Johann Hari: We've forgotten the force which really drives political change
When you are just one person sitting on a warming planet – when you see economies collapsing, wars raging, and reasons for fear on every corner – how should you react? What can you do? The current cluster of crises has stirred mood-responses that you can hear in every bar and coffee shop. It's worth looking at them, because beyond their siren messages, there is a road to real change that is being neglected.
The first mood is to feel powerless, and to turn this into a defiant pessimism. You know the script. I can't make any difference. It's all going to happen, whatever I do. The political conversation is remote and boring and has nothing to do with me anyway. I'm going to buy an extra-big lock for my door, hug my kids a little tighter, and sit out the storm.
We all have these moods from time to time, but they have now turned into the default mode of citizens in the supposedly advanced democracies. The second mood seems to be the opposite, but is actually its flipside. It says: what we need is a heroic leader who will save us. Enter Barack Obama. He's clever and articulate and has a conscience. He's the photographic negative of George W Bush. He will sort things out. Leave it to him; breathe out at last, and wait for every country to find such a man.
Both these moods leave you – the ordinary citizen – inert. All you can do is focus on your own personal life and wait, for disaster or salvation. But these twin dispositions leave out the real option that is waiting for you. It is the only one that has ever delivered political change in the past, and it is the only one that will pull us out of the ditch now. It is where ordinary individual citizens – you – come together and raise their voices and offer solutions of their own.
To get there, you have to deal first with the people who say that politics is irrelevant and boring and they don't care. I always offer them one fact. According to the best scientific evidence, if we have five degrees of global warming – which is now a significant possibility in my lifetime, unless we change our behaviour fast – there will be global crop failure. Food will not grow.
Are you bored by this prospect? Is that dull? You won't be bored when you are hungry. Martha Gellhorn, the great war correspondent, said: "People will often say, with pride: 'I'm not interested in politics.' They might as well say, 'I'm not interested in my standard of living, my health, my job, my rights, my freedoms, my future or any future.'" Be serious. It might seem remote; it might seem difficult; it might be a world away from the arcane mumblings of Brown and Cameron; but unless you are a psychopath, you care.
Far from being some dreamy call to kumbaya, collective political action is the single biggest reason your life is incalculably better than that of your great-grandparents. When people first called for equality for women, when people first started to conduct scientific experiments, when people first suggested paid weekends and holidays for ordinary workers, they were greeted by the same glib pessimism we hear today. It'll never happen! What can we do? But ordinary people who believed they were necessary gathered together. They spoke and argued and marched and lobbied in their defence – and they won.
These achievements were never handed down by people at the top. Who was the leader of feminism? Who was the leader of scientific progress? Who was the leader of workers' rights? Sure, there were inspirational individuals along the way. But they happened as a result of millions of ordinary people demanding it, and never giving up. If we had waited for leaders to spontaneously see the light, we would be waiting still. That's why the unquestioning faith in Barack Obama of the past year – now slowly dispersing – has been as disempowering as despair. Both ask nothing of you. In reality, Obama will only be a good President if ordinary people pressure him to be one – if they shove him away from his errors (like aerial bombardment of Pakistan) and push him to pursue his good goals more vigorously (like building universal healthcare at home).
Trusting him to do the right thing is a basic misunderstanding of how progress happens in a democracy. You choose the best leader available within the power structure – which Obama undoubtedly was – and then you pressure him like hell. Great democratic leaders permit the public mood to prevail over the entrenched vested interests blocking their will. It's an art, but it's not the most important art: that lies with you, and me, and all ordinary citizens.
That's why I get angry when I see movies or plays venerating leaders as quasi-messiahs. In the otherwise-excellent new play at London's Trafalgar Studios, The Mountain-Top, Martin Luther King is given a premonition of Barack Obama as The One that will come after him. In the movie Bobby, about the assassination of Robert Kennedy, one character asks in tears: "Jack's dead. Bobby's dead. King's dead. Who's left?" The response is – all of you. Bobby Kennedy's mind was changed on Vietnam by the vast public protests by ordinary people; Martin Luther King had power because he was part of a huge movement of concerned citizens. Neither were lone heroes: there is no such thing in political life.
If you don't turn on to politics, politics will turn on you. In any society, the people who already have power will try to get the state to work in their interests. Every day, the oil companies and the billionaires are lobbying for their interests – and they speak far louder than their numbers, because they have so much hard cash. If you sit back, shrug and say you can't do anything, their interests will prevail over yours.
That's how we got into the credit crunch that endangers your job, and the climate crunch that endangers your ecosystem. Banks spent billions on lobbyists and PR-mongers to make our governments scrap the rules restraining them, so they could then pile up mountains of risky profit. In the end, it caused the financial house to fall down on us all. Similarly, big oil and big coal spend a fortune to stop governments making the urgent transition to clean energy that we need. It will cause the ecological roof to fall in. In both cases, a small concentrated private interest prevailed over the public interest – and you were screwed.
Politicians respond to the pressures put on them. The banks and oil companies and billionaires never stop putting on their pressure, waving their cheques, and making their threats. We need to make sure our collective voices talk louder. The only way to do that is to give your time and energy and dedication to demand genuine democracy.
This isn't something remote. It's very simple and very practical. Choose one or two groups, and donate a few hours of your time a week. There are a thousand brilliant campaigning organisations – I'd recommend Plane Stupid, Greenpeace, End Child Poverty, the Tax Justice Network and the National Secular Society, just for starters. They all have work for you to do, now. If there isn't a group for the cause you most believe in, start your own.
Political change rarely happens in a satisfying orgasmic flash, but if enough of us demand it, it comes in the end. Democracy – real, campaigning democracy, not the dessicated Westminster variety – works like those Push Ha'Penny machines you find in old arcades. You remember: thousands of two pence coins lie on a moving shelf, and you have to drop in coins of your own in the hope it will cause the pennies to tumble down for you to collect. Sometimes it feels like you are wasting your coins and the piles aren't moving even a millimetre – but then a ker-ching landslide happens, often when you least expect it.
You are not powerless. You are surrounded by millions of people who share your frustrations and share your instinct for justice and rationality. It is your job as a citizen to connect with them. Together, you are powerful. If you remain alone and apart and soaked in cynicism, you can be sure the Rupert Murdochs and Wall-Marts and British Petroleums will be fighting for their interests – against yours, and humanity's.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
World could be a frustrating place to live in, particularly for those who consider themselves free.
We dream, think, make plans and hoping one day to make a difference but for some of us, it could hardly ever be materialised.
Interestingly we consciously observe those with less imaginations, talents, enthusiasm, hard-work and sense of responsibility who are grabbing sensitive positions, all over the world and, demanding us to follow their 'leads'.
Despite all thse facts, why don't we try to take the control of situation?
We might have certain reasons to believe that these 'leading figures' should stay in charge, not because we trust them, but because we are living in a world of terror and tyranny where only wild dogs can protect us against wolfs.
Anyway, every dog has also its day!
Britain's decline was caused by politicians and the welfare state.
Britain became great due to a variety of factors, which yes include the efforts of individual enterpreneurs, but you avoid noting that most of these entrepreneurs did their best to avoid raising the standard of living of their workforce. You also neglected to mention the vast sums extorted from Africa and Asia as a result of the Slave Trade, the sale of opium and the highly exploitative trade of commodities such as palm oil, rubber, coffee, cocoa, cotton etc etc...
I expect you will find some way to dismiss the above factors. Still, georgesign, at least try to open your eyes! The giant capitalist industries have always been buttressed by generous state subsidies. There has never been a free market and there never will be. Adam Smith himself recognised the inherent danger of vested interests who always subvert the market to maintain their position.
I suppose that it could be a coincidence that, on average, Human Health, Lifespan, Happiness etc. have all increased in times when individuals could work for themselves rather than a Feudal or other Power, but I doubt it.
Subsidies, in the sense that I suspect you mean, are a recent phenomenon. In most Capitalist Countries for most of the time there was no Power to grant subsidies, monopolies etc.
I agree that when Companies approach Monopolistic Power, they need to be constrained as does any other Power Centre in a Society.
If you'd care to read georgesign's comment that i replied to, you would have seen that he referred to the history of how Britain became Great, which I'm sure you will agree took place over several centuries. British becoming great coincided with the height of the Atlantic Slave Trade, which enabled the British cotton industry to expand exponentially, and after abolition, it coincided with the colonial era. You can choose to view this simply as a correlation. However, economic evidence of cause and effect exists, if you have an open enough mind to want to read it.
I suspect, however, that for you and georgesign, no evidence will suffice, just as no evidence is ever enough for holocaust deniers.
The Slave Trade has been going on in Africa for a millenium or more - long before any Europeans reached the East or West Coasts. I would argue that the apogee of Empire was after and because of the Industrial Revolution which was after and unconnected to Slavery in any way. The maximum expansion of the Cotton Industry was in the mid- 19th Century because of Steam Power allowing automated spinning etc. to increase exponentially. I would agree that this was an impetus to Colonialism both to secure supplies and to ensure a captive market.
I do not understand what "holocaust denial", whatever you mean by that, has to do with this debate - is this meant to be some sort of smear re me or georgesign (or both)?
If you can deny that the Atlantic Slave Trade removed wealth from Africa and increased the wealth of Europe and America, then you can deny anything. Ask yourself where cotton was farmed, by whom and for whose profit? Ditto, sugar.
No, don't bother! The dots are too far apart for your eyes.
My my, you do jump to conclusions about "my situation". I'm doing fine thank you, a hardworking tax payer, who doesn't wait for anyone to give me a handout. By dismissing my point without consideration, it is you that displays your ignorance of the slave trade. You also chose to ignore my observation about how exploitative commodities trade helped to make Britain great. Your point about the great Victorian philanthropists is well made, but they were exceptional individuals who chose to buck the norm of rapacious exploitation rather than typical industrialists. Still, this point is debatable and offhand I can't think of anyone that has economically quantified the benefits of philanthropism versus the depredations of capitalism.
I could be wrong about you of course. If you are a laissez-faire capitalism cheerleader and also very wealthy, then I would say that, rather than being a fool, you are simply being extremely disingenuous, which of course laissez-faire capitalists have made their stock in trade.
Thank you for these timely words.
Where do you fill your car if at all. If you go to Texaco, you are not a patriot. I read they plant for every gallon they sell one tree. I have to find this yet. I do not want to go that far but the profits keep piling on and I like their advertisements.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
A comparitively small percentage drop in the number of births will reduce enormously the pressure on the resources on this planet.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?d
The planet 'warmed' from 1976 to 1998, cooled from 1945 to 1975 and has been cooling in the 21st century.
You can write as many poxy articles as you like, but those FACTS do not change.
So if you want to do something about 'global warming', wait until it starts warming again.
Alternatively, go to the web site for the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research (part of the Met Office) and download the HadCET spreadsheet of the Central England temperature record. An hour's work in Excel will show you that there has also been no increase in temperatures in England since 1997 either.
Don't take this on trust - go and do it yourself.
This may be a short term blip but some Scientists think that it is the beginning of a reversal that will last for decades or more.
If so, look at http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c
Thank you for encouraging me to learn *some* history; better, I think, to learn *from* it.
You have a sharp mind and your heart is in the right place.
If President Obama said tomorrow that he had information at hand that Iran posed a direct threat to US national security, and had to be dealt with by immediate military intervention to reduce that risk, would Mr Hari support such action?
Johann Hari You have a Sharp mind and your heart is in the right place.
I am so happy I feel proud, honest. At least one has that. Others I do not know, onions?.
You see when you abuse the polticians you are raising every thing in proper manner. The 3 years becomes life sentence and so forth. But you carry on, we are with you . When we see you see at the end of the rope we part.
But we love you . Keep on reporting we give you kokes. Jokes>>> I speak Hindi. That will be good for your eyes.
Aging Mildred was a 93 year-old woman who was particularly despondent over the recent death of her husband Earl. She decided that she would just kill herself and join him in death.
Thinking that it would be best to get it over with quickly, she took out Earl's old Army pistol and made the decision to shoot herself in the heart since it was so badly broken in the first place.
Not wanting to miss the vital organ and become a vegetable and burden to someone, she called her doctor to inquire as to just exactly where the heart would be.
"On a woman," the doctor said, "your heart would be just below your left breast."
Later that night, Mildred was admitted to the hospital with a gunshot wound to her knee.
An old man and woman hate each other, but remain married for years. During their shouting fights, the old man constantly warns his wife, "If I die first, I will dig my way up and out of the grave to come back and haunt you for the rest of your life!" One day, the man abruptly dies. After the burial, the wife goes straight to the local bar and begins to party. Her friends ask if she isn't worried about her husband digging himself out of the grave.
These are the few medical fictions; I see these in reality these days as we are very ignorant of what is right and what is wrong. Here is another piece. The top shot comes from USA as rep from Obama and tells us this, ?.Dr. Shu SORRY IT IS CHU, I think to tell us, PAINT the roofs white as the paint is good for the global warming? I like pink. It soothes my nerves my doctor say. They are painting all the hospitals, crazy houses with pink; they are also planting pink roses on the roads, as they have no fragrances. These keeps the hay fever away I am told. Please to save my typing read the last line I am not paid to give all these to you.
Now where DO WE ALL GO? THE TV 4" is full of violence and all the students are hooked to the nets watching XXX.
Darling: 'We need to get lending going' That is not you or me IT IS THE TREASURER
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
What is in the name? I thought that Johann was ( no offence please ) was a woman. But I see you as a man. Plastic surgery? My she dog is Rex? Is that bad?
Please do not comment on this It is between me and him(her).
Is Tony short of Anthony Golsanvez. Bill for William, Ted for Edward. They are all politicians. Why you not change your name Jane Hari Rama Hari Krishna I send you to India and you earn many pennnies.
Ilove your column It is so.... ED please do something. Transfer him to Sarah Paliniii El Pacho
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Thank you.
Cyniicism, laziness and despair are the enemy of democracy. I see these mental attitudes everday here in Brazil, and it saddens me. People would rather moan, or escape to shoping malls than have fun- yes it can be fun (!)- campaining for what they want.
Keep up the good work Johann.
Let's take a look at the groups you mentioned. The first two - the environmenalist lobby has an enormous influence on policy (it has even been compared with organised religion, although I would not go that far) not to mention they aren't always exactly law-abiding. And the NSS - the secularist lobby has so much power in Britain today that Christians are pretty much oppressed (look no further than the string of items in the news where public sector workers are suspended for even talking baout their faith) - while we as a nation bend over backwards to other religions, Christianity is relentlessly attacked.
You also talk about sustainable energy and lack of financial regulation. The latter was actually requested by ordinary people who voted for Thatcher's Conservatives. The former is blocked not only by big oil but also by the general public - the NIMBY brigade are always protesting against the building of just about anything, but the main problem is that the public are simply not prepared to pay the set-up costs, as Eurobarometer surveys show. To suggest that the world's problems are due to some shadowy figure pulling the strings is at best scare-mongering that brings you down to the level of organised religion and at worst class discrimination - a cheap shot at the wealthy.
As for other issues, the government's need to keep the people on its side sometimes results in the inability to do the right thing. Why did we withdraw from Iraq? To curry favour with the anti-war majority and their misguided views.
The success of China as a nation has lead some people to openly question the effectiveness of democracy, and many more will follow. Perhaps the EU have adopted the right approach in leaving the ordinary person out of the decision-making process.
Once again, I repeat my main point: pressure groups have far too much power as it is and you are advocating exacerbating the problem.