Commentators

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Roger Middleton: Stopping these attacks will be difficult - but the pirates may regret taking on America

Analysis

Since the upsurge in attacks at the end of last year, more than a dozen countries have sent ships to the Gulf of Aden, patrols have thwarted several attacks, and the beginning of 2009 has been much quieter.

But the navies have fallen victim to their own success. The effectiveness of the patrols in the Gulf of Aden seem to have caused the pirates to refocus their attentions on the western Indian ocean.

One other factor lies behind the recent successes of the pirates: the weather. Very bad at the beginning of the year, it has now improved enough for pirates to get alongside targets with ease.

Now hijackers are threatening an area of up to two million square miles, they are much harder to locate. European, US and other navies are still overwhelmingly concentrated off Somalia's northern shore, hours or even days journey away from the recent attacks.

Although the pickings may be slimmer and the sea more dangerous in the ocean the pirates have found an easier place to work and the western Indian Ocean may soon be as notorious as the Gulf of Aden.

Attacks in the ocean mean ships going nowhere near the Gulf of Aden are under threat. Even the Seychelles is seeing ships seized in its waters, which could have a devastating impact on its tourism industry. Ships will need to maintain full speed and anti-piracy watches for much longer times and over greater distances, adding considerable costs.

The naval forces will have to find a way to extend some degree of protection over the Indian Ocean without compromising safety in the Gulf of Aden. The easiest way to do this might be to increase patrols by aircraft that can warn ships and even try to scare away pirates. But it will be very difficult, and perhaps impossible, to provide even the limited protection available in the Gulf across the millions of miles of sea now threatened.

Some say that the clause in UN Security Council resolution 1851 allowing militaries to pursue pirates into Somalia may now begin to be used. But this is unlikely to counter the massive financial motivations young men have to become pirates, and as Somalia lacks well defined pirate dens, it will be difficult to find targets.

America has been reminded that Somali piracy is not just a threat to its interests in the free movement of trade but that American citizens can also fall victim to these crimes. The moves against piracy were some of the last actions of the Bush presidency, and it is now likely that the new administration will intensify action against the pirates of Somalia. If so, those pirates who boarded the Alabama may not be the only ones to regret their daring.

Roger Middleton is the author of a major Chatham House report on piracy

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Somali Pirates - Danger on the high Seas
[info]ras2009 wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 04:56 am (UTC)
The Pirates of Somalia are becoming more brazen and dangerous each day. They MUST be stopped. Please read this very informative article about how they operate and what drives them. http://www.acams.org/Members/ResourceCenter/ACAMSToday/2009_January.pdf
PAGE 22
I am waiting for the pirate report and no ransom paid.
[info]famulla wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 05:12 am (UTC)
Roger Middleton: Stopping these attacks will be difficult - but the pirates may regret taking on America. Roger Middleton is the author of a major Chatham House report on piracy.
Roger. I like the tone of your piracy. The American showed the Iraq war and Afghanistan, threatened to blow the world economy and they have done that. I am waiting for the pirate report and no ransom paid.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
U.S. and Somalia - ring any bells?
[info]giuseppesapone wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 07:46 am (UTC)
Unless I am very much mistaken, I thought that the U.S. military was kicked out of Somalia by a bunch of street urchins some years ago after the U.S. decided to "pacify" the place.
Nuke the coast from space
[info]living_fossil wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 10:23 am (UTC)
Nuke the coast of Somalia from space. Let the UN whine! This may seem extreme but by sending a warning message the virus of modern day piracy will be less likely to spread. Like anything that threatens the modern world extreme countermeasures are necessary to protect the lives & livelyhoods of millions from the greed of a few. This is a different time. No more Mr Softy in the West!!
Piracy
[info]leonore35 wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC)
The pirates of the 17th and 18th cents were destroyed by unrelenting naval power and hanging the
ones caught.
I wait for them to take an Israeli ship, if they are so stupid, then you will see action, the Israelis don't play abput wqith these types of people
There is a simple way to stop pirates. They have to get alonside to board so just just drop 2 or 3 grenades in the boat, and don't pick up survivors if any. Problem solved!
Once they see pirates don't return they will get the message.
Re: Piracy
[info]lillico24433131 wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 06:58 pm (UTC)
We have just seen the possible devastation when these terrorists visit our shores. I can see no problem with identifying and sinking these terrorists. The international laws should be changed to allow shipping on the high seas to take direct action rather than defensive action. Blowing these third class criminals out of the water would do the world a service. No doubt there are plenty of "knit your own clothes, masters degree in being nice people" out there, but they don't risk their lives to drive ships full of consumables. The people inhabiting the horn of Africa live by the law of the jungle. Let them die by it.
No, it doesn't ring any bells
[info]ihateutoo wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 06:39 pm (UTC)
The US could whup the Somali's any and every which a way they would want to ""giuse........pone" . At least the American's had the balls to take their ship back!!
You reap what you sow
[info]shampooer wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 07:57 pm (UTC)
Before the Ethiopian invasion of Somalia by the Islamic Courts were popular, had a degree of accountability, made Mogadishu safe and controlled piracy. The situation arising now can be squarely blamed on the Americans and Ethiopians destroying a movement that had brought peace to Somalia, and creating the environment for extremists and piracy to thrive
Piracy - yes, but who are the pirates?
[info]lewoiu wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 09:10 pm (UTC)
Piracy:

Somalia was stabilizing quite well a few years back. A new Islamic governing force was taking the country over, in as legitimate way as anything has happened in that country since Black Hawk Down. And they had given assurances that they intended to run an apolitical country. But the USA couldn't leave well alone - no -- they paid Ethiopia to attack Somalia. Money that could have been used to saving starving Ethiopians paid for a totally illegal and unreprimanded attack on the new Islamic government. Having got rid of them, they watched as the country descended into impoversihed chaos once more. And they didn't lift a finger to prevent ships dumping toxic cargo on Somali shores, or to stop illegal offshor fishing in the waters of Somalia. Oncwe again when the shit hits the fan we find the US behind it all (Iraq, Afghanistan .. remember....?) and the locals and other countries pay the price. But - help is at hand -- those rotten devils captured an American sailor ... shake in your shoes Somalians ... until you get a bomb of your own.
[info]aea48 wrote:
Saturday, 11 April 2009 at 01:23 am (UTC)
Pirates are rogues. If they touch a hair on their hostage's head, we should blow them out of the water, and hound their mother ships to hell. Beware the angry Navy. But be truly fearful of angry US Marines: the teufelhunden whose hymn begins "From the halls of Montezuma/To the shores of Tripoli/We will fight our country's battles/On air, on land, on sea... The Somalis should read the history of the Barbary pirates of 200 years ago, and fear the ghosts of Stephen Decatur and Marines who went to Tripoli. Fear those ghosts, pirates: fear them. The USS Constitution, "Old Ironsides," still sails with 200-year-old bloodstains on her decks. Shane and John Murphy, godspeed. Richard Phillips, look toward home. Look to Vermont. Look to Ethan Allen. Look to Old Ironsides. Not far from where I write, her rigging is restless...restless...restless...

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Enough of the philosophy, Mr Cameron.

Think-tanks play an important role in politics. But they have their limits.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Very nice - but forgiveness is overrated

Sometimes, as Lydon sang, in his post Sex Pistols band, 'anger is an energy.'

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Why not call Blair now and wrap it up?

The enquiry already seems like a sideline as the queues dwindle.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion