Matthew Norman: Welcome home Lord Mandy
It might be Awakenings, with Gordon reviving the narcoleptics
Thursday, 16 October 2008
The photograph is so inherently, immutably surreal that, gazing upon it now, a part of me suspects one of those cunning paste-up jobs art directors contrive on Apple Macs. That or someone is wearing a latex mask, the impersonating device Tom Cruise used no more than a dozen times in Mission Impossible II. Or did some Downing Street wag sequester the dummy from the Madame Tussaud's storage depot for a jape?
On reflection, we can rule out the latter on the grounds that the person captioned as Peter Mandelson looks the spit of Peter Mandelson, and not Mike Tyson, Katie Boyle, Rin Tin Tin or television's hardest man Ross Kemp.
The other two theories are less glibly dismissed, because however long it has been since the news broke, however much one has read about it and however incontrovertible the fact, it remains a mental challenge to accept the stark visual evidence that here is the Baron Mandelson of Foy and Hartlepool sitting opposite Gordon Brown in a meeting of his Cabinet.
Accept it we must, of course, although for some it is harder than others. Indeed, yesterday's more frequently printed photograph, of an ermined Mandelson flanked by Lady Jay and Lord Falconer of Girth, provoked seething outrage from some who see his ennoblement as an historic low point for the honour and dignity of the upper chamber.
It is an argument, I suppose, although how an institution that welcomed that public relations cutie pie Tim Bell, an erstwhile cocaine abuser with a conviction for indecency (for masturbating at the window of his Hampstead bathroom in full view of passing au pair girls) – and with Margaret Thatcher herself as one of his sponsors – could have any new nadir to plumb escapes me for now.
These days the noble Lord Bell of Much-Tossing-Over-The-Heath's lavish client list includes the self-exiledBoris Berezovsky, while according to reports, Lord M has a Russian oligarch connection of his own.
His appearance on the yacht of aluminium billionaire Oleg Deripaska neatly combines with his generous Brussels pay-off to lend a translucent fig leaf of principle to a Vesuvial eruption of familiar loathing; not to mention homophobic ranting of a poisonous blatancy you naively assumed had long ago been driven underground by a sense of the passage of time, if not the dictates of common decency.
My God, though, isn't it great to have him back? I say this not only because he adds so incomparably to what his chief tormentor du jour, Richard Littlejohn, would call – with a hefty nudge and a Jim Davidson-esque wink – "the gaiety of the nation". It goes without saying that he is the most captivating character that Westminster has produced in generations, and that we who make a living offering two-bit opinions about British politics should be down on our knees (thank you, Richard, that'll do) with gratitude.
Few hacks have made more merry with him over the years than your columnist. I cannot express the pride I take from having given him his nickname, when according to the latest NOP poll, barely 97 per cent of five-year-olds have the innate wit required to think up "Mandy" for a playground colleague surnamed Mandelson.
The ensuing feud kept me busy for years. It ended a decade ago almost to the day when he invited himself to dinner shortly before his first and fully justified Cabinet sacking, and it would be dishonest not to state that I am fond of the old boy. ("I never break bread with them," as a lobby correspondent of the Twenties put it when asked if he socialised with his subjects. "It dilutes the purity of my hatred.")
More pertinent than personal feeling, surely, is this. No one sensible denies that this is a highly intelligent and extremely able ministerial presence in an era not notably overladen with those. I wouldn't wish to extend this comparison with the please-God future President, but the pettiness of the attacks on Mandelson this week are reminiscent of the laughable McCain-Palin smears against Barack Obama for occasionally attending the same educational meetings as William Ayers. This is simply too colossal a moment in history for dwelling on the trivial, you sense, and fixating on allegedly dodgyassociations diminishes the accuser more than the accused.
What matters is how effective his lordship will be as a Secretary of State for Business, as businesses, great and small, face what we assume will be their most intense survivalist struggle since that monstrous monetarist recession of the early 1980s.
If he is half as talented a pragmatist as his civil servants thought him during those sadly truncated stints at Trade and Industry and Northern Ireland – a post from which he was absurdly fired for no other reason than reputation – those still in work because of his efforts in a year's time may conclude thathe is welcome to his EU pension and House of Lords allowance, and even the odd glass of vintage Bolly on an oligarchic superyacht.
With Alastair Campbell and the other ageing beauties suddenly back in harness, the Blair Gang renaissance of which Mandelson's Cabinet post is the most startling manifestation has an oddly cinematic quality, even if it's too soon to have much clue which film is the template. It might be Awakenings, with Gordon reviving the narcoleptics for so poignantly short a while. Or possibly Cocoon, in which a bunch of political geriatrics are miraculously and permanently rejuvenated. It could be The Big Chill, where a group of mates are reunited by a funeral (albeit Gordon is off life support for now). Who knows, maybe it's the British college reunion movie Peter's Friends, with the petty jealousies and resentments of old varsity pals placed in perspective and partly resolved by the terminal condition of their host. As the psychodrama develops, all should become less opaque.
For now, all I can do is stare at that Cabinet Room snapshot, and – noticing a beaming Hazel Blears in the background – reflect that Peter Mandelson is a titan among pygmies at a time when baggage seems slightly less important than having seriously clever people doing what they can to dig us out of this economic cesspool. So welcome home, your lordship. Now get to work and make us proud.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
12 Comments
I would never attempt to be straight with the press; they are incapable of truth. If anyone out there ever gets interviewed, the time they spend videotaping you walk, and shooting your hands, about ten timtes the time spent talking to you, is used so they can put their own spin on things when editing.
I don't know of any politician who is honest with the press; unless they have never dealt with the press before.
Perhaps the only person who supports Peter, is the only person who has had any dealings with him? I have given my honest opinion.
I've neer had dealings with Blair, so can only say what I've seen on the TV. The Media love him, and will attack people for association with him, whilst continuing to laud him. I can only presume that Peter Mandelson who is constantly attacked by the same media, is less liked for some reason.
Posted by Robert Price | 16.10.08, 14:07 GMT
I love Mandelson. He is the coolest guy in Britain. He His style is way ahead of current times. People who do not like him are those who simply do not know the genetlman. And once you understand him, he truly is a gentleman. I think one of the reasons he is disliked is because he is too sharp for most people.
Mandelson is a walking brain. He is better equipped intellectually than Gordan Brown and his Darling put together. Brown always knew this, and therefore, when time called, he asked Mr Mandelson to help out. Mandelson showed his true soul. He put his country first and forgot about the past grudges. Britain needed his hands. He gave them both. Britain was in grave economic situation. She needed a real man. I believe that without Mandelson, Britain would have been in deep hole. He saved us all. We should all really be grateful that we have a wise person like him in our society.
Posted by Zed | 16.10.08, 13:47 GMT
Can your correspondent can provide the factual evidence to support the nonsense statement, " a post from which he was absurdly fired for no other reason than reputation"?
Mendacious Mandy would not wish to resign a lucrative position, with the corollary of the loss of rank and status, within the government, if he was "absurdly fired for no other reason", especially given that Blair could, so easily, have smoothed over the need for Mandy to resign. But then he has resigned twice (for alleged fiscal impropriety) and the EU post was also resigned. Nothing to do with the admission that he accepted a private trip to Jamaica.
Passport scandal, Millenium dome funds, Mortgage scandal, Sonae funds, Jamaican trip... all from a man credited with stating ""We are intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich". Your statement "reflect that Peter Mandelson is a titan among pygmies" is clearly a new (labour?) use of the word, 'titan'. UK plc must be moribund; if we need Mandelson.
Posted by Jeff Cable | 16.10.08, 13:44 GMT
If the only posting that supports Mandelson, tells us that he was part of an amoral group, then that says it all !!
As for being "a pretty honest straightforward man", didn`t Blair use very similar wording, to describe himself, and that has now entered folklore under "ridiculous quotations" ??
Posted by David | 16.10.08, 13:39 GMT
I thought labour was against hereditary peers because they had done nothing to deserve their titles, apparantly our heredetary peers "boo! hiss! boo! " have been replaced by much more deserving life peers untainted with corruption.
it would appear the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Posted by unhappy jon | 16.10.08, 13:36 GMT
This article is so badly written that I did not make it to the end.
Did anything exciting happen?
Posted by Andrew | 16.10.08, 10:33 GMT
Perhaps what is most hated by the media commentators is the knowledge that Peter was one of their number, and knows just how amoral they are.
I'm from Hartlepool, and was a member of the Labour Party whilst Peter was MP. I think he is a much maligned man, blamed for all of the faults of a large section of the population. He is derided an attacked, frequantly by people who cannot formulate an argument as to why.
In general, and people wont want to hear this, I found him to be a pretty honest straight forward man, who was fighting, as everyone was, to survive in politics. He was also someone who did things to genuinely improve the business opportunities here, and was clearly a workaholic.
It's funny how the media still laud Blair, yet continue to attack Peter Mandelson as guilty by association with Blair.
Posted by Robert Price | 16.10.08, 10:10 GMT
Perhaps Mandelson is not the worst man ever to don ermine but he is certainly the most odious so far this century. He is without doubt the overtly sleaziest member of the current cabinet and probably the nastiest, though Brown runs a close second in nastiness. But why was he brought back? Is Brown being brilliant, but us ordinary mortals cannot see it, or was he been pressured into the move by threats of resignation from four or five Blairites in cabinet? If it was the latter then it will be interesting to see how long Mandy or any other of the Blairites remain if Browns new found popularity continues.
Posted by P Stroud | 16.10.08, 09:33 GMT
But he's a crook Matthew! Why on earth are you applauding the return of a crook to a criminal regime?
Posted by Antipholus Papps | 16.10.08, 09:31 GMT
The nauseous sight, of Mandelson posing in his pretty red cloak edged with fluffy white ermine, reminds us of everything that is corrupt in politics. This disgusting individual was rewarded by Blair for his curruption and Brown now feels that it is the right thing to do. Some moral compass !!!
Posted by Duncan | 16.10.08, 09:21 GMT
12 Comments