by BuzzLOL | 31.07.08, 17:41 GMT
"All the doctors who are offended"... have you considered the possibility of us being offended as intelligent beings by the (in)consistency of the (il)logical connections and conclusions? Doctor - sees people suffer and die - he gets used to it - he kills people... Like saying guitar = instrument, compass = instrument, let's play music with a compass. I am not trying to defend the professional reputation, it's bad enough without serial killers and fanatic politicians, and sure we got our share of people full of cr*p. But the war crimes are not committed by solitary madmen and fanatics of whatever profession or religion, but by the financial apparatus that supports and exploits their influence on the people for it's own profit. P.S. Don't get confused by my greek last name. I ain't christian-orthodox, I got no religious reason at all on support the serbs (I don't support them anyway, my initial comment was about facts and conclusions)
Posted by Dr V.Nikolopoulos, M.D. | 31.07.08, 07:56 GMT
Every man has to answer for its crimes, but isnt being a Nazi tied to anti-semitism? Bosnian Muslims love Jews? It is hard to believe. You should watch their news how ill they talk about the US because of its recent wars in the Middle East or read their paper and the US happened to be feeding them during their Civil War! I wonder how long before they start growing poppy seeds and embrace terrorism.
Posted by Joe | 31.07.08, 02:11 GMT
Wars in former Yugoslavia, including Bosnia, were civil wars, whose suffering was escalated by the unwillingness of the US and Germany to put on the table the request to negotiate a fair borders of the separatist to-be-new-states. Such negotiation would take into account the fact that Serbian people lived all over the former Yugoslavia, and did not want to separate. Why should they be forced to live in to them hostile new states. As it usually happens, when people are denied voice, they turn to guns, and so it happens that in this case people who wanted to stay in Yugoslavia (Serbs from Bosnia) had guns of Yugoslavian army on their disposal and where able to do proportionally larger damage.
The resulting war was tragic civil war with brutalities inflicted and causalities suffered by all sides. It was fundamentally a war for territory, but it does not qualify by any stretch of imagination to be classified as genocide, despite the consistent drum of West propaganda.
Posted by Stephen | 30.07.08, 17:32 GMT
My, my. All the doctors who are offended that someone would actually suggest that one of their profession could do bad things. My father and uncle were physicians (married to RNs) who were selfless professionals dedicated to healing. Unfortunately, many of their colleagues were arrogant know-it-alls who enjoyed their power. Why is a surprise that someone in that profession could swing over to full-blown megalomania, just like a few bad apples in any profession? Are doctors supposed to be immune from human foibles? The Butcher of Bosnia is no more reflective of all doctors than Hitler is of all vegetarians. Get over yourselves.
Posted by Bill | 30.07.08, 16:29 GMT
Oh dear, I just discovered that my colleagues are the ones behind war and mass murder! I was living a life full of lies and deception, believing it had been (and still is) the war-industry, the oil companies, the banks, and as their servants and perpetrators the perverted religious and political fanatics that make poor (intended both as "broke" and "unlucky") people pumped up to carry out the dirty job. If it had to do something with emotional detachment and lack of empathy, I' d pick the gravediggers - they get to see more corpses than we do. Well, your opinion is as good as anyone else's, surely not good enough for a newspaper like "The Independent" and it's readers. Historical truth and you, Mr Lawson, took different paths and never got to know each other. My regards, and wishes of a good, pleasant and healthy life - you never know what kind of GP gets his filthy hands on you, do you? (the wishes are sincere anyway)
Posted by Dr V.Nikolopoulos, M.D. | 30.07.08, 12:23 GMT
NOBODY SHOULD EVER WASTE TIME TO READ THIS ARTICLE
Piece of journalistic self gratification
Posted by tinka | 30.07.08, 11:29 GMT
As a first hand witness to the brutality of Chetniks as the extremist bosnian serbs call themselves Mladic& Karadzic deserve their limbs cut off and be left to bleed to death, I buried bosnian children who's only crime that they were muslim. Those 2 and anyone embracing their views are a waste of oxygen
Posted by Tarek | 30.07.08, 06:44 GMT
Bunch of crap this article of yours, Mr. Lawson, you should be ashamed of yourself. I mean, isn't there some minimum of actual fact and knowledge necessary to write an article in a journal such as Independent? Do you think anybody with some knowledge of the region, its history, and the actual situation on the ground in this last of Yugoslavian civil wars, could buy into this one-sided garbage of yours?
To the editors of Independent: clean up your act or you will loose your hard earned reputation and your respected readership.
Posted by Dr. Peter Dahl | 30.07.08, 01:54 GMT
I agree. Why sneer and posture about this fellow and ignore the bloody, illegal deeds of Bush, Cheney, Rummy, Colin Powell and their ilk? (Brit leaders were and are equally guilty of genocide, but everyone knows you English are our lapdogs.) Why not arrest and try them as well? Bush comes to UK and gets the red carpet and bows while this old guy faces foreign judges in a strange country? Bush has killed far more people than this dude.
Posted by Mister Jimmy | 29.07.08, 21:50 GMT
24 Comments