Johann Hari: Don't let the Games blind us to the plight of China's workers
This is a dictatorship we aid every day – through our government, corporations, and choices at the till
Thursday, 7 August 2008
Over the next three weeks, we will watch a slick propaganda parade of Chinese "sporting heroes". But we will not see China's true heroes in the glittering stadiums of Beijing – because they are in prison, or they have "disappeared." If you are indiscreet enough to ask after them, you will be instantly smeared as "anti-Chinese".
But what are these critics saying? Liu Shaokun is a young teacher in Sichuan Province. He watched his pupils die in the earthquake because their school was built using cheap substandard materials, by corrupt officials who pocketed the change. He took photographs to prove it and posted them on the internet. So he has been seized and indefinitely imprisoned without trial. Is he anti-Chinese?
Chen Guangcheng is a blind self-taught lawyer who exposed the government's policy of forcibly sterilising disabled Chinese women. So he has been jailed for four years. Is he anti-Chinese? Jiang Yanyong is a doctor who exposed the government's attempt to cover up the SARS outbreak, saving tens of thousands of Chinese lives. So he is under indefinite house arrest after a lengthy "re-education". Is he anti-Chinese?
Yet many of us want to believe we are being tolerant – and even anti-racist – by sticking our fingers in our ears when it comes to the conflict within China. Why? Because our silent societal taboo: we aid and abet the Chinese dictatorship every day. Through our government. Through our corporations. And – crucially – through our choices at the till. At some semiconscious level, we don't want the Chinese people to be allowed to speak and assemble and think freely – because it would mean we had to pay more.
Meet the young women crammed into damp dormitories in China's River Pearl Delta, and they will tell you why. These women – mostly teenagers, or in their early twenties – made most of the goods in your home. Like 200 million other young Chinese workers, they have made the epic journey from China's villages to its metastasising factory-towns, in search of a job. They live in their factories, sleeping on bunk-beds; they tell themselves they will do the job for a decade, then leave.
The China Labour Bulletin conducted a study of their lives. Ms Zhang, a 21-year-old woman who made artificial Christmas trees, was a typical interviewee. "We worked seven days a week, and we only had three days off a year," she says. "We worked overtime every night until 10 in the evening. The workshop was always filled with smoke. You couldn't see very far. When you entered the room, your eyes burned and watered, and you had difficulty breathing."
One night, Ms Zhang – exhausted and sore-eyed – was pushing plastic through an iron-roller when she felt terrible pain. Her hand was trapped. She was taken to hospital for extensive skin-grafts. Two weeks later the factory abruptly stopped paying for the medical treatment. They told her to get back to work. "I felt like jumping out of a window," she told the researchers. The skin on her hand is still peeling and painful.
"When you enter this factory," another young woman says, "you are under their control. If you get tired and want to stretch your neck or look around, you can't. They won't even allow you to look around!" If you do, you are docked the day's wages. To prevent workers from trying to seek out better factories, it's normal to pay two or three months in arrears. If you quit, do you get the backlog? Never.
The women were all worried that making our goods was wrecking their bodies. A 17-year-old explained: "We often come into contact with paint thinner. It stinks something awful, and you get pimples all over your face. We know it's bad for you to breathe in but what can we do?" She talked nervously about colleagues who had miscarried, and another who developed leukaemia. "I find it really hard to recover when I get sick these days. I've had a cold for a month now and it just won't go away. [One of my room-mates'] periods have stopped, and she's afraid it is because of the radiation from the electronic parts she has to handle."
Occasionally, inspectors from Western multinationals arrive – but the women are drilled to give false answers. Every month, 50,000 fingers are sliced off in Chinese factories; every year, 130,000 Chinese people die in them, while more than a million contract fatal diseases.
These women – and hundreds of millions like them – want to be able to band together and demand better conditions. But they are prevented, by law. Only one trade union is allowed in China – and it is controlled by the government and designed to suppress labour, not represent it.
If you try to organise independent of this bogus trade union in the workplace – to demand breathing masks, say – you are beaten, or put in prison. It is a strange hybrid: a Maoist police state, enforcing the most extreme model of capitalism.
Nonetheless, the Chinese people are kicking back: there are 87,000 workplace protests a year. Last year, there was a tumult in Chinese factories after a string of workers died of organ failure while doing 50-hour shifts. The panicked Chinese government was poised to make a major concession: they were going to allow the formation of elected trade unions in the factories.
It was startling: independent political organisations? Elected? In China? But it didn't happen – because there was panic from rich-world investors. Organised workers can ask for more safety measures, and better wages. Microsoft, Nike, Ford, Dell and others – acting through the American Chamber of Commerce – swiftly announced the laws were "unaffordable" and "dangerous", and muttered they might look elsewhere. European and American governments parroted the corporate line. Far from lobbying for freedom, they enthusiastically lobbied against it. So the Chinese dictatorship watered down the proposals, and the girls of the Pearl Delta factories are stuck. This isn't Chinese "culture" – it's our corporate culture's wet dream, forced on them.
Does this system work well for us in the rich world? If we can silence our consciences, yes, we get cheaper goods; communist suppression knocks pounds off your weekly shopping bill. But there is another price tag. All over the world, wages are artificially depressed because you are competing with a workforce that is prevented by a police state from asking for more.
And in the long term, there is a darker price still. The great true cliché of our age is that China is rising. (Cue the famous Napoleon quote, and on and on.) Do you want all that power in the hands of a sober government that is becoming steadily more accountable to its people – or a dictatorship that will look hungrily for foreign enemies to distract its people? Today – as we snuffle for the cheapest possible Chinese goods, and politely ignore the vanished Chinese defenders of human rights – we are all lobbying for the dictators to prevail.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
55 Comments
P Lloyd. "J Gunder and John Doe clearly know very little about how business works in China." That is where you are so wrong! You have no idea the extensive first hand business exposure I have in China. So, please don't show your ignorance. Go see first hand how the Chinese business is really done.
Posted by J Gunder | 08.08.08, 17:57 GMT
John Appleby "One can expect stupidity and ignorance from the Chinese people who have their thoughts and ideas shaped by the state. Those who refuse to conform of course become enemies of the state and are sent away for -re-education. "
Surprise! From which under which stone you had been hiding all these years? This is the biggest joke I have heard recently if it is not pathetically bigoted and racist. Pls wake up, stop hiding in your little hole and go see the world. It has changed since.
Posted by John Doe | 08.08.08, 17:51 GMT
DJ
"If a chinese company abuses it's employees (the chinese citizens, you know, the people that the government is supposed to serve) and the government enables/turns a blind eye to the abuse, then yes, it is partially the Chinese government's fault."
So, in your infinite wisdom, you know how to manage the hundreds if not thousands of mid and lower level government organisations how not to enable/turn a blind eye to such abuse? Talk is easy and cheap. You think governing a billion highly individualistic populace is just as easy?
Posted by John Doe | 08.08.08, 17:46 GMT
Martyn son
Thanks for the demented psychotic, anti Amirican rant. Very childish. If it wasnt for the Americans, you would be speaking German.
How would YOU have dealt with Hitler, send in a crack division of vegetarian social workers to Berlin.
How old are you ? 7 or 8 . Which is it ?
Posted by Wilhelm | 08.08.08, 09:29 GMT
Hi Wilhelm, thanks for calling me a liberal. The ultimate compliment and spot on. As a liberal I am a passionate supporter of liberty and the right to be free. That means I that I am not blind to Chinas faults or those of the countries that represent my own culture. However, it does mean that I don't reach for a B52 every time someone gets up my nose. Which, when you think about it is a good thing.
Posted by martyn | 08.08.08, 07:01 GMT
Hey Beth - you're absoloutely right: business interests have never ever had anything to do with the extension of opportunity. Do you want to show that that fact is wrong, or just live in an anti-capitalistic fantasy-land?
But, I'm sure you do NOT believe that, just like I do not believe that they only ever have provided opportunity. If you look a bit closer at what I wrote I said that business do accelerate opportunity, not that the ONLY accelerate opportunity.
But the basic truth remains that if you create a job - wether you are a large business or a small one - you are creating something which was not there before for somebody else: an opportunity.
The problem with these articles is that they so often ignore the fact that in the overwhelming majority of cases businesses do very good things like providing jobs for other people, thus leaving an impression of "capitalism only ever = a bad thing" in the mind of the reader.
Posted by Bertie | 07.08.08, 23:03 GMT
Martyn
Thanks for the nutty liberal rant.
Posted by Wilhelm | 07.08.08, 22:36 GMT
Martyn
Thanks for the nutty liberal rant.
Posted by Wilhelm | 07.08.08, 22:34 GMT
China has crammed 200 years of the West's industrial and social revolution into thirty years. It is unfair to expect them to be just like Sweden. But they are working on it and may well get there in another thirty years given the chance. How many years ago was it America was napalming Vietnamese villagers killing over a million people? How many wepons has Britain sold to oppresive regimes throughout the world. How many years ago did these two tell their citizens a pack of lies as an excuse to invade and rape another country. How many people has China lifted out of poverty in the last decade. More than all Europe and America combined. Of course it is not a paradise, but nor is anywhere else. China will sort out it's own problems bit by bit and will be all the better for it. They do not need our 'help'.
Posted by martyn | 07.08.08, 22:18 GMT
Deborah: "We need to clean up our own house before anyone will listen to us pontificate about human rights and the "rule of law." "
Deborah, I suggest you, along with a good many other posters on this blog, try reading JH's article properly. He actually pinpoints the worst offenders as the multinational corporations, backed by the rich world's govts, who have pressurised the Chinese govt into NOT introducing decent rights for workers.
Posted by bill h | 07.08.08, 22:14 GMT
55 Comments