Stephen Corry: Don't call these people primitive
Michael Buerk's choice of words could not have been more unfortunate
The fall-out from BBC broadcaster Michael Buerk's comments about New Guinea tribes has been quite something. Presenting Radio 4's Moral Maze, Buerk made his own moral howler by labelling New Guinea tribes "primitive" and accusing them of killing random strangers. "The only really primitive societies to survive into the modern age are the tribes in the remote parts of New Guinea, and whenever they come across a stranger they kill them," were his words.
The Papuan human rights organisation, Elsham, responded by accusing Buerk of "regurgitating racist stereotypes" and "being offensive and totally wrong". Others have weighed in. Here at Survival International, the NGO defending tribal peoples' rights around the world, we called Buerk "dangerously wrong".
What's all the fuss about? Does calling tribal people "primitive", or even "Stone Age" or "savage", really matter? Isn't this just another example of political correctness gone mad? In fact, it has nothing to do with political correctness at all. The reason the use of terms like "primitive" to describe tribal peoples is so important, and so dangerous, is because they lead directly to the destruction of tribal peoples.
Governments, corporations and assorted others regularly exploit the idea that tribal peoples are "primitive" in order to remove them from their land or open it up to outsiders, thereby freeing up access to the natural resources on or under their land. Often this is done in the name of "development", justified on the grounds that the so-called "primitive" tribes are backward and out-of-date and need to "catch up" with the rest of us. But what are the consequences? For the tribes, they are almost always catastrophic: cultural and spiritual alienation, poverty, alcoholism, disease and death.
Mr Buerk could not have chosen a more unfortunate example than the tribes of New Guinea – peoples so "primitive" that there is evidence they were practising agriculture thousands of years before anyone in what became the British Isles.
The Indonesian government's "transmigration" policy, which has brought millions of Indonesian colonists into West Papua, was, according to one government minister, "probably the only way of getting Stone Age, primitive and backward people into the mainstream of Indonesian development". What this has actually meant for local Papuans is the loss of their land and economic marginalisation – to say nothing of the imposition of brutal military and police regimes that together has intimidated, tortured, and killed about 100,000 Papuan adults and children.
Paradoxically given Mr Buerk's view, one thing tribal peoples do possess which we seem to be losing is a strong sense of how to live in a community and how to treat people appropriately. They do not live in paradise: barbaric practices can unfortunately be found in all societies, including ours. Even worse, wanton, casual and gross inhumanity towards defenceless people is more evident much closer to home than New Guinea. Calling tribes "primitive" ignores all this and plays into the hands of the powers that be who are destroying them.
Stephen Corry is the Director of Survival International
www.survival-international.org
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
The savages of Europe and America were searching for new lands to exploit, and in 1936 the Rockefellers were told that the world's richest deposits of gold & copper were in West Papua. Their dutch geologist named the mountain Ertsberg, Mountain of Ore. Believing they had a divine right to the world's gold and copper, they lied to the colonial government and claimed they had not found anything. When the Papuan mines office announced in 1959 that they were searching for the mountain source of alluvial gold they had found in the Arafur Sea; a Rockefeller mine company Freeport Sulphur began sending people to lay claim to the Ertsberg site. In 1960 a fellow Freeport director, Robert Lovett told US President elect Kennedy that he should appoint McGeorge Bundy as the US National Security Adviser; and from April 1961 Bundy and the NSC began telling Kennedy that he had to sacrifice West Papua to buy the good will of Indonesian President Sukarno.
West Papuans are a civilised people. I can not say the same about the foreign people from America, Europe and Indonesia.
Please stop the savage GENOCIDE and EXPLOITATION of West Papua.
is the term savage bad? by definition, no ("Not domesticated or cultivated; wild"). Paul Shepard, one of the best human ecologist/natural philosophers used the term to regenerate something deep inside all of us. its all based on the context used. our culture controls perspective and stigma (ie: we must prove to idiots like Buerk that everyone lives in a contemporary world and has been historicized through multiple external factors). idiots who believe in the myth charter of Progress think of "savage" as negative. people looking for different models of community find it a liberating term and something to "reclaim" from negative connotation. maybe theyre terms not worth dying on a hill for... at the same time, civilization isnt worth saving either. ;)