Stephen Pound: I threw away my cigarettes the day after voting for the ban
Monday, 30 June 2008
Like most people with bitter experience of the wide gap between legislation and behavioural change, I doubted that the ban on smoking in public places would prove to be anything more than another well-meaning government initiative that would be swiftly circumvented by the hapless slaves to nicotine.
I also genuinely doubted that the law would be enforceable and imagined scenes of chaos at my branch of the Royal British Legion. I suppose that as a 50-a-day man I was hardly an objective witness, but the whole debate seemed to smack of good intentions unmatched by attainable public support.
During the debate in February 2006 I drew deep, if not on my Senior Service, on the experiences that I had had in Dublin, where a ban had been introduced and the immediately visible consequence was a cordon insanitaire of patio heaters outside every pub in Temple Bar and a concentrated fug of Sweet Afton that was almost a tangible barrier to entry.
I'll admit that there was a bit of the Jeremy Clarkson in my protest as the anti-smokers were, in the main, a po-faced bunch who seemed bent on banning tobacco smoking as the first step on a prohibitive road.
Having said that, the Freedom for Fagsmokers crews were well staffed by moon-howlers who seemed to want to do away with speed limits and any drugs control. Two people did make a sane and sensible contribution to the debate within and without the chamber. Deborah Arnott of ASH was calm and realistic, and Dr Richard Taylor, the independent MP for the Wyre Forest, was scarily scientific in his description of the foul chemical-sodden composition of what I had thought was sun-dried organic Virginia tobacco.
Still, I voted against the ban and withdrew to the smoky hellhole that was then my office for a restorative gasper.
Suddenly it just didn't seem quite so cool to dice with death at £5.50 a packet. I concluded that while I had a right to kill myself slowly I had no such right to visit a long, lingering and agonising death on those around me. It was a moment of epiphany – or "epuffhany," as it emerged on the Today programme next morning.
Smoking was so much a part of the Westminster style. The only intimate conversations I had with David Cameron and Ed Vaizey were in the smoking room (where they kept their Silk Cut and Marlborough Lites in a humidor – true!) and I was conscious of Oscar Wilde's comment about war always having its supporters as long as it was considered wicked, and it only becoming unpopular when it was seen as vulgar.
The ban worked – and works ever-more effectively by the day. Hospital admissions for CCF and emphysema are plummeting and the world smells a little sweeter.
I threw my cigs and well-worn Zippo lighter away the day after I voted for the ban, and I haven't had a cigarette since. Modern nicotine replacement lozenges and gum do more than enough to sort out the chemical craving and giving up was quite painless.
Next morning I met my teenage daughter at home. She had a stack of polythene bags in her arms. She told me that ever since she was a toddler she'd shrouded her clothes in plastic bags because they reeked with smoke otherwise. That was the decider. Smoking is so antisocial that it should be banned – and this time I will trust the better instincts of the people and vote for health over libertarianism.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
11 Comments
Factual or have you been infected by the righteousness of the anti-smoking brigade and, just like them, become 'a touch over dramatic'? ....... "Hospital admissions for CCF and emphysema are plummeting and the world smells a little sweeter."
How can a countrywide drop of 3% be a plummet? Did you only read the headline hype and ignore previous falls such as the 11% Scottish drop in 1999 well before any ban?
AND does the world actually smell sweeter? Those whose cafe, bingo hall, pub or club has closed and whose life is the poorer for it might think it stinks!
Good for you and any others who have given up but that was your choice.
At a time of financial crisis you might ask how much Government invested in this ban including the cost of advertising, the rise of smoking cessation empire and enforcement officers. Estimated by some as 1.6 billion in the first year it's rather more than the 30 million the DoH suggested in its selective RIA creation.
Can we afford over-egged idealism?
Posted by ChrisB | 03.07.08, 09:39 GMT
Stephen by the way was her plastic bag environmentally friendly??
Posted by Carlos | 01.07.08, 15:39 GMT
Hope you've still got your whisky and Revolver!.
Posted by Maverick | 30.06.08, 23:59 GMT
So Stephen authoritarianism is a good thing and libertarianism "bad" in your views?? Am I right?
Posted by Carlos | 30.06.08, 15:49 GMT
What's that sound , Stephen?
It's Bill Hicks, the anniversary of whose death you mentioned in Parliament, turning in his grave.
Posted by Tim Clarke | 30.06.08, 14:38 GMT
Please allow me to offer you my congratulations, you have opened the door to the complete ban on alcohol and the complete destruction of the public house, whiich is the heart of free speech in this country.
You have opened the door to the deliberate persecution of anyone who is even slightly overweight or enjoys a burger or the traditional english breakfast.
HELLO DRIVERS he has opened the door to the ABOLITION of the MOTOR CAR, motor vehicles have been 'SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN' TO PRODUCE MORE DEADLY EMMISSIONS AND IN GREATER QUANTITIES THAN SMOKING EVER DID!
Once again MY CONGRATULATIONS
Posted by soapy | 30.06.08, 14:37 GMT
As a lifelong non smoker and an asthmatic who regularly goes to pubs the ban of course suits me. But that doesnt mean I am happy about it. Now the prohibitionists have this victory under their belt they will be looking for the next thing to ban. And it looks as if alcohol is next on the hit list. The opening salvoes in what is started to be called the "war on drink" have all ready started. It starts with TV advertising campaigns and state prescribed pricing policies. Expect curbs on retail outlets in the immediate future, and curbs on personal consumption in the next 5 years or so. In some states in the USA bars are restricted to serving c customers a maximum of three drinks per visit, others limit you to one drink per hour. It wont be long before we have that here. Pubs as we know them won't exist in 10 years time
Posted by Alan Trent | 30.06.08, 12:23 GMT
'Expert witnesses' have been struck off . I believe that MPs and MEPs should have to resign or be imprisoned for giving false information.
Posted by chas | 30.06.08, 11:19 GMT
As in all these MUST do laws coming out from central government, had they made it a generational / cultural change, we would have been more able to make the message and carry the people with us.
However, like all draconian legislation, this will run and run, with ever increasing 'Must Nots' being added.
As an ex servicemen in constant pain, when the NHS care to ignore my conditions, I enjoy a smoke in my OWN space.
They thought 24 hour drinking would kerb 'Binge Drinking', how wrongh they were on that one as well.
Like all the changes, it has to be with good education and over a generation, as a smoker I too have my Human Rights, or take away my pain!
Posted by Charles Brindley | 30.06.08, 10:23 GMT
Dear Mr Pound. I was a Navy Cut man but only 30 a day. I stopped because my son contracted asthma and couldn't come near me without gasping for breath.
It was moral of you to act in accordance with your vote but more importantly you have probably given yourself the chance to see your grandchildren graduate from Uni. I wish you a happy 60th birthday on Thursday and a long and happy retirement in 2010.
Posted by atropos | 30.06.08, 08:51 GMT
11 Comments