Commentators

Rain (AM and PM) 15° London Hi 18°C / Lo 12°C

Lucy Winkett: We must address poverty, wars – and female bishops

The Anglican Communion is not a multinational with a board and a chief executive

Monday, 7 July 2008

"A church by law established but from law exempt". So a leading Free Church commentator described the Church of England this week. In the week when we celebrate the 80th anniversary of the Equal Franchise Act, giving women the vote in Britain, how is it that the Established Church, exempt from the Sex Discrimination Act, is still debating on what basis it can admit women to its leadership?

Put more acutely, given that most people live their lives without reference to organised religion, does it really matter if the Church of England decides to consecrate women bishops or not? What does it matter either if a group of conservative Anglicans meet in Jerusalem and call themselves Gafcon or Foca and issue a declaration that excites journalists, depresses many Christians and mystifies everyone else?

While acute suffering continues for ordinary people in conflict zones around the globe, what greater humiliation could there be for the Church than groups of Christians gathering to argue over one another's identity or lifestyle? Fiddling while Rome's burning, rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic; pick your metaphor and weep.

I was ordained in the Church of England 13 years ago this week. As a priest whose vocation is to pray, to proclaim the gospel of Christ and to serve others, I am embarrassed by the public preoccupation of Anglicans with sex, and, on one level, I want to argue that these current arguments don't matter at all. But the truth is, they also matter immensely.

Today the doctrines of Christianity take their place not only alongside other world religions, but also an almost infinite number of beliefs mediated by the not-so-holy-trinity of Yahoo, Google and Wikipedia. The modern Church of England is drawing on ancient principles of prayer and service in shaping its mission in a complex society. While it's true that in community projects, prisons, hospitals and schools, pioneering work is being done by Church people standing alongside those who are on the margins of society, I think it's also true that some of the current arguments over gender and sexuality are a kind of displacement activity.

The fact is, it is extremely difficult for the Church to make effective, large-scale contributions to the huge questions of late modernity; that, for example, more people were killed in wars in the last 90 years than in the previous 500; that the gap between rich and poor continues to widen; that Westerners are scandalously inattentive to the ecological consequences of over-consumption. To really make an impact on this huge agenda is extremely challenging, so we Christians find ourselves retreating to familiar territory: attempts to regulate private sexual behaviour and the public role of women.

In this last week, our two archbishops have spoken out about credit unions for the poorest in society and about civil rights in Zimbabwe. They are wise and prophetic but, despite many serious frustrations, it is not wrong for the Church also to discuss the place of men and women, heterosexual and homosexual, in a society that believes mistakenly that these issues have been resolved. The Fawcett Society reminded us recently that eight out of 10 votes cast in the House of Commons are cast by men, and nine out of 10 decisions in UK boardrooms are taken by men. Homophobic bullying is also a serious issue for schools. Human identity and role are not irrelevant topics for theological debate by serious people in the context of a society where these questions, addressed by legislation, are not resolved in reality.

I believe passionately that women and men should represent Christ in sacramental ministry and I hope that today the General Synod will remove the barriers that prevent women from becoming bishops. I hope it is done decisively and with generosity towards those of a different opinion. I hope too that FOCA, newly constituted, will be very careful about its rhetoric in a volatile world.

To disagree is not wrong, and we should not be afraid of it, because ultimately, whatever is decided at conferences and meetings, the Anglican Communion is not a multinational with a board and a chief executive; it is part of the body of Christ, and I am bound by my baptism to every other Christian, whatever their views about me or anyone else. Every soul in these islands has someone to pray for them, and it is here that the Church of England lives and breathes; in the deep and genuine desire of people with differing theological views, and in different circumstances, to live lives marked by compassion, forgiveness and love. It doesn't get any simpler than that.

Lucy Winkett is canon of St Paul's Cathedral

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

17 Comments

This was a great and refreshing article which gets the debate in perspective, though I was very sorry to hear the narrowness and unfriendly tone of some of the following comments.
THANKS LUCY

Posted by Mary | 09.07.08, 22:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Hmm, being all the scandal in churches over dodgy clergy MEN, I would think women taking more control would only be a good thing. How many times do you hear of women abusing kids in church? Women are far holier than men at the end of the day. And being the biblical phrases were written by men, makes them suspect. And I reckon the whole Adam and Eve story was created as a tool to oppress women. The only ones really against it are those who want women oppressed in general, men who are weak and insecure in themselves, that they only feel better by oppressing others.

Posted by Erin | 08.07.08, 01:54 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"We must address poverty, wars – and female bishops"
Oh, puhlease!

Posted by Michael | 07.07.08, 21:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Lucy Winkett said we must address the issue of who can become a "Bishop", so I will address it according to who has created it. God has said if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work (1st Tim 3;1), you see he said a "Man", he also said A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;(1st Tim 3;2) if you notice he said "husband" I would also direct u to 1st corinthians 14;34 which says "Woman should remain silent in the church" and 1st tim 2;12 "But I suffer not a woman to teach nor to usurp authority over a man but to be in silence", So to sum it all up and not using my or any humans opinion, coming strickey from the mouth of God if you believe, he is saying that a woman is not permitted to become a Bishop or any kind of a leader in the church, so my question is, who has the issue? Please, I will pray for this woman that she repents of her disobedience to God. Troy Austin

Posted by Troy Austin | 07.07.08, 21:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

1 Timothy, chapter 2: "9 I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, 10 but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God.
11 A woman should LEARN IN QUIETNESS AND FULL SUBMISSION.
12 I DO NOT PERMIT A WOMAN TO TEACH or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. 15 But WOMEN WILL BE SAVED THROUGH CHILDBEARING - if they continue in faith, love and holiness with PROPRIETY." - Is this clear enough? Or is our friend Benjamin going to try and play with "ambiguous Greek words" again, in order to justify that which is UNJUSTIFIABLE?

Posted by Ivan | 07.07.08, 21:02 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The Anglican Fellowship is like a company that has invited strikebreakers in to fill the places of people who resisted oppression and betrayal. It is ridiculous for strikebreakers to be posturing about the behavior of management. In the minds of most observers, the pretense of the Anglican Fellowship to be the Church at all is offensive.

When the laws of God are obeyed--including the laws all nature also obeys, of natural and decent relationship--when charity and the fruit of the spirit are evident, and when some acknowledgment is made that the violent beginnings of Anglicanism are out of character of the Church, this absurd group may be taken seriously. In the meantime, the claims of their "Canons" and Bishops--male or female--to represent appointed Church authority are not real.

Posted by M.Curry | 07.07.08, 20:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"Paul uses a rare word 'authentein' that translators now think is 'I forbid a woman to teach or engage in fertility practices with a man' rather than 'or to have authority'" - Until the time comes for the Antichrist to assume power, I am sure the "scholars" will have found a way to pervert, AMBIGUATE and "correctly" (carnally) reinterpret everything in the Holy Scripture that pertains to women and sodomites. Yours is a TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF CARNAL INTERPRETATION of the Holy Scripture. You've focused on 1 Timothy 2:12, but You've, quite NEATLY, CHOSEN TO "FORGET" 1 Corinthians 14:35: "If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for IT IS DISGRACEFUL FOR A WOMAN TO SPEAK IN THE CHURCH." Not to mention that You've utterly IGNORED the verses JUST AFTER 1 Timothy 2:12, which just REAFFIRM that which is stated. Let alone: 1 Corinthians 11:7-9, Ephesians 5:33. You're a living proof that EVEN THE DEVIL CAN RE-INTERPRET THE HOLY SCRIPTURE TO JUSTIFY HIMSELF

Posted by Ivan | 07.07.08, 20:41 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Lucy's article was in no way mean spirited but some responses aren't what I would hope to see in dialogue between members of my family. I dread to think how people talk to those who don't share our Christianity. Maybe 1 John 4:7-21 is helpful?

1 Tim 2 is obviously a good place to start in this discussion. So let's look at what it says. Paul is writing to his protege Timothy, who has been left in charge of the Ephesian church where certain false doctrines were prevalent. This chapter is refuting them. The essence of those heresies was that sexual promiscuity and conduct brought the worshipper closer to God (cf cult of Diana). Paul uses a rare word 'authentein' that translators now think is 'I forbid a woman to teach or engage in fertility practices with a man' rather than 'or to have authority'

Paul is definitely pro women leaders in Acts 18 and besides Gal 3:28 says that we find identity in Jesus, not gender

In Christ, cos He's the main thing :)

Posted by Benjamin | 07.07.08, 18:59 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Her muddled thinking is indicative of the reason why so many people want to maintain apostolic tradition and continue with male clergy.
Dear Lucy would have offered Adam the fruit, counseled Noah to quit building that darned big politically incorrect boat,directed Lot to a sensitivity course and on and on.
Dear little Lucy you try so hard and yet you are unfulfilled-rest from your labor for a spell. Enjoy this brief time and give the Creator thanks. People who disagree with your life choices really do care about significant issues yet your eyes and ears are not sensitive to their concerns.
Rest awhile - the world will continue until tommorow.
Shalom

Posted by Allan | 07.07.08, 18:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

In the face of a resurgent Islam all the Church of England can do is whine about sex.Of course there is a place for women and gays in the Church. How can women be ordained and then refused advancement and homosexuality is a fact of nature.Why don't we get over it and concentrate on matters that are of major importance. We are all children of God.

Posted by Ken | 07.07.08, 18:09 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

17 Comments

Most popular in Opinion