Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

Robert Fisk's World: A region boiling with tales of kings, gangs and war

Saturday, 16 August 2008

Two groups from Moscow fought it out with Kalashnikovs amid Dubai's architectural masterpieces

I call it the back of the book, the ream of reports and stories that pile up in my reporters' notes which cannot be used; because the sourcing isn't quite good enough for every detail or because there simply isn't enough information to make it long enough to get into the paper. It's an enraging situation since the "back of the book" often turns out to be true – usually bursting into the papers when I'm on holiday or flying back to Beirut from Los Angeles, or, most awful of all, when I'm marching into The Independent office in London for a rare visit.

This is one reason why journalists are often more interesting to talk to than to read. The other reason is that American reporters are so fearful of being criticised by Israel that their work is bland to the point of incomprehension; if you want to know what The New York Times or The Washington Post knows, you've got to talk to one of their correspondents. But I'm tired of these conventions. When I hear something in Dubai, then I hear it again in Qatar and then, a week later, over lunch in Beirut – and then on the phone from a friend who's just returned from a holiday in Casablanca – you, the reader, should hear the same.

So here goes. The Middle East is currently boiling with rumours about the state of the monarchy in Morocco. Where is King Mohammed V!? In Qatar, they say he has spent two months' holidays in the Far East (Thailand is the favourite) and this would account for his absence at President Sarkozy's Bastille Day bash last month. The King, it is said in Dubai, simply doesn't want to be king any more – I always thought kings liked being kings, but no matter – and that he wants his brother to take the throne. And I suppose we shall never prove that £4bn have left a Moroccan account for Europe...

Let's go to the Gulf for a while. Dubai is, as we all know, busy producing the largest, tallest, smallest, deepest buildings in the world. The highest one, however, appears to be a favourite haunt of the Russian mafia and, earlier this year – so Dubai's Indian expatriate community insists – two rival gangs from Moscow fought it out with pistols and Kalashnikovs amid the towering architectural masterpieces. The police had to storm this most famous of all the Gulf's pearls in order to end the battle. Or that's what they say.

Oh yes, and then there's the little matter of the new railway line from Dubai city centre, aimed to terminate – for now, at least – at the emirate's new international airport. There's a problem, however. Engineers in Dubai have apparently noticed that the carriages on the largely overhead track will be so narrow that passengers will not be able to carry baggage on them.

To Beirut now, and the almost totally unreported – and totally unexpected – arrival in the city of General David Petraeus, the US commander who has turned anarchic Iraq into a tourist paradise with just one surge and a lot of walls (or "fences" as we would have to call them if they were built in Israel). Petraeus saw Lebanon's new President, Michel Sleiman, and the acting commander of Lebanon's army, General Shawki el-Masri, with whom he discussed how to "strengthen the army's defensive capabilities, training and logistics". Petraeus, the most popular general in American journalism, is to take charge of US central command, which will give him overall command of the Middle East, but you might have thought Lebanon was some way down his list of priorities.

Not so. For when you remember that the Lebanese army fought one of al-Qa'ida's satellite groups, Fatah al-Islam, for months last year – last week's bomb in Tripoli that killed nine Lebanese soldiers might have been the group's revenge – Petraeus has good reason to turn up in Beirut. Many of the suicide bombers who have assaulted Petraeus's men in Iraq started their journey from the Palestinian refugee camps of Lebanon whose perimeters are guarded by Lebanese troops. Since 2006, the US has given about £170m in military assistance to Lebanon – Israel, of course, gets £1.5bn year – which includes Humvees, ammunition and lots of new blue police cars.

And there's just one more thing. Less than a week after Petraeus's visit, Sleiman was to pay his first presidential visit to Damascus, Did the American general perhaps have a few requests to make of President Bashar al-Assad via Sleiman? A word of thanks, perhaps, for improving security along Syria's border with Iraq? A plea for a little more help in restraining the insurgents, perhaps even paving the way for good relations with the next US president? It will, obviously, take a bit longer before President Petraeus arrives in the White House...

Yet still the Middle East debates whether Israel or the US will bomb Iran. Personally, I don't believe this will happen – but then again, that's what I told my friend Seymour Hersh before the Iraqi catastrophe, when he said we would invade and I said we wouldn't. Currently, he thinks an Iran attack is still on the cards. So, apparently, does the Emir of Qatar. He's generously handed the Americans yet more desert for their massive air base outside Doha, land that stretches away on the further side of the military installation. He's asked for the return of the side of the base closest to the capital. The reason? Well, if America bombs Iran, the Islamic republic's missiles are likely to come hissing towards US forces in Qatar. The Emir wants them exploding as far from Doha as possible.

And we'll have to finish in America. I received a letter last week from an old friend whose son has just returned from military duties in Iraq. And he's been wandering the Pisgah mountains in the US with a group of schoolkids in an area where he noticed a lot of military training going on a year ago, and... Well, I'll let him tell you the story. "I had seen nothing more up there until this past week, when C-130s and C-17s suddenly were making low runs through the high mountain valleys. There were also military helicopters around. It may mean nothing, but it may indicate something for the future. I am enclosing some photos of the area to give you an idea of what it is like. Perhaps it reminds you of somewhere."

And I looked carefully through my friend's snapshots of rocky mountainsides and thick forests. And, darn me if they didn't remind me of the Elborz mountain chain just outside Tehran.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

49 Comments

Al: you ask why the Muslim extremists kill so many fellow Muslims. It is not something to these conflicts, it is simply the unfortunate nature of civil conflict.

The French revolution is a classic case; it is thought of (and by all accounts was meant to be) an attempt by the bourgeoisie to kill and depose the aristocracy, however records clearly show that of the tens of thousands executed, less than 1 in 10 were actually member of the aristocracy. The vast majority were members of the peasantry/working class not having allegiance to either side (many of the victims even supported the bourgeoisie - the ones orchestrating all the executions).

It is simply the nature of civil war that the general populace suffers terribly by being caught in the middle with warring factions all around.

Posted by Mr Brown | 21.08.08, 10:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The more the price of oil drops the greater the odds that they will hit Iran. They know now the world economies can cope with the extraordinary price of $150. However now that Poland has signed its independence away under the smoke screen of professed horror at Georgias occupation by Russia, it may temporarily have sated its appetite. Yet more than likely under the present administration in the US, it may seek to consolidate more its grip on the world.

The question is who 'It' is? The Devil probably. Its for sure that most of the characters involved in this wild chess game are when it comes down to it pretty normal and ordinary people.

Robert Fisk's articles I find are an honest attempt to make some kind of meaning and put some kind of form on the self destructive tendencies of the human race in general and the Middle East in particular.

Jeremiah - Irish, dont jump to conclusions

Posted by Jeremiah | 21.08.08, 05:50 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

So much rubbish in the article and some of the responses. Fisk really has a problem with Israel trying to defend its citizens against those that want to kill them that he has to bring the fence (and it's a fence for most of its length, hence its name) into his rambling comments. As for the Pisgah mountains, so what? If I were running the US armed forces I'd want to practice for every eventuality, no matter how remote.

To Amer: Actually 68% of Israeli Jews were born in...Israel. Not very bright are you?

To BJG: the Israeli citizens behind the barrier tend not to be the stone throwing types; the latter are to be found in the more ideological settlements further in the West Bank (and who need to be dealt with a lot more firmly than they are at present by the Israeli authorities)

Posted by JH | 20.08.08, 22:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Contrary to some of the hostile views,the Iranians understand the value of Robert's report.Although it sounds a bit like a competition to foretell someone's death and when it happens, you rejoice the death because of the"I told you so factor"yet it has a value:It concerns the grim fortunes of thousands of innocent people who live thousands of miles away from you and they will live no more, because of our competing circumstances. Value in rejoicing such a grim winning?May be yes,if it would prevent the ugly events from taking place.The truth is that it would not.Americans have embarked on military operations- landing their paratroopers in the South East- and terrorist operations inside Iranian borders in the last couple of years; reporting those events would have had a definite value.So what is new?closing on the news black outs? Democracy: What? The Western media have refrained from reporting the American operations and incursions in Iran.Tizab

Posted by Tizab | 20.08.08, 10:59 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Mr Fisk on lebanon.(i paraphrase)

"Assad i think knew nothing about the hariri killing it was his Baath underlings who were responsible."

Mr Fisk travels to Lebanon often and so has to look after himself.Quite rightly.So he absolves the arch thug Assad from the murder of the lebanese Prime Minister.
Mr Fisk has several problems.He does not want to alienate the Lebanese Christians who would be angry with him for absolving the thug so he pins the blame elsewhere.And he is not keen on Syrias's murderous anger either.
Lebanon has had a series of murders.The victims were the Christian elite as well as the Sunni PM.To pretend that Assad knows nothing is pretty silly.

If the writer tells us that LEBANON AND SYRIAN RULES (in the words of Thomas Freidman) prevent him from being open with us we would understand.

Posted by James | 19.08.08, 18:01 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Dear Wendy Lil,

Cutting back our spending!!! How niave of you!!! We give them worthless paper, they give us oil and goods. We can't cut back our spending if we tried, they can withhold goods and oil, then our stupid democracies will suffer and wage war on them.

Either way the wolves are circling, they will get their bloody revenge on us. We would deserve it.

Posted by GD | 19.08.08, 14:02 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

having to transit in dubai (even for a short period) is one of the most uncomfortable and horrible experience that i had experienced.

Posted by Wendy Lil | 19.08.08, 11:49 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Cutting back on our spending in asia and middle east may just help us to chase the wolves away.

Posted by Wendy Lil | 19.08.08, 11:07 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think the US will attack Iran and I like a lot of others also think it will be the final event that will seal the US's downfall into oblivion too.

I also think that the events in Georgia are linked with the US seeking and failing to close off any possible Russian intervention that could come from that direction for Iran.

But let us see what happens, how the US ships fare against the Sunburn, how the US planes fare against the many s-300 AA systems, how the ships sent into clear the Straits of Hormuz are picked off by Iran's hunter-killer subs and then also will be put to the test the Patriot system which hardly coped with Scud's pitted against Iran's reaction and then the six months as America's oil reserves run dry as Iran withdraws its oil from the west, as Venezuela stops sending its oil to the US, Saudi Arabia cannot keep up to demand... and as America collapses, the wolves seeking revenge will close in on Israel.

Posted by Ian Watson | 19.08.08, 00:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

While I usually agree and respect the central gist of what Robert Fisk has to write in his column, I find this article poorly written and dubious in it assertions. If anything, as a veteran Middle East correspeondent, he should be celebrating the fact that there are places like Dubai and Qatar which are booming economically and are safe business and tourism destinations, despite the Middle East's reputation for instability. The above article is condescending, out of place, and not consistent with the Independent's journalistic standards.

Posted by SAS | 19.08.08, 00:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

49 Comments