Patrick Cockburn: A land darkened by the shadow of the Taliban
Letter from Kabul: Eight years after the war to overthrow the Islamist regime, one part of Afghanistan is beginning to flourish again – but it's very much the exception
I spent the war which overthrew the Taliban in 2001 in a town called Jabal Saraj just north of Kabul. It was miserably poor and extremely dirty, but it was firmly held by the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance and a good place to wait for the start of the US-backed offensive against the Taliban.
Jabal Saraj stands at the southern end of the Panjshir valley, a main opposition bastion under both the Communists and the Taliban. The town itself had been ravaged by war. The main bridge had been blown up and replaced by a bizarre temporary structure made out of captured Taliban armoured cars heaped on top of one other. The front line with the Taliban ran 20 miles to the south, the trenches cutting through the well-watered villages of the Shomali plain.
When I was there, the people of the Panjshir and Shomali plain were doing badly even by Afghan standards. Offensives and counter-offensives by the Taliban and anti-Taliban forces had made it almost impossible to live and work there. Much of the population had fled. The fruit orchards and fields were full of lethal little anti-personnel mines and the irrigation system had been wrecked. On the Taliban side of the line, which ran through Bagram airport, the villages had been systematically blown up or burned and some 140,000 people turned into refugees.
Eight years later, the people of the Shomali plain and the Panjshir valley are among the not very numerous winners in the Afghan conflict since the fall of the Taliban. Having once lived in one of the most dangerous places in the country, they can now count their towns and villages as very safe. Victors in the war, they were well positioned to win jobs and contracts in the post-Taliban era. Yet the reasons why they have done well help to explain why so many other Afghans are doing badly.
I drove north out of Kabul last week to visit the places where I had spent the war in 2001. In any case, if I wanted to leave the capital I did not have much choice about the direction I would have to take since all other routes are dangerous. Taliban squads travelling on motorcycles frequently set up checkpoints in Logar province on the road 30 or 40 miles south of Kabul and kidnap or kill any foreigner or Afghan connected to the government. The route going east through the Kabul Gorge to Jalalabad has also been attacked. I asked a member of the Afghan parliament from Bamyan, north-west of the capital, if it was safe to visit his province. "There are two roads there and one is very dangerous because the Taliban control it," he replied judiciously. "The other road is safe so long as you have armed bodyguards." On the second route men dressed in police uniform had recently stopped and killed six drivers and guards in two vehicles carrying money for a local bank.
The road out of Kabul was very crowded. For many in the city it is the only one that can be used to spend a day in the countryside. It is also a crucial lifeline for US and Nato forces. Their military supply routes to Pakistan are vulnerable to the Taliban on both sides of the border. Ironically, the Pakistani truck drivers carrying equipment for western troops to fight the Taliban are allowed safe passage only because the transport companies pay the Taliban commanders not to attack them.
Charikar used to be a dismal, impoverished, half-empty market town near Bagram airbase, through which ran the Taliban front line. Today it is full of trucks carrying fruit and vegetables to the capital from the farms and orchards of the Shomali plain, while crowding the road going in the opposite direction are petrol tankers and huge container lorries going to Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.
I had been in Bagram where General Baba Jan, an important Northern Alliance military commander in charge of the area, used to show journalists the Taliban positions from the half-ruined control tower of Bagram airport. I asked what had happened to the general and was told he was doing well, having become security chief of Kabul and later of Herat in western Afghanistan in the post-Taliban era. He no longer has an official position, but is said to have won a highly lucrative contract to supply US forces in their Bagram headquarters.
After the fall of the almost entirely Pashtun Taliban, the Northern Alliance commanders, mostly Tajik and Uzbek, were best placed to enter the new ruling elite. We drove along the Salang valley, where the road from the Shomali plain winds steeply upwards through the Hindu Kush mountains to the Salang tunnel, which is the only all- weather road linking northern and southern Afghanistan.
The scenery was magnificent. The Salang river had turned into a torrent as the mountain snow melted. There was a thunderstorm, and the dark cliff walls beside the road were illuminated by flashes of lightning. I used to come here in 2001 to visit General Bashir Salangi, a warlord who belonged to the Northern Alliance and controlled the Salang tunnel.
Even in the treacherous world of Afghan politics, Gen Salangi had achieved fame by secretly doing a deal with the Taliban in 1997 to allow thousands of their fighters to swarm through the tunnel – a potential catastrophe for the Northern Alliance. Gen Salangi had then blown up the mouth of the tunnel, trapping the Taliban, whose men were promptly slaughtered by Northern Alliance troops waiting in ambush. Since 2001 Gen Salangi has flourished in a series of senior posts.
The careers of generals Baba Jan and Salangi underline a complaint made to me by an observer in Kabul. "Whoever is meant to be in charge of our government," he said, "we still seem to see the same old faces which we have known since the early 1990s." Criticised for relying on former warlords and unelected tribal leaders, President Hamid Karzai may not have much choice but to look to these traditional power-holders.
One big change on the roads north of Kabul is that the bridges have all been rebuilt. These, almost without exception, had been blown up in the wars. The rebuilding of the roads is not quite as complete, but they no longer look and feel like rocky river beds. Jabal Saraj is once more a prosperous truck-stop town. The bridge made out of old Taliban armoured personnel carriers has been replaced by a new concrete structure. Reconstruction of bridges and roads, at the centre of the US aid effort, has the additional advantage of allowing American military forces to move around more easily.
Could the prosperity of this part of Afghanistan be repeated in the rest of the country? It is not very likely. Rather to their own surprise, its people, thanks to the US intervention provoked by 9/11, turned out to be victors in the war with the Taliban. Their well-irrigated fields were always more fertile than the rest of the country. They also benefit from the troubles of others as they control the one safe route out of Kabul that is not beset by Taliban in both Pakistan and Afghanistan.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
These Northern Alliance warlords whom Cockburn credits with establishing havens of peace and prosperity are in reality vile thugs who ferry tons of heroin in official vehicles over NATO-built roads, use their uniformed goons to rob and extort the poor, and rape any virgins they can get their hands on with impunity, not to mention young boys. RAWA, the Afghan womens' rights organization that the Yanks lionized before and during their 2001 invasion because it decried the Taliban's mistreatment of women, has been screaming its head off against the NATO-backed warlords but the Wurlitzer media now simply ignores it.
The irony with the Somali warlords is that the head Yank stooge, Abdullahi Yusuf, is at the same time running all the aid-convoy-plundering and maritime piracy conducted from the port of Eyl in the autonomous province of Puntland, home of his Majerteen tribe. That's why the US 5th fleet has been strangely passive throughout the piracy crisis, whereas when it came to helping Ethiopia invade Somalia, it went in with all guns blazing.
These people fought and defeated in Chengis Khan - in his only defeat in battle - in Parwan.
These people were the ones whom ejected the British occupation.
These are the people against whom the USSR intervened in Afghanistan to save their Pashtun puppet regime.
Interestingly - it was against these people that the USSR also acted in 1929 when they had risen up and ejected the pretentious fool Amanulah.
These people elected Amir Abdur Rahman Khan as Amir and helped him to create the centralized polity that is shown on maps as Afghanistan. The Tajiks were the main backbone of that polity - and anyone whom forgot that ultimately was removed from Kabul.
These are the people whom against whom the USSR lost most of its troops and as a result were a major factor in their decision to withdraw.
Yet, because of the arbitrary and British given name of that country - Afghanistan - many Pashtuns seem to think that Afghanistan is the exclusive property of Pashtun (real Afghans)... and thus they see the Shamali Tajik as thorn in their eyes.
It is why they celebrated when the Taliban - along with their fellow terrorist Pashtuns from across the border torched - looted - raped their way through the Shamali. It is why they seek to undermine the partisan leadership of the territory - whom are not angles by any measure - but are angles in indeed when when compared with the Pashtun terrorists.
It why they are silent on the countless coward criminal in types, under the guise of technocrats, whom traveled from outside of Afghanistan to grab up position and the aid coming in, without any of the hardships of the fights against the various enemies of that land.
In another example, Herat prospered under Tajik Ismail Khan, yet these tribally minded Pashtuns could not stomach it - and sought - along with their international allies to remove that patriot - calling him a warlord and criminal and now the situation in Herat has deteriorated vastly - yet they are silent on it because it is their original intention was ethnic.
The US occupation - the supplies of which are guarded by the Pashtun Taliban - going from Karachi - up through Pashtun territory - through Pashtun Khyber and Chaman to Pashtun Jalalabad and Kanadahar....with the overwhelming majority of the aid going to the south - whilst killing their own enemy Pashtun tribes - and yet calling others criminal and warlords - such hypocrisy is sign of diseased culture - a culture that is the enemy of civilization and humanity.
These Pashtunists have messed so many things up - the Taliban are on the outskirt of Kabul and yet they want to criticize and remove the Partisan leaders whom were implacable enemies of the Taliban.
It's in the second link in my first post, as you would have known had you read it, and saved yourself major embarrassment:
Afghanistan: Karzai Fires Kabul Police Chief Amid Land-Grab Scandal