Commentators

Rain (AM and PM) 8° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

John Rentoul: It's Miliband's turn for hard choices

And they're all about him. Should he aim to be Europe's foreign minister, or wait and see what else might come up?

Having spoken to well-placed sources, I can reveal that David Miliband's preferences for his next job are in this order: 1. Prime minister before the election, 2. European foreign affairs high representative from January, 3. Leader of the opposition after the election.

Not that this is what the well-placed sources say. They say that he is totally focused on being Foreign Secretary and that he is not a candidate for any other job. My world exclusive revelation is based on deeper secrets. I happen to know that, despite occasional cunning appearances to the contrary, Miliband is a human being, and an ambitious one. He wants to be prime minister, and his appetite for the job has not been diminished by the business with the banana last year. Nor does he think it impossible that a vacancy might occur before the election. Indeed, I have heard that some rather surprising people think it a real possibility that Gordon Brown might stand down in the new year. Or that he might still be pushed.

One former Cabinet minister – there are a lot of them about, now – told me that what had changed since a year ago is that "now everybody in the Cabinet knows what everybody else in the Cabinet thinks". They all know that everyone else thinks that Labour stands a chance of depriving David Cameron of a majority if it fights the election under a different leader. All that keeps Brown in No 10 is the difficulty of organising the change so that everyone acts together.

This is particularly hard when the two main potential beneficiaries of a coup, David Miliband and Alan Johnson, are fixed in their belief in the "clean hands" doctrine. Miliband has repeatedly said that he is "not a plotter", and does not want to be seen as one. A Johnson supporter told me: "If a knight in shining armour comes to rescue you, do you want his hands to be dripping with blood?"

What an awkward moment, therefore, for what Miliband regards as the second most desirable job to come up. Any normal person is forgiven if, in the hysteria of anti-Blair rage, he or she failed to notice that the Lisbon Treaty creates not just a President of the European Council but also a "High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy". This is an important job, that offers the chance for an ambitious politician to influence some really big global issues, including climate change, fairer trade and world peace. Miliband is well qualified for it – assuming that Tony Blair does not get the top job. Both jobs cannot go to Britons, on the principle set out by Abraham Lincoln: "I suppose if the Twelve Apostles were to be chosen nowadays the shrieks of locality would have to be heard."

But the timetable is tricky. Vaclav Klaus, the Czech President, is ready to sign on the dotted line this week. That means that the president and the high representative may be appointed at a special summit of European leaders later this month, to start work on 1 January. Miliband has only days, therefore, to weigh up his chances of getting the Europe foreign affairs job now against those of becoming prime minister in a few weeks' time. Does he go for the higher probability of the second-preference job or a lower probability of gaining his first preference? The number of factors in the calculation would make the resulting equation look like a GCSE maths student's worst nightmare.

The latest wrinkle, for example, is the possibility that European leaders might think that one of the top three jobs (president, foreign affairs and president of the Commission) should be held by a woman.

Another factor is that, if for any reason Brown were to leave Downing Street, Johnson rather than Miliband is the favourite to succeed him. The Home Secretary has the qualities of personable reassurance best suited to a damage-limiting defensive election campaign. But he can be dull, and there would probably have to be a leadership election this time, even in the short time remaining, in which anything can happen.

For reasons that are still slightly mysterious to me, many of those closest to Tony Blair tend to favour Miliband as the next leader and to be dismissive of Johnson. Perhaps Miliband would shine in a way that Johnson failed to do in the deputy leadership campaign two years ago. So Miliband could still be prime minister – not for long, but possibly earning the party's gratitude for avoiding oblivion and possibly even with some role to play in a hung parliament.

But you can see why the greater likelihood of the European job – a bird if not in the hand at least hovering over the seed being offered – could be preferable.

Especially when you consider option three. If Gordon Brown stays on and Labour therefore loses the election badly, Miliband would be well placed to win the leadership election that would follow. I believe that Johnson, who is 59, would not be interested in being leader of the opposition. The only member of the Cabinet who could rival David Miliband would be his brother Ed, a more natural TV communicator but not a candidate yet likely to give Prime Minister Cameron sleepless nights.

If David wanted the job, it would be hard for Ed to challenge him directly, but does David want it? Leader of the opposition is a peculiarly frustrating job, and the semi-derelict state of the Labour Party might render it particularly so after the next election.

On the other hand, though, it may be that the Conservatives, forced to take difficult decisions to cut spending and raise taxes, could become unpopular quite quickly. But that is not so much a bird in the bush as one that might be in the bush behind the hedge. That is why, if he sees a reasonable chance of getting the Europe job, David Miliband is likely to go for it. And then Peter Mandelson might get to be Foreign Secretary after all.

John Rentoul blogs at independent.co.uk/eagleeye

More from John Rentoul

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Millipeed for Leader - what ???
[info]tigermoth_33 wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 01:00 am (UTC)

The Millipeed is living in cloud cuckoo land if he thinks there's going to be anything much left of the lying cheating corrupt commie lot after the next election. Who in their right minds would want to lead a party of 10 - if they're lucky !!!

Labour could choose Moses, David Beckham, Elvis, Ant and Dec, any combination - and they wouldn't stand a cat in hell's chance of being contenders for Government for the next three elections.

The light has dawned in the minds of a lot of people; they can see now how they have been totally betrayed over mass immigration, destruction of their pensions, MPs greedy stealing from the tax-payers - and the sordid furtive sneaky way that Brown signed the White Piece of Paper of surrender in the biggest act of TREASON and Treachery since Heath lied to us about the Common Market.

In your dreams, young David - go and cause trouble elsewhere....you're not wanted in the UK, nor are any others in your 'cabal'....get thee gone from this place - right now.
Re: Millipeed for Leader - what ???
[info]zugzwang43 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:11 am (UTC)


Why do you even ask, no room here for indulgent rhetorical questions...
Milliband should take the European Community Job
[info]lewis_northants wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 05:27 am (UTC)
Mr David Milliand who rising star is waning with the failure of the Mid-East peace process, the Afghan war,and the impending doom of the Labour government would be wise to take the job as the European Community's high representative for foreign policy.The number of years that Labour will spend in the wildness is debatable.But it might be short. The Tories will be the owners of a national debt of £800 million plus , unemployment of 10%, plus a hedonist society used to a rising life style, not the austerity post war Britain of the late 1940's and the and early 1950's promised by Mr Cameron and the present government's policies on the Afghan War. In 4-5 years the Tory's approval level could be as low as Labour's today. Mr Milliband could return to British politics with an enhanced reputation gained through this high visibility job, ready to compete for the leadership of the Labour party. Mr Milliband as the high representative for foreign policy would be Britain's counter balance to the Neanderthal European policies promised by Mr Cameron. He would better serve his country in Brussels and Strasbourg than by sitting in any position on the opposition front bench.

the EU and Miliband
[info]uranus2009 wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 07:45 am (UTC)
Just reading that in the vast expanse of the Euroland , the EU leaders without
their peoples' mandate could only get a 7-year old banana-bearin boy as the foreign minister
says a lot about this undemocratic edifice. We need a referendum soon to settle whether we need
failed polticians and sleaze merchants to migrate as Euro leaders.
Leaving the EU corruption in place is like allowing a theif to keep his ill gotten gains...
[info]fwdinsight wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 09:43 am (UTC)
Leaving the EU corruption in place is like allowing a theif to keep his ill gotten gains. These men have sdtloen our Liberty as a country. The Labour party has set this country on an unacceptable course that the large majority of the British people reject, up to 75% in recent polls. They have used every dirty trick in the book from prior top the last election Mr Bliar lying in parliament at the despatch box twice when he promised a referendum on the Constitution even if every EU state turned it down in their referendums. Straight after the election he refused to hold one. Brown also refused to hold one offering the excuse that it was now called the treaty and it was different. Yet nearly every head of the EU including the original drafter of the Constitution admit it’s the same with clauses re-ordered and called a treaty. Now for Cameron to commit himself to upholding this corruption is unacceptable. Question your MP and Cameron if you can. Phone, Email, Visit or write to your MP demanding answers. Also contact the Conservative MP and demand answers if you local MP is not Conservative. I am doing exactly this. Its like a court allowing a thief to keep his goods after he broke in and stole them Its wrong. These men have stolen our rights by deception and lies
Re: Leaving the EU corruption in place is like allowing a theif to keep his ill gotten gains...
[info]zugzwang43 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:00 am (UTC)


It hurts , it always hurts...
Milliband for Eu job...
[info]vauban33 wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 09:45 am (UTC)
Do we really want a nonentity like Milliband to become EU president? Have we no one else in the UK capable of being put forward? How awful...
Re: Milliband for Eu job...
[info]zugzwang43 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:25 am (UTC)


Don't despair, are you ready for this; if you want some one who knows his way around Europe, someone every body knows, there can only be one meaningful candidate, the one and only Sir Terry Wogan, however, if he is busy, Rolf Harris would make a reasonable alternative...
[info]jona123 wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 05:48 pm (UTC)
Lots of right wing froth in the comments. Yes milliband should be given the Leaders reins. Dear old Gordon is just too dour to appeal to the electorate.
[info]eleos1437 wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 09:35 pm (UTC)
Miliband is Jewish.

While we may shrink from acknowledging this for fear of being labelled anti-semitic, in most parts of the world where present conflicts threaten our wellbeing this fact will be emphasised, and exploited as an indication that Europe has, like America, fallen under the Zionist spell.

Miliband would be severely handicapped whatever his talents.
Eleos 1437 wrote.................
[info]ganef wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 10:40 pm (UTC)
"Miliband is Jewish"

So bloody what?

"under the Zionist spell"

Have you seen a doctor for your paranoia? Perhaps you should?
ELEOS
[info]zugzwang43 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:42 am (UTC)


"While we may shrink from acknowledging this for being labelled anti-semetic" . Not as handicapped as you are, is my impression, but what do I know ?
[info]zugzwang43 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:17 am (UTC)


Well, he has to be something, what, exactly are you ?

Columnist Comments

steve_richards

Cameron is following in footsteps of Hague

Both sought to modernise their party. In both cases, the results were mixed

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: Tax if you must, but do so effectively

First and foremost tax must raise revenue; but then only at the lowest possible cost

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Things can happen when you travel on a Virgin train

It seems that it is being run by philosophers from the 13th century


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion