Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Terence Blacker: But what about her second serve?

Tennis has been comprehensively hijacked by the marketing of sex

The Argentine Gisela Dulko celebrates her 6- 2, 3-6, 6-4 victory over the unfit and under-prepared former champion Maria Sharapova

REUTERS

The Argentinian player Gisela Dulko

In the glory days of L!ve TV, the red top-inspired television channel, a show called Topless Darts attracted a certain amount of attention. Its concept, half-naked women paying darts, was based on the simple idea that a combination of sport and sexual titillation would be a ratings winner.

Topless Darts disappeared from the screens in 1999 but, 10 years on, there is a new and profitable version of the same basic formula. It is called the Wimbledon Tennis Championships.

No other sport, with the possible exception of beach volleyball, has been more comprehensively hijacked by the marketing of sex than professional tennis. The potential for exploitation has always been there. Back in the 1970s, the most popular Athena poster was of the famous bum-scratching, knickerless Tennis Girl. More recently, newspapers have loved to run candid on-court photographs of young, attractive female players as they stretch adorably – and revealingly – to make a shot.

Tennis underwear is a regular subject of debate, providing an excuse to feature the low-angle picture, technically known by paparazzi and pornographers as the "up-skirt". Now, the pretence that this wet-lipped boggling has anything to do with sport has been abandoned. The press list their Top 10 Wimbledon Babes and run headlines like "Volley of the Dolls" and "Babe, Set and Match!". The BBC is playing the same game, if the words of an unnamed spokesman are to be believed. "Our preference would always be a Brit or a babe as this always delivers high viewing figures," he told a Sunday newspaper.

There is nothing wrong with BBC programmes stimulating a dim throb of desire in their viewers – it is an important part of the corporation's mission to entertain – but perhaps we could all stop pretending that this kind of light voyeurism has anything to do with sport. Otherwise, if sporting broadcasters are really so anxious to bolster their ratings with the sexually frustrated, why not include peak-time teenage gymnastics in the schedule?

Wimbledon itself, so often praised as the home of old-fashioned lawn tennis, appears to be eager to accommodate this new kind of tennis fan. There is now a powerful bias in favour of young players who look good when it comes to the All-England Club's scheduling of matches. The latest pig-tailed cutie from Slovakia or Romania will appear on the Centre Court while a higher-ranked player, who happens to plainer or older, is banished to the outer courts. "Box-office appeal has to be taken into consideration," the club's Johnny Perkins has explained. "It is not a coincidence that those (on Centre Court) are attractive."

It is difficult to see how those in charge of a professional sport can expect it – or them – to be taken seriously when among the criteria for their match-planning decisions are the legs, breasts and general dimpled gorgeousness of the player in question.

There is something about Wimbledon which offers the British middle-class a holiday from being themselves. For these two weeks, respectable folk who would disapprove of anyone sitting slumped in front of a TV watching sport for hours throughout the day, do just that. They gaze mistily at the screen as a couple of babes grunt and gasp and tell themselves that their interest is entirely innocent. Self-delusion, after all, is one activity at which we British excel.

terblacker@aol.com

More from Terence Blacker

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

This is hilarious
[info]pokerknave wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 06:56 am (UTC)
No wonder we cant produce a reasonable world tennis champion or two. I agree with the sports minister if Andy Murray is the best we can do after all that money has been spent then I think they should re-direct the money elsewhere.

Maybe get the Williams sisters dad as an advisor and get him to go and find 50 potential tennis champions, because he has produced more tennis champions in the last decade than the whole collective brain power of the All England Club in the last 73 years...
non-coital stress relief
[info]richleau wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 07:00 am (UTC)
Maybe the better description is sex starved? Or rather to be more precise England has a middle class that doesn't get what it wants bedroomwise?

If TV companies know they are onto a winner and newspapers salivate on their readers behalf at the sight of tennis babes it sort of tells you where the problem lies. I feel sorry for the poor darlings. An entire section of society lost between primness and titillation. Tennis for the middle class is as John B so poetically wrote outdoor sex. They can lust after each other with purity, flirt with gamesmanship, think dirty while playing fair. Tennis allows them all those things they would otherwise have done in the vynil heat of a closed car in the woods.

As I said sex starved.

Re: non-coital stress relief
[info]andrea_2 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 07:36 am (UTC)
Speak for yourself!
Re: non-coital stress relief
[info]richleau wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 08:29 am (UTC)
I would, but it might result in a foot fault or net call.
Tennis & Sex
[info]corcaighrebel32 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
It represents the degrading of sport and of us all.
[info]paulcking wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 12:30 pm (UTC)
I agree wholeheartedly. It completely degrades the sport.
Hypocritical Article
[info]paul999 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 12:38 pm (UTC)
This was followed on the Indie page by a link to an article giving, guess what, the result of the 'sexist tennis star' poll.
Seriously
[info]sheikwaba wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 12:43 pm (UTC)
Why don't we get them to all wear burkas? We cannot and must not be exposed to flesh. Better still ban women from playing, especially the pretty ones!! And what about the men, I saw one changing his shirt... in public... the gall of it, sin upon sin... Let's ban it all.

Or how about we realise that to qualify you need to excel at your sport and that these girls, pretty or not, are there on merit and not because of some clandestine beauty contest. The attire they wear is no more revealing than is worn about town by those in their age group and if some middle aged men like to watch them as much as they like the game - good luck to them. We are not under the control of the Taliban and still have enough personal freedom to make our own choice.

If you don't like the tennis, then don't watch it. This has to be the most glaring case of trying to create controversy where none exists. A shallow, sexist and pathetic article; can we go back to some journalism please.
Re: Seriously
[info]andrea_2 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 02:20 pm (UTC)
Well said.
Re: Seriously
[info]adampooler wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 02:43 pm (UTC)
Yes, quite. There is much of interest which could be written about the current state of women's tennis, however this space-filling, prurient tosh is entirely wide of the mark.
But surely....
[info]kevdman wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 01:45 pm (UTC)
It is also a result of the manufacturers (and personal sponsors) of the sportswear of the players?

Remember all the hooplah (ie free publicity) generated last year by Sharapova's outfit?

Personally, I watch the tennis for the tennis, and any bonus generated because one player's legs are better than another's to look at is icing on the cake. (and in this I'm referring to the men!)
Just another indication...
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 02:40 pm (UTC)
... of how our society is becoming more and more obsessed with sexualising anything and everything it can.

It seems to be getting out of control and there is a link it would seem that as our society becomes more depraved so does the crime figures for sexual related crime goes up too.

What are the next generations going to grow up into? Are we going to fall down into the same abyss that the Romans fell into, where anything goes? Where children are fair game and worse.

Because every time we raise the ceiling on whats acceptable sexual wise, it then leds to complacency and then people get bored with the new high, seek to push the boundaries further and further.

I don't think we need to be a nation of prudes by any means but it is getting far far too much.
The Argentinian player Gisela Dulko
[info]maakaan wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 03:32 pm (UTC)
I think this article needs a more revealing picture of the Argentinian player Gisela Dulko. The current picture does not adequately support the contents!!
[info]thomasth wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 06:12 pm (UTC)
What utter rubbish! There are some hugely ugly female tennis players at the top of the game. Are they branded as sex symbols? No! Obviously not. As for the sexy ones: let them wear burkas!
what a laugh, eh?
[info]richleau wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 08:43 pm (UTC)
Seems you can't get a much humourless than a tennis fan, when I read some if not most of the stuff here.
Compared to footie tennis is pure white and boooring. Where are the sex scandals in tennis, the romping in hotels, the playgirls and naturally the beefcake doing kiss and tell? Come on tennis stars Boris did try to get the ball rolling so to speak, but since his little broom cupboard incursion - zilch. Even our cricket boys managed to break a bed once, and generally cavort on tour. But tennis -- oh so dull.

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Enough of the philosophy, Mr Cameron.

Think-tanks play an important role in politics. But they have their limits.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Very nice - but forgiveness is overrated

Sometimes, as Lydon sang, in his post Sex Pistols band, 'anger is an energy.'

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Why not call Blair now and wrap it up?

The enquiry already seems like a sideline as the queues dwindle.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion