Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 12° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Robert Fisk: Could it be al-Qa'ida is missing Bush?

President Barack Obama was received in the Middle East with the usual grovelling Saudi plea for help in taming the Israelis and an incendiary threat from Osama bin Laden that America will pay the price for his role in displacing a million Muslim refugees in Pakistan. It wasn't difficult to see why Obama warned the world not to expect too much from his attempt to "create a better dialogue" with Muslims.

Bin Laden was probably 1,300 miles to the north of Obama when the US President landed in Riyadh yesterday for his meeting with King Abdullah but, as usual, Bin Laden's words were a good deal more direct than those of the fawning Saudis. By his support for the Pakistani army's assault on the Taliban in Waziristan, Obama had "sown new seeds of hatred against America" and was "laying the foundation for long wars ahead". With his normal flourish, Bin Laden added that he "warned the American people... that they will suffer the consequences of his actions".

Could it be, perhaps, that Bin Laden is beginning to miss old George Bush and his "war on terror", that the ever smiling Barack Obama is beginning to stick in Bin Laden's craw, that the fractional improvement in US-Arab relations is beginning to be a little irksome – or that, by some awful mischance – Obama actually might tame the colonial ambitions of Israel? Ironically it was Madeleine Albright – writing with the usual pomposity but with almost bin Laden-like directness in the New York Times – who also spotted that no Obama speech, "however eloquent, can disentangle US-Muslim relations from the treacherous terrain of current events such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan..."

The Saudis, of course, wanted to talk about the Iranian – i.e. Shiite – threat to the Sunni world as well as the refusal of Bibi Netanyahu to bow to Obama's demand for an end to the Israeli colonisation of Arab land. Indeed, there are times when the Saudis speak of Iran with almost the same hatred as Bibi. They really should meet some time, although success for the 2002 Saudi peace plan – total Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 border in return for full Arab recognition of Israel – would probably guarantee that just such a meeting took place.

Obama's speech writers will have tightened up the US President's Egyptian address for today once they discover whether King Abdullah is still as keen on the Saudis' own 2002 plan. It will no doubt be neatly slotted into the "better understanding" speech which we are going to have to listen to in Cairo today when Obama addresses that famous entity, the "Muslim world". The trouble is that the Shiite-Sunni void – to be played out again this weekend in the theatricals of the Lebanese elections – is almost as important for the Arabs as resolving the tragedy of the Palestinians.

And, of course, everyone wants to be seen hugging the new American President. Grinning over his cardamom tea with the king in Riyadh yesterday, poor Obama is going to have to endure the embrace of Hosni Mubarak in Cairo today where the government press – almost as fawning as the Saudis – have been proclaiming that Obama's reference to the Egyptian president as a "stalwart ally" of peace proves that Egypt has yet again won its place at the centre of the Arab world.

Yes, Obama did actually call the old dictator a "stalwart ally", much to the disgust of the opposition in Egypt, but that is what you have to do in this part of the world if you want to get invited back. Waiting for the President's speech is almost exquisitely painful because, like the Arabs, Washington's policies still appear hopelessly divided. While infuriating the Israelis – much to the Arabs' delight – Obama continues to send his men into the graveyard of empires to beat the Taliban, shrugging off any responsibility for those one million Pakistani Muslim refugees whom Bin Laden so shrewdly spotted on the horizon. The only real question, perhaps, is whether Obama has asked himself the most important question: does the "Muslim world" actually exist?

More from Robert Fisk

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
(no subject) - [info]exec_ceo - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:25 am (UTC)
Re: Another dishonest, biased Robert Fisk article which doesn't even mention the word 'HAMAS'
[info]davidm99 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:43 am (UTC)
What kind!? The kind who has the depth and the knowledge to write articles not filled with oversimplified talking points, slogans and nonsense. But don't let that stop you from coming back here and regurgitating the same tired slogans.

Hamas vs. Israel. How laughable. It's like comparing the French partisans of WWII to the big Nazi empire with its aircraft, tanks and artillery. "Oh that evil Hamas. It's going to destroy Israel with fireworks and a couple of guns".

I suggest next time, ceo_exec (I doubt you are) you go read a Spiderman comic book, the forces of good vs. evil should give you the rush you so desperately seek. You'll find that comics will also agree with your intellectual level.

P.S.: For those interested in substance and truth, Hamas has already recognized the 1967 border as their goal (i.e. an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza to the Green Line will satisfy them).

Even the New York Times said so in an interview with Khaled Mishal less than a month ago. In other words, the old talking point that the almighty Hamas is hell bent on destroying Israel is not only laughable, ridiculous, but is absolutely FALSE.

Meanwhile, Israel has yet to recognize the Palestinian people as a national group with rights. Ask any settler in the dozens of colonies in the West Bank and he'll tell you the Palestinians never existed as a nation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwrskVXpOs4
Hey Fisk, doesn't the Saudi peace plan include flooding Israel with massive amounts of Palestinians?
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:30 am (UTC)
Robert Fisk says: "2002 Saudi peace plan - total Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 border in return for full Arab recognition of Israel - would probably guarantee that just such a meeting took place."

QUESTION TO FISK: Doesn't the Saudi "peace" plan ALSO include hundreds of thousands, or millions, of Israeli Jew-hating Palestinian Arabs into Israel, which would make Israeli Jews a minority in Israel, which would result in Israel not being a Jewish homeland anymore, which would make put Arab Muslims via majority in charge of Israel, which would result in Israel probably being remained to some Arab world, which would basically mean Israel just ceased to exist?

There's already a Palestinian Arab state - Jordan.

Israel is the Palestinian Jew state.

There can be a third Palestinian state (the west bank and gaza) but it seems unfair to demand that Israel ethnically cleanse hundreds of thousands of Jews out of hte west bank. Though, every arab country already did that to their Jews, so I guess you figure Israel should do it to the ones in the west bank, too
Re: Hey Fisk, doesn't the Saudi peace plan include flooding Israel with massive amounts of Palestini
[info]cm999 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 07:41 am (UTC)
Israel is not the Palestinian Jewish State. It was a sop created by the West through the UN to ease the guilt trip of the holocaust of WW2. It is a wholly artificial entity created by politicians and then imposed on those who already called the land home.
Yet another article involving Israel and the Palestinians that makes NO MENTION of HAMAS!
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:34 am (UTC)
Robert Fisk continues to write absurd, dishonest articles that just rant over and over about "taming" Israel, yet the word 'HAMAS' does not even appear in his ranting!

What's the point of this line of editorial, really?

No matter what Israel does, as long as the radical islamic fundamentalist viewpoint (of hamas, and the millions of palestinians who voted for them) is to destroy Israel, instead of peace alongside Israel, none of this even matters.

Lots of silly fools just like to obsess on some Jews building a new 2 bedroom house on an empty hill somewhere in the west bank and pretending that's some big problem, when none of that stuff matters. Arabs in the West bank are living better lives than most arabs in arab countries are.
Re: Yet another article involving Israel and the Palestinians that makes NO MENTION of HAMAS!
[info]davidm99 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:44 am (UTC)
What kind!? The kind who has the depth and the knowledge to write articles not filled with oversimplified talking points, slogans and nonsense. But don't let that stop you from coming back here and regurgitating the same tired slogans.

Hamas vs. Israel. How laughable. It's like comparing the French partisans of WWII to the big Nazi empire with its aircraft, tanks and artillery. "Oh that evil Hamas. It's going to destroy Israel with fireworks and a couple of guns".

I suggest next time, ceo_exec (I doubt you are) you go read a Spiderman comic book, the forces of good vs. evil should give you the rush you so desperately seek. You'll find that comics will also agree with your intellectual level.

P.S.: For those interested in substance and truth, Hamas has already recognized the 1967 border as their goal (i.e. an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza to the Green Line will satisfy them).

Even the New York Times said so in an interview with Khaled Mishal less than a month ago. In other words, the old talking point that the almighty Hamas is hell bent on destroying Israel is not only laughable, ridiculous, but is absolutely FALSE.

Meanwhile, Israel has yet to recognize the Palestinian people as a national group with rights. Ask any settler in the dozens of colonies in the West Bank and he'll tell you the Palestinians never existed as a nation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwrskVXpOs4
I love Robert, I love his honesty, and his ability to report neutrally.
[info]coraldelmar10 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:58 am (UTC)
OK. I get it. People are biased, one way or another. This man is NOT, which is a RARE, almost freakish occurrence when it comes to the middle east. Robert has been there for a LOOONG time, I remember the first time I was even made aware of what was going on to my neighbors (palestinians), I was watching the discovery channel while visiting an aunt in NYC for the summer, his "From Beirut to Bosnia" special.... this man should be lauded for his courage to go in and bring back REAL information without taking sides, because he reports it all, very TRUTHFULLY.

This isn't about religion....all those who make it about "god", whom might as well be another scientific "theory" religions have so many problems with, are completely ignoring the most important part of it all....

THIS IS ABOUT HUMANS WRONGING HUMANS. god aside, or whatever, HUMANS SHOULD WORRY ABOUT THE OTHERS OF THEIR KIND...

OF COURSE the Palestinians have turned into crazy religious fanatics that go to the extremes for their "god"... they have been left no other choice. these are people who got everything taken away from them 50+ years ago, and their children and children's children have been born into violence and despair; of course they are angry, and if you were one of them, I'm pretty sure you'd feel the exact same way..they MUST believe there is a higher power, and are willing to take it to extremes, because fact of the matter is NO ONE IN THE WORLD COMMUNITY HAS HELPED THEM, and the only way they can garner international attention for their plight is by way of violence.

I in no way agree with this, but I feel in some sick way that they are justified, as sad as it is. I am completely terrified by extremist muslims, and think they have it all completely wrong, but i also believe they got this bad because they have been pushed into a corner for so long.

Then on the other side we have the israelis, who have NO RESPECT for any other human, muslim or not. If you're not a jew, they barely see you, the fact that you have two arms, legs, a beating heart... they choose to ignore the fact that you are JUST LIKE THEM... i wish i could shake them, tell them WE ARE ALL PEOPLE, but that'd do no good... because they KNOW what they are doing. educated israelis KNOW they are wrong, and they justify themselves with the dumbest excuses and a big old smile on their faces... makes me sick. for a people who cry so much about the holocaust, seems VERY HYPOCRITICAL that they are committing even BIGGER ATROCITIES on another group.

and I am Israeli. born, raised...as soon as I was old enough to recognize what a crock everything was, I packed up and left.
Now I'm in China, where, well, human rights aren't at it's finest and free speech isn't exactly encouraged... but its better than the consuming hatred.

I feel terribly for the state that this has gotten to. my biggest qualm is that it might never stop, just because its been going on for so long, and both sides are too consumed by their anger to reach a solution, not to mention blinded by their respective faiths... ugh dont even get me STARTED on religion.... its just a thin veil that drives masses. before thinking and putting some mythical person as your "leader", consider those in your immediate surroundings, take care of THEM, respect THEM, because they are here, "GOD" is not. What's so difficult to see about that is just.... I don't know. People should believe in themselves, and have the faith to believe in each other....
this is highly unlikely, I know, and the wars will continue until there's no one left.

But Robert, thanks for your work. Seriously.
Re: I love Robert, I love his honesty, and his ability to report neutrally.
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:57 am (UTC)
coraldelmar10 spews a load of garbage.

There are 1-2 billion poor people in the world, most of whom are more poor than the palestinians, and most of them manage to not be insane radical religious extremist nutcases.

Furthermore, there are crazed islamic radicals causing problems in many countries around the world. It's their own fault, not anyone else's.

Anti-semites like making excuses for the crazy, irrational behavior of the nutty palestinians.
Thank you - [info]smoothop8388 - Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 01:06 pm (UTC) Expand
For shame - [info]fiskisadisgrace - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:07 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: For shame - [info]goatbucket - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 01:40 pm (UTC) Expand
oh... one more thing...
[info]coraldelmar10 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:02 am (UTC)
tehee, spiderman comic books.... spot on, commenter, spot F-ing on....

tools like that ignorant idiot who spends too much time on the interwebs and calls himself a CEO is a classic case of jewish denial... i should know, my brother suffers the same condition.

Re: oh... one more thing...
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:59 am (UTC)
coraldelmar10: Congrats on your 10 minutes of useless babbling.

As long as the palestinian powers that be are crazy, irrational nutjobs, Israel will find it hard to make peace with them.

If the Palestinian powers that be, supported by the palestinian majority, are ever sane, rational, reasonable people, Israel will find it easy to make peace with them.

Whether that takes 20 more years or 350 is up to the nutty palestinians and the radical islamic fundaamenalist nutjobs.

Everything else is just a side note.
Re: oh... one more thing... - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:50 pm (UTC) Expand
coraldelmar10 is misinformed
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 03:02 am (UTC)
coraldelmar10 says "no one in the world has helped the palestinians."

He is ignorant.

The palestinians have received massive amounts of aid in all directions.

But they just want to keep making war with Israel.

They are stupid.

If they are ever smart, they'll declare a permanent peace with Israel, recognize Israel for what Israel is, swear terrorism off forever, and act on it. And then Israel will give peace back, a permanent negotiation will take place, and this nonsense will end.

You ultra-leftist loonies are as irrational as those on the far-right. You pretend to hate crazy islamic terrorists, except when they try to murder Israeli Jews. Then you just make excuses for them.
Re: coraldelmar10 is misinformed
[info]a_al_amin wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 04:16 am (UTC)

>The palestinians have received massive amounts of aid in all directions.

Well, how much aid has Israel received over its showmanship as a victim?

It clear as daylight, the day the conflict with Palestinians end, that billions of $$$ will stop coming in, and you can't grab more land or make new settlements on others property anymore. All the reason to keep this going on endlessly. The world is not stupid, but the world became powerless in front of Israeli showmanship.

Negotiations to start after recognitions for Israel? What nonsense. The thieves dont have a right to say this. After creating all this hatred, its the duty of Israel to win back trust and recognition, by offering a just compensation for the land and sufferings. That's what justice calls for. Without that show of clean intentions on part of Israel, Arab heart will be difficult to move, especially after all this destruction and killing and suffering at the hands of Israel. You have simply got to wake up from the illusion of building a safe home by military power alone.



Re: coraldelmar10 is misinformed - [info]exec_ceo - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 04:37 am (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 is misinformed - [info]49niner - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 05:07 am (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 is misinformed - [info]jerusalem1 - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:59 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 is misinformed - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:11 pm (UTC) Expand
coraldelmar10 - [info]coraldelmar10 - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:38 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:54 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]coraldelmar10 - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 12:45 am (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]goatbucket - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 01:44 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]coraldelmar10 - Saturday, 6 June 2009 at 01:05 am (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]goatbucket - Saturday, 6 June 2009 at 11:21 am (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 is misinformed - [info]muslimegypt - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:35 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]coraldelmar10 - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 01:08 am (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]muslimegypt - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 03:40 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]coraldelmar10 - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 03:58 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]muslimegypt - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 05:45 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: coraldelmar10 - [info]coraldelmar10 - Saturday, 6 June 2009 at 12:45 am (UTC) Expand
Poor Fisk
[info]michaelji wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 04:11 am (UTC)
Still shilling his false and silly message about Afghanistan being the "graveyard of empires", next it will be the "brutal Afghan winter" tc etc.

just because Fisk got the sh*t kicked out of him when he went to Afghanistan...
Is bin Laden still alive?
[info]chesscheckers wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 04:32 am (UTC)
Is bin laden still alive?

Since AIPAC and pro Israel US lawmakers control the US foreign policy, nothing will be achieved because it is in their best interest to prolong the tension in the Middle East.

In order to initiate a real peace in the Middle East, Obama must first put an end to the AIPAC and pro Israel lawmakers' choke hold on the US foreign policy, otherwise, all his efforts will be wasted.
Al-Qa'ida missing Bush?
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 06:18 am (UTC)
More appositely - could it be that Mr Fisk is missing Bush?
Fisk
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 06:37 am (UTC)
Boy! Fisk really dislikes everyone in the Middle East, with the exception of his beloved Palestinians.

Can't someone switch him to the House and Home desk?? He's such a predictable bore.
missing Bush
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 06:37 am (UTC)
Like Osama Bin Laden, hellfire missiles be upon him, Mr Fisk seems a little lost now the Bush witch has gone as well I think.

Could it be that, as the US policy is broadly the same but with a spoonful of sugar and a promise to not ask you to account for your behaviour, it was the racist ignorant reaction to Bush led by people like Fisk that is the "problem"?

Plus the fact that Bush was the first US pres to make a two state solution formal US policy, and the first to actually oppose and eliminate religeous lunatic terrorists who were brutalising Afghans, and worst of all to emancipate (make politically free) Iraqi's (has to invent loads of oil theft and imperialism lies to explain that one didnt you)?

Resolving the Palestinians suffering is of little real concern to Arab states. Its just their witch, and they love it. All bankrupt people/political movements/societies through history define themselves as in opposition to a witch of some kind. For Arab states Palestinians suffering is their security. Iraq's state may be different, as it alone is beholden to its people, who like ordinary people everywhere do care about Palestinians

Its why Mr Fisk your trade is so filthy, IMHO. You promote these one sided narratives of victimhood.

Still, you seem to be trying to change (or I may just be being fooled) so I should encourage you.

How about telling us about the political freedom in Iraq and the huge volume of unreported news on the internals of Iraqi politics. This would seem to be somewhat of an omission for a journalist puporting to report Arab politics dont you think? What does Iraqi politics say about the Palestinian problem? Are there many views, or just one?

Or can you not, like most of the media, bring yourself to report Iraqi politics, for to do so would be to recognise it and the emancipation of 27 million Iraqis that you opposed and then fuelled an insurgency against that cost so many lives with the same stories and lies of puppet govts, resource theft, imperialism.
Re: missing Bush
[info]goatbucket wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:14 pm (UTC)
And the lapdog of American hegemony is back!

How many of the Iraqi refugees have returned now?
Re: missing Bush - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:16 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: missing Bush - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:35 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: missing Bush - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: missing Bush - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: missing Bush - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:07 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: missing Bush - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:20 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: missing Bush - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:26 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: missing Bush - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 04:05 pm (UTC) Expand
?. Osama is relaxed sitting I will come back between the milks of the goats.
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 07:03 am (UTC)
Robert Fisk: Could it be al-Qa'ida is missing Bush? They do not want him. They want those who say, ?These are the axis of evil?. Osama is relaxed as CNN reports on and off with Al Jazeera TV, the small tapes. I will come back between the milks of the goats.
Bob. I think you ought to be here, honest if you ask me, but you do not.
Does the "Muslim world" actually exist?
Muslims are from 2000 years and before that too on the earth and for your knowledge in every corner. To you the Middle East is the end of the line for the Muslims drawn albeit by your little knowledge. See this in your paper and may be you will learn more.
They may be missing Bush but they are trapping more British who are not the part of Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
British holidaymaker is 'beheaded by al-Qa'ida'
Author: By Daniel Howden, Africa Correspondent
Al-Qa'ida in the Maghreb claimed it had carried out its threat to kill Edwin Dyer ? who was kidnapped in January in the border area between Mali and Niger ? on Sunday after Britain failed to meet its demand to release a Jordanian militant reputed to be the European envoy of Osama bin Laden. Abu Qatada is being held in Britain pending extradition to his homeland.
But the killing appears to have followed a refusal by Britain to pay a ransom for Mr Dyer, who was taken with three other European tourists after attending a nomadic cultural festival on 22 January. Two of the four hostages were released in April, along with two Canadian diplomats taken in a separate incident, after a ?5m (£4.3m) ransom was paid.
The long-haul captain, speaking on condition of anonymity, dismissed the theory the doomed jet suffered catastrophic electrical failure.
"There are five electricity supplies on the plane. And to cause it to break down completely they would all have to fail. Even then, a type of wind turbine takes over to generate power.
"We cannot know if it crashed after being struck by lightning. But we know this is very rare."
French defence minister Herve Morin said a terror attack could not be ruled out.
You see Osama is here, there, everywhere. Not Muslims, Osama. Muslims will not do this.
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
Re: ?. Osama is relaxed sitting I will come back between the milks of the goats.
[info]goatbucket wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:15 pm (UTC)
Um, Islam was created in the 7th century.
[info]alex_fraser1 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
What no one seems to be mentioning is this "tape" allegedly from bin Laden.
What a load of rubbish.
Probably recorded in a studio in California.
Wake up people.
Why do we accept the authenticity of this tape from the boogeyman Bin Laden?
Where is the proof?
All a propoganda exercise, especially the visit of Obama to Saudi, probably layingthe next foundations for next satge of the orchestrated financial collapse, and the erosion of more civil liberties.
Don't Worry man ,America is Falling
[info]muslimegypt wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 08:35 am (UTC)
Weather you believe it or not ,USA is going to fail ,just like Soviet Union and may be we see 52 country in North America ,there is no hope for a country which messed so Much in the world ,from Global warming to Economic Crisis and Wars on Muslims except Falling ,American Shall pay for the Sins they did to the Muslim world ,sooner or later ,and don't call us at that time terrorists ,because it's better to call use Revengers
Re: Don't Worry man ,America is Falling
[info]edmund03 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
LOL! So are you going to exact revenge from the thousands of Iraqis who at the sight of an invading army decided to invest in electric powerdrills and explosives to kill, maim and torture their countrymen women and children with a relish and savaregy which defies belief? In terms of sheer numbers, the great enemy of the Mulsim is...yes, you guessed it, his/her fellow Muslim. Strange how these fearless armchair warriors of Islam fail to criticise the true murders and psychopaths within their midst. Hypocrites all.
Re: Don't Worry man ,America is Falling - [info]muslimegypt - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:31 pm (UTC) Expand
execrable_ceo
[info]adnanagram wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 08:59 am (UTC)
I see exec_ceo is crawling all over this execllent Fisk article like he always does - under the pay of GIYUS (Give Israel Your Uncritical Support)
Re: execrable_ceo
[info]john_b_ellis wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:34 am (UTC)
Ssshh! Don't worry about him. His style and content surely tend to tip moderate folk - even moderate friends of Israel! - into doing a net search to find a Hamas support group to join ...

Of course he could be a closet Hamas sympathizer, doing what he does as a smokescreen with just that intention ... But that would assume that Hamas did black propaganda ...
When did Fisk become such a liar?
[info]findempire wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:14 am (UTC)
I remember when Robert Fisk reported honestly on the plight of Afghan refugees of the 2001 US invasion, empathizing their hopelessness and fury even when they almost killed him.
"If I Was an Afghan I Too Might Have Attacked Robert Fisk"

My Beating by Refugees is a Symbol of the Hatred and Fury of This Filthy War


By Robert Fisk

Now he comments on a - most probably fake - Osama tape about the 3.4 million (at last count) Pakistani refugees created by the Yank puppet Zardari's brutal war on his own Pashtun tribes. Millions of Pakistanis are being butchered and driven out of their lands and into total misery as Pakistan's sacrifice on the altar of Obomber's AfPak policy and not only does Fisk not feel the need to go and find out what's really happening in Swat but he even knocks down the number of refugees to 1 million.

Fisk doesn't just play fast & loose with millions of war refugees. The network that broadcast the tape - aljazeera - didn't provide a full transcript. Neither Fisk nor anyone else even asks for a transcript, nobody asks for independent expert confirmation that the voice is really Osama's, nobody asks how it is that aljazeera gets all these Osama tapes while the Yanks, who have not hesitated to bomb aljazeera several times when they didn't like what it was reporting, just sit idly by, not even attempting to trace the tape deliveries back to their most wanted terrorist (or so they say he is).

The whole thing stinks to the high heavens of psyops, especially considering that it comes on the tail of a rather blatant psyops release by Intel Center, a "private" intelligence agency full of Pentagon and Mossad alumni, whose productions are broadcast without question by the West's bought-and-paid-for Wurlitzer media:

Al-Qa'ida 'murders British hostage' in Africa



This picture of British hostage Edwin Dyer was released by al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb on 18 February and distributed by IntelCenter


Fisk's wholesale forfeiture of his former scepticism and honesty is particularly bizarre when the Yanks have just started a third major war on Muslims - the one in Pakistan that the "Osama tape" refers to - as part and parcel of Obomber's rebranding of the neocon Afghanistan war as the "AfPak" war. How can Fisk say with a straight face that Bush's "war on terror" was worse than Obomber's "new improved" GWOT, now rechristened with Obomber's trademark euphemistic/elliptical lawyerspeak:
In a memo e-mailed this week to Pentagon staff members, the Defense Department's office of security review noted that "this administration prefers to avoid using the term 'Long War' or 'Global War on Terror' [GWOT.] Please use 'Overseas Contingency Operation.' "

At this point one has to ask: Is Robert Fisk turning into another Christopher Hitchens? Is he being "rhinocerized" by Obomber just as Hitchens was "rhinocerized" by Bush?
Rhinoceritis, implies lonesco, is the most communicable disease of the 20th century: under the pressures of mass-think, man loses his individuality and is driven to joining the bestial herd. Many characters protest the change, but relentlessly their skins thicken and wrinkle, their voices become grunts, and great ski-jump tusks appear on their faces. "We must resist rhinocerization at any cost," cry the seemingly unafflicted, but already they start, rhino-like, to munch odd bits of paper, ivy leaves, potted plants.
Re: When did Fisk become such a liar?
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:15 am (UTC)
Zadari is the elected leader of Pakistan. The SWAT valley was occupied and the rule of the Pakistani state overthrown by a small group of Taliban. They then brutalised the population with regular beatings and beheadings. Fin-de-sanity would never psot these youtube vids of Taliban crimes though, for he is hysterical as always and totally one sided

See how he claims 1 million "butchered". This level of extreme bigotry and disconnect makes fin-de-sanity a very dangerous person as these cretinous narratives are the very basis of Islamic extremism.

Pakistan is acting as any state would when its territory and 1 million of its citizens have the protection of the state of the removed and an extremist authority replacing it by force.

Fin-de-empire, your arguments are like watching a retarded person hammering square pegs onto round holes. You have your conclusion, you have always had it, and the facts must be battered into the "proof" you need to enjoy your righteous indignation

You, fin-de-sanity, are a case study in Rhinocerization. You are, are you not, simply unable to ctitique or even recognise the actions of the taliban in SWAT. Such is the sad state of mental dysfunction that your righteous bigotry has brought you to eh?

Watch Mr Fisk make the journey he finally appears to have embarked upon. Balance.
Freedommangler you insufferable Yank lapdog - [info]findempire - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 03:41 pm (UTC) Expand
yes he is
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:18 am (UTC)
wanna meet him?
Re: yes he is
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:22 am (UTC)
well, aquire him (in the targetting system) yes. where is he then? Oh yes, Pakistan!

Still, I expect the fires of hell will make anything the US does to this vermin look like childs play dont you?

How much support does OBL have on the Arab Street these days? We used to hear of his support all the time from our media sewer, yet for perhaps 4 years now the Arab Street seems to have been quiet (saying the "wrong" thing to support the media hate narratives against the US and freedom)

Listen to the Arab Street as and after Obama talks today. He is about to wake them up. No wonder the Arab state rulers are finally beginning to shift. Because EVERYONE wants and will demand to be free, as is their right.

First the nasty tough teacher comes in and quiets the class and whacks the trouble makers

All hate them for it

Then the "nice" teacher replaces them and all the things the nasty tough teacher did can now be rebranded and applauded as the work of the new soft teacher. It's a price thing as you know, for otherwise you would have to acknowledge you were wrong.

27 million Iraqis are free. They can be ignored no longer, as can the lies about resource theft, colonialism and all the other lies for which Iraqis and coalition forces paid such a terrible price

So today these same liars are busy weaving their hate narratives of lies about the Palestinian problem.

Read them here under the article by their (old?) hero
Re: yes he is - [info]famulla - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:29 am (UTC) Expand
Re: yes he is - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC) Expand
Re: yes he is - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:20 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]j_abuali wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 09:30 am (UTC)
ceo-exec,

Have you noticed that irrespective of the point made by any contributor, you have the sane ready-made answer! (D0 not answer this question, please otherwise we would be subjected to the old boring diet of: "the land was gained from Jordan and Egypt" ... "fanatical Muslems" ... "little poor [nuclear] Israel threatened by Hamas mobs" ... "Jordan is Palestine" ... "anti-semites" etc).

I really think, for your own credibility, that you attempt to field the diverse legitimate concerns of some co-contributors with respect, and don't constantly exhibit your narrow-minded approach to what is obviously a humane matter with cross-cultural concerns the world over.

May I suggest that you check again with your communications chief and ask him/her for more talking points that reflect the change in world public perception of the Palestinian-Israeli issue.

I am still waiting with abated breath to a question posed above pertaining to the legality in international law of a land acquired by occupation and then annexed. If a land is 'won over' from USA, UK, Jordan Egypt etc. by an act of war, does this make the land in question legally the property of the occupier to deal with its original inhabitants (Americans, British, Jordanians, Egyptians etc.) as the occupier wishes?

Regards
[info]goatbucket wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:05 pm (UTC)
I saw a superb argument from a guy who calls himself "fiskisadisgrace" recently - that Jews should have a home in Israel because there were Jews in that area thousands of years ago.

Apparently there are no such things as property rights - you can take anything you like, as long as you are related to someone who owned it at some point previously.
I'm glad your'e citing me - [info]fiskisadisgrace - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:10 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I'm glad your'e citing me - [info]goatbucket - Friday, 5 June 2009 at 03:04 pm (UTC) Expand
INFOHIWAY
[info]infohiway wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:20 am (UTC)
AlCIAduh IS BUSH!
THE REASON BIN LADEN ATTACKED AMERICA? - ISRAEL!
[info]copycat7 wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:32 am (UTC)
No denying it when it comes on video from the horses mouth and is authenticated by CIA and American Govt.
CNN VIDEO MESSAGE CONFIRMED AUTHENTIC BY CIA:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/29/bin.laden.transcript/

Bin Laden Quote from video: "But after the injustice was so much and we saw transgressions and the coalition between Americans and the Israelis against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it occurred to my mind that we deal with the towers. And these special events that directly and personally affected me go back to 1982 and what happened when America gave permission for Israel to invade Lebanon. And assistance was given by the American sixth fleet.

During those crucial moments, my mind was thinking about many things that are hard to describe. But they produced a feeling to refuse and reject injustice, and I had determination to punish the transgressors.

And as I was looking at those towers that were destroyed in Lebanon, it occurred to me that we have to punish the transgressor with the same -- and that we had to destroy the towers in America so that they taste what we tasted, and they stop killing our women and children."

INFOHIWAY
[info]infohiway wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 10:35 am (UTC)
Further to: AlCIAduh IS BU$H

Bin Laden is long dead, probably in frozen 'storage' somewhere in Virginia; to be thawed out and dumped once "The War Against Terra(*)" is declared to have been "won".

Such 'war(s)', often 'declared against abstract nouns, such as: drugs, terror, poverty, illiteracy, crime and imbibing etc is THE fool's game - but it works every time.

Fisking
[info]michael_bard wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:05 am (UTC)
Who would credit it! The Mullah Fisk still spreading his bias and snide invective, that is now so clearly costing lives, encouraging hate and has become embedded in the problem as it distorts history and gives weight to the false narrative to de-ligitimize Israel. This is the supposedly honest commentator who once shared a website with those other bastions of objectivity, Chomsky and Siad. What is intolerable, from such an obviously talented and knowledgeable man to be lying, and supported by this paper, defies belief. Fisk knows that the Peel Commission in the late thirties stole back land promised to the Jews and gave it to Jordan. Fisk knows that Jewish life in their capital city was made intolerable under the Nazi Mufti, who were subject to sniper fire and killings for years; he knows the number of Israeli's fighters killed trying to relieve the siege in 47/48 against the British led Arab Forces. He knows the strategic importance of the area around East Jerusalem, where the settlements are concentrated, but from where the coastal plain can be bombed. Even the supposedly moderate PLO know that with control of Jerusalem they can destroy Israel - as was reiterated by their ambassador to Lebanon Abbas Zaki in an interview a few weeks ago.He knows under the Arabs Jewish shrines were desecrated and how they were denied access, but everyones rights of freedom to worship are now respected. He knows fundamentally that Israel has repeatedly given back land, dismantled settlements, withdrawn from territory what ever the cost in soldiers lives to defend that same area if there is any real prospect of peace, even in the knowledge that it may not come, and mostly has put them in a more vulnerable position, with further loss of life. As belligerent as Israel might appear, and sometimes acts, it has only to make one wrong step to be destroyed by the forces arraigned against it, who with each generation believe they are gaining ground, as indeed they are, with the long term, intention of destroying not just Israel, but as much of the Jewish world as they can. The roots of this conflict are deeply embedded in history, but the Jewish connection to the Holy Land is simply something that everyone else has always found intolerable, yet is the one simple statement that is incontrovertible what ever the endless lies, and distorted narrative so readily covered by the term 'Fisking'. What ever Fisk writes about he never misses a trick to undermine Israel and put Jewish lives at risk.
Obama and Interpretations.
[info]superkeith wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
It is possibly true that the 9/11 attack would not have happened if Obama had been President, or indeed anybody less confrontational than George Bush. In my personal opinion Bush was always a war monger, it was his approach to problems, and even if there had been no strife in the Middle East he would have involved the USA in conflict somewhere. Terrorists and some Heads of State seem to live for the power trip and the self aggrandisement they get when they feel they are controlling the minds of others and are probably not actually really interested in the cause they claim to espouse which is only a hook on which to hang their terrorism. I believe this is the case with Islamic terrorism and I wonder if the real problem is that many young men have no way to express their passions. Probably a good game of Rugby or climbing a mountain would get all that testosterone poisoning out of their systems and of course in places like Afghanistan the traditional way to exercise your passions seems to be by warfare and while the Western forces are handily available they have no need to fight one another.
I have a Dream
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:31 am (UTC)
"It is a Martin Luther King moment" Hamas former Minister - Al Jazeera TV, 5 minutes ago

Give up the narratives of victimhood and hate from all sides, for it is these narratives, narratives that perhaps dear reader YOU have been promoting for years, that must end to end the suffering.

There never were any witches, just hysterical people hunting them and hurting so many in their righteous fury to end the injustice.

STOP

Recognise the evil of expanding settlements and of distorting Islam so that it justifies such extreme inhumanity in the name of God.

just STOP

As Obama said, everyone KNOWS the solution. We all have all along.

(maybe Robert you should do your bit and announce publicly your retirement?)
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel
[info]philipshahak wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:42 am (UTC)
A note on the Zionist abuse of Martin Luther King. As well as the ADL spying on Dr King and his civil rights colleagues in the 1960s, Zionist also faked a letter allegely from him to a friend denouncing anti-Zionism. The evil of the Zionists knows no bounds...

www.counterpunch.org/kiblawi01172004.html
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:45 am (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:22 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:29 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:42 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 01:59 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:10 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:15 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 02:28 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 03:05 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]goatbucket - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: I have a Dream - no more Israel - [info]freedommonger - Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 12:51 pm (UTC) Expand
I like you Bob Fisk
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 4 June 2009 at 11:35 am (UTC)
You always talk sense
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Most popular in Opinion