Joan Bakewell: No wonder the toffs are back with a vengeance
Friday, 16 May 2008
Bling is back and I'm glad to be one of the blingers. My personal favourite among jewellers is Argenta: those people with a stall on many a railway station and rows and rows of neat, trim and cheap earrings. I am a regular patron. It's so handy when you set out in a hurry and forget. Stop off at their stall and for £5 you go away with ears properly dressed for whatever meeting you hope to impress. Back home, they join other Argenta pairs holding their own among swinging ethnics and flashy sparklers from more rarefied retailers. I hope they do a roaring trade in Northampton, recently declared the bling capital of Britain.
Bling is riding high, it seems, with residents of Northampton loaded with £469 of jewellery every day. In Glasgow the sum is £468; in Wrexham £460. London is some way down the list, each of us sporting a mere £286. In fact, the findings are shot through with incongruities. Do these statistics include men, illegal immigrants, residents in Her Majesty's prisons, and old people's care homes? That they probably include engagement rings and good watches makes the statistic less surprising. No shock discovery, then, except that many of us like wearing the stuff. The research was dreamed up by Halifax Home Insurance, no doubt in the hope of getting us jumpy about theft and loss. The Halifax is the bank of choice for the gypsy community, who safeguard their gold by decking their young women. Perhaps the rest of us are doing the same.
The whole giddy story serves to point up just how much appearance matters. Even those with little to spend doll up with chains and beads, fingers full of rings, wrists jangling, even noses and lips twinkling with studs and stones. As a tribe, we are certainly into the business of body decoration and, like all tribes, much given to judging people by how they dress. It relates obliquely to the sudden surge in the talk about toffs that is currently infecting political reporting.
Labour supporters in the Crewe by-election, desperate at the dire Labour standing, are running an "anti-toff" campaign against the Tory candidate who just happens to be heir to the Timpson shoe fortune and lives in a big house. Activists wearing top hats and tails have been stalking him, and greeted David Cameron; flyers have featured top hats too. If they could have hired Bullingdon Club tailcoats I'm sure they would have done. When Boris Johnson was elected Mayor of London the same allegations of toffery flew, only to be squashed by the disclosure that his great-grandfather was interior minister of Turkey. Perhaps that doesn't count.
It's all beginning to look a little stupid. But it points up a paradox of current politics. The old war between the working classes and the upper classes, with the workers uniting to resist being exploited by their rich employers, bit the dust when the workers' party turned Tory, and began privatising even more than Mrs Thatcher and devising taxes that hit their own. At the same time, the resurgent Tory party seems to have deserted its flirtation with hard-working middle-class leaders – Edward Heath and Margaret Thatcher – and reverted to those of title and breeding. Far too many of the Shadow Cabinet, and now the mayor's office, come from the same school and the same university. Pity Douglas Hurd, whose 1990 bid to be Tory leader was said to have been blighted by his being an old Etonian.
Does any of this matter? In bling terms, it doesn't. The world of film and football celebrity has created its own aristocracy of achievement and fame. It's great to see girls on the street with their peacock pleasure in gaudy dress with as much confidence as their icons from Sex and the City. No one need feel socially inferior any more. Indeed, more and more people are confident of all their many legal entitlements and keen in their pursuit.
When it comes to leadership and judgement, it shouldn't matter any more who has the most wealth, posh homes, titled connections. But when a group of such people of similar background and interests, cluster together within one influential group – in this case the Shadow Cabinet – it does matter. In August 2006 there were 15 old Etonian office-holders on Cameron's front bench. There have been comings and goings since then, but two of the top Tory jobs, leader and London Mayor, are still Etonian-held. Not surprisingly, they have many skills between them. You don't pay £28,000 a year unless you get small classes, excellent teachers, civilised surroundings and values. David Cameron is rightly credited with charm and understanding. But he comes from a tiny elite. As I hope Crewe will tell him, it's time he looked further afield.




Comments
21 Comments
Yet another sneering article from a member of the leftist chattering classes who are positively panicking at the prospect of a swing to the Right in British politics.
Just what is it with the Independent at the moment? This article is almost as bad as Howard Jacobson's article on Boris Johnson.
Your attempts to suppress your dread at such a swing to the Tories are obvious and wholly laughable. Come mid-2010, the only people who will be prepared to listen to you will be your fellow champagne socialist-esque chatterers. When working-class communities in South Wales start voting Tory, as they did on May 1st, you know the tide is turning.
And the fact that your rhetoric that they should "keep the faith" etc. does nothing to convince them any more must positiviely scare you witless. Your grip on the debate agenda is going, going, and by the next election: GONE.
And I, and only God knows how many others, cannot wait.
Posted by Joe | 17.05.08, 16:48 GMT
Come off it Joan. I think that you are taking the p*ss. This class war isn't between the WC and the Toffs it's between lefty ideologues like yourself and those better off and more privileged than you. If you came to my local and heard my family and mates talking about politics you would be depressed. The bookies, fitters, dustmen and builders I know couldn't care less about the Toffs. These people earn a good living and aren't filled with the envy that possesses many of the middle-class who think that they are owed an easy life.
The messianic Nu-Labor project despises the WC. It hates what we drink, what we eat, what we watch on TV and any way in which we take our pleasures. My brother is going horse racing today and you can be sure of one thing; the Duke and the dustman both like a drink and a flutter. Is it any wonder that Nu-Labor puritans (and the inevitable hypocrisy that attends such a dogmatic religion) have lost their grip on what used to be its core constituency.
p.s. Shame on you Joan for using the word 'bling'. A seat on a breakfast TV sofa awaits you.
Posted by Terry Walpole | 17.05.08, 08:32 GMT
By the way, Joan, you are a representative of a tiny elite, a posh leftie toff, the type who is hugely overrepresented in the media, particularly the BBC. Give me an unashamed toff any day.
Posted by Trofim | 17.05.08, 05:51 GMT
Class is simply a perception of how we view the world. To view something without bias is to view it without class. The dream of socialism - a classless society, isn't achieved by toff-bashing - but by realising that the fact that they are toffs is completely irrelevant.
Simple, it seems, and yet completely ungraspable to our ever more desperate looking goverment. They should quit the toff-bashing and simply attack the tories on (lack of) policy, however hypocritical this may seem.
Posted by Charlie Peters | 16.05.08, 14:29 GMT
Precisely, Robert Everitt. I too could not care less if our leaders went to Eton or Bash St, only that they fulfil their promises in an open and honest way. Let's hope that next lot, wherever educated, show that they have the slightest interest in the lives and fortunes of the electorate and serve us without deceit.
Posted by Martin Dale | 16.05.08, 13:11 GMT
Softly Joan.for, from the view available to many millions of voters you are a toff.This working class lad has no envy of those who avail themselves of the best in education,nor that they have a social circle that does not include me (nor you, it would seem).
If I can avoid the politics of envy surely you can.
From our next political elite, following the faliure of the present one, we require competence.No accent or school, or Cabinet minister's nationality can can guarentee it, but neither can a pedigree of which you might approve.
Pehaps a different political ideal might serve.
Posted by robert everitt | 16.05.08, 12:21 GMT
It seems a little sad to base a whole toff-knocking piece on a falsehood. George Osborne is no more an Old Etonian than you are, Joan. The only other Old Etonian in the Shadow Cabinet is Oliver Letwin. How many public schoolboys and girls are in the Labour Cabinet?
Posted by Baskerville | 16.05.08, 12:02 GMT
ian Bilbey | 16.05.08, 10:54 GMT
Personally I'd much rather they were intelligent with experience of the real world. Any fool can be educated if their parents have the money and some of the "jobs" our MPs have held down before going into Parliament don't exactly fill me with confidence as to their abilities.
Posted by flipped | 16.05.08, 11:48 GMT
What a load of rubbish, and ill-informed rubbish at that, as others have pointed out, because George Osborne went to St Paul's. And you only get 3 Old Etonians in the top 3 jobs by making mayor of Londno one and ignornig the shadow home secretary and shadow foreign secretary.
You mgiht as well say that Gordon Brown (Primie Minister), Alatstair Darling (Chancellor of the Exchequer), Des Browne (Defence). Douglas Alexander (International Development) are all Scots who were educated at Scottish schools and universities and have no understanding lf life south of the border.
Funnily enough, I think that Crewe and Natwich may have more of a mesage for the scots than the "toffs".
Posted by Mark | 16.05.08, 11:13 GMT
George Osborne did not go to Eton but to St Paul's. William Hague was at Rotherham Comprehensive and David Davis was at Bec Grammar School.
Please get your facts right.
Posted by NBeale | 16.05.08, 11:10 GMT
21 Comments