Ed Balls: We will make a happy childhood a reality for all
Tomorrow, the Secretary of State for Children receives the report detailing Britain's abuses of young people's human rights that led to our exclusive story. But, he says, with an iron fist for offenders inside a velvet glove of support, this can be the best place to grow up
Sunday, 8 June 2008
William Golding, an author famed for his bleak portrayal of youth, once said that childhood is "a disease you grow out of". In my view, he couldn't be more wrong. Childhood should be the most exciting and fulfilling period in a person's life – a time to feel safe, loved and encouraged to believe anything is possible.
And despite the rhetoric of doomed youth, the vast majority of young people do enjoy their childhood. A recent survey shows that 90 per cent of young people agreed that England is a good country to grow up in, compared to 74 per cent of parents and 71 per cent of the public.
But a "good childhood" still isn't a reality for every child – which is one of the reasons why the Prime Minister created a Department for Children. It's why we set out our vision in the Children's Plan, which encompasses the spirit of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Clearly, one of the most pressing issues of the day is to address the threat posed by gang and knife crime. Only a tiny minority are involved in this activity, but the impact they have on themselves and those around them is disproportionate and devastating. Tough enforcement is essential. I have no sympathy with the view that you should excuse bad behaviour on the grounds of other problems in a person's life. But an iron fist response to bad behaviour doesn't work in isolation.
We need a "triple track" approach, with tough enforcement accompanied by early intervention addressing the root causes of violent or anti-social behaviour, and support to help troubled youngsters to get their lives back on track. This is particularly important for young offenders. In the most serious cases – like knife crime – it's right that young people should face a custodial sentence. But when they are in custody, we must give these young people the education and support they need to get make a new start. Our forthcoming Youth Crime Action Plan will look at how we deliver this "triple track" approach, improving the youth justice system so that it delivers the right support to rehabilitate young offenders.
This reflects a much broader principle of the Children's Plan: it's always better to prevent a problem rather than deal with a crisis later. We must do a great deal more to intervene early to tackle the causes of disadvantage and vulnerability.
Child poverty, in particular, represents a scar on our national conscience, and an affront to good childhood. We set ourselves a bold target to end child poverty by 2020. I'm proud that we've lifted hundreds of thousands out of deprivation since 1997, when we had the worst record in Europe for child poverty. But it remains unacceptable that more than three million children still live below the poverty line, and I was disappointed that child poverty rose last year. This is a sign that we have to redouble our efforts, which is why the Chancellor committed a further £1bn in the last Budget.
While extra financial support for families is important, we must also address the long term causes of child poverty. Later this week, James Purnell, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, and I will be outlining new plans to combine reforms to build a modern welfare system with a long-term approach to break intergenerational cycles of poverty and disadvantage.
That means ensuring every child has the right to a high quality education – and this week we will launch a new National Challenge to turn around the fortunes of lower-performing schools. Our new diplomas and other qualifications will expand choice, breaking down the boundaries between vocational and academic learning. And we're legislating to make sure all children stay in some form of learning to 18 – school, college or an apprenticeship. But schools know that they also have a vital role to play in addressing the broader "opportunity gap" and tackling all the barriers to learning in and out of school. From birth to the age of majority, we need to give young people the support they need to stay safe, and be healthy, happy and make the most of their talents.
I am clear that neither government nor schools can bring up children – that's what parents do. Families are by far the most important determiner of a child's prospects. But while parents are clear that it is their job to bring up their kids, they do want more help with the challenges of 21st-century family life.
So we're investing record amounts in childcare and nurseries, with nearly 3,000 Sure Start Children's Centres, a universal right to nursery education and twice as many childcare places than there were in 1997. And for the most fragile families, we're building better targeted programmes, using outreach workers to help excluded or vulnerable families get the specialist support they need.
I do think there is too much negativity surrounding young people. We mustn't let the small minority cast a shadow over all young people, and affect the way communities treat children as a whole. All of us need to challenge the prejudices that make us wary of youth, and reluctant to give our children the freedom and independence we enjoyed.
We are right to expect young people to keep on the right side of the law and respect our community – but young people also have a right to be listened to when they say there are not enough decent places for teenagers to go and things to do after school and at the weekend. The investment we're committing to build more playgrounds and sports facilities, and the money going into next generation youth clubs will create many more exciting, safe places for children in every community to go after school and at weekends. We need to give young people the opportunity to show us the amazing things they can do when we give them a chance.
The tradition of doom-mongering about the state of the nation's youth stretches back centuries. Shakespeare was expert at it, and we should remember that William Golding wrote Lord of the Flies in the 1950s – often held up as a halcyon era for childhood.
There is a lot more we must do – and many challenges ahead – but I think we can make this a golden age for our children. As Children's Secretary, I won't rest until we make this country the best place in the world to grow up.

When are governments going to listen to the children and their parents? Money needs to be ploughed into enabling families to spend time together and helping healthy attachments survive. From an early age babies learn not to depend upon their parents who are pressurised to detach themselves from their children. Whilst children are separated from their families for most of the day and sent to large institutions where peers are relied upon for support and direction we will continue to alienate them. Children have no choice, no extended family to call upon, no communities to look to for support and no parents around to give them that much needed unconditional love.
Posted by T Stewart | 11.06.08, 21:54 GMT
The State cannot do what parents can. The most effective way of lifting children out of poverty is to encourage parents to marry and stay married (statistics from the Heritage Foundation, USA). What, Mr Balls, are you doing to support strong family life?
Posted by Louise Kirk | 08.06.08, 22:24 GMT
Just one more push, Comrade Balls, and all the state will provide quality education for all!
Never mind that the monopoly state education has absorbed ever-increasing amounts of public cash and still not succeeded so far. What is required is yet more government centralised initiatives.
Of course, those of us that think that the government has no business running an education system or providing childcare are clearly mad because we're not professional politicians and don't live off the taxpayer.
Posted by HJ | 08.06.08, 22:18 GMT
Having been a teacher in a state comprehensive in recent years I do believe that many a politician overlook the fact that the very size of our secondary schools today are alienating children and causing the gang mentality that is so prevailent in todays children.
If children are not listened to by adults either at home or at school then they will feel a necessity to form their own groups, without the direction of adults with experience, children will resort to instinctive behaviour of self preservation which can be dangerous in it self, for instance carrying knives to protect themselves.
Our schools are far too big to nurture the next generation, did government ever consider the social effects upon the next generation before selling off all the smaller schools to make/save money? I don't believe they thought twice about it. This is why so many children are dissaffected, not necessarily because of their poor background, this problem needs to be accounted for, not overlooked.
Posted by Tricia Cook | 08.06.08, 16:52 GMT
The children's plan should go something like,
1) make it possible, i.e. economically, for parents to be parents to their children by offering one or the other or both a living wage for the 24-hours-a-day-7-days-a-week job of staying at home to look after their children until such time as the children start school - or else let parents take their little ones to work with them, and/or
2) stop treating schoolchildren like so many herds of cattle going to market and instead treat them like the young, inexperienced and vulnerable human beings they are: a) give them small schools where everyone is going to get to know everyone else - and maybe even care about them! b) give each child a classroom with a proper teacher in charge and a desk and chair of her/his own, c) have subject teachers moving around the school building in between lessons - not the children.
If children are 'falling through the net' in their droves now it's because the net is rotten and hanging from a single nail.
Posted by Parentulike | 08.06.08, 14:07 GMT
What Ed Balls has to say is utter hypocracy. Yes, he may mean well, but words are the cheapest end of the market. This is the kind of familiar rhetoric we repeatedly hear from so many politicians, which we are expected to take seriously.
Come on Ed, lets feel the earth move, because this is the upheaval it will take to really get to grips with poverty, in all its forms, behind the dreadful lives of so many children.
Lets begin with mentioning money; not peicemeal amounts; steady investement. Real money, because this is what it will take.
Posted by Joan Appleton | 08.06.08, 10:45 GMT
A recent survey shows that 90 per cent of young people agreed that England is a good country to grow up in, compared to 74 per cent of parents and 71 per cent of the public.
So these young people had tried growing up in at least two countries, then? I mean, they had to have some source of comparison in order to give this unscientific conclusion any meaning. My neighbour is convinced that Britain is the best country in the world. He's never been out of it.
Posted by Trofim | 08.06.08, 08:51 GMT
We will make a happy childhood a reality for all.
No you cant. Your policies are all very well, but there are limits to what you can do, so stop trying to kid the population you can walk on water.
Early in my disastrous childhood, I realized my awful parents were psychologically younger than I was. Like infants, they thought only of themselves. They never, ever grew up psychologically.
My advice to abused and neglected children is to become their own best friend as soon as possible. Respect yourself and have dignity. Stand on your own two feet, and treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. Become all you can become, and dont spend your life wringing your hands over why Mummy didnt kiss me goodnight, and why Daddy hit me so often. Forget them and move on.
Posted by Alan Robinson | 08.06.08, 07:19 GMT
is he mad?
Posted by terry sullivan | 08.06.08, 06:22 GMT