Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 6° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

Mapping the path to peace in the Middle East

Building on The Independent’s map of the Crisis in Gaza, which generated widespread interest and support—and as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and George Mitchell begin to reach out the Middle East—Independent readers and the Debategraph community have begun to focus on the options for achieving a long-term sustainable peace in the Middle East.

As before the first objective will be to develop a comprehensive map of the issues and options facing the main regional actors and the international community, and the arguments for and against the different options.

As the process develops, the map will begin to encompass the key diplomatic texts, analysis and initiatives from all sides; with the aim of representing the different worldviews and interests fairly and succinctly on a common map.

In this case though we want to push the mapping process one stage further: by using the map as an informal, multi-dimensional poll about the merits of the different options.

Everyone who registers to participate in the map will be able to signal the merit they attach to the different issues, options and arguments just by clicking on the arrows in the map. The ratings can be applied just to the top level options or, if you are minded to do so, through the entire structure as you navigate around.

As the votes are cast, the visual structure of the map will change to reflect the significance of the different elements as perceived by the community of participants—with the stronger options and arguments beginning to come the fore.

The process will run over the next four weeks; with the emphasis shifting from mapping to rating in the fourth week. However, the mapping and rating processes can occur simultaneously: so if you want to experiment with the rating system feel free to start now.

?and as before you can you can also keep up to date with developments on the Gaza map via the Independent Minds blog and @TheIndyDebate on Twitter.

David Price [david AT debategraph DOT org]

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Back to land
[info]frank_reader wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 05:45 pm (UTC)
Now that much of Gaza is destroyed, it's high time to for its expelled people to be allowed back to their land, in Palestine.
You can do better
[info]lrubinow wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 07:14 pm (UTC)
The "Key Historical Events" in the "History of Israeli-Palestinian Conflicts" begin with the creation of Hamas in 1987? My goodness. I suppose that does away with all of that "Israelis living in our houses" stuff, so that's convenient. I expected better from the Independent.
Re: You can do better
[info]samz_h wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 06:33 pm (UTC)
Irubinow, yours is a good point and well made. Any chronology of this region's current conflicts must surely at the very least go back to key events relating to the British Mandate and onwards. Anything less is immediately out of context.
Re: You can do better
[info]david_price wrote:
Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 11:51 pm (UTC)
Thanks lrubinow and samz_h.

The map is a visual wiki open to collaborative editing that starts with a few illustrative elements to seed the discussion. As you can see (above) more events have been added to the historical section since you posted your comments, and anyone is welcome to add any more at any time.

David
DebateGraph gets the thumbs down
[info]pareimi wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 08:11 pm (UTC)
I have just tried DebateGraph. It is hopeless unless you are keen on shallow drivel. In real life arguments are constructed from many points that have to be taken together, in their entirety - especially when an issue under debate is as complex as the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. One wants to quote historical reasons for the origin of the conflict, and then draw points from these in a single, coherent passage - but DebateGraph has a limit on the number of words per box that stifles proper, logical debate. The manner in which DebateGraph forces points to be isolated is intensely irritating, and DebateGraph paradoxically achieves the exact opposite of what it sets out to do. One is forced to see branches on individual trees rather than the forest itself. And it is far too tedious.
Re: DebateGraph gets the thumbs down
[info]david_price wrote:
Sunday, 8 February 2009 at 01:22 am (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback, pareimi.

Although it may not be immediately apparent on first use, every point on the map can be connected to any other point on the map (or any other group of points) in a complex multidimensional structure; so if you would like cross-relate the different points and the different branches of the map in the way that you describe you are welcome to do so.

Similarly, each point on the map is described not only by the short heading and roll-over text shown in the visualization above, but also by an expanded text that can be up to 50,000 characters long and include images and other media (which you can access via the buttons below the graph). This allows you to add detailed essay or report length contributions to any point on the map.

If you would like me to guide you through either process, just let me know - and, in the meantime, I have added a first draft of the arguments from your LiveJournal blog post on the Sinai Peninsula proposal to the map here:

http://debategraph.org/flash/fv.aspx?r=11531&d=2&i=1

David
Independent and pro Israel
[info]giuseppesapone wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 09:25 pm (UTC)
Whilst the Independent's posture towards the plight of the Gazans since the world-wide revulsion of thier massacre by the IDF has been sympathetic, may I remind readers of the leading article it published on 5th January as the iDF ground troops enterered Gaza, under the heading "Gaza will not find peace until Hamas ceases to be a threat".

Bearing in mind that it was known at the time that many hundreds of civilians had been killed and thousands maimed, the article included the following lie...

"There is no reason at this stage to doubt Israel's description of its ground assault as 'defensive'."

And this concern for troops who were about to commit many atrocities against defenceless men, women and children...

"Israeli troops are now exposed to death, injury and capture and to becoming perilously bogged down."

I would dearly like to know the name of the individual who wrote this Zionist Hasbara, but don't expect to find out.

Thanks for the comments and feedback
[info]david_price wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 10:21 pm (UTC)
Thanks frank_reader, lrubinow, pareimi, and giuseppesapone.

The whole structure of the map is like a wiki - everything is mutable and provisional, and anyone can add new issues, positions, arguments, events and evidence to the map. At the time of writing the map is at any early stage of development, with plenty of gaps to fill and strands to deepen.

Each element on the map can be cross-related to any other element on the map; so any point can be seen in the context of any other point or any other group of points. And each element is described not only via the heading and roll-over text shown in the visualization above, but also via an expanded text that can be up to 50,000 characters and include images and other media. You can begin to access and explore this deeper content via the buttons displayed below the graph.

You are welcome to edit and restructure the map and to enrich it with new voices and perspectives; with the collective aim over the next four weeks being to develop the currently inchoate structure towards a maximum of community intelligence - i.e. a point at which every perspective is represented fairly and succinctly on the map and (temporarily at least) no one has anything further to add.

You can improve the map by adding new material to it directly or, if you prefer, by leaving suggestions for additions and/or links to relevant documents and articles as comments here.

If anyone has any questions about how to accomplish any of the above, I'll be delighted to help.

David

Columnist Comments

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: Roll up for the great emissions-fest

Do world leaders believe what they say about the imminence of disaster?

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: World leadership is an outdated hope

The EU did not want a traffic-stopping standard-bearer

john_walsh

John Walsh: Born and bred a Brit...

...but apparently I know nothing about Britishness


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion