Geoffrey Wheatcroft: This by-election is a regular fixture: Catholics vs Protestants
Sunday, 20 July 2008
Whether or not the Government holds Glasgow East on Thursday, this by-election helps explain why Labour retains a bedrock of support in Scotland. Religious faith may have faded, but sectarian loyalties remain: Glasgow East is a Catholic constituency, and Labour is the Catholic party.
Two centuries ago, Scotland was overwhelmingly a Presbyterian country. All this changed with immigration from Ireland, which had begun before the Great Famine in the 1840s and then became a flood. Most cities in Scotland and England – Glasgow and Liverpool, above all – ac-quired large Irish Catholic populations, leading to a bitter sectarian conflict. Notoriously, this was reflected in football, as well as politics, with Rangers (Protestant) and Celtic (Catholic) in Glasgow, "Hearts" and "Hibs" in Edinburgh, and, in Dundee, Dundee FC and Dundee United.
In England and Wales, the Liberals were the party of Protestant Dissent, until Labour succeeded them. The early Labour movement had deep roots in the chapels, and plenty of men graduated from the pulpit to the hustings. But, in Scotland, something else happened, as Catholics turned to Labour. This was personified by one man, John Wheatley, whose story few know better than Gordon Brown.
In his own hot youth, the Prime Minister wrote an admiring biography of Wheatley's colleague and political pupil, James Maxton, the fiery leader of "Red Clydeside". At the 1922 election, those Independent Labour Party extremists (as even some Labour people saw them) captured 21 of of 28 seats in the Clyde region. Although Maxton was a Presbyterian (like his biographer), several Clydesiders were Catholics, most conspicuously Wheatley, a self-made businessman, born in Co. Waterford before his family migrated to Scotland. He, more than anyone, captured the Catholic vote for Labour, as he moved from the United Irish League by way of the Catholic Socialist Society to the ILP.
As Minister of Health, Wheatley was the most effective member of the short-lived first Labour government of 1924, although still obedient enough to his church, he refused to allow health authorities to give advice on birth control, which foreshadowed a more dramatic episode. During the second Labour government of 1929-31, Sir George Trevelyan's Education Bill was ambushed by Catholic MPs on the Labour back benches, acting on behalf of their bishops.
And that alliance cut two ways electorally: if Labour meant Catholic, then the Conservatives were the Protestant party. Even at the Labour landslide of 1945, the Tories still won a third of the Glasgow seats, thanks to the Orange vote, which explained also why they held a majority of Liverpool's seats in the 1950s. Most startling in hindsight, at the 1955 election, the Tories won a majority of seats in Scotland.
Less than 40 years later, they didn't win a single Scottish seat, and they have remained a negligible force north of the Tweed since the 1997. Religion isn't the only reason for that collapse, but it is a neglected political truth that Scotland, like England, ceased to be a Christian country before it ceased to be a Protestant one – and is now nothing at all. But while Labour hangs on to its residual affiliation – with probably more Labour-voting "Catholics" in Glasgow East than go to Mass – the Tories have been gravely damaged by the eclipse of political Protestantism.
That didn't stop the Tories winning more votes than Labour at the last general election (another neglected fact), and it is almost certain that they will win more English seats at the next. If they fail to gain a parliamentary majority because of Labour's Scottish-Catholic hard core, might not "Orangeism" yet return in new guise?
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

SNP put the Wolfetones to play on the top deck of an open top double an drive through Glasgow .
Posted by Michael Williams | 20.07.08, 20:44 GMT
This is quite possibly the worst article I have seen in print. Ever.
The fact that someone is getting paid to write drivel like this beggars belief.
Posted by John | 20.07.08, 16:54 GMT
The Nationalists agenda appeals to all Freedom minded Scots and
others who live in Scotland ; eg the ethnic groups are joining in
droves and many English especially from Berwick/Tweed are
jealous of the SNP NHS changes. Free perscriptions on the way,
better old age care; hospitals to remain Public organised; no
Trident missiles vote, and no modernisation of Atomic Power stations. Power will be greener than Englands with wave power,
Hydraulics and modern Coal powered plants in the offing.
The legacy of Sectarianism is still there but will be less and less
apparent in the coming years. The Glasgow East election may well see a candidate chosen for his competancy rather than his private
beliefs; perhaps the snide remarks about the divisions could have been cleared up if Blair had put through a Bill proposing the
Abolition of the UK Sectarian Bill denying the Rights of any Person
to be Prime Minister or member of Royal Family because of his/her religion.
Posted by Jim | 20.07.08, 16:15 GMT
I think the divide in Scotland is to do with political patronage and the corruption of a one party state. Glasgow has been Labour too long, and many people's jobs depend on the perpetuation of that one party system.
The electors don't vote tribally, they just don't vote at all. The best thing that could happen for Scotland is that Labour gets hammered in the East End, that their party disintegrates and the enterprise of people who do so well in other countries - Canada, Hong Kong, England - is liberated from the dead hand of the mafia which dominates places like Glasgow.
Many of my friends grew up in a country which had a sectarian division, and many of us have married partners from the other tradition. We don't care what religion a person is. But today everyone gets married in tartan. The conservatives are perceived as an English party. They can wear a sash if they want, but I suspect that will cost them more votes than they would hope to gain.
Posted by David B | 20.07.08, 16:12 GMT
Soccer Doc - No he means Scotland has lost it`s Faith to secularism!
Posted by Alan | 20.07.08, 15:14 GMT
Is any free-thinking Scot surprised at this rubbish? The hopeful last sentence, "...might not Orangeism yet return in new guise?"
is so out of touch with modern Scotland that its beyond belief. The Scots RC population is a very small 15%. Hardly bogey-man variety.
It smacks of Unionist Tory wishful thinking. The return of the poisonious wee Orange working class dwarf and the return of the reactionary UJ carrying triumphalist Orange/Tories. GOOD GOD IN GOVAN !!!!
The irony of this article is utterly lost on the author but not lost on the majority of modern day Scots. The "traditional" East End labour/catholic/irish republican/rebel voter has voted solidly over 50 years for the Union Jack London Labour....who have brought them corruption, poverty, squalor and hopelessness.
As Scotland rejects the union the diminishing catholic=labour voters left today have to seriously ask him/herself where they stand:-
Broon/London/UJ v SNP/Positive, real change/Hope/Pride ?
Posted by LEGION | 20.07.08, 15:09 GMT
Lazy lazy journalism.
Has this man even been to my home parish in the East End of Glasgow?
I think not
Posted by phil mac giolla bhain | 20.07.08, 14:48 GMT
I have never read such a load of nonsense in all my life. I could go through this on a point by point basis, but I will settle for this one. Does Mr Wheatcroft not wonder, that (his words) if the "Conservatives are the Protestant Party", something odd must have happened when "Less than 40 years later, they (the Tories) didn't win a single Scottish seat, and they have remained a negligible force north of the Tweed since the 1997." Does this mean that the whole of Scotland has converted to Roman Catholicism? If so, someone better tell all those who send their kids to non-denominational schools for a start. UTTER RUBBISH!
Posted by Soccer doc | 20.07.08, 12:11 GMT
I hope noone takes tis article seriously.
Posted by Am Balach | 20.07.08, 02:13 GMT
Poor Poor article. To suggest a modern day Dundee/Dundee United rivalry is sectarian in nature and to menion it in the same breath as Rangers/Celtic is absolutely ridiculous and smacks of poor or lazy journalism. The Dundeee football rivalry has not has a religious element since the early 20th Century
Posted by Iain | 20.07.08, 01:59 GMT