Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Rupert Cornwell: The US needs a truth and reconciliation inquiry

Dick Cheney may be out of office, harbouring no future ambitions other than writing his memoirs. But as this latest row involving the secrecy-obsessed former vice-president and the CIA demonstrates, he casts scarcely less of a shadow over the Obama administration than he did over that of George W Bush before him.

The charge that he directly ordered the agency to conceal from Congress a secret counterterrorism programme is potentially extremely serious. That it was made by none other than the CIA's present director Leon Panetta, who has before defended the agency's past behaviour, makes it more serious still.

Yet it is fitting that the charge has surfaced just as the Justice Department may be moving towards naming a special prosecutor to investigate the alleged use of torture, the so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" of which Mr Cheney was a leading advocate, by CIA personnel against captured terrorist suspects after the September 2001 attacks here.

None less than the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, has accused the agency of failing to tell Congress that in 2002 it was already using waterboarding against some detainees. But her charge has been dismissed by Mr Panetta. The new controversy could scarcely be worse timed, a divisive distraction as Mr Obama is trying to push through vital but contentious legislation to reform health care, energy policy and financial market regulation.

But it must be addressed. The question is how. For decades, ever since the 1970s Church Committee investigated earlier abuses by the CIA, the agency's accountability has been a problem. Legally, it is bound to keep the intelligence committees of Congress, "fully and currently" informed of its activities. But it has often been less than candid for fear of leaks (although these have been few and far between). The new row will only increase pressure on the agency to be more forthcoming, perhaps to the detriment of its performance.

There will surely also be new demands for a broad investigation into how the Bush administration waged its war on terror. The White House has so far rejected demands for a South African-style truth and reconciliation commission to examine what happened. But for how much longer?

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

no worries
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 12:33 am (UTC)
Cheney is not at all worried, since he knows Obama belongs to the same corrupt 'gang' and will do nothing to expose the truth that lies behind the facade of American government. (if he even attempted such a thing, he'd soon be assassinated)

Meanwhile, they'll all do their best to keep the proles distracted from the real game.

'Mr Obama is trying to push through vital but contentious legislation to reform health care, energy policy and financial market regulation.'

Nothing will be reformed, but there will be some tinkering, to make it look as though Obama is doing something.
Re: no worries
[info]virginia_1976 wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 11:24 am (UTC)
Did you know that Cheney and Obama are cousins?
Re: no worries
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 11:54 am (UTC)
No. But I do know they have the same agenda. It's just that Obama is a bit better at deception.
Cheney Black OPS at CIA
[info]retiredscot wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 02:39 am (UTC)
Cheney's "Black OPS" is Probably what has kept the USA safe from Terrorists these many years since the 911 attacks. ALL Governments have Espionage / Security groups like this for the Protection of their people. If it all goes public it restricts the way these OPS operate and defeats their purpose and Security suffers. The end result does not always justify the means but a balance has to be struck between total Security Transparency and Total Secrecy. Obama's "CHANGE" in wanting to be 'Friends' with every country and giving each the 'Keys to the Kingdom' is NOT doing the USA's Security any good! The odds are that more people than you think knew of this arrangement with the CIA.
Re: Cheney Black OPS at CIA
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 05:05 am (UTC)
Cheney organised 9/11.
Rupert Cornwell: The US needs a truth and reconciliation inquiry
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 05:51 am (UTC)
Yes Yes yes yes yes I am in Gitmo please let me out then i tell more I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
the mafia
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 06:30 am (UTC)
the USA, the so called land of freedom, is as free as a man with his mouth taped shut, manacles on his hands and feet, chained to a wall in a darkened room, with electrical wires tied to his balls. it is the epitome of facism. corporate interests and multinationals control everything and everyone and the icing on the cake is the last administrations blatant disregard for any aspects of the law and basic human rights while plundering the reserves of sovereign nations for financial gain. but of course, they are rooting out "terrorists"!!

anyway, the latest findings on cheney and the cia are great news. it puts blair and his cronies even more in the frame. this criminal mafia like cabal, run from the ivory towers of wall st and the city of london, causing havoc all over the world in the name of greed greed greed with their paid for and well groomed from an early age politicians, are being rooted out. this is the age of enlightenment, where the information superhighway has surpassed these meglomaniacs in power, and they will all be held accountable for their crimes against humanity eventually. lets see how mr cheney, mr bush, mr rumsfeld and mr blair like being tortured. they should broadcast it live like a big brother special. now wouldnt that be worth watching?

as for crimes of terror, the daily hardship of normal people in these current times due to errant bankers is possibly the worst act of terror we have seen in the last 100 yrs however, we have been well and truly shown by our own PM who rules the roost with bailouts instead of criminal charges.

reports like this show the tide is turning but unfortunately obama, will say the right things, tweak it here and there to please the masses but do nothing of significance to change the staus quo, as he always does. he works for the staus quo, bought and paid for. groomed to perfection. come on barak, you have the stage. lets see what you are made of !!!!!!!!!!!!!

i know the answer already. does anyone else?
Re: the mafia
[info]virginia_1976 wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 11:26 am (UTC)
I would like to see evidence of the accusations you have levelled in your first, incredibly badly grammaticised, paragraph. That's concrete proof, mind you, and not some airy-fairy, jealous rantings because you either didn't get the Green Card you wanted or because some American girl turned down your advances in a pub because of your incredibly bad oral hygiene and British teeth.
Re: the mafia
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 11:53 am (UTC)
mmmmmmm

you must be one of our beloved bankers (that could be rhyming slang by the way)

so which of my accusations is wrong then?
Above the law, beneath contempt
[info]lkdamo wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 12:41 pm (UTC)
It seems some western people are able to square the circle of the joint process of Democracy, Freedom and Torture. Well they can square in their own minds anyway, but they can't make a coherent argument about it.

When you start kidnapping innocent people from all over the world and torture them, how can you argue that keeps us safe. Any of us could be the next victim of their mistaken identity program, mostly because they don't know who they are looking for and will take information from anybody it seems. How does that make me safe?

We have laws in Democratic countries to prevent people doing what they want, for good reason and this is a good reason to have these laws. Every major country had a hand in this, which is the biggest shame, not one of them had the balls to tell the Americans that this is againat the law and you can not use our country to torture people.

No one gives a shit about the moral high ground anymore by the looks of it, not even the great god Obama.
It's getting crazy
[info]lasvegasrich wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 04:12 pm (UTC)
To actually believe that Pres. Obama, and Cheney are part of the same gang is crazy. Cheney had few, if any friends in Washington, even among Republicans, as he pursued his own agenda. Cheney, and apparently the CIA, hid behind a shield of secrecy, refusing to advise, and actually lying to Congress about what they were doing. This need for secrecy, still hampers Congress's investigation of their activities.
It's happened before and it will happen again.....
[info]rhysjaggar wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 09:25 pm (UTC)
If he concealed it from the President it will be borderline terror at least.......

Only those who know what it actually was will know whether it was justifiable defence or imperialistic actions.

I'd suspect that it was offensive terror, but I wonder if the public will see the details?

There's already quite enough to indict Cheney for war crimes, but I guess it's only one of a number of potential options right now...........

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Enough of the philosophy, Mr Cameron.

Think-tanks play an important role in politics. But they have their limits.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Very nice - but forgiveness is overrated

Sometimes, as Lydon sang, in his post Sex Pistols band, 'anger is an energy.'

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Why not call Blair now and wrap it up?

The enquiry already seems like a sideline as the queues dwindle.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion