Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Howard Jacobson: Make me laugh – even at an offensive joke – but just don't be so smug about it

Self-satisfaction is an unpardonable crime. Hence the need to keep a straight face

'Say what you like about servicemen amputees from Iraq and Afghanistan..." You'll know the joke by now, even if you didn't hear Jimmy Carr deliver it in person. And you'll be aware of the hullabaloo. Yet another. Every time a comedian does what he's paid to do, there's a hullaballoo.

Why do we go on with this? Where did we get the idea from that there's such a thing as a joke-free zone? Have we not read Swift on solving Ireland's economic problems by eating the babies of the poor? How funny's that? Very. Though at the time it might not have seemed so to the Irish poor in question.

But that's the way of it with a joke. There's always somebody who doesn't get it.

I haven't seen Jimmy Carr live. I don't go to comedy clubs. Not any more. The one time I did go, which was in the course of writing an article about comedy clubs and why I don't go to them, I was heckled by the comedian. "Call yourself a comedian!" he suddenly and for no apparent reason shouted at me, and you can't in that situation start arguing with the injustice of the laughter, or stand up and say you defer to his ridicule only because he enjoys the tacit privileges of performance, otherwise you would have him for breakfast, because by that time he has had you for breakfast. So you perspire heavily, smile the shit-eating grin of the publicly humiliated and look forward to the time you will see him sitting in your audience, while knowing all along that that will never happen because he's an illiterate clown and won't be coming to hear you speak about Comedy, Anathema and the Limits of the Permissible.

I knew in my bones I was going have a hard time of it at the comedy club. People on stages pick on me. They always have. The first time my parents took me to a pantomime I was spotted by the Dame and made fun of. "Call yourself a little boy!" Since then I have given places of public entertainment a miss, or sit so far back I can't be seen. But still they find me. Only recently I was eyeballed during Swan Lake by a cygnet with a piercing stare who for a horrifying moment I feared was going to call me up on to the stage. A Tosca at Covent Garden once paused before throwing herself off the ramparts to look my way though I was hunched in an aisle seat on the back row of the Grand Circle. I knew what she was thinking. "Call yourself a tenor!"

But I have other, more specific arguments with comedy clubs. I don't like the audiences. They are too militarised. They laugh to a rhythm, not at what's funny. As though wound up. And they laugh as a body. And those who laugh as a body today will march as a body tomorrow.

Furthermore – because there is a furthermore – I am envious. I am one of those men who cannot see a platform, dais or any other raised construction without wondering why they're not on it. When it's the ballet – and leaving aside what's coming from the cygnet – I just about cope. I am not, after all, built for ballet. I leap fine but land badly. My centre of gravity is in the wrong place. But when it's comedy I want it to be me. I should have been a stand-up comedian. Should in the sense that it would have been a better long-term career decision than novelist in an age when no one reads, at least as I understand reading – ie to seek out a verbal challenge greater than Katie Price throws down.

So anything I have to say about Jimmy Carr does not come without context. Based on what I've seen of him on television he doesn't amuse me. His shtick is to be amused by himself. No great comedian is ever amused by himself. Billy Connolly could have been a great comedian had he not taken to collapsing hysterically during his own routines. The seal on David Brent's prattishness was his laughing at his own jokes. Then it turned out that Ricky Gervais, who created him, laughs at his own jokes too. Self-satisfaction is an unpardonable crime in a comedian because his role is to remind us that nothing is satisfactory. Hence the necessity of keeping a straight face. It affirms the seriousness of his calling. Which is to make people laugh, not because life is funny but because it isn't.

Amputee servicemen are desperately not funny. Which doesn't mean the joke isn't. It's easy to show people who took offence that the butt of it was not the amputated servicemen but those responsible for their injuries, the inefficient, the penny-pinching, war itself. But that's just the satire dealt with and satire is only a small part of comedy. Why we laugh is a more vexatious question. In a recent novel I recalled a sick joke from my youth. "How many Jews can you fit into a Volkswagen Beetle? A thousand: two in the front, two in the back, nine hundred and ninety-six in the ashtray." To readers who were stupid enough to be outraged by this I explained that the person making the joke was an anti-Semite. End of problem. The joke was, as they say, dramatically "placed". But that doesn't explain why I and my Jewish friends who weren't anti-Semitic enjoyed the joke when we first heard it.

Precisely because it was offensive is the answer. Precisely because it was off-colour, cruel, heartless, in the very worst of taste. We need relieving sometimes not just of propriety and discretion but of grief and horror. And comedy is the place we go to get that relief. It isn't that in comedy anything goes; in comedy anything must go. If you're not being offended you might as well stay home.

But that puts a heavy burden on the comedian. Anything goes morally, but aesthetically the rules could not be stricter. You don't do whimsy. You don't do self-satisfaction. And you don't do shocking just to enjoy shocking. Curb Your Enthusiasm has suddenly become unfunny because Larry David is trying too hard to be obnoxious. The sorts of comedy panel shows on which Jimmy Carr appears are tiresome for the same reason. What television executives call "edgy" has already had all the edges smoothed off it. Jimmy Carr – substitute any name you like – doesn't amuse me, not because he's offensive but because he is so pleased he is. It's a fine line. But then it's a fine business.

More from Howard Jacobson

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]tonysmyth wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 07:41 am (UTC)
'Billy Connolly could have been a great comedian' > You are in very small minority with that opinion. Billy Connolly has been a really great comedian for a very long time, which is why his shows sell out so quickly.
Slack riposte
[info]dcscott wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 08:40 am (UTC)
Howard Jacobson could have been a great journalist had he not taken to self-justifying during his own ruminations.
Howard Jacobson – substitute any name you like – doesn't enlighten or inform me, not because he's self-effacing but because he is so secretly pleased that he is. It's a fine line. But then it's a fine business.
Howard Jacobson: Make me laugh
[info]milesbatch wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 09:52 am (UTC)
No, Howard Jacobson doesn't make me laugh. He gives the impression that he is that little bit more intelligent than everyone else. Whereas Billy Connolly does make me laugh, and he does laugh at his own jokes, but at least they are funny, and on a level that most of us plebs can understand!
Jokes
[info]gwilymrj wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 09:59 am (UTC)
The Pan-Am baggage handler joke was about as sick as it gets.
Comedians Laughing At their Own Jokes
[info]dreambrother28 wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 10:39 am (UTC)
How many comedians don't laugh at their own jokes?
Who's relief?
wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 11:53 am (UTC)
Why are offensive jokes so often made by middle-class white men like Jimmy Carr? Is it that the rest of us need them to facilitate our relief burdened as we are by living in an implicitly, often explicitly misogynist, racist, disablist, homophobic culture? Or do Jimmy Carrs tell such jokes because they need relief from having to pretend to be decent human beings?
PC jokes
[info]agynes wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 02:21 pm (UTC)
'Cos I is Jewish innit?
[info]shegelu wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 03:36 pm (UTC)
Lol, I think you are a great comedian Howard, if unintentionally. So, you mistake the performer's stare into the blackness beyond the stage lights for a vicious & accusatory eyeballing? Some might think this a rather paranoid delusion that most audience members get over at their first music gig in their teens. if I were Alan Johnson, I might suggest that your paranoia could be due to too much toking.
make me laugh
[info]arrydaph wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 06:01 pm (UTC)
At last an article with genuine insight and intelligence, Howard you are an island in a 'sea of frightened mediocracy' Original and brave, an anathema to the self satisfied, shock school of sickening sameness, championed by uneducated thugs (like Ross and co.) and perpetuated by drones who are shocked into laughing together for safety. Heart warming and genuinely satisfying. Bravo!
Dulce et decorum est.
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 06:17 pm (UTC)
Initially glossing over the article I pondered. Lawson was on here defending Carr a while ago. Armed forces humour is necessarily mordant and black. Jewish jokes Howard? Yes there are funny ones about assimilation, goyim, social climbing. The Shoah? There can be no laughter post Auschwitz. Too far perhaps? Carr was not "edgy" he was what the West Indians term a Ras Clart. Baron-Cohen? I noted he never went to a halting site to do a "gypsy" joke. Finding the fun side of humour is subjective. I'll finish here, and let you get back to Bernard Mannings top 100 Abe and Becky jokes.
Depends.....
[info]chipmem1 wrote:
Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 06:59 pm (UTC)
" Self-satisfaction is an unpardonable crime in a
comedian because his role is to remind us that
nothing is satisfactory. "

Quite often, I hear people say this, but I suppose it depends why you are
laughing. Self- gratification from the brilliance of your own joke or just
because it is, Universally Funny. Connolly was the latter , in my book.

If Connolly had kept the bad language down, he would have been one
of the greats, but next to Carr...... he is.

Victim humour, should be reserved for the deserving, today it's thrown
around too easy. Life is ridiculous from most angles and that why we
need comedy, but we must remember, we are all included in lifes
humour. Those who think they are above it, don't last long.
PC jokes
[info]agynes wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 04:35 am (UTC)
Israel is suatting palestinian land allegedly (joke or what?)
PC jokes
[info]agynes wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 04:36 am (UTC)
Israel is squatting palestinian land allegedly (joke or what?)
PC jokes
[info]agynes wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 04:51 am (UTC)
Israel is squatting in Palestine lol = Laugh Off my Leggings
[info]bankrobber35 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 02:53 pm (UTC)
I'm pleased to have found this page. I always found it irksome, that to read Jacobson's columns, I would have to buy The Independent, as it had become such a very, very bad newspaper. What made it worse was the column's position, so close to the letters page. I wanted to read the column, as it was one of the rare places one could find seriousness and originality each week. Reading these comments, I amost laughed out loud. The idiots swarm around this publication like wasps round a nest of idiocy, congratulating and one-upping themselves. I still find it odd that such a column would appear in such proximity to such thinking, and seeing Alihbai-Brown's and Fisk's names to the right seem to underline this.
[info]temporal7 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 07:58 pm (UTC)

Well, initially, I thought I was 'in with a chance', reading the Swift 'eating babies' bit (I had, oh glory, glory hallelujah, read and assimilated that point some time ago) but, no, as usual, I could not quite separate my glory from a skulking, in-the- back-ground self-satisfaction upon realising it. Dammnn it, I think I may have even beaten Mr Howard Jacobson there (if, of course I ignore the fact that he wrote the whole piece) in terms of understanding the finer points of self-satisfaction but, but, why oh why did I enjoy (even more so) the part about having to endure the “shit-eating grin of the publicly humiliated” when all the time Mr HJ was way ahead of the humiliation zone of an “illiterate clown” - I'm laughing again, is there no reprieve for a mere mortal here?

Ok I give up on this understanding the limits of the permissible stuff but, come on, Swift knew a trick or two and so did Shakespeare come to think of it – try reading his limits of the permissible – they know they can get everybody else laughing hysterically for them, they don't have to do it themselves – seriously.

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Enough of the philosophy, Mr Cameron.

Think-tanks play an important role in politics. But they have their limits.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Very nice - but forgiveness is overrated

Sometimes, as Lydon sang, in his post Sex Pistols band, ‘anger is an energy.

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Why not call Blair now and wrap it up?

The enquiry already seems like a sideline as the queues dwindle.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion