Commentators

10° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Mark Steel: The youth of today – they just don’t show no disrespect

What is striking is that university officials are now backing down

One of the many upsetting aspects to being in your forties, is hearing people your own age grumbling about “young people” the way we were grumbled about ourselves.

Old friends will complain, “Youngsters today have no respect like we did”, and I’ll think: “Hang on. I remember the night you set a puma loose in the soft furnishings section of Pricerite’s.”

There’s also a “radicals” version of this attitude, a strand within the middle-aged who lament how today’s youngsters, “Don’t demonstrate like we did”, because “we were always marching against apartheid or for the miners but students these days don’t seem bothered”.

It would seem natural if they went on: “The bloody youth of today; they’ve no disrespect for authority. In my day you started chanting and if a copper gave you any lip you gave him a clip round the ear, and he didn’t do it again. We’ve lost those values somehow.”

You feel that even if they did come across a mass student protest they’d sneer. “That isn’t a proper rebellion, they’ve used the internet.

“You wouldn’t have caught Spartacus rounding up his forces by putting a message on Facebook saying ‘Hi Cum 2 Rome 4 gr8 fite 2 liber8 slaves lets kill emprer lol’”.

It doesn’t help that many of the student leaders from the sixties and seventies ended up as ministers or journalists, who try to deny they’ve reneged on their principles by making statements such as: “It’s true I used to run the Campaign to Abolish the British Army, but my recent speech in favour of invading every country in the world in alphabetical order merely places those ideals in a modern setting.”

Also it’s become a tougher prospect to rebel as a student, as tuition fees force them to work while they’re studying. But over the last two weeks students have organised occupations in 29 universities, creating the biggest student revolt for 20 years.

In Edinburgh, for example, the demands were that free scholarships should be provided for Palestinian students, and the |university should immediately cancel its investments with arms companies.

So the first question to arise from these demands must be: what are universities doing having links with arms companies in the first place? How does that help education?

Do the lecturers make an announcement that, “This year, thanks to British Aerospace, the media studies course has possession of not only the latest digital recording equipment and editing facilities, but also three landmines and a Tornado bomber”?

The occupations involve students selecting an area of the university, then staying there, day and night, and organising a series of events and worthwhile discussions while the authorities pay security guards to stand outside and scowl.

Warwick University, for example, organised an “Alternative Careers Fair”, in which, presumably, if someone was brilliant at maths, the careers adviser would say to them, “I suggest you become an accountant for a Peruvian guerilla army.

“They’re looking for people who can reliably file their tax returns before the deadline, as they’re in enough trouble as it is.”

But the extraordinary part about this wave of student protest is that in most universities the authorities, having spent the first week insisting the demands were impossible to meet, have now backed down.

So dozens of Palestinians, who these days seem to be minus a university in Gaza for some reason, will have places here. And several are reviewing their connections to the arms trade. University College London, for example, could be |severing its link to the arms company Cobham.

Presumably this will spark outrage from predictable sources, who’ll yell: “We don’t pay our taxes so that students can go round selflessly helping people who’ve been bombed.

“We fund their education so they can get a degree in business studies and cock up the global economy. If these layabouts can’t buckle down it’s time we cut off the funding we’re not giving them and send them out to work in a job that no longer exists!”

And there’s another impact of a modern student revolt, which makes it even more threatening than similar protests in the sixties. Because most students now have to work to fund their course, so a protest like this will not only infuriate their authorities, it will also bring every pizza delivery company and chicken nuggets shop to its knees at the same time.

More from Mark Steel

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Why arms companies?
[info]bapthorpe wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 08:12 am (UTC)
How do links with arms companies help education? They don't, but, in the case of the university I'm currently at, they make a hell of a difference to the staff pension fund.
Spot on! Epater les hypocrites!
[info]mssuperior wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 08:20 am (UTC)
In the late 1960's I was at the same (non-Oxbridge) university as many of the current crop of politicians (and media folk). It was known as the hub of protest and nationally vilified as such. Then on graduation for these beanbag warriors, Need For Big Money kicked in, and middle class students went running back to their comforable. deep roots having played at revolt for 3 or 4 years. As one of my friends remarked 'If I have to hear one more stockbroker's son singing about how tough it is working on 'de railroad' I'll REALLY get violent.'
casting shallow
[info]leoardo wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 10:03 am (UTC)
we've who have had our chance at the helm of society deserve no respect.
Steely Mark
[info]sara_sense wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 11:44 am (UTC)
"creating the biggest student revolt for 20 years."

So what you're really trying to say here, is that students are revolting? Tell us something we didn't know ;-)*

*Disclaimer: I'm only ebvious because I'm not longer a student and have to (gasp) wash these days!!
Not only students who are apathetic
[info]csb1a wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 12:32 pm (UTC)
Mark, Although an excellent article, I fear you miss the point. Not only are students apathetic but the majority of the country seems to be stuck in some kind of laxidasicalness. I remember the poll tax protests and riots and although I only advocate peaceful protest, it staggers me that although this Labour governement has inflicted far worse on us then even the evil the poll tax was, as a country we seem to be standing idly by. Meanwhile our money is taken by greedy bankers, our taxes continue to multiply both in number of them and money demanded, our liberties erroded and our society spinning violently and hoplessely out of control. Maybe we need to remember that you can opress some of the people some of the time, but not all the people all of the time.
Re: Not only students who are apathetic
[info]iditor wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 03:44 pm (UTC)
Laxidasicalness = the philosophy of forcing laxatives upon the unsuspecting?
Charmingly off-point retort to Mark's cheery article. I think I managed to infer that actually he thinks students are just as politically active as they ever were.
The reason why British people choose apathy over entering politics is that feeling as if one is on the set of Blackadder, The Real Show, dilutes one's ideals somewhat.
I am just waiting for Miranda Richardson to be appointed Minister for Education.... Now that's a politics I want a part of.
Re: Not only students who are apathetic
[info]gavfaemonty wrote:
Wednesday, 18 March 2009 at 01:11 pm (UTC)
You sick git. She's lying near-dead after a skiiing accident.
Re: Not only students who are apathetic
[info]villapete wrote:
Thursday, 19 March 2009 at 12:10 pm (UTC)
No she's not - that's Natasha, or it was.
Sod the students what about a revolution
[info]unlikelylad wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 03:59 pm (UTC)
Its all good and proper asking student to revolt but what we actually need is a revolution of ideas to change the World we have created and ignite the population. By all means I welcome student leading the cause but it would gain more liegitamacy if it came from a collection of society angry and mobile enough to take to the streets and demand action.
It will happen but needs to be soon.
Lazy
[info]dexter_cobb wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 07:36 pm (UTC)
Man, what a lazy article. You used to be quite good ten years ago Steel. But now maybe its time to think about doing something else
Don't rely on us students
[info]lynsey888 wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 07:02 am (UTC)
I'm a mature student at the moment and really should be studying for my politics exam later this morning, but I cannot resist a bit of Mark Steel. The apathy of my younger, fellow students is worrying. They are mostly shallow, solipsistic and care not about world/societal issues or our political process. To them it's irrelevant and boring and it's unbelievable they've actually chosen to study these subjects. There is no passion within them for change or new ideas. Maybe this is due to false consciousness, but I fear the younger generation will sit back and let the present and future governments do as they please. If there is to be a revolution, it will need to be now. If anyone can be ars*d let me know.
Students and alumni can really make it happen
[info]sarotschka wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 09:46 am (UTC)
I am one of the students who managed to persuade UCL to adopt an ethical investment policy, on the basis of which they are now reviewing the imvestment in arms trader Cobham, which Mark refers to above.

I believe our campaign to Disarm UCL was ultimatelty succesful because we teamed up with UCL alumni and together students and ex-students put the pressure on. While we were leading protest stunts in the quad the alumni organized letter writing campaigns to say they would not donate to UCL if the arms investment continues. http://disarmucl.blogspot.com/

So if you have a higher education and are in your thirties, fourties, fifties, sixties instead of whinging about current student activism maybe you should have a look what is going on at your old uni and help the students groups build alumni networks. An alliance like this can really make it happen
silly young people
[info]webcelt wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 08:30 pm (UTC)
All this nonsense of young people organizing through e-mail and networking sites and knocking on doors to ask people to vote instead of march is pointless. Just ask President McCain.

Columnist Comments

bruce_anderson

Bruce Anderson: Iraq is inseparable from Tony Blair

The destruction of Saddam was a noble cause, even if ineptly conducted

yasmin_alibhai_brown

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Why is my gender in retreat?

The truth is that all nations would prefer it if women went back indoors

philip_hensher

Philip Hensher: Gaffes that can be a boon to Cameron

The expenses scandal too will be seen as a helpful winnowing exercise


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion