Robert Fisk: When propaganda turns out to be fact
Saturday, 19 July 2008
What happens when myths turn out to be true? I'm talking about the "myth" of the German army's atrocities in little Belgium in 1914, the raped nuns and the babies spitted on Prussian bayonets. "Hun barbarism" was the powerful propaganda tool to send the British Tommies and the French poilus – literally, "the hairy ones" – off to the killing fields of the Somme, Ypres, Passchendaele and Verdun. But now, thanks to the analytical, brilliant, horrifying work of Alan Kramer, a history professor at my own alma mater of Trinity College, Dublin, it all turns out to be – well, let's speak frankly – true.
He's not the first to catalogue Germany's war crimes in the 1914-18 conflict – Germany's own academics got their hands on the military and political archives proving that the massacre of civilians in Belgium really happened at the start of the war – but Kramer has gone a stage further; he has traced an undeniable pattern of atrocities not only in Belgium but in First World War Italy and Russia too. The Nazis, it seems, were marching in the footsteps of earlier German war criminals.
Maybe it's hypocritical to dwell on these long-ago war crimes when our own illegal invasion of Iraq may have culled a million Iraqi lives, not to mention Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki – readers can fill in the extra names – and it's true that New Zealand troops murdered German prisoners in the First World War (on 15 September 1916, to be precise).
So did Canadian troops. And Brits. But slaughtering prisoners on the battlefield is one thing. Shooting down rows of innocent civilians is quite another. Kramer's new book has a suitably academic title – Dynamic of Destruction: Culture and Mass Killing in the First World War – but its contents freeze the blood.
Here, for example, is what happened to unarmed civilian prisoners in the Les Rivages suburb of Dinant after German troops were attacked by snipers: "German witnesses to one mass execution ... stated that the order was given by a major whose face was 'contorted with rage' ... More than half of the 77 killed were women and children: 38 women and girls, and 15 children under 14, of whom seven were babies; seven of the men were over 70 years old."
A Captain von Loeben describes another nearby massacre. "The people were arranged in several ranks by the garden wall. Women, children and older men were excluded ... I had some difficulty separating the women and children. One woman clung to her husband and wanted to be shot together with him. I therefore decided to let her go free, together with her husband. One man had a child of about five in his arms ... the child was taken away from him and sent to the women. The man was shot with the rest."
In all, 674 citizens of Dinant, including many women and children – one in 10 of the population of the town – were executed. Another 262 civilians were murdered by the Kaiser's soldiers in Ardenne where the burgomaster – a man called Camus – was hacked to death with an axe. German troops had already torched the historic Belgian city of Louvain, bayoneting civilians in their homes and burning the great university library with its wealth of Latin and medieval manuscripts. "Holocaust of Louvain," the Daily Mail trumpeted on 31 August 1914. For once, the paper was right.
There's a chilling photograph of a German shell exploding on the roof of Reims cathedral, one of the finest medieval treasures of France. Of course, the Germans said that the Allies were using it as an observation tower – but they effectively blew the place to bits. And come to think of it, I recall my Dad, 2nd Lieutenant Bill Fisk of the King's Liverpool Regiment – yes, of course, he has featured in this column before – telling me how, after being bitten by a rat in the trenches, doctors removed an entire layer of his skin; and how he lay each night in agony in a makeshift hospital at Reims.
"I was made to sleep on the floor of Reims Cathedral," he told me, "and every night, I'd look up at the stars and see all these gargoyles glaring down at me." So the Germans had blown the entire roof off the cathedral.
After the massive Italian defeat at Caporetto – the Italians were on "our" side in the First World War, so it was perhaps only fair that the Germans should have them on their side in the Second – mass deportation of Italian civilians began, along with executions and deliberate starvation. The number of Italian deportee and PoW deaths – largely from maltreatment, but also massacre – reached 24,597. Some were dispatched to camps whose names – draw in your collective breath, O reader – were Mauthausen and Theresienstadt.
Indeed, there were Jews in the German army in the First World War – 12,000 of them were killed in action for the Fatherland – but hands up those readers who know that, even as the Germans were fighting for their lives in 1916, the authorities undertook a "Jew census" in the army after provocations from small anti-Semitic parties in Berlin.
On the eastern front, 92,451 Russian prisoners died in German captivity. "They are not to be given water at first," a 1914 German 8th Army order read. "While they are in the vicinity of the battlefield it is good for them to be in a broken physical condition." The Untermenschen idea was already there, it seems. At least 9 per cent of Germany's 158,000 soldiers in Russian camps, it should be added, also died.
Amid such a charnel house, the Ottoman genocide of one and a half million Armenians – still outrageously denied by Turkey, although it taught Hitler how to destroy the Jews of Europe less than three decades later – provides a terrible historical continuity.
Did those German-Jewish soldiers of the First World War have the slightest inkling of what was to come? They must have known of the German army's cruelty towards civilians, even if they could not then read the words of the angry, gas-blinded corporal from the Somme who asked after the armistice: "Did all this happen only so that a gang of wretched criminals could lay their hands on the Fatherland?"
This young German soldier had been fighting less than a mile from where my father stood in the trenches of the Somme. Alas, 2nd Lieutenant Bill Fisk didn't manage to shoot Corporal Adolf Hitler.

Comments
67 Comments
In a world so over-populated what appears remarkable is the relative rarity of attrocity. How to keep it that way is the question of our age as it is for every other.
Posted by kevin | 25.07.08, 13:30 GMT
i would like to remind mr fisk by the massacres of the israeles in west bankand gaza.
Posted by anwer | 25.07.08, 12:02 GMT
Andrew, it's always been 1.5million... the killings were long before 1915... in the 1890's and on... and armenians took up arms just like the greeks, the bulgarians, the serbs and the other subject people of the ottoman empire...
a couple of days ago the TIMES online opened her archives (till 1985), i suggest you take a look - not only on this subject, but in general, there's an amazing historical value there... you will also see the thousands of articles on turks killing armenians way before the 1st WW... and let's not forget the subject: "When propaganda turns out to be fact"... everyting is a propaganda, but some things are for real...
Posted by Bederlands | 25.07.08, 01:19 GMT
Right, again about the Armenians, only because the subject seems to have come up again, and as I mentioned this to Mr. Fisk him self in person, whom I have great respect for, there is no mention of the countless Turkish villages attacked and civilians killed at the hands of the Armenians anywhere in his great book, or in any history books for that matter.
These attacks occured BEFORE, not after, any alleged attrocities to the (What number are we up to now? 1.5 million? its like the price of petrol ... keeps going up.) Armenians.
It was a terrible war and people died on both sides. Armenians lived with Turks for centuries, why then did they decide to attach Turkish villages while Turking was waring on many different fronts?
Its terrible that Armenians live with this collective phycological weight. They invent a tragedy and brain wash their children at a young age stunting them mentally. It must be horrible to not know what the causes of their struggles were.
Posted by Andrew | 24.07.08, 19:41 GMT
What about the millions of Armenians killed under the eyes of the germans??? Didn't that "young german soldier" say: "Who after all speaks today of the annihilation of the Amenians", in 1939?
Mr Fisk mentions this in is his book "The Great War for Civilisation"...
Posted by Bederlands | 24.07.08, 16:23 GMT
The young "Austrian" soldier, actually. Although he served in a Bavarian regiment during WWI A. Hitler did not become a German citizen until the mid-'20's.
Posted by coalbanks | 24.07.08, 01:46 GMT
How about incarcerating non-combatant Boers - men, women, children including servants- in "concentration camps" (the British Army term) where many died of disease, exposure, malnutrition in order to break the Boer resistance in the Boer War? Not quite the same thing as shooting down surrendering enemy combatants or POW's, is it? More like... well, war crimes?
Posted by coalbanks | 24.07.08, 01:40 GMT
REVISE: Atrocities against civilians and those drafted into military service have always been part and parcel of what we call war. Rape of women (and men), mass killings of sons and fathers, filling ditches with the murdered, have been a staple of states of war glorified by historians and poets on the winning side since before we knew the biological process of our own reproduction.
We claim more humanitarian approaches as we "progress", but our progress can only be measured by a kind of sick efficiency, with the distance between the killer and those massacred increased until it hardly registers except as some reality TV news program with excited and physically augmented journalists describing a scene that looks like a fireworks show over Disney Land.
We are horrified when two girls are allowed to lie dead on a beach somewhere, but eagerly justify our blood lust in slaughters of those less well hung with bombs so we can stay drunk on the oily source of our own demise. Go figure.
Posted by Bob | 22.07.08, 18:33 GMT
Atrocities against civilians and those drafted into military service have always been part and parcel of what we call war. Rape of women (and men) mass killings of sons and fathers, filling ditches with the murdered, have been a staple of states of war glorified by historians and poets on the winning side since before we knew the biological process of our own reproduction.
We claim more humanitarian approaches as we "progress", but our progress is only be measured as a kind of sick efficiency, with the distance between the killer and those massacred increased until it hardly registers except as some reality TV news program while excited and physically augmented journalists describe a scene that looks like a fireworks show over Disney Land.
We are horrified when two girls are allowed to lie dead on a beach somewhere, but eagerly justify our blood lust in slaughters of those less well hung with bombs so we can stay drunk on the oily source of our own demise. Go figure.
Posted by Bob | 22.07.08, 13:25 GMT
There we go again, tittle tattle, tut, while our PM is in Israel, he is competing ahead of Obamma, in case one should convince the Israelis to take the "war plunge" ahead of the other: Preparing for another war by grouping and regrouping, Britain and America together know that their business in the Middle East has just started. We are unrolling the same infamous lies in the West, while the media is doing the little job of fanning this scourge into a big flame just fine. Yet, I accept that people have the freedom to be fools as Robert says- that they refuse to see the truth. Is this because they suffer from this ugly and destructive pride? We know this pride is about installing AlMaliki and his likes on the throne of power in the Middle East. Well, If I was the people of Middle East I would not be happy about this either. Would you? That is what it is, which suits the Western allies just fine.
Tizab
Posted by Tizab | 22.07.08, 10:48 GMT
67 Comments