Commentators

9° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Nadine Dorries: This is a witch hunt – the torture must end

Comment

No Prime Minister has ever had the political courage to award MPs a level of pay commensurate with their experience, qualifications and position, despite recommendations year after year from the Senior Salary Review Body.

Prior to my intake in 2005, MPs were sat down and told that the Additional Cost Allowance was an allowance, not expenses; it was the MPs' property, in lieu of pay; and the job of the Fees Office was to help them claim it. This was the system because every Prime Minister, including my heroine, dropped the political hot potato.

At a drinks party the other night, I put it to the YouGov founder Stephan Shakespeare that MPs prior to my intake had been told for many years that the ACA was in lieu of pay. "Yes, we have all known that," said Stephan. "The question is how do you move forward, what will be put in its place?"

When Stephan said "we all", what he meant was the political and media establishment. The BBC knew it. Every journalist knew it. The Today programme presenter who interviewed me knew it; and Martin Bell probably knew it because he was given the rule book when he became an MP 12 years ago.

If MPs prior to 2005 were sat down and told, "This is your pot, sat on a shelf in the Fees Office, and our job is to make sure you have it as it's part of your salary because no one here since the time of Cromwell has had the guts to address MPs' remuneration", you can't blame the older MPs for not giving due diligence to what it was spent on. The system was an utter disgrace, but it was the system.

The Telegraph's technique of picking off a few MPs each day, emailing at noon, giving five hours to reply, recording the conversation, not allowing them to speak, telling them they are going to publish anyway, amounts, at day 15, to a form of torture and may have serious consequences. No can deny the right to expose this, but any decent human being can question pushing individuals to the brink of despair.

The Telegraph conflates serious acts of fraud with the mildly embarrassing and plain administrative errors. No MP will escape the inquisition. All MPs wait with knots in their stomach every day. A sense of relief washes over when it's not you with the fatal midday email. But then comes sickness, as the next 24-hour wait begins.

MPs are human beings. They have families. Mums married to MPs must still go to the supermarket or school gate, often with the husband hundreds of miles away. Their children are scared. McCarthyite witch hunts belong to the past. As do archaic, cowardly methods of pay.

If MPs are judged wanting, so are those who knew the system was in place, including the Telegraph journalists.

Nadine Dorries is Conservative MP for Mid-Bedfordshire

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
Can you see what it is yet?
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Friday, 22 May 2009 at 11:12 pm (UTC)
Who owns the Torygraph? Barclay Bros. Who are eurosceptic? Ditto. Political parties willing to gain most? UKIP & BNP. Coincidence this happened just before an election, isn't it?
Re: Can you see what it is yet?
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:56 pm (UTC)
Yep that is right.

You will find more extreme right wing bloggers and journos on the Dully Tele than at a bear baiting.

Even their religious correspondent Damian Thompson endorses obscene posts and regards all muslims as islamo-fascist untermenschen.

Yet when the usually appalling Nadine Dorries posted there to point out that much of the current furore re the ways MPs have augmented their salaries with allowances / expenses her effort was deleted.

The Indie has hosted it as we see.
Re: Can you see what it is yet? - [info]quietzapple - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Can you see what it is yet? - [info]ron_broxted - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:03 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Can you see what it is yet? - [info]quietzapple - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:14 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Can you see what it is yet? - [info]ron_broxted - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:49 pm (UTC) Expand
How you get to be an MP... - [info]robert_price - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:34 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: How you get to be an MP... - [info]quietzapple - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:46 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: How you get to be an MP... - [info]ron_broxted - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:51 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: How you get to be an MP... - [info]quietzapple - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 08:49 am (UTC) Expand
witch hunt
[info]northernnorman wrote:
Friday, 22 May 2009 at 11:35 pm (UTC)
I am not paid what I am worth either. Successive government's have lacked the political courage to pay me my due (in terms of my experience, education and responsibility). Trouble is, I don't have the opportunity to fiddle an obscene expenses system to make up what I believe to be the shortfall. In truth, I can't even get expenses for the most basic things I need to do the job.

That is the trouble Nadine. That is why people are so angry. It is both the fact of the fiddling and the jaw-dropping conceptions of what is 'reasonable' AND the fact that MPs of all hues have spent decades clamping down on ordinary workers and criminalizing poor people who survive by doing a bit on the side here and there.

Now you are all waiting for the e-mail. So where has your party stood on hounding the 'benefit cheats' - or on exhorting the rest of us to grass them up? What has your position been on the inexorable rise in the prison population over the last four decades - and don't pretend that the prisons are full of 'real' criminals. unlike yourselves. Thousands are inside because they made mistakes, screwed up, tried to take a shortcut etc. Why should we have any sympathy for you all when it is now your own cheating and fraud that is suddenly about to be exposed.

Both major parties have consistently dismissed criticism of the surveillance and punishment society that they have spawned with the mantra - 'if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear'. So what is it that MPs are worried about?

Of course the media are appalling. Of course it may be desperate for many individuals who don't deserve it. But that is the game you have all been playing with real people for years. It is no bad thing for MPs to experience what they and their media allies/enemies have, for so long unleashed on others.
Re: witch hunt
[info]linchung wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 12:59 am (UTC)
HERE HERE!

Thank you for putting it so calmly and clearly.

Nadine, take note!
Re: witch hunt - [info]themartindale - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:01 am (UTC) Expand
Re: witch hunt - [info]0pi0 - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC) Expand
Re: witch hunt - [info]konangunner - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:40 am (UTC) Expand
Re: witch hunt - [info]robert_price - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC) Expand
You are spectacularly missing the point
[info]jj9876 wrote:
Friday, 22 May 2009 at 11:48 pm (UTC)
If you think for one moment that the expenses fiasco is about the expenses, then you are truly bereft of any intelligence, insight or wit.

They said that this expenses system had been in place since the 1960's and you said 'we all knew about it - including the media'. So we let you get away with it for 50 years. However, since 1997, you (MPs and Government) have exploited us, the taxpayer and started a war on our individual liberty, our individual rights and our privacy in complete contravention of what we want. So it is only fair and proper you lose all your earlier 'rights' of your allowances/expenses and all your rights to privacy.

And no, the torture must not end, because all of you still do not get it. This is the only way you will 'get it'.
Re: You are spectacularly missing the point
[info]linchung wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 01:07 am (UTC)
Again, spot on!

Thank you for stating the simple truth.
What about taxpayer torture?
[info]joshtate90 wrote:
Friday, 22 May 2009 at 11:49 pm (UTC)
Torture can be defined in many forms. Watching people like James Purnell, Hazel Blears, Anthony Steen, Sir Peter Viggers etc expropriate our hard earned money for tax dodging and outrageous purchases. Some people have committed suicide because they have been robbed blind by people in nice suits. There is no difference between a sharp suited man conning an old lady out of her life savings and these venal, mendacious and corrupt MP's stealing, and it is that, our hard earned money to fund extravagant lifestyles beyond the means of us ordinary people. I'm all for free market capitalism, and it makes me warm to see somebody who has lifted themselves out of the gutter and made a success of themselves. That's why people entered parliament in post war period. We had miners, businessmen, industrialists etc. Dennis Skinner, whose views are the polar opposite to mine, is an exemplary parliamentarian. He entered parliament because he believed in something and his passion and dedication is unrelenting. People like Norman Tebbit, whose views mirror mine, had a career in journalism and trade unionism before entering parliament. Now we have a parliament of venal careerists whose only work experience has been a political advisor. I don't care if these evil swines commit suicide, the sooner this rotten parliament is extinguished and consigned to the dustbin of history the better. We need an election, and a high turnout to fill the Commons with completely new MP's.
[info]rozr wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 12:50 am (UTC)
This woman knows perfectly well that the expenses "system" insults the voters and steals our hard earned tax money. The things MPs have spent our money on defies belief. Panties and panty liners, nappies, duck islands, gardening, hanging baskets, flipping homes and furniture galore, light bulbs and bathplugs. It is outrageous and no excuses will do.

MPs are paid perfectly well as it is. All an MP is worth is what the constituents think they are worth. If they want more, they must find a job that will pay them more.

So forget the excuses, stop whingeing, Ms Dorries, You've all been caught out. You MPs kept the System secret and wanted us not to know you what you were about. You owe the Revenue huge sums of tax for benefits in kind. Then you need to repay what you grabbed in benefits in kind seeing we taxpayers didn't authorise these payments to you so you should not have been given them.
You win.No. I do not want to fight you when you are on the broom.
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:22 am (UTC)
Nadine Dorries: This is a witch hunt ? the torture must end.
Comment
No. I do not want to fight you when you are on the broom. You win. That okay with you.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Re: You win.No. I do not want to fight you when you are on the broom.
[info]gacman wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 03:58 pm (UTC)
Pardon?
[info]rubik101 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:50 am (UTC)
Nadine, I suggest you write your future pieces on this subject to more accurately reflect the views of your readership. You are missing the point. There are legitimate expense claims and there are MPs expense claims. Most of the latter are questionable at best and are fraudulent at worst. Stop trying to hide a good story.
Why??
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:42 pm (UTC)
would she bother writing to reflect the views of those who know nothing much on the matter?

The Dully Tele has done that, and loads of their followers too . .

Try: http://quietzapples.blogspot.com/ for some more info on the Dully Tele's campaign of abusive libels & etc . . .

and http://snowflake5.blogspot.com/ for the view of someone as scandalised as most of you, but with a more realistic approach, and good moderated debates on the matter.
What "experience and qualifications"?
[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:03 am (UTC)
If the Labour machine had had its nepotic way then 23-year old Georgina Gould would now be standing as an MP in a safe seat. What level of pay would be commensurate with her "experience and qualifications"? The same applies to all the other MPs who have had little experience of reality outside politics.

If MPs were people of high integrity, wisdom, intellect and calibre then I doubt people would be so upset about their remuneration and expenses. Unfortunately too many MPs are next to useless.
Re: What "experience and qualifications"?
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:46 pm (UTC)
Apart from your disappointing name nothing prevents you from standing & trying to become an MP.

Even were your silly assumption about Mps true:

1 The responsibilities and work are phenomenal

2 They do "represent" - some of us choose them for qualities which we imagine (rightly or wrongly) are qualities we think valuable, whether they suit wannabe smartarses, or not.
Nadine Dorries
[info]simonrant wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:19 am (UTC)
Assume the drinks were free !!!
Shame the electorate did not know about your 'Secret club" , a nod and a wink on your secret salary . Of course nothing dishonest in misleading the electorate on your pay and benefits , who are you trying to kid ? Hope ar ewilling to take this stand in the next election as you wont have to worry about this problem after it . YOU just dont get it !
Re: Nadine Dorries
[info]teestee wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 12:24 pm (UTC)
"Assume the drinks were free !!!"
Lol.
What an odious use of the word 'torture'
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:56 am (UTC)
How disgusting that an MP can use the word torture in this context at a time when British citizens have been subjected to real torture in Guantanamo Bay and various third-party countries and the details of the Baby P case are fresh in our minds!
When in a hole---------
[info]bs_potter50 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:58 am (UTC)
Please stop digging. You are one of a "type" who simply has to have the last word - think Heather Mills, who you, rather alarmingly, resemble by the way. You have this strong need to draw attention to yourself and manage only to draw opprobrium. The subtext of this latest outburst -"please don't probe my expense claims or I'll top myself" is all very unedifying.
Re: "The subtext of this latest outburst -"please don't probe my expense claims or I'll top myself"
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:49 pm (UTC)
I don't read her that way, and I doubt you do either.

Juts a cheap jibe - eh?

She may be nutty on various issues, but I would be surprised if she and others were not phoning those who don't show when expected & etc.

Curious that MPs have become the untermenschen in the distorted minds of those whom the Dully Tele has turned.
poor you! I pity you Nadine!
[info]sergio_montes wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
Why don't you get a real job? I am being paid 815 pounds a month, which after taxes is 615, how would you like it? Would you maybe prefer to carry on with what you call "torture"? I wouldn't mine to be interviewed in exchange for half of your salary really... That you complain about your position just shows that the kind of help you need is call therapy. Nadine, is obvious that not matter how much money you get you will still be disatisfied, get a good psicologyst. Good luck.
nadine
[info]ranter001 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:10 am (UTC)
I'm wringing out 'me hankie, I really am.

Just go! the lot of you, anyone caught exploiting the system, 'out' As we can't trust the political parties to sort this mess out, a National Government of 'Angels' with a maximum two year life, to purge and cleanse the 'Demons' without, 'fear or favour'

Don't think you'd be an, 'Angel' Nadine.

Experience & Qualifications
[info]themartindale wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:10 am (UTC)
"No Prime Minister has ever had the political courage to award MPs a level of pay commensurate with their experience, qualifications and position"

No, Ms Dorries. Because for many, that would require a considerable pay CUT.

Unthinkable!

Luckily for you, no doubt your experience and qualifications will land you a terrifically well-paid job next year when you're made redundant from your current position. (Don't suppose you'd consider making it a bit sooner?)
Ha Ha Ha
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:12 am (UTC)
"..a level of pay commensurate with their experience, qualifications and position.."

That would be about 25k a year then. I know junior engineering managers on 30k a year who work harder than, are more intelligent than, are generally more able that any of the bunch of grubby crooks at Westminster.

The serious job of 'running' the UK is done by the Civil Service. All an MP has to do is vote with their party and listen to the problems of the unfortunate people they represent. Oh, it's vital that they attend drinks parties to keep in the gossip loop as well, such an arduous task.
Re: Ha Ha Ha
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:18 pm (UTC)
What an ignorant post!

MPs work up to 90 hrs a week, and usually supervise two offices.

And they also now have the responsibility of having to vote on whether GB goes to war should that matter be put.

It is sad that so many have gone to no trouble whatsoever to understand how our country is governed.
Re: Ha Ha Ha - [info]robert_price - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:30 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Ha Ha Ha - [info]quietzapple - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:55 pm (UTC) Expand
Therapist needed
[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:40 am (UTC)
It sounds like a lot of MPs could do with some therapy. Didn't there used to be a psychotherapist who gave good rates to Labour politicians? Derek somebody...
Re: Therapist needed
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:20 pm (UTC)
You m ay be thinking of pervy Lord Laidlaw, the tory donor last heard of in therapy for some sexual deviance in a clinic in Switzerland?

You know what Cameron said he thought when he was being told about then . . . errm . . indiscretions?

"Oh No! Not George Osborne again!"
[info]vic29864 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:48 am (UTC)
Get a grip! or get a real job.. geez.. I am a social worker in a deprived inner city borough. I really don't have any patience with MPs who blub. We also are subjected to various 'media witch hunts' when we can do no right.

Sometimes life is like that - that's what happens. If you really want to see what's going on in the world and put things into perspective any MP is welcome to come on a few home visits with me and see what good the money they've been sucking out of the system could be doing.
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:55 pm (UTC)
legends in their own minds
[info]westmidden wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:54 am (UTC)
am i right in thinking the united kingdom is in a total state at the present time? then would i not fire the people responsible for said mess? i certianly would not decide to pay them for the botched job they've carried out? and to then find out they've been stealing the hob nobs and nicking the spare change, then to present me with a huge bill 10 times the estimate? i can only say "go four letter word yourself" ms dorries
Go tell it to the Archbishop
[info]rogersbrother wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:54 am (UTC)
More spineless snivelling from one of the Westminster pigs.
Our country has been bankrupted, we are swamped by uncontrolled immigration, our elected MPs are as corrupt as they are smug and incompetent and this odious woman has the temerity to complain that the public are expressing their outrage.
If you don't like it - resign. Find a real job (if you can) or go and snivel to the Arch-idiot of Canterbury who seems determined to defend the Divine Right of Thieves.
Witch Hunt
[info]fxtrot_oscar wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:58 am (UTC)
So what - tax authorities are quite happy to conduct witch hunts against GBP - which causes suicides.
Pot kettle black!!!
Re: Witch Hunt
[info]jj9876 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:33 am (UTC)
Well said.

They have given massive new powers to the tax man, for example, to enter your property without notice, to arrest you, to get your DNA taken for even the tiniest honest error on your tax return, whilst they vote to exempt themselves from the tax man.

When they make a truly massive 'error' - the only real error being they got caught, they call it an 'administrative' error. Some of them are simply paying back what they think is owed, whereas, we, the public, would have the HMRC add interest and up to 100% of the amount originally owed as penalties. We would have to pay back double.

Nothing this lot since 1997 has been fair. They have continually treated the British public with total contempt.
Eh.....?
[info]dydor wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
Some of your compatriots have experienced what many people out-with the 'intelligence' community, and doubtless some within it, would describe as 'actual' torture. Some of those tortured have subsequently been found to be innocent of wrong doing. You and your colleagues have been exposed to embarrassment, ridicule, and outrage. Your sense of proportion seems to have got lost somewhere. Perhaps you could claim for a new one?
The widespread feeling that our representatives regard us as naive or stupid is what fuels much of the outrage you are currently experiencing.
Re: Eh.....?
[info]quietzapple wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:22 pm (UTC)
If you feel that you are the object of contempt there may be good reasons for that.
Re: Eh.....? - [info]dydor - Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:50 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Eh.....? - [info]quietzapple - Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 06:42 am (UTC) Expand
More than meets the eye
[info]nabil2000 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:53 am (UTC)
And more than meets the eye...
Do you believe Mr John Wick is the real whistleblower.
The pathetic excuse of lax security with a hard drive lying about is a cracking joke.
Of course by coincidence Mr Wick came forward, and got deployed shall we say the soon as
some started scratching the oligarch question involvement in the leaks.
Now if you read carefully what the commentators in the DT say, they propose, and advise, and even threaten,
the latest being "Now is the time to obliterate the political class" by Charles Moore.
You combine this with the persistent drip drip of revelations, and can't you see the trend here.
This is pure and screaming blackmail.
And oh boy aren't there strong laws for that!
The DT should be seized and banned from publication of this anymore, and Mr John Wick arrested for conspiracy to blackmail Parliament.
This is a line of prosecution that is as clear as daylight.
As for reforms, they are overdue, and maybe this is a blessing in disguise, and Parliament needs to address as Public wants to, but as we don't bend backwards for terrorists or arsonists, we should not bend backwards for blackmailers!
Who else feels....
[info]jonny_socialist wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:15 am (UTC)
Thats we should call for this womans immediate resignation. Her spectacular missing of the point and self centred attitude is utterly disgusting.
Torture?
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:20 am (UTC)
Nadine. It is up to you as an MP (or a collectively as a body of MPs) to ask for an appropriate level of pay. If that isn't forthcoming you do not revert to stealing from the public purse. Didn't they teach you that at prep-school Nadine? You'll be very lucky not to be imprisoned for theft of the public purse.

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime! Simple.
Nadine, Epic Fail
[info]freggles wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:26 am (UTC)
If you ever read this, which I doubt, answer me this:

When you were told that the ACA was in lieu of getting a pay rise and it was therefore OK to use it for things that are not strictly necessary for being an MP, was this before or after you stood for election?

You knew the salary when you applied for the job. Your talk of ACA as a supplement is all smoke and mirrors. Enjoy your gold-plated pension.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Columnist Comments

joan_smith

Joan Smith: How can religion not have played a part?

Major Hasan actions were the result of a clash between his profession and his faith

john_rentoul

John Rentoul: Why Cameron is the new Blair

The Tory leader has learnt from New Labour not to promise too much

janet_street_porter

Editor-At-Large: MPs - they still don't get it, do they?

What a bunch of whingers... and the women are worst of all


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion