Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 3° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Rupert Cornwell: Obama's choice of VP reveals much about himself

Sunday, 24 August 2008

With Hillary Clinton never seriously in the running, Joe Biden has always been the best option on Barack Obama's vice-presidential shortlist. True, the presence of this 35-year Senate veteran on the Democratic ticket undercuts Mr Obama's claim to be offering a fresh "non-Washington" approach to the country's problems. Nor does Mr Biden bring a trove of electoral college votes. His tiny home state of Delaware offers only three and, with or without him, was already a certainty for the Democrats.

But the pluses far outweigh the minuses. As chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr Biden offers the foreign policy heft Mr Obama lacks. The absence of that has been especially visible during the Russia/Georgia crisis – one reason for John McCain's comeback in the polls. But even if Georgia hadn't erupted, another global flashpoint would have done before the election, focusing attention on the Illinois senator's lack of experience. With Mr Biden he can fend off such criticism far more convincingly.

In other ways, too, the direct, outspoken – if sometimes garrulous – Mr Biden complements the more detached and cerebral Mr Obama. Mr Biden is not just a foreign policy specialist. He is a northeastern Catholic of populist bent who grew up in blue-collar Pennsylvania. As such he should help Mr Obama to connect with the white working-class voters in key swing states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan who went for Hillary Clinton during the primaries, and may be sorely tempted by Mr McCain in the election.

Yes, Mr Biden has been prone to gaffes, which Republicans are sure to bring up against him. But in Congress, he has proved his ability to work with Republicans on specific issues. Mr Biden is popular on both sides of the aisle. If Mr Obama is serious about bridging the partisan divide in Washington, Mr Biden is as good a bet as anyone.

However, he – or whomever else Mr Obama might have chosen, even Hillary Clinton – can only do so much. This November, as always, Americans will be voting for president, not vice-president. Only once in modern times, when Lyndon Johnson helped John Kennedy to carry Texas in 1960, has a vice-presidential choice arguably changed the final result. In 1988, despite picking the much-mocked Dan Quayle as his running mate, George Bush Snr easily defeated Michael Dukakis and the impressive Lloyd Bentsen as his No 2.

The 2008 election is about Barack Obama. If Mr Obama can convince voters he is up to the job, and overcome doubts about his youth, his commitment and his race, then he will win. If he can't, he loses – with or without Joe Biden.

Joe Biden is important for what his choice reveals about Mr Obama himself. In this case, the message is encouraging. The candidate has acknowledged his areas of weakness, and picked the running mate best able to address them.

For rolling comment on the US election visit: independent.co.uk/campaign08

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

12 Comments

Amazing site.
Thanks, webmaster.

Posted by Order Viagra | 28.08.08, 15:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

A clear choice between Tweedle-dum and Tweedle-dee. (Big) business as usual in the bum-stumbling American empire. Obama, a nickel slick shyster, McStain a doddering old coot, Biden a useless windbag. Wonderful.

Posted by Marla DuPre | 24.08.08, 22:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

To affect change, you have to be elected....

McCain - or rather, the Republican machine that pulls his strings - will stuff the Supreme Court with pro-life judges, annihilating Roe vs Wade and forcing raped women or girls to carry to term

They'll fund oil, coal, arms and the whole military-industrial complex

They'll give tax breaks to anyone with over $5million and crush the poor.


This is no ordinary election. By 2012, the world will be four years closer to a whole lot of danger. I'd rather have a Democratic administration at the helm than a Republican one.

end of story




Posted by Macha | 24.08.08, 13:56 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

My concern about Biden is that he may well help fend off criticism but to achieve change would Obama have to endure criticism? To "change" a country you are going to make enemies in the short run but will hopefully reap many more friends in the long run.

Biden has only just hit the ground, and as a Brit I am ignorant of him, but my concern would be that he may represent the problem not the solution. Biden supports rapid Nato expansion I believe.

You mentioned Georgia. If, and it is still if, the conflict started due to Georgia shelling Russian civilians in South Ossetia then they probably did it with Nato membership in mind. That is hardly the 1968 comparison that Nato hawks have been alluding to. Its "us" attacking civilians and that is not right.

A senior ex-Kremlin adviser said on Newsnight recently something along the lines of Ukraine, where there are larger ethic Russian populations, could be far more dangerous. That could be WWIII.

That is not smart.


Posted by thegangofone | 24.08.08, 13:38 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Kailash and Carol have it right: Obama has made a wise choice in Joe Biden, leaving the playing to big working class state wannabes behind. What you see with Biden is what you get; he has been around long enough to see through the petty politics and know what is best for, yes, best for this country which does, after eight years, stillhave some hope for a statesman in the White House. Biden is a Catholic with Pennsylvania roots and can lay it on the line in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Ohio and other rusted-out areas. He is refreshingly unponderous - and, as far as is known, owns one(1) house - and in the White House will be emminently prepared for that 3 AM phone call. Maybe with these two we can get some decent health care, public transportation, and attention, more than perfunctory, to a real green-up.

Posted by ellen | 24.08.08, 13:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Joe Biden and no change at all…

"I am a Zionist,'' he said in a March 2007 interview with the US-based Jewish cable television network Shalom TV. "You don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.''

Posted by Phil Ishmael | 24.08.08, 12:24 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

'the real change Hillary would have represented'

And that she would overwhelming NOT have actually brought. I'm liberal but I agree with P J O Rourke when he said she was America's ex-wife; the one sitting on the sofa with a sour look on her face when you come home late. We saw her in action for YEARS, we all know what she is ad what she was. There's nothing new there at all.

Posted by Steerpike | 24.08.08, 12:16 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Biden is just another middle aged white player of the power game. I cheer for the witty and unvanquished PUMAs, still wanting the real change Hillary would have represented. A woman president in a misogynist culture - just imagine it. And as for Change and Hope? Biden voted for the war (as would Obama have done had he been in the Senate to do so). He stands for a bellicose foreign policy and much else that is rancid and corrupt in US foreign affairs (not least support of Israel). No - the choice reveals Obama to be no different from any other Washington insider, hungry for power and supported by a media furiously spinning to help him on his way. As for the real voters - well, they were ignored in selecting him. 18 million of them made it to the polls, despite the chicanery and tircks pulled by the Obamites. So - no change there either.

Posted by Briar | 24.08.08, 10:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

If the PUMAs (Party Unity My @ss) truly do want to see their kids drafted into an endless succession of middle eastern wars that will bankrupt the country, led by whatever revolving-eyed fundamentalist McCain puts in as Veep (and who will take over the moment they admit their candidate is too old to run the country - say, January 2nd), then they will indeed, tacitly or actively support McCain.

Otherwise, they'll get every nerve and sinew behind Obama/Biden and make sure there's still an economy to run in 2012

Posted by CarolJ | 24.08.08, 09:49 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Biden, an impressive choice for VP.Obama has added a serious, sophisticated and experienced voice to the ticket.In choosing a running mate, every presidential candidate insists that he is seeking above all someone who could serve as president at a moment's notice.Obama's electoral calculations have certainly played an important part in this choice. But Biden passes the "ready on day one" test better than most vice presidential candidates.Biden,as chairman of the Judiciary Committee in 1987, and currently as the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has impressed even his ardent critics as an jmpressive operator. Most recently he has demonstrated a grasp of the intricacies of the political situation in Iraq, although his preferred solution -- a "soft partition" of the country into Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish regions -- never gained traction.Obama's ticket now looks very effective

Posted by Kailash Chand | 24.08.08, 07:38 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

12 Comments

Columnist Comments

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The greasy gravy train of lobbyism

The idiocy and graft at work in the system barely merits a second glance.

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: When 'life' should mean life.

Sometimes the public feel the perpetrator should not be released.

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

Why was Damian Green arrested with such spectacular insensitivity?