Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

World Focus: Al-Qa'ida keeps its promise to be 'bone in crusaders' throats'

By Robert Fisk
Thursday, 21 August 2008

Al-Qa'ida "in the Maghreb" strikes again. Forty three dead on Tuesday, another 11 yesterday. And across the Muslim world, it continues. A suicide bomber in Mersin in Turkey, 23 dead in a hospital complex in Pakistan and – let us not forget how these figures are put together in the Middle East – 10 French soldiers at Salopi in Afghanistan. Yes, I'm sure we're winning the "war against terror". But aren't we losing it?

It was one of al-Qa'ida's most prominent leaders who announced in 2006 – on 11 September, of course – that the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat and al-Qa'ida would be "a bone in the throat of the American and French crusaders" and they kept their dark word. Tuesday's appalling suicide bombing in Algeria was followed yesterday by car bombs in the city of Bouira. Just as the earlier suicide bombing targeted police cadets, so the Bouira bomb were aimed at foreign nations. Canadians and Frenchmen were said to be among the victims.

If the bombings seem casually crafted to a Western audience, they did not appear that way in the Arab world. "From Asia to the Maghreb – terrorism is coasting along," the Beirut French language L'Orient Le Jour headlined its front page on Wednesday. It was perfectly correct. The last French military casualties on this scale were at the Drakkar building in Beirut in 1983. The fact that the Taliban could officially announce not only the French dead in the town of Salopi but their own casualties as well showed how sophisticated their attacks have now become.

If it was not clear last night whether the latest Algerian attack was a suicide bomber – the slovenly Algerian press agency declined to say (which probably means it was) – the target, foreigners working on a dam project – spoke for itself. The local police – in Iraq, in Algeria, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan – are now the men who will pay the price for fighting the West's "war on terror".

Is it worth it? This is the question that the Iraqis and the Algerians and the Afghans and the Pakistanis now have to ask themselves. In answering this question, they will have to ask whether we care about them – we do not, of course – and whether the money they make from working for us is worth their lives. The mere fact that 10 French dead matter so much in Afghanistan – when 10 Afghan villagers matter so little when they are killed off in our anti-Taliban air raids – speaks mountains about our love for the Muslims of this towering, massive landscape.

In reality, we care as much about the Afghans of Afghanistan as we care about the Iraqis of Iraq and the Algerians of Algeria.

I remember well, with great sadness, how we cared nothing for the babies whose throats were slashed by so-called Islamists (some of whom, it turned out, worked for the government) in Algeria, giving the statistics of dead children rather than their names. I printed the names of these poor babies. And it was to the shame of their murderers – and to the government whose savage butchers participated in these outrageous acts – that they cared nothing for them.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

91 Comments

Pakistan had no suicide bombimg till its induction into the Afghan jihad in 1979.It had no drugs or firearms problems.In fact it was a fairly liberal and tolerant country where religiosity did not define the state or the society.
After the country or rather its Western backed military rulers joined the war against the Soviet Union and later against Taliban the situation changed.Arrival of millions of Afghan refugees(at least three million still remain after several years of repatriation) created severe economic,social and administrative pressures.Poverty,religious fanaticism,intolerance,drugs,weapons,crime,violence and corruption began to characterise the society.The situation deteriorated rapidly with passage of time.Thousands of Mujahideen recruited from the Middle East and North Africa were brought to join"volunteers"from within Pakistan.As the foreign war in Afghanistan continues,the battle ground is being shifted inside Pakistan.Suffering of powerless Pakistanis goes on and on

Posted by Afzal A. Neseem | 27.08.08, 22:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

To WLil:
You sound like a bastard of Nietzsche; getting one of his most interesting and most profound exclamations terribly confused. Perhaps what you meant to say was that morality is perspectival; constantly at the mercy of the dominant paradigm. This is excusable. What is not excusable, however, is claiming offense at a writer whose perspective is guided by facts and-though the discipline is horribly contaminated by vulgar scholars-history. Attacking legalized murder on a global scale is not meaningless. However, I can tell you what IS meaningless: spawning global militant resistance through coercive governance and abusive power structures only to then "fight" such "terrorism" with more terror! Perhaps the most offensive depictionof Ouroboros I have seen yet...

Posted by Matt Rodrigue | 27.08.08, 21:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

hakan, nobody is definitely wrong or definitely right. right or wrong is subjective to an individual analysis or interpretation based on obvious reality/facts. in the end, it is up to individual to believe or not to believe your rant. i find your opinion most offensive and confusing and meaningless.

Posted by WLil | 24.08.08, 13:46 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

some people are definitely on the wrong way about WEST war politics, it is not about God but Goat.

Look at drug raise news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6957238.stm

After the fall of the Taleban in 2001, the Drug production has gone up. west started to kill themselves. very ironic. I really surprised and feel sorry for them.

Posted by hakan | 24.08.08, 07:09 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

it is not the white Americans fault that some asiatic or islamic people just worship excessively the US dollar or the US technology or the fact that arabs want to rule the world with their restrictive islamic ideology.

Posted by WLil | 23.08.08, 18:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I am constantly sickened by the ignorance we americans use to justify our hanus actions. We invade other countries flying the flag of freedom when all we are realy doing is reinstateing a different kind of dictatorship. We trade tyrant leaders for tyrant corporations, but this is compleatly acceptable when we are making trillions from this. I talk to people all the time who hate the Arab world, and flinch at the word muslim, swearing that muslims are out to destroy the "infidels" and enslave the world. Most of these people are shocked to find out that infidel is a christian word used during the crusaids to define people who did not worship christ (IE Jews), and the term quickly spread to define muslims as well even though Christ is mentioned more in the Quran than Muhomad. None of these people have read the Quran or even know anything about the muslim world, they just repeat the brainwashing tyhey hear on the news stations that are owned by the same cooperations that benifiet on this w

Posted by SiD | 23.08.08, 17:04 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

noor aza, is it a coincidence that you come on this site after i speak about my hatred of islamic people?if you are trying to track me down to show your so-called kindness, then i'm afraid you failed miserably. after what i have gone through in malaysia, i find it very hard to trust any malaysian, be they moslem or nonmoslem. if you said that you are not a moslem, so be it. in any case I still do not wish to have anything to do with you.

Posted by WLil | 23.08.08, 16:51 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

why should we nonbelievers be afraid of alqaida or any moslem? They don't deserve any respect or attention or aid. and why should americans help those moslem and other asiatic rebuild their wasteland, when all we nonbelievers get in return is more harm than good. we need to get our independent life back, pronto. we don't need to kowtow to their worthless eastern/islamic/black culture.

Posted by WLil | 23.08.08, 16:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

PaddyMiguel,

Well, to defend the vainglory of the French exception (no NATO, no english speaking) 10 French paras lives seems a small price for France to pay to stay all "puffed up". Much less than say, 1,000,000 Rwandans for example

And of course it seemed vanishingly unlikely that French soldiers might have actually died in combat fighting the enemy. Is there discount in the Kabul restaurants now the French have, partly, left the safety of the capital where they have been hiding for five years?

Or is it Paddy that you were actually seeking to blame cowardly thick yanks for the deaths of these valiant French fighters? Hard to tell....

Whatever, the Tail-o-bangers were defeated as they always are when they actually come out and fight instead of sending women and children with explosives strapped to them like the "brave" fighters they are (not). This is the point when someone utterly amoral asks "why are 'we' [sic] fighting in Afghanistan"

Posted by mike | 23.08.08, 16:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Correction: The 10 French troops were not killed by Al-Qa'ida or the Taliban but by so-called 'friendly' fire from their Afghan allies bringing up the rear and US aerial support called in after the ambush. Unable to communicate with the Americans the French paras were bombed whilst trying to recover their injured.

Posted by PaddyMiguel | 23.08.08, 12:49 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

91 Comments