Commentators

Rain (AM and PM) 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 10°C

Ian Burrell: Lawyers could be the winners in Fleet Street hacks' 'blagging' game

It was in Portcullis House that Rebekah Wade first let the cat out of the bag. "We have paid the police for information in the past," the editor of The Sun brazenly stated to MPs on the Culture, Media and Sport committee.

Since then, six years ago, the committee has been trying to uncover the extent of Wapping's culture of paying for confidential data. Meanwhile, Wade has been promoted to chief executive of Rupert Murdoch's News International, and her friend Andy Coulson has risen to communications director at the Conservative Party.

At the time of Wade's astonishing admission, Coulson was alongside her as editor of the News of the World, and promised MPs: "We have always operated within the code and within the law." Four years later he quit after Clive Goodman, his royal editor, was jailed for phone-tapping.

Yesterday the heat was back on both of them. Allegations that as many as 3,000 people were targeted (the police said only a "much smaller pool" had been tapped) by 31 journalists from the News of the World and The Sun mean that the same Commons committee will reopen its inquiries. Wade and Coulson will face the MPs anew.

The Fleet Street practice of paying investigators for the provision of ex-directory telephone numbers, criminal records and other confidential information has been widely documented. Known as "blagging", it was once widespread, but – officially – is no longer deployed. In 2006, after a raid on a firm of Hampshire private investigators, the Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, published a report, What Price Privacy Now? It revealed that blagging was prevalent not only at Wapping, but at the Mirror titles, at The Guardian's sister title, The Observer, and women's magazines such as Best and Closer. The investigation firm's biggest clients were the Daily Mail, which made at least 952 requests for secret information, according to seized documents. The Independent was one of the few national newspapers where such activities did not take place, the report found.

The winners in all this could be the lawyers. The Guardian's claim that News International paid £700,000 out of court to Gordon Taylor, chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association, along with £300,000 to other victims of the royal editor's phone-hacking, raises the possibility of more civil claims from those targeted. The financial ramifications for Murdoch's empire could yet be enormous.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Hello?
[info]had_it wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
This is the information society: information is money, so why is anyone surprised that journo's buy it just as any other business does? If these information sales bother you, you really ought to get out more. Everything about you, or anyone you know or have ever heard of, from the trivial to the important, is for sale.
[info]bundubasher wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 10:50 am (UTC)
Do not get why everyone is so shocked.It is surely how the rags have always operated and we have a government that spies on US the public ,24/7, via CCTV cameras everywhere ,and reserves rights to tap our phones and read all our text messages and emails , and once on internet one is silently followed by anyone for any reason at all.As for celebrities - well they just love all the attention when they are doing all the jabbering themselves, which they so often do for PR .

Is it all morally reprehensible.. indeed yes !!- but the pretence of shock and awe and horror is somewhat hilarious really ,all thing considered.

Legislation has removed everyone's rights to privacy it seems and that is what is wrong.
Your 'aving a laugh.
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 01:06 pm (UTC)
Aren't you? Lawyer's may be the only winners!!!!. I a feel reasonably confident the record will show this particular breed never lose. Irrespective of whether the case is a win, lose or draw. The lawis of the land are tools used by scheming individuals within the legal professsion for personal gain in a game of three dimensional.

Columnist Comments

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Didn't we have a lovely time the day we went to Basra

What do you do when you've bombed the living daylights out of a country?

david_lister

David Lister: Great writers don't need a helping hand

There's an unusual story about the new Alan Bennett play which opens at the National Theatre next Tuesday


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion