Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 3° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Sean Farrell: Regimes play power games with oil supplies

Monday, 16 June 2008

When the oil price rocketed in 1973, everyone knew what the reason was. Opec, tired of supplying cheap oil to the world, flexed its muscles by cutting supplies and massively increasing prices, resulting in a global economic slowdown.

This time there is less agreement and more finger-pointing for the more than doubling of oil prices in the past year to a record $139.12 a barrel. Demand has no doubt increased, partly on demand from rapidly growing countries in emerging markets, led by China.

Until now, Opec has rejected claims from the United States and other oil consumers that there is not enough oil to go around and instead blamed the surging cost on speculators.

Tony Hayward, the chief executive of BP, dismisses the idea. But it is clear that investors have increasingly turned to commodities to add to their portfolios, causing concerns about a bubble. According to Mr Hayward the main constraints are political and not ecological. Supplies are controlled by regimes in countries such as Russia and Kazakhstan as well as the states of the Middle East. Some of these countries are exercising their new-found power by holding back reserves.

What is certain is that further large increases in the oil price can wreak huge damage on the global economy. The Group of Eight major economies said at the weekend that rising commodity prices were replacing the credit crunch as the main threat to world growth.

If prices rise above $200 a barrel, as some analysts are predicting, the "new stagflation" – slowing growth combined with higher prices – will take an even firmer grip on the world economy as inflation continues to rocket and businesses and households rein in spending and investing. Central bankers are preparing to raise interest rates to cope with the increase in prices even amid claims that we may be heading for the worst economic slump since the Great Depression.

Whether speculators bear some of the blame or not, the demand for oil has been driven by all of us as the long global economic boom and rising living standards have boosted demand for the goods that China and other manufacturing nations churn out. It may be that what is needed to bring oil prices down is the very recession that policymakers grappling with the problem are trying to avoid. The Saudis may now have realised this and decided to act to ward off that prospect.

However, there may be a beneficial by-product. Faced with massive costs, governments and businesses will invest more in finding alternative sources of energy.

Beyond the current debate about who is to blame for the exploding cost of oil, the grim truth is that in the long run the stuff is going to run out.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Henry Kissinger made deals with OPEC countries to buy their oil on condition payment would be in U.S.dollars and part of the funds would be used to pay off our national debt by buying our T bills and Federal Reserve issues. We gave them the impression they controlled the price, but not so. They agreed except for Iraq, Iran and Venezuela. Since Iran and Iraq would not agree to the terms, they had to be dealt with and we know the story of Iraq.

Iran has the third largest oil field in the world and have set a date when they will flood the world with cheap oil and it's going to denominate all oil sales in Euros. Consequently, something has to be done about Iran before this date arrives and we are using nuclear weapons construction as a pretext to go to war with them when it has nothing to do with the situation.

Lindsey Williams (Book - The Energy Non Crisis) worked as a Christian Minister in Alaska when the pipeline was being built, predicted 25 years ago gas would go to $4-5.

Posted by Mary McKeon | 16.06.08, 18:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Power games are what it's all about. Can you imagine what power moves the US would be playing if we were net exporters of oil?

What goes around comes around.

Personally, behind the scenes and never part of an analysis (except when Mofaz recently shot off his mouth about attacking Iran), I believe as long as US-Israeli Zionist power is gamed to expel the Palestinians from their land, oil will be gamed to make all us non-Zionist suckers pay for Zionist gaming.

Posted by Observer | 16.06.08, 13:03 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

If the government is serious about alleviating the prices rise crises then perhaps it could try the reduce the Tax it charges on a liter of petrol.
2007 price of liter was 95.1 pence. Of which 63.7pence was TAX!

But only serious solution is less dependence on oil.

Posted by SC | 16.06.08, 12:56 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

If the money spent on Israel and Iraq had been spent on developing alternatives to oil there would not be any problem and the World would be a better/safer place.

Posted by wilson | 16.06.08, 02:16 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details