Peter Coltman: Asylum-seekers need urgent help to escape destitution in Britain
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
As the UK Borders Agency announced plans to transfer up to 400 Nigerians to prisons in their home country the other day, we were treated to BNP proposals to "sink" boatloads of migrants.
As approaches to the asylum issue, these are a million miles apart but enough to remind us of the failure of any political group to develop a workable solution to asylum which deals effectively and sympathetically with the people and families caught inside the system.
A recent Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust report highlights the human cost of the Government failure to manage the asylum system. "Still Destitute" finds that the Government's new asylum model is not working. In fact, destitution resulting from the New Asylum Model has increased by a third since last year. Further, more than a third of refused asylum-seekers have now been destitute for more than a year and many are now suffering mental illness and malnutrition as a result.
Britain is committed by international treaty to allow those fleeing persecution to apply for asylum. The real issue for policy makers is how far – or how well – they should address this commitment. Currently, we operate a system which has made it increasingly difficult to enter Britain to claim asylum in the first place. Those who do get in face a flawed decision-making process which refuses about 80 per cent of applicants.
And yet, as "Still Destitute" shows, two-thirds of those found destitute come from extremely troubled countries where return passage often cannot be arranged – making a mockery of such decisions and leaving people in limbo. Obviously this is bad for them but it is also bad for the UK to have increasing numbers of destitute people in its cities.
We need an urgent solution which doesn't award refugee status to people who, technically, don't qualify but does give them limited leave to remain, reviewed periodically if they cannot be returned. At all stages they must have a licence to work, access to healthcare and proper legal representation.
Once these basics are there, we must create a genuinely "new asylum model" which treats people humanely, and is appropriate to the needs of refugees, the conditions in developing countries and the social health of the UK.
Peter Coltman is a trustee of the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Because we have more than 16,000 pounds saved we get no other monies except a family allowance of 20 pounds for our child aged 8, we pay full council tax, tv licence, dental treatment, glasses.
We own our house so we are liable for any house repairs, compare this with the genuine or false asylum seekers who are given houses, furniture, food & clothes free gratis.
Peter Coltman you insult intelligence of the vast majority of people in the UK with your plea for these people, they should not be here, we are only a very small piece of land with no resources & no money or so the government tell us. Let charity begin at home by removing all these lechers and beggars and for good measure maybe Mr. Coltman could provide their business class fare home so that they do not feel destitute.
By the way I paid contrbutions to the system for 47 years committed no crimes and my reward like so many others is a kick in the teeth from the establishment.
Secondly, there is simply no benefit for any parts of society to leave people in complete and utter destitution on the streets of their country. Precisely because this will create social and other problems you describe mentioned in the CNN report.
Peter has outlined the exact way forward:
1) Stop the destitution and get people access to some basic things
2) Have a new asylum model which actually works
It's not that difficult if you actually want to get it right.
Peter Coltman forgot item zero in his list - if they are criminal or are lying to falsely claim asylum then throw them out. I would have thought that this applied to Afghan Hijackers of aeroplanes (for example).
A bogus asylum seeker would be someone who pretented to have filed a claim for asylum with the Home Office but has not done so. I don't think this is what you are referring to. Let's get the terminology right first and then we can debate the other issues.