Commentators

Rain (AM and PM) 11° London Hi 13°C / Lo 10°C

Patrick Mercer: We must be ready to tend to the casualties of this war

We are getting used to the flag-draped caskets, the precise drills and the sadness as each dead hero is carefully carried off the back of a transport aircraft at Brize Norton.

No one wants to dwell on the exact circumstances of each soldier's death, hoping that it has been as quick and as clean as possible, although that is seldom the case.

But, of course, most deaths involve other casualties as well and it is these that we need to know more about. There are five men wounded for every one who is killed in Afghanistan, and we must have greater visibility on exactly how our soldiers, sailors and airmen are being hurt and the aftercare that this Government offers them.

My visits to Selly Oak Hospital in Birmingham have been salutary. Twenty-five years' service in the infantry has exposed me to many injuries before, but I am still shocked by the effects of high explosive and gunshot wounds on young bodies. Be in no doubt, the care that our fighting men receive at this hospital is world class, but is society ready for the long-term support these boys will require?

It is now many years since we, as a nation, have had to deal with a swathe of amputees, other serious physical injuries and mental scars. The Government must be ready not just to compensate our fighting men, but to look after them into later life. I recall my father, three times wounded in the war with the Sherwood Foresters, only starting to have terrible, debilitating, nightmares in the early Sixties. We have got to be prepared for similar symptoms to take a long time to "present" and be ready to support the victims.

That is why we need clarity on how many are being injured and to what degree. It was very revealing that the Government announced last week that 125 reinforcements were being sent to Afghanistan. The suggestion was that these were mainly specialists, but that was not the case. A full Company from 3rd Battalion The Yorkshire Regiment were being sent as individual battle casualty replacements (BCRs) – the first time such a thing has been contemplated for many years. Up until now, each unit has been told to find its own BCRs from within its own resources but now reinforcement has had to be put on a war footing.

This is a war in all but name. The MoD cannot view this as some sort of police action that can be side-lined. We need to know how many of our fighting men are being maimed so that we can be ready to help them. War is a brutal and ugly business. Thank God we have people who are prepared to do the dirty work for us; we must stand behind them.

Patrick Mercer OBE MP was an infantry commanding officer before becoming a defence correspondent for the BBC. He is now the MP for Newark in Nottinghamshire and chairman of the counter-terrorism sub-committee

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Casualties of war
[info]hjaffe wrote:
Friday, 31 July 2009 at 06:07 am (UTC)
Right, tend to the casualties of war even as you tend more intently to your culture's bloody, immoral, and fruitless intervention in Afghanistan.
THIS IS THE TIME TO ASK FOR HELP FROM FRIENDS
[info]laserdent wrote:
Friday, 31 July 2009 at 06:58 am (UTC)
While there is an obvious difficulty in getting other countries to be on the field in Iraq and aphganistan, IT SHOULD BE POSSIBLE TO to ask and EXPECT a positive responce to a request for help and treatment of battle injuries once out ot the field .

An OBVIOUS PRACTICLE example WOULD BE Israel which has experience and sympathy for battle injuries and a general sympathy for the war on terror.

The treatment could be carried out next to injured Israeli soldiers and the mutual progress in treatment could be of great value to both in.
Re: THIS IS THE TIME TO ASK FOR HELP FROM FRIENDS
[info]jaffe4 wrote:
Friday, 31 July 2009 at 05:52 pm (UTC)
"War on terror," Israel as a moral example--those are dangerous rehashed platitudes.

Of course, the war-injured on both sides should be treated carefully and expeditiously, but the fundamental question is the war itself.

--Think about "terror," both the illicit and licit sorts.

--Distinguish, if you can, between the Taliban, al-Qaida, and so-called ordinary Afghan or Pakistani.

--Remember the Russian's ten-year failed war in Afghanistan.

--State the precise aims of the UK and US in Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan.






Columnist Comments

adrian_hamilton

Adrian Hamilton: People vote for competence not policy

In a peculiarly British way, the result usually reflects the consensus in the country

andreas_whittam_smith

Andreas Whittam Smith: To understand modern France, you really must see La Rafle

Chirac accepted the French state had supported the persecution of Jews

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The march of playground morality

Vindication of the self-righteous majority is part of everyday life


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion