Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 5° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Joan Smith: Everyone, it seems, has a theory about Madeleine

Friday, 8 August 2008

Fifteen months after the disappearance of Madeleine McCann from her parents' holiday apartment in Portugal, the mystery of her whereabouts is as compelling as ever. At least two new theories have emerged this week, one involving a paedophile ring in Belgium and the other a possible sighting in Amsterdam.

The less sinister of the two is based on an incident not long after the disappearance, when a little girl answering Madeleine's description apparently told a shop assistant in Amsterdam that she had been taken from her mother. The other involves a "spotter" photographing Madeleine in Portugal, sending the images to paedophiles in Belgium and then kidnapping the child to order.

Both theories emerged as the police released files on the case, which were immediately seized on as containing significant pointers to Madeleine's fate. Her parents' decision to launch a massive publicity campaign, which was understandable in terms of their desperate situation, produced thousands of sightings in the weeks after the little girl disappeared; most of them were well-meaning but mistaken and there is no evidence that the Amsterdam lead is any different. When a second woman came forward this week, asserting that she too had spotted Madeleine in Amsterdam, it emerged that the local police had responded promptly to her call and decided it was a case of mistaken identity.

"Maddie" has been spotted all over Europe and indeed in Morocco, where a sighting of a blonde child caused great excitement before turning out to have an innocent explanation. Many of these "leads" are based on nothing more substantial than calls to the police switchboard from members of the public who have been racking their brains in the hope of remembering something that might help; the McCanns' media strategy has worked, insofar as it has made millions of people feel personally involved in their daughter's disappearance, but the truth is that most of us have nothing to offer that might help. With reporters hungry for new angles, tip-offs and cases of mistaken identity have been elevated into sensational developments that will supposedly crack the case, producing unbearable feelings of disappointment when they go nowhere.

Few criminal investigations have produced such an intense craving to become involved, but there are parallels. From the beginning, the McCann case has had echoes of the kidnapping in 1932 of the Lindbergh baby, the 20-month-old son of the celebrated aviator Charles Lindbergh, which attracted the intense interest of everyone from the US President to prominent members of the mafia. (It also changed US law, leading to kidnapping becoming a federal offence.)

One of the ransom notes was leaked to a newspaper, prompting a rash of false claims and letters, and all sorts of theories were floated to establish the toddler's whereabouts. But the case ended tragically when his body was found in woods two miles from his parents' house in New Jersey. A German carpenter, Bruno Hauptmann, was convicted and sent to the electric chair four years later.

The reason that a minority of cases catch the public imagination is not just to do with the family's relationship with the media, although the McCanns have become as well known as the Lindberghs in the months since their daughter was spirited from Praia da Luz. As well as incarnating parents' deepest fears, the disappearance (and reappearance) of children is a regular feature of myths and fairy stories, a fact which has clearly, if unconsciously, influenced the theories floated by newspapers.

A persistent theme in coverage of the McCann case is the sighting of a flustered woman, dragging a reluctant toddler in her wake, who has taken Madeleine to fulfil her craving for a child; in this narrative, Madeleine functions as a changeling who might one day be reunited with her real family.

Then there are the strangers with evil intent, who prey on children and steal them for their own wicked purposes; two decades ago, they would have been on the look-out for children to use in Satanic rites, but now they come in the more up-to-date guise of paedophiles.

This is not to argue that such explanations for Madeleine's disappearance could not possibly be true, but it does sound a warning note about placing too much credence in new "leads" unsupported by hard evidence. For more than a year now, the McCanns have been searching for their daughter amid headlines which have repeatedly presented speculation as fact. Tragically for them, the huge publicity surrounding the case has thus far been much more effective in producing fantasies than the breakthrough which might lead to her recovery.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

67 Comments

If madeline was seen in a a bank in belgium,should it not be possible to check what accounts were accessed on the day and rule out or find the person madeline was with on the day????
I do not think it will help with the search,papers been leaked ever sighting.

Posted by pat | 10.08.08, 20:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

i agree. The only real facts here are that a little girl is missing and needs to be found.

Posted by debbie | 10.08.08, 17:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I noticed the other day that the Independent had copied the habit of tabloids that use dubious quotes in headlines to suggest a breakthrough yet the main article tells a different story. Please for the sake of decent journalism stop covering this story unless there is any actual news.

Posted by mark | 09.08.08, 10:58 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I have hoped for over a year that John o Connor,John Stalker and Commander Yates of Scotland Yard,if agreeable,got officially involved as some sort of focus group.
I firmly believe the child is still within the vicinity.All this Belgium talk is wasteful,disgraceful nonsense.
An Immediate house to house search in Praia da Luz was a squandered opportunity.All decent people would have agreed to it.

Posted by mick,Glasgow | 09.08.08, 09:07 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

It is disturbing that, perhaps due in part to the readiness of the McCanns to take legal action against them, the majority of newspapers seem to have adopted a policy of fawning all over this couple.

It is somewhat galling to be repeatedly reminded that they intend to leave 'no stone unturned' when they are looking to swell the coffers of their fund. I would find this a slightly more credible stance had it not transpired that they were not willing to return to Portugal to take part in a reconstruction, and had we not been able to see from the case files that Kate McCann withdrew her co-operation on being made an arguido.

So far, I have heard them or their agents repeatedly heap blame upon the PJ.
They have however, never accepted blame themselves. Kate frequently says she has to remind herself she is a good mother, that she loves her daughter - sounds remarkably like finding an excuse for her own lamentable performance as a parent. They failed that child - one way or another.

Posted by Bridget | 09.08.08, 04:37 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Just a suggestion. Why doesn't the Independent concentrate on one line of investigation the PJ rather inexplicably left to the LP instead of the Gardaï : I mean the Martin Smith family. Where did they cross the man carrying the child ? What did they exactly say to him ? What reason did they imagine at the moment for his not replying? Isn't the fact he didn't reply very significant ? Did he keep silent in order not to be identified as a British ? Is there another possible explanation ? When you cross someone in Spring and at night in such a little village at least you say "hello". I wonder if the Smith family would have remembered that man had he answered them.
We don't know how the man was carrying the child. Exactly as GMcC does when coming out of the plane ? The head of the child against his left shoulder ? They spoke of a "clumsy" gesture. What did they mean ? On the photograph GMcC carrying a twin doesn't look clumsy at all. What was clumsy then ? The child's position ?

Posted by ana betancourt | 09.08.08, 02:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Message to the British Media


THE SHEEPLE ARENT FOOLED.!!!!!!!!

But I thankyou .. the Independant for this piece and allowing gen uine searching questions to be posted.

However I would have expected a Newspaper of this callibre...to have done some good old investigative journalism.

WHAT ARE YOU ALL SCARED OF?????

Posted by Scud Fraser | 09.08.08, 00:50 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Too much 'fantasy', from the McCanns, from the very beginning, is what derailed this case. Why? It has always made them look as though they had, and still have, something to hide.

Now that the police files are open, why not do some proper investigative journalism- starting with a full and objective reading of ALL the information contained in them? As others have already pointed out, the really interesting material in the files has nothing to do with ridiculous, patently false and long-discounted 'sightings'. Start with the compelling evidence from the British dogs. And when is someone going to confront Kate McCann about her disgusting failure to answer simple questions, and thus cooperate with the police force who were trying to find the daughter they neglected in favour of nights out with their friends?

Why are the British press and media unique in Europe (and possibly the world) in being seemingly unable to look at more than one viewpoint regarding this case?

Posted by Ruth | 09.08.08, 00:02 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I have to admit to finding the xenophobic attitude towards the Portuguese police one of the most disturbing aspects of this case. This attitude has been perfectly illustrated by certain sections of the press - not the Independent, I hasten to add - and also by the McCann's public relations machine. It is worth considering two points here. Regardless of whether they have been able to find sufficient evidence to charge the parents with a crime, it would have been completely remiss of the PJ not to have regarded the McCanns as suspects right from the beginning - partly because in the majority of cases where a child disappears, a close family member is involved, and also because of the circumstances involving Madeleines disappearance. Dress it up however one likes, but it is not normal and acceptable behaviour for parents to leave such tiny children unattended. To blame the police for not being able to find the child they lost is pretty disgusting, I think. They are not miracle workers.

Posted by Bridget | 08.08.08, 23:06 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

For all you so called journalist and news reporters we are sick of hearing about new so called sightings of Madeleine.Canyou please stop insulting are intelligence and get down to the real story.

YOU ALL SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES>

Posted by casey | 08.08.08, 22:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

67 Comments

Columnist Comments

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The greasy gravy train of lobbyism

The idiocy and graft at work in the system barely merits a second glance.

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: When 'life' should mean life.

Sometimes the public feel the perpetrator should not be released.

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

Why was Damian Green arrested with such spectacular insensitivity?