Commentators

Rain (AM and PM) 4° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Hilary Benn: We must produce more food – without risking farmers’ futures

I want British agriculture to produce as much food as possible. No ifs. No buts. The only requirements: that consumers want what’s produced and that the way it’s produced sustains our environment and safeguards our landscape.

This is not about targets for production or self-sufficiency. We are a trading nation. Some of the food we grow, we export; nearly £12bn worth in 2007. And the food that we import is really important too.

It is about productive, efficient farming. It is about the higher-yielding seeds, better irrigation and more sustainable use of fertilisers that have transformed agriculture in parts of the world.

Norman Borlaug – the man who brought these technologies to the developing world – made the point that if instead of rising, yields had stayed at their 1950 levels, then by the end of the century just gone we would have needed an extra 1.8bn hectares of land to grow enough grain for the world. That’s an area about the size of South America. It shows why improving yields is so important.

But, as we all know, intensive production does not come without a cost. We are taking three times more water out of our rivers today than we did 50 years ago. 60 per cent of our ecosystems are now being degraded or used unsustainably. The ripping out of hedgerows did real damage.

And yet, as we all know, the soil, the water, the air, the plants, and the forests are the very foundation on which our food – and therefore our existence – depends.

So in meeting demand today, we must ensure that we do not destroy our ability to feed ourselves tomorrow. It’s not about either environmental sustainability or production. It has to be both.

We are also working together to see how we can best retain the environmental benefits of set aside, while settling on a better approach for farmers.

I know it’s controversial. I know that some may think that there isn’t a problem to solve. So let’s go back to the start and ask ourselves why the way in which you farm is so important.

And the answer is simply because it really does deliver important environmental benefits – and over time these benefits will be vital to maintaining levels of production.

The Environment Secretary Hilary Benn was speaking to the National Farmers’ Union earlier this week

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Hilary Benn chatting to NFU
[info]maramaorganics wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 07:03 pm (UTC)
It was illuminating to see that the UK consumer only care about the environmental and lanscape protection aspects of their food production. I was wondering if the fact that its nutritional content and safty does not seem important might give an indication how far we have fallen from the days of producing life enhancing food. The only reason for farming that I see mattres is that we are sustaining the healthy lives of our consumers. Against that the environment is irrelevent- the environment will survive just fine though it is and will change. It is the human population that is facing bigger challenges through ever decreasing food quality. Alas in New Zealand we have climbed on the same destructive treadmill.

Graham Clarke
www.maramaorganics.co.nz

Columnist Comments

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Cool realism is a political virtue, too

No ideological vision could have replaced sound judgement in 1989

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: Reality TV police shows are criminal

For half an hour, the real world is presented in black-and-white terms

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: The only options are to double up in Afghanistan or leave

At a risk of sounding callous, the number of casualties is actually small for a war


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion