Commentators

4° London Hi 5°C / Lo 1°C

Johann Hari: Life-threatening disease is the price we pay for cheap meat

Modern factory farms have created a 'perfect storm' environment for powerful viruses

A swelling number of scientists believe swine flu has not happened by accident. No: they argue that this global pandemic – and all the deaths we are about to see – is the direct result of our demand for cheap meat. So is the way we produce our food really making us sick as a pig?

At first glance, this seems wrong. All through history, viruses have mutated, and sometimes they have taken nasty forms that scythe through the human population. This is an inescapable reality we just have to live with, like earthquakes and tsunamis. But the scientific evidence increasingly suggests that we have unwittingly invented an artificial way to accelerate the evolution of these deadly viruses – and pump them out across the world. They are called factory farms. They manufacture low-cost flesh, with a side-dish of viruses to go.

To understand how this might happen, you have to compare two farms. My grandparents had a pig farm in the Swiss mountains, with around 20 swine at any one time. What happened there if, in the bowels of one of their pigs, a virus mutated and took on a deadlier form? At every stage, the virus would meet stiff resistance from the pigs' immune systems. They were living in fresh air, on the diet they evolved with, and without stress – so they had a robust ability to fight back. If the virus did take hold, it would travel only as far as the sick hog could walk. So if the virus would then have around 20 other pigs to spread and mutate in – before it would hit the end of its own evolutionary path, and die off. If it was a really lucky, plucky virus, it might make it to market – where it would come up against more healthy pigs living in small herds. It had little opportunity to fan out across a large population of pigs or evolve a strain that could be transmitted to humans.

Now compare this to what happens when a virus evolves in a modern factory farm. In most swine farms today, 6,000 pigs are crammed snout-to-snout in tiny cages where they can barely move, and are fed for life on an artificial pulp, while living on top of cess-pools of their own stale faeces.

Instead of having just 20 pigs to experiment and evolve in, the virus now has a pool of thousands, constantly infecting and reinfecting each other. The virus can combine and recombine again and again. The ammonium from the waste they live above burns the pigs' respiratory tracts, making it easier yet for viruses to enter them. Better still, the pigs' immune systems are in free-fall. They are stressed, depressed, and permanently in panic, making them far easier to infect. There is no fresh air or sunlight to bolster their natural powers of resistance. They live in air thick with viral loads, and they are exposed every time they breathe in.

As Dr Michael Greger, director of Public Health and Animal Agriculture at the Humane Society of the United States, explains: "Put all this together, and you have a perfect storm environment for these super-strains. If you wanted to create global pandemics, you'd build as many of these factory farms as possible. That's why the development of swine flu isn't a surprise to those in the public health community. In 2003, the American Public Health Association – the oldest and largest in world – called for a moratorium of factory farming because they saw something like this would happen. It may take something as serious as a pandemic to make us realise the real cost of factory farming."

Many of the detailed studies of factory farms that have been emerging in the past few years reinforce this argument. Dr Ellen Silbergeld is Professor of Environmental Health Sciences at Johns Hopkins University. She tells me that her detailed, on-the-ground studies led her to conclude that there is "very much" a link from factory farms to the new, more powerful forms of flu we are experiencing. "Instead of a virus only having one spin of the roulette wheel, it has thousands and thousands of spins, for no extra cost. It drives the evolution of new diseases."

Until yesterday, we could only speculate about the origins of the current H1N1 virus killing human beings – but now we know more. The Centre for Computational Biology at Columbia University has studied the virus and now believes that it is not a new emergence of a triple human-swine-bird flu virus. It is a slight variant on a virus we have seen before. We can see its family tree – and its daddy was a virus that evolved in the artificial breeding ground of a vast factory farm in North Carolina.

Did this strain evolve, too, in the same circumstances? Already, the evidence is suggestive, although far from conclusive. We know that the city where this swine flu first emerged – Perote, Mexico – contains a massive industrial pig farm, and houses 950,000 pigs. Dr Silbergeld adds: "Factory farms are not biosecure at all. People are going in and out all the time. If you stand a few miles down-wind from a factory farm, you can pick up the pathogens easily. And manure from these farms isn't always disposed of."

It's no coincidence that we have seen a sudden surge of new viruses in the past decade at precisely the moment when factory farming has intensified so dramatically. For example, between 1994 and 2001, the number of American pigs that live and die in vast industrial farms in the US spiked from 10 per cent to 72 per cent. Swine flu had been stable since 1918 – and then suddenly, in this period, went super-charged.

How much harm will we do to ourselves in the name of cheap meat? We know that bird flu developed in the world's vast poultry farms. And we know that pumping animal feed full of antibiotics in factory farms has given us a new strain of MRSA. It's a simple, horrible process. The only way to keep animals alive in such conditions is to pump their feed full of antibiotics. But this has triggered an arms race with bacteria, which start evolving to beat the antibiotics – and emerge as in the end as pumped-up, super-charged bacteria invulnerable to our medical weapons. This system gave birth to a new kind of MRSA that now makes up 20 per cent of all human infections with the virus. Sir Liam Donaldson, the British government's Chief Medical Officer, warns: "Every inappropriate use in animals or agriculture [of antibiotics] is potentially a death warrant for a future patient."

Of course, agribusinesses is desperate to deny all this is happening: their bottom line depends on keeping this model on its shaky trotters. But once you factor in the cost of all these diseases and pandemics, cheap meat suddenly looks like an illusion.

We always knew that factory farms were a scar on humanity's conscience – but now we fear they are a scar on our health. If we carry on like this, bird flu and swine flu will be just the beginning of a century of viral outbreaks. As we witness a global pandemic washing across the world, we need to shut down these virus factories – before they shut down even more human lives.

j.hari@independent.co.uk

More from Johann Hari

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
You reap what you sow
[info]ftgt wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 12:53 am (UTC)
The cruelty and stupidity of mankind never ceases to amaze. Time for a coplete rethink on modern factory farming.
Pig Sick
[info]dixiedean99 wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 03:45 am (UTC)
Not to be complacent, but am I the only one who feels part of some huge civil defence exercise? That in itself wouldn't be such a bad thing, but why do the powers that be refuse to let us in on this stuff. More at

http://foot-and-mouth.blogspot.com/2009/04/im-guessing-im-not-only-poor-soul.html
There's more bad news to eating meat than that
[info]panchoangry wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 03:55 am (UTC)
I've recently been diagnosed with cancer and looked far and wide for help. The biggest new idea I've found is that eating meat tends to confuse our immune system. When we leave off eating meat, our immune system targets the tumors far more readily, sending cancer into remission. If you're battling cancer, give a vegan, or at least vegetarian diet a try!
Re: There's more bad news to eating meat than that
[info]fakhry wrote:
Saturday, 2 May 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)
what about vegetarian animal that offered meat to eat ?
Virus will come to caw,goat,bird,.....?
We change what GOD told us to do!
[info]alexweir1949 wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 05:15 am (UTC)
Yet another case which confounds modern-day conventional wisdom as espoused by Thatcher, World Bank, and neo-cons - that market forces left to their own devices will create the best of all possible worlds. T
Conventional wisdom is wrong again....
[info]alexweir1949 wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 05:20 am (UTC)
Conventional wisdom is wrong again....

Yet another case which confounds modern-day conventional wisdom as espoused by Thatcher, World Bank, and neo-cons - that market forces left to their own devices will create the best of all possible worlds. Time for a long hard look at where the world, humanity and society are and where we are heading. Time for ordinary citizens to flex their political muscles. Time to eliminate the situation whereby 1% of the world's population dictate to the other 99% what happens, where and when (and what doesnt happen). This kind of stuff is much bigger than puerile national politics and the pathetic efforts of amateurs and incompetents like Brown, Cameron and Blair. Mr Alex Weir, Gaborone and Harare.
Re: Conventional wisdom is wrong again....
[info]bowesy wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 08:20 am (UTC)
and your point - aside from a bit of grandstanding, is?
Re: Conventional wisdom is wrong again.... - [info]errol888flynn - Friday, 1 May 2009 at 03:31 pm (UTC) Expand
Swine flu and intensive farming
[info]wilsoan wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 05:40 am (UTC)
It is true that a pathogen which arises in an intensive farm has more opportunities to infect its neighbours and spread than one which appears in a small extensive herd. However, new flu viruses have historically arisen in extensive farming systems, typically in villages in China where humans, pigs and ducks live in close proximity and their viruses mix and share their genes, occasionally producing a new variant. These new viruses will take longer to spread and cause a pandemic, but eventually they will.
Re: Swine flu and intensive farming
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 03:40 pm (UTC)
In rural communities throughout China humans have lived in close proximity to pigs and ducks for over 2,000 years. Only during the 20th century, and especially the last 10 years, have problems arisen. So unfortunately, your reasoning does not add up.

Factory farming is the principal culprit. End of story!

Putting it bluntly, killing off Factory Farming has now become a predicate for ensuring our own survival.

I personally don't care if a several factory farm businesses go bust and their owners suffer. They should have thought through the consequences of their actions in the first place. Good riddance.

If truth be known, Factory Farm owners and their investors do not care about the public, and they sure as h*ll don't care about the animals they are raising for slaughter.
Re: Swine flu and intensive farming - [info]crinne - Friday, 1 May 2009 at 06:24 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Swine flu and intensive farming - [info]errol888flynn - Saturday, 2 May 2009 at 06:27 am (UTC) Expand
Animals in the Digestive System
[info]sehaalturk wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 05:47 am (UTC)
Animals do not pray,and yet, this increasingly looks like divine justice.
When will they ever learn?
[info]aartbrouwer wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 06:26 am (UTC)
This article begs for a successor that blames the H1N1 virus on global warming, and a third that blames it on the CIA/Mossad/AlQaeda. By that time I will have stopped reading The Independent altogether.
Bird flu
[info]oomigoolies wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 07:40 am (UTC)
I'd love to hear this idiot Hari's reasoning behind avian flu.

What a cretin.
Ammonium
[info]julianlzb87 wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 07:49 am (UTC)
Ammonia
nothing new yet again!
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 07:53 am (UTC)
yes, OK, but nothing new here- its been known for years that human contact with other animals has been the source of many human infectious diseases, the closer the contact the greater the risk;

today's problems are the result of just 2 factors : out of control human population explosion, and the inevitable evolution of stock farming into factory farming to meet the inevitable explosion in human protein requirements;

nothing will really change until the sacred cow of the human 'right' to reproduce is well and truly slaughtered!
Re: nothing new yet again!
[info]letthemlive wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 01:07 pm (UTC)
... and the human 'right' to eat any other creature he chooses
Re: nothing new yet again! - [info]fastguyeddie - Friday, 1 May 2009 at 01:26 pm (UTC) Expand
We have few doctors or they will only come when they are paid.
[info]famulla wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 07:55 am (UTC)
ALL religions are man made. Yes. I admit that this is true. We manipulated our souls. I admit that we have done wrongs to ourselves. The verse I wrote is from the holy Book. The men change this has nothing to do with chicken feeding in the states where there is no food. However, the delicacy is with us. The chicken drumstick, chicken sandwich, the liver. The book talks of Swine and not Chicken. When we get the flu, we run to the doctors who run to the laboratories.
We choose to look for the quick fix, cheap meat from not known farms, pay them little, so they in turn economize on feeds, and the cycle goes on. We know of this when we have the deaths around. We have few doctors or they will only come when they are paid.
Tell me, where are we going?
Interest rate & Pig are a lesson to lean this year.
[info]fakhry wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 08:12 am (UTC)
Dr Ellen Silbergeld is Professor of Environmental Health Sciences at Johns Hopkins University. She tells me that her detailed, on-the-ground studies led her to conclude that there is "very much" a link from factory farms to the new, more powerful forms of flu we are experiencing. "Instead of a virus only having one spin of the roulette wheel, it has thousands and thousands of spins, for no extra cost. It drives the evolution of new diseases."
"More powerful form of flu" is still controversial,.more powerful form still to come.
I wish "Hari " to think Why some Religion do not accept Pig as the feeding meat ?
Interest rate and Pig are a lesson to learn this year.
this is God Hints to us all.
Re: Interest rate & Pig are a lesson to lean this year.
[info]janebolacha wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 02:55 pm (UTC)
Well, I was just waiting for someone to say this is God's Punishment! It took longer than I'd expected. At least you didn't say it was because of gay marriage, no doubt some Christian nutter will spew out that one.
You Are Desperately Lighting Smokescreens - [info]errol888flynn - Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 09:10 am (UTC) Expand
Right?
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 08:19 am (UTC)
Yeah right. So we know the flu virus is a nasty one. Millions died in the past without intensive farming?? Oddly enough it was low intensity , I've got a chicken in my back yard 'farming' that killed off a swathe of the developed World's population. Hari's got an Aids complex-moderate your bedroom behaviour accordingly.

Mine's a double bacon and egg sandwich.
Re: Right?
[info]ganef wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 12:27 pm (UTC)
Since when did a nice Jewish boy like you take to eating bacon sandwiches?
[info]drug_baron wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 08:35 am (UTC)
Jewish grandparents breeding 20 pigs on a Swiss farm ?? Thats a really convincing argument to support your article !!

Was the Pork being sold to the local Kosher butchery ??
You cannot compare 20 pigs to 6,000
[info]iunomoneta wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 09:35 am (UTC)
You would have to compare the chances of a virus developing at 300 small farms to a single farm of of 6,000. If you do this then the comparasion is less convincing.
Re: You cannot compare 20 pigs to 6,000 - [info]cunningtourist - Friday, 1 May 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC) Expand
No evidence! Another opionated media person.
[info]therealskipper wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 09:49 am (UTC)

Well it may be true that modern pig frams are awful places - it certainly sounded like it from the description that I read. However, there is presently NO EVIDENCE at all that the American farm near La Gloria in Mexico (where the epidemic is believed may have started) is responsible, none at all. In other words, despite being a nasty, intensive American farm, this place may have nothing whatsoever to do with the outbreak.

What annoys me, is that this non-scientist Hari (who I'm sure has political gifts and a way with words) has acquired the POWER to fill hundreds of thousands, or millions of other people's minds with his MISTAKEN IDEAS. Why as a society do we give Arts people high status, and scientists are mocked as 'geeks'?
Re: No evidence! Another opionated media person.
[info]mont82banais wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 12:43 pm (UTC)

Johann Hari does not name A pig farm near La Gloria. I suggest that you read the article more thoroughly.
The outbreak is thought to have started at PEROTE in Mexico. As an other reply states, the Americans are far from innocent - viz North Carolina .
Tocknell
Yes Indeed
[info]kanchenjunga wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 10:05 am (UTC)
For once I agree totally with Mr Hari. The agrochemical industry for many years has fueled the demand for cheap meat while at the same time poisoning slowly the health of humans everywhere. This scenario is interrelated to the other general trend of greed and unethical behaviour experienced by us from the bonehead financial classes who together with a desperate media and political system out of control allows such events to happen in ever increasing dramatic hues.

To deny this fact as backed up by not only Mr Hari's evidence but from a consolidation of evidence gathered over many years by independent research is to accelerate the inevitable demise of our planet as we know it. Is it just coincidence that this is happening now? Synchronicity is more like it as we increase population without educating people into ethical methods of farming consequences such as we have now could and will create great harm for all of us.

This whole scenario does not sit in isolation but is integrally linked to the whole negative essence of our destruction of ourselves in return for a short term gain in our bank accounts.
We are responsible for all our actions and the ripple effect is a scientific fact for good or bad.
Re: No evidence! Another opinionated media person.
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 10:24 am (UTC)
Totally agree. His 'Art' is writing, manipulation of the English language to suit his leftist, vintage champagne, Notting Hill life style. Should have tried an engineering degree. Adds beef to the bone.
Re: No evidence! Another opinionated media person.
[info]maxmillerfan wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 11:49 am (UTC)
"vintage champagne, Notting Hill life style"? Hari lives in a small flat in Whitechapel, the poorest part of London. Fool.
Is Johann a Calvinist?
[info]edjzet wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 10:28 am (UTC)
I didn't know Johann was a Calvinist.

Yet this is the same old trite medieval viewpoint taken by bigotted clergy and believers alike: you get ill because you are sinners.

Grow up!
Re: Is Johann a Calvinist?
[info]fakhry wrote:
Saturday, 2 May 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC)
Calvinist is well known maid by "Cohen"?keep an eye.
SOLUTION TO PROBLEMS INDUSTRIAL ANIMAL FARMS
[info]bongya wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 10:39 am (UTC)
There is no need to panic. We have the technology to solve this and other related problems intrinsic to industrial animal farming. Please visit our website www.atovianimalg2.com.
[info]bemjammin wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 10:45 am (UTC)
Good article and a theory that definitely needs to explored. My concern is that it invites a call to ban all factory farming, which would be lovely, but in a realistic world, unreasonable.

I also think such a call damages the case for a balanced investigation into the possible malpractices of farms which cause flu to become so potent and wide-spread, and damages the enforcement of banning these malpractices.
No wonder a pig is not alloed in Islam, you hypocrites!
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 10:57 am (UTC)
No wonder a pig is not alloed in Islam, you hypocrites!
Re: No wonder a pig is not alloed in Islam, you hypocrites!
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 04:04 pm (UTC)
Originally, Judaism was a desert animal, and so was Islam. Pigs are most certainly not a desert animal, and don't belong there. The desert is the wrong environment for Pigs because this animal cannot sweat. Simple to understand really!

Pigs are native to Europe and the Europeans have lived with Pigs for over 4,000 years.

Please mind your own bl**dy business in future and don't try to lecture the British on what they should or should not eat! We don't particularly care what Muslims and Jews think about pork and bacon. Got it?

Contrary to stupid opinion, pigs are no more unclean than a host of other domesticated animals so long as they are treated properly and fed properly. Furthermore, pigs have far higher intelligence than dogs.
Johann Hari - Professor of Epidemiology and Virology
[info]kerrygold wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
And I thought he was just a journalist. Well done Johann, you have managed to keep your medical and scientific knowledge well hidden hitherto. Perhaps you can enlighten us on the viability of Cold Fusion? I'm waiting for Piers Morgan's article on the Riemman Hypothesis, or perhaps you have already sorted this one out as well.
Re: Johann Hari - Professor of Epidemiology and Virology
[info]maxmillerfan wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 11:12 am (UTC)
Uh... perhaps you didn't notice, but he based everything he said on interviewing... yes, Prfoessors of Epidemiology and Virology.
djang. Pork obssesive?
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)
Porky pies djang. Making a pigs ear of it again? Ah, now I see it. Muslim nations are so successful, so, so tolerant because they don't eat bacon sarni's. Are you still porking that young man? Does he satisfy you?....Good....nice to know you're a happy chappy. Bless.
Re: djang. Pork obssesive?
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
Go and get stuffed with pigs and alcohol, kodak321!
War criminials on poor countries. Go and have a go at North Korea now, cowards!
cheap meat
[info]battier wrote:
Friday, 1 May 2009 at 11:54 am (UTC)
The public health benefit of inexpensive meat far outweighs entirely theoretical risks of novel viruses developing in so-called factory farms. You should look up the history of smallpox sometime.

The reason people eat meat is because it is highly nutritious, far more so than an equal weight of grains, vegetables, or fruits. It is the best source of protein, fats, iron, and the B12 vitamins, all required by humans.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Columnist Comments

john_rentoul

John Rentoul: Maybe Tories aren't so stupid after all

When Labour was last in opposition, much of the party was obsessed with electoral reform

david_lister

David Lister: The daddy of all that divides the sexes

Van Morrison has proudly announced on his website the birth of a son, George Ivan Morrison III


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion