Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 14° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Glenda Jackson: How to beat the fascists? Build houses ...

There have been few more sickening sights in politics than the spectacle of Nick Griffin celebrating his election to the European Parliament.

But it's important we don't let our disgust overcome our reason. Last night wasn't the triumph Griffin and his acolytes had been hoping for. At the start of the European election campaign he had confidently boasted he would secure a minimum of seven seats. As the expenses scandal broke, he raised his prediction to 12. Even as late as yesterday morning, Griffin was estimating four gains, including one for his organ grinder Simon Darby, the man who described Archbishop Sentamu as a "spear thrower".

Make no mistake, one BNP member is shaming. Two is a moral catastrophe. But this is not the "breakthrough" that Griffin craved and many of us feared. The number of people voting for his unique cocktail of racism and hate actually fell compared to five years ago. The BNP share of the vote rose a paltry 1.3 points. And all this against the background of recession, expenses and ministerial resignations. At least the way ahead is clear. The days of arguing whether we should confront or ignore the BNP are over. We won't confront them. We will tear into them. We will highlight and expose and destroy their agenda of prejudice and bigotry and division.

We also have to realise that our political parties, however principled, cannot lead the fightback against extremists who take pride in positioning themselves beyond the political mainstream. The anti-fascist campaign group Searchlight, based in my constituency, constructed a unique coalition of faith groups, trade unionists, business people, celebrities and voluntary organisations to face down Griffin's storm troopers. They ultimately failed to prevent his election but without their campaign the nightmare of a dozen BNP victories could have become reality. Those who yearn for a "new progressive consensus" would do well to follow Searchlight's lead.

But while politicians cannot take the lead, nor can we abrogate our responsibilities. We must be tough on fascism, and tough on the causes of fascism. A social housing revolution; a renewed and sustained regional investment strategy; policy priorities that reach out to voters who have never stepped inside a focus group. These are the weapons that Nick Griffin fears most. Anything that undermines social, political and yes, racial, inequality undermines, fatally, his platform of extremism.

Within a year, we face our defining reckoning with the British National Party. Griffin believes the ultimate prize, a parliamentary seat, lays within his grasp. We have less than 12 months to prepare ourselves. That will be the moment that determines whether last night was after all, the BNP breakthrough, or whether it was the moment when the enemies of extremism drew a line in the sand. Nick Griffin should beware – after last night he crosses that line at his peril.

Glenda Jackson is Labour MP for Hampstead and Highgate

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
bnp
[info]wsmith176 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 01:17 am (UTC)
How come now the Labour hydra is in desperate straits funds can be found for more social housing that will increase the taxpayers burden. Maybe if Glenda and her colleagues spent more effort on their constituents rather than Ikea then Britain would be a better place and there would be no need to rant on about a small pragmatic activist group that listens to the people! Indeed the threats made in the article above might create rather difficult confrontational situations which are not in the British tradition of live and let live.Certainly a fair minded person would think ,as the article above warns ,that disgust has unfortunately overcome reason.










Re: bnp
[info]richardm20 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 07:31 am (UTC)
And they would populate these houses will unskilled poor immigrants. They have done this in the past ans have learned nothing. Glenda Jackson should hang her head in shame.
Re: bnp - [info]nightside242 - Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC) Expand
At least he bought one seat to UK.
[info]famulla wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 05:16 am (UTC)
Glenda Jackson: How to beat the fascists? Build houses ...
There have been few more sickening sights in politics than the spectacle of Nick Griffin celebrating his election to the European Parliament.
Glenda Come on let us celebrate to all the victories. At least he bought one seat to UK. Have you seen how sportsmen throw the bottle of new fizzy whiskey over the shoulder not drinking a drop? Do I tell them to build the factory of bottles?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
... build houses and carry on the good work begun by sacking smith et al
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 05:41 am (UTC)
Two BNP MEPs are two warning shots from Real Labour Britain, across the bows of all quisling blatcherist snouts and fellow travellers , not only those still being shaken out of government.
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/06/bnptv-interviews-nick-griffin-mep/
How to beat the fascists? Stop promoting Islamophobia
[info]giuseppesaponi wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 06:22 am (UTC)
It is laughable that the Zionist controlled "mainstream media", which has done so much to promote Islamophobia and xenophobia, now bleats about the alleged rise of the BNP. The purpose of the Zionists is to promote chaos, whether it be in the Middle East or the U.K. for their own malign purposes.

Isn't it obvious that the attempt to bring down the government for not being pro Israel enough by the same Zionist controlled media is supported by "Labour Friends of Israel"? just look at the cabinet ministers who have resigned in the last week - Blears, Flynt, Parnell and Kennedy, all members of LFI.

Now we know what that meeting on Deripaska's yacht was all about. Remember that?
Let us recall that the cabal included Mandelson, Osbourne and Nat Rothschild, son of lady Rothschild who is one of the largest financiers of the Conservatives. Lady Rothschild, by the way, financed her friend Hilary Clinton's presidential bid, until she lost out to Obama and then financed McCain - so she is a racist as well as a Zionist, but the two go together.

What's is it all about? Maybe, the forthcoming attack against Iran with the U.S. on behalf of and maybe with Israel over Irans non-existent nuclear weapons programme.

People need to wake up.
Re: How to beat the fascists? Stop promoting Islamophobia
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 09:07 am (UTC)
Oh Christ NOT Israel AGAIN! Some people have a one-track mind!
Re: How to beat the fascists? Stop promoting Islamophobia - [info]ganef - Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 11:49 am (UTC) Expand
BNP
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 06:35 am (UTC)
Had Ms Jackson's precious Labour government not allowed, via ineptitude and complacency, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants into the UK, the BNP wouldn't have stood a chance.

But they did.

And the BNP do.
You and your party sicken me
[info]rickraider wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 07:03 am (UTC)
There have been few more sickening sights in politics than Gordon Brown clinging onto power instead of doing what is right for the country. The Labour party lacks honour, lacks leadership and lacks a moral compass. The BNP is the creation of socialist failure, failure to understand the legitimate and real concerns of the British people over immigration. You and your evil party have like the fascists bullied the electorate, stamped out dissent ruthlessly and bashed the British people with your Politically Correct (Political Censorship) nonsense until they submitted. You and your sickening leaders have driven your social engineering experiment to the extreme by lying continuously to the British people over immigration when you had no intention of stemming the flood of immigrants. In the early years you told us that all these economic migrants were asylum seekers and 95% turned out to be bogus. That was a big lie playing on the British sense of fairness. Then you told us they were good for the economy and now we find out they are sucking billions out of the economy. Finally the lie that you were tightening up border controls and immigration and we find it is the opposite.
Why have you and your evil party done this? Quite simple give an immigrant a passport and they vote Labour, or at least 80% do. In 12 years you have changed the complexion of our society and made poor white people second class citizens without a voice. You Glenda Jackson and your rotten government have forced these people into the arms of the BNP, so I can only blame the nasty socialists you represent.
You have traded on our sense of fair play, and abused our traditional tolerance. Instead of bemoaning Nick Griffen you should look in the mirror to look at the ugly sight of Britain today. If you and your party wanted to stop the BNP you could do it overnight by taking away their ammunition. You could stop all immigration, stop all arranged marriages, and throw out all the illegal immigrants tomorrow, but you will not do this because it cuts off your supply of voters.
So do not feign disgust over the BNP when they provide you with a political distraction away from the appalling mess you and your government have made of this country. Remember you have made our poor poorer, you have made our streets more dangerous, you have taken us into an illegal war, you have failed to give our troops the right combat equipment and you have ruined our economy.
There is no more sickening sight in politics than to see a socialist PM groveling to keep his job.
Re: You and your party sicken me
[info]richardm20 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 07:28 am (UTC)
VERY WELL SAID!! This article by a woman with a 2 million pound house in Hampstead is as trasparent as glass. She thinks the spin she has used for the past 20 years will work this time. And she is very badly mistaken.
Re: You and your party sicken me - [info]bobthebrit - Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 12:35 am (UTC) Expand
Re: You and your party sicken me - [info]kuma2000 - Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 11:32 pm (UTC) Expand
What a truly sickening article!
[info]richardm20 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 07:26 am (UTC)
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 05:01 am (UTC)
The rise of the BNP has been caused entirely by the contempt politicians have had for the concerns of ordinary people. For years people have been trying desperately to raise concerns about massive amounts of immigration and it consequent effects on the very fabric of our society. Good people have been branded as rasists (and worse) by Labour and their trendy left followers, simply because they have been concerned about the seismic effects that Labours immigration policy has had on our communities. One only has to walk down the street to see the sheer magnitude of the effects that Labours unfettered immigration policies have yielded. Untold hundreds of thousands of immigrants have been let into our contry by Labour, many of whom are unskilled, poor (unable to support even themselves, let alone contribute to the economy), unhealthy (no medicals are required to immigrate to the UK and are therefore a burden on the NHS) and have religious convictions which are incompatible with modern society. these people have been let into our borders without even the most cursory of checks. They are not even required to speak English (unlike immigrants to Australia and New Zealand).

Labour has FAILED even to deport FAILED asylum seakers.
Labout has FAILED to accept the need for any immigration control whatsoever.
Labour has FAILED to deport criminals that have committed serious crimes such as murder of UK citizens. Remember those damning statistic published 2 years ago about this very matter?
Labour has FAILED to develop an immigration policy that benefits the citizens of the UK.
Labour has FAILED to insist that immigrant integrate into our way of life - and now we are seeing the results of that little experiment, arn't we!

But most of all Labour has FAILED - no REFUSED - to listen to the repeated calls from the people to halt unfettered immigration. Instead it chose to denigrate those people who were raising the concerns. Well they now have their answer. Someone IS listening and it is the BNP. All of us have New Labour to thank for THAT little gem.

NOTE LABOUR AND CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS - deal with peoples concerns about immigration or the BNP will continue to succeed. For too long, from your crystal towers, you have ignored british people - and now you have seen the result.

The British people demand and end to immigration by means of arranged marriages (an outmoded primitive religious custom). They demand an END to all immigration from people who are unskilled or unqualified or whose professions are not required from an economic perspective. They demand that all immigrants have a medical exam and if they are unhealthy their residency refused on the grounds of public cost.

The left-leaning media have treated the BNP appallingly - most noticeably the treatment of their leader by Dimbleby on the TV. And before the carping whining bleating lefties start on their usual path of denigrating people who have opinions like this - NOT I AM NOT A MEMBER OF THE BNP NOR WOULD I EVER VOTE FOR THEM. GOT IT! I am just echoing the concerns of the huge majority of British people abouit the seismic changes brought about by unfettered immigration into the UK - and the sickening behaviour of politicians when people raise their legitimate concerns.
Is Glenda a closet BNP sympathiser?
[info]tatcawh wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
Seriously Glenda, are you some sort of agent provocateur for the BNP? If I were ever tempted to vote for them, it would be precisely because these islands, the most beautiful country in the world, are already grotesquely over-populated: the idea of putting even more of this green and pleasant land under brick and concrete to provide housing for yet more armies of immigrants is an obscenity.

Did you write this to demonstrate just how unfit to govern you and all the other champagne socialists are?
Re: Is Glenda a closet BNP sympathiser?
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 08:46 am (UTC)
Absolutely right!
Re: Is Glenda a closet BNP sympathiser? - [info]collin_brown - Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 02:27 pm (UTC) Expand
You're not reading the script, Glenda.
[info]milchcow wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC)
The success of the BNP (if you can call it that) was brought about by a combination of factors much more involved than regional investment and bricks and mortar. Indeed, the misdirection of these are as often as not the substance behind the BNP argument. You need to look at the psychological drive behind BNP voters.

If our MPs (whose standing in the community is hardly unblemished) brand the BNP for racism and hatred, people will nowadays see that as a diversionary tactic to stifle argument about their own crimes. Then we have large sections of the media who are equally vehement and who again, are not always regarded by the public as the paragons they like to be thought as.

And together they make unfortunate bedfellows.

To many people a coordinated campaign by politicians and the press is something to treat with the gravest suspicion ... and at times like this, a very good reason to raise two fingers. It was hardly unexpected, I suggest, to a bullying and dictatorial and seemingly deaf executive.

People will usually respond to honesty and decency but they'll mock you, as they did on Thursday, otherwise.







Talking at, and not even with any more.
[info]junkkmale wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC)
And not even listening, much less hearing.

You reap what you sow, Ms. Jackson.

I seek representation in Parliament, not the installation of whipped-into-shape media luvvie ciphers who seem to have the odd notion they are there to 'rule'. And misuse this privilege to obsess about trivia. It's not like you and your ilk are even being very effective in your core mission of seeking out and destroying those you don't fancy, even if they are rather unattractive. The only ones you can get rid of seem to be such as Ms. Kennedy. Way to go!

That your Leader has 'triumphed' again in some eyes, thanks to some odd, sycophantic internal popularity contest against the wishes of 85% of the electorate and the clear interests of the country, is something I will make those who made selfish, careerist choices NOW suffer for WHEN I eventually get my real chance at the next ballot.
Re: Talking at, and not even with any more.
[info]w1551ns wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 01:41 pm (UTC)
Methinks Ms Jackson will have to fish out her Equity Card after the next election....whenever that is?
BNP voters knew what they were voting for
[info]trimountaingal wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 09:43 am (UTC)
The people who voted for the BNP were perfectly aware of their racist policies, which is why they voted for them. Hiding behind illegal immigration or Muslim terrorism as 'reasons' for supporting the BNP is laughable. No matter how angry a person maybe about these issues, no one who was truly revolted by the BNP's views, would dream of voting for them. There were many other parties that these voters could have chosen, if they want to make a protest vote, but they chose the BNP.

To paraphase Orwell, I suspect that if we "looked from Griffin to BNP voter, and from BNP voter to Griffin, and from Griffin to BNP voter again... it [would be] impossible to say which was which."
Re: BNP voters knew what they were voting for
[info]colinru wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 03:18 pm (UTC)
Sadly, what alternative do people have who want illegal immigration (or mass immigration) stopped? None of the other Parties have put forward any serious Policies to confront these issues.
Re: BNP voters knew what they were voting for - [info]trimountaingal - Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 04:59 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BNP voters knew what they were voting for - [info]colinru - Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 09:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BNP voters knew what they were voting for - [info]trimountaingal - Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC) Expand
Re: BNP voters knew what they were voting for - [info]colinru - Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 06:35 pm (UTC) Expand
Build Houses?
[info]shieldwarrior wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 10:36 am (UTC)
Glenda Jackson is mouthing faded left wing extremist platitudes.
When did a Labour government NOT try to build its way out of trouble? Witness the ghastly tower blocks thrown up for the labour voting masses, and the soulless estates built for proletarian workers ,going back to the sixties brave new 'liberal' world and beyond.One can almost date the labour party's occupation by this architecture.
The arrogance of the old regime,which is schooled in race hatred reflected in Anglophobic laws,shines through with every sentence. One million voters,one million opinions about the divisive,politically correct,revisionist wreckage the far left have left tells our 'representatives' nothing- except to keep up the empty rhetoric.
The trouble is that the English population( the ones who are voting for the BNP) are abused daily with similar comments seen here.If you disagree with being treated as a second class citizen.If you don't want mass immigration or 'positive discrimination' practiced against your school leaver son or daughter
you are either a fascist and need to be re-educated in a state scheme, or you are a racist and need to be hauled before the CRE and prosecuted. Glenda, you are a hypocrite and traitor to your own people.
You represent the ugly reality of living under Labour's reign of terror.You have tried to intimidate us,suppress our freedoms and continue to imagine you inhabit the high moral ground.
I thank you that your rotten, corrupt and divisive party and its extremist agenda have finally awoken the sleeping English .We could not have started the rebirth of our country without you.
[info]gazskin1 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC)
12 years to build affordable houses, secure pensions, increase pay for the low paid, ensure employers don't import cheap labour. 12 YEARS. Labour is just waking up to what they havent done and how aggreieved working class voters have become. It's a bit late to do in one year what could have been done before. Is this really how Labour regards its core vote. Dependable, passive, stupid? Shock responses.
Build more houses. Shallow thinking
[info]krekelin wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 10:56 am (UTC)
This article just demonstrates the shallow thinking of most Labour politicians who think nothing through and have no idea of the consequences of their actions on the environment, water and food resources and the well being of future generations.
Fascists getting tough on fascism? That's rich Glenda.
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:10 am (UTC)
The (Progressive-Left) are the REAL fascists - let's be VERY, very, clear about that one. Evidence below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNEIprfXXqU
Before You Get Too Carried Away
[info]mishmos wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:19 am (UTC)
Let's not get too carried away with the media hysteria and labour, tory and lib/dem crocodile tears about the BNP. It is a side issue to move our attention away from the so called main party system.
We are not fascists in this country, but we are bloody fed up being told by those at westminster who live in the suburbs with nice salaries, pensions, expenses, gravy train mates, and light as air backgrounds what and why we have voted for certain groups. It is all window dressing and a way to keep the plebs in their place.
We the electorate (who are mostly to blame for voting for the same rubbish decade after decade) are led through the nose by the media, colunmists, tv broadcasters, political lobbyists, champagne socialists, the gentry and the now ubiquitous bloggers (or should that be blaggers).
We know we are lied to daily by the press (who have to sell papers), politicians (whose only aim is their self preservation at all costs) and local government.
If we choose to vote for the BNP then it is because we are fed up with illegal immigrants using the human rights act against us, mass immigration to an already over crowded island, islamists telling us what we can and cannot watch, read or comment on whilst a morally bankrupt cadre of MP's look on, a failed social experiment called multiculturalism, an NHS that counts managers and targets over patient care and honest delivery of services, and an education system that is so corrupt that frankly my labrador could get into one of the universities now, a public transport system that a clown from Hull talked up in 1997 and then subsequently went to further undermine,a policeforce that is so driven by mindless targets that the figures are so unreliable even the police don't know what they mean anymore, a building policy that even a moron (what the hell does that say for what is proposing and supporting the current building fiasco) could see was slowly, but surely stangling the south east causing further problems with transport, health, education and policing, back gardens designated as developed sites for pleb developers to knock up some eyesore under the guise of "executive" homes. The list is almost endless as to both zanulabour and tory gents inability to provide true meaningful leadership and sensible policies, not just the morally bankrupt and easy option ones we have had for decades.
I'll take no journalistic lectures from an ex-luvvie representing a party who could not find their backside with a map or both hands.
Take a very good hard look at youselves before casting any attempt at the post labour wipe out side swipes please. The political stage is much like the theatre as both depend on entertaining the audience with real substance, only the tickets for your show are and have proved to be too expensive for there lack of content.
[info]pj2009 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:22 am (UTC)
Stop importing people, stop the policy of mass immigration ushered in under New Labour- there is your problem. How many ways do the public need to tell politicians this?
How Much Extreme Can You Get Than The Iraq War
[info]mishmos wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:24 am (UTC)
How much more extreme can you get that sending hundreds of British soldiers to their deaths in Iraq and Afganistan on the whim of a liar such as Blair. Get some sense of perspective and look within as people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
I notice that Blair has not put any of his brood up for service in the army to show his commitment to the cause.
Re: How Much Extreme Can You Get Than The Iraq War
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:33 am (UTC)
And your comment is relevant to this discussion because....? Stop chucking up smoke screens - OK!
Re: How Much Extreme Can You Get Than The Iraq War - [info]mishmos - Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 04:42 pm (UTC) Expand
Listen to the people
[info]videostuff wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:26 am (UTC)
Glenda do you live in area that has been totally transformed in the last few years by huge numbers of immigrants? Where schools and hospitals are stretched to snapping point as a result of Labour's free for all immigration policies. Do you actually have any idea how it feels to be an alien in your own country? Nearly a million people voted for the BNP. Look at the numbers who voted for UKIP - do you suspect the vast numbers of arrivals for Central Europe might have been a significant factor in their vote? There are far far too many immigrants and they are not leaving. Labour has sold out working class people so that big business can keep wages at poverty levels. This has had a terrible impact on ordinary workers and Labour doesn't seem to care. People are trying to tell you something very, very clearly. Stop hearing what you want to hear and LISTEN to people!
Listen to the people
[info]videostuff wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
Glenda do you live in area that has been totally transformed in the last few years by huge numbers of immigrants? Where schools and hospitals are stretched to snapping point as a result of Labour's free for all immigration policies. Do you actually have any idea how it feels to be an alien in your own country? Nearly a million people voted for the BNP. Look at the numbers who voted for UKIP - do you suspect the vast numbers of arrivals for Central Europe might have been a significant factor in their vote? There are far far too many immigrants and they are not leaving. Labour has sold out working class people so that big business can keep wages at poverty levels. People are trying to tell you something very very clearly. Stop hearing what you want to hear and LISTEN!
TYPICAL CHAMPAGNE SOCIALIST
[info]georgesign wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:35 am (UTC)
Glenda Jackson obviously follows the policy of keeping the lower orders in their place by making sure they are confined to a ghetto of social housing. Socialists like Glenda Jackson love to live the high-life but make sure their voting base is kept in poverty and aspiring to nothing by given them hand-outs and subsidised housing. Socialist do NOT like Democracy or free-will, it gets in the way of their ordered society.
Who let in racists?
[info]warrenlebuffet wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:38 am (UTC)
Unfortunately it's Labour that has positioned itself beyond the mainstream of ordinary life. Where in the Labour manifsto does it set out to increase the population by 10 million? But if you describe the consequences of this logistical nightmare you're likely to be described as a racist. Even with the best economy in Europe the West Germans didn't find it easy coping with East German intergration; Britain, with no real economy left, poor infrstructure, reliant on fast depleting oil revenues, has no chance!
What a clown
[info]jimmysdodgyknee wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC)
Another politician with no idea, the white working class have no one else to turn to but the BNP, Glenda you and new labour SOLD US OUT, when we voted for Blair in 97 we voted for a wolf in sheeps clothing, a bunch of middle class eliteists with no time for the white working class and what we need, you used us to get in power then screwed us, and now were going to vote you out.
Zionist Media promotes BNP
[info]philipshahak wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 11:56 am (UTC)
For years now the media has been awash with Zionist journalists writing Islamophobic articles. They know damn well that this will increase support for the BNP. Why? a giuseppesaponi points out - they wish to create chaos in the U.K. in order to put their stooge into power. The Zionsit elite are smarting since their agent Blair was forced out and Brown isn't Zionst enough. It's bloody obvious.
Re: Zionist Media promotes BNP
[info]ian_lineham wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 12:16 pm (UTC)
Can I assume this is meant to be ironic?
JUDGING BY THE POSTS ON THIS PAGE...
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 12:22 pm (UTC)
I bet Ms Jackson now wishes she had kept her socialist mouth shut. The depth and intensity of feeling against Labours immigration policies is now coming to the surface, after many long years of frustration. Politicians better start listening AND acting on this matter - OR ELSE...
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: A time for giving with a difference

With the recession, there is a shift from giving people things to giving them services

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Come rain or revo- lution, it's money they want

Haven't the 20th anniversary celebrations of the overthrow of communism been miserable?

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: Science must never be political or emotional

Politicians and action groups select favourable data, ignoring inconvenient evidence


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion