Roger Middleton: Stopping these attacks will be difficult - but the pirates may regret taking on America
Analysis
Since the upsurge in attacks at the end of last year, more than a dozen countries have sent ships to the Gulf of Aden, patrols have thwarted several attacks, and the beginning of 2009 has been much quieter.
But the navies have fallen victim to their own success. The effectiveness of the patrols in the Gulf of Aden seem to have caused the pirates to refocus their attentions on the western Indian ocean.
One other factor lies behind the recent successes of the pirates: the weather. Very bad at the beginning of the year, it has now improved enough for pirates to get alongside targets with ease.
Now hijackers are threatening an area of up to two million square miles, they are much harder to locate. European, US and other navies are still overwhelmingly concentrated off Somalia's northern shore, hours or even days journey away from the recent attacks.
Although the pickings may be slimmer and the sea more dangerous in the ocean the pirates have found an easier place to work and the western Indian Ocean may soon be as notorious as the Gulf of Aden.
Attacks in the ocean mean ships going nowhere near the Gulf of Aden are under threat. Even the Seychelles is seeing ships seized in its waters, which could have a devastating impact on its tourism industry. Ships will need to maintain full speed and anti-piracy watches for much longer times and over greater distances, adding considerable costs.
The naval forces will have to find a way to extend some degree of protection over the Indian Ocean without compromising safety in the Gulf of Aden. The easiest way to do this might be to increase patrols by aircraft that can warn ships and even try to scare away pirates. But it will be very difficult, and perhaps impossible, to provide even the limited protection available in the Gulf across the millions of miles of sea now threatened.
Some say that the clause in UN Security Council resolution 1851 allowing militaries to pursue pirates into Somalia may now begin to be used. But this is unlikely to counter the massive financial motivations young men have to become pirates, and as Somalia lacks well defined pirate dens, it will be difficult to find targets.
America has been reminded that Somali piracy is not just a threat to its interests in the free movement of trade but that American citizens can also fall victim to these crimes. The moves against piracy were some of the last actions of the Bush presidency, and it is now likely that the new administration will intensify action against the pirates of Somalia. If so, those pirates who boarded the Alabama may not be the only ones to regret their daring.
Roger Middleton is the author of a major Chatham House report on piracy
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
PAGE 22
Roger. I like the tone of your piracy. The American showed the Iraq war and Afghanistan, threatened to blow the world economy and they have done that. I am waiting for the pirate report and no ransom paid.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
ones caught.
I wait for them to take an Israeli ship, if they are so stupid, then you will see action, the Israelis don't play abput wqith these types of people
There is a simple way to stop pirates. They have to get alonside to board so just just drop 2 or 3 grenades in the boat, and don't pick up survivors if any. Problem solved!
Once they see pirates don't return they will get the message.
Somalia was stabilizing quite well a few years back. A new Islamic governing force was taking the country over, in as legitimate way as anything has happened in that country since Black Hawk Down. And they had given assurances that they intended to run an apolitical country. But the USA couldn't leave well alone - no -- they paid Ethiopia to attack Somalia. Money that could have been used to saving starving Ethiopians paid for a totally illegal and unreprimanded attack on the new Islamic government. Having got rid of them, they watched as the country descended into impoversihed chaos once more. And they didn't lift a finger to prevent ships dumping toxic cargo on Somali shores, or to stop illegal offshor fishing in the waters of Somalia. Oncwe again when the shit hits the fan we find the US behind it all (Iraq, Afghanistan .. remember....?) and the locals and other countries pay the price. But - help is at hand -- those rotten devils captured an American sailor ... shake in your shoes Somalians ... until you get a bomb of your own.