Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Religions should not be allowed to make ghettos
Some ardent Christians, Jews, Hindus and Muslims wish to demolish our secularism
Monday, 30 June 2008
I cannot stand Cristina Odone, and the feeling is mutual. We haven't spoken for years, since the week when, as deputy editor of the New Statesman, she commissioned a hatchet profile on me by a female journalist (of course), who had met me once on a radio show. Even I, well used to abrasive attacks, was knocked back by the virulence in a left-wing magazine I had previously worked for. Time has not healed that bruise, and never will.
It is hard to make fair, objective judgements when there is such animosity. It can be done, one hopes. Odone on, say, the sanctity of life, is sincere and credible. She is a canny networker and obviously has flair. But her new report on faith schools for the Centre for Policy Studies, In Bad Faith: The New Betrayal of Faith Schools, is insufferable.
She enthuses over faith-based schools, especially Muslim schools, where our children are apparently taught to be Muslim and British (you don't say), as if, like donkeys and horses, we have to be specially trained into behaviours to get to this state of grace.
As usual, subtle warnings run through this report. Apologist Muslim organisations use blackmail. Give them what they want or many more Muslims will become domestic hellhounds. If the state does not agree to fund further educational institutions of cultural, religious and gender apartheid, Muslim girls will be "disappeared", forced into marriages. From segregated schools, which, says Odone, are "crucial to traditional Muslim families", they will one day go into higher education.
This stream of irrational consciousness leads to separate universities and colleges, for how can Muslim women be in the same lecture hall, tutorial group, common room, dining room with other Britons and men? Is Ms Odone going to recommend that too, next?
Go into any British university and you see huddles of manifestly Muslim men and women sitting apart from others, including Muslims who refuse to cover up or live separate lives. You never saw this before because, until a decade back, there wasn't this distorted Islamicisation of Muslim life. An evocative film to be broadcast in July on Channel 4 on the Qu'ran examines this alarming spread across the world. More Muslims hate this reactionary Islam than do outsiders. Our thoughts tend not to matter to people like Odone.
The reason so many Muslim girls are abused, denied education and pushed into early marriages is because the community and family patriarchs and matriarchs violate their human rights. Proportionately more Muslim girls and boys run away from home than do the children of other Britons. Are they trying to escape the freedom of British society, or trying desperately to find it? Our state needs to protect these girls, not hand them over to their oppressors.
Odone praises one school where girls, covered up completely except for the face, are kept apart from boys. An "elegant Arabic-style courtyard with a fountain" is the barrier. That's fine then. What about those young girls so swathed and swaddled they constantly fall over in playgrounds? These shrouds sexualise them as much as boob tubes do the daughters of the "infidels". Both see young females as objects of unhealthy desire.
The report disapproves on our behalf of state education which offers "mixed gym classes or art classes where they are asked to draw a human body". Ya Allah. What next? Maybe science books, fiction with male and female characters falling in love, poetry? You want our children to go to hell like yours?
A bigger game is being played here. Some ardent Christians, Jews, Hindus, and Muslims are rising, collaborating to demolish secularism in the UK, which has always been weak and too loosely committed to the separation of faith and state. So the Archbishop of Canterbury ruminates fondly about Sharia family law and his conservative bishops plot to gain moral supremacy. Some from this devious coalition briefed against the nascent British Muslims for Secular Democracy and Ed Hussein's Quillam Foundation. They condemn gay rights, liberal principles and personal freedom.
What I write springs not from personal hostility, but from extreme political opposition to the ideas on state and religion promulgated by Cristina Odone, high Catholic priestess of this new order and the circle of uncompromising believers. I hold my faith dear, and am wary of anti-religious bigots, but religions should not be allowed to dictate policy and politics, nor make ghettoes. Millions of Muslims like me – and others too – recoil from the ideas promoted by this multi-religious Opus Dei. Let's hope God's on our side, not theirs.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
77 Comments
You say some ardent Hindus are collaborating to demolish secularism in the UK. I have never come across any such Jews or Hindus. On the contrary, all the HIndus I have met are against separate faith schools. I agree with your views on Christina Odone. Whenever I have heard her on the media, she displays such ignorance that I wonder why any media employs her.
Posted by faima mohamed | 05.07.08, 11:31 GMT
The world will long remember...What, when the dust has settled, will history remember? Perhaps not the abandoning of freedom of speech and individual sovereignty, but the more concrete consequence, the selling out of women and girls, the total abandonment of the notion female persons born into Muslim communities have the right to self-determination, the schools to inculcate the opposite, the laws to silence derision and contempt of those aspects of religion that are derisory and contemptible, and of course the exclusion of women's organizations from the High Table in favour of the Sacranies and Murphy O'Connors. Odone notwithstanding, this is a gig by largely male politicos and overwhelmingly male religious persons. This may be our battle, ladies, because frankly the place seems rather short of male champions right now.
Posted by Ysabel Howard | 05.07.08, 10:51 GMT
Too many leftists don't believe in racial equality and think that all "nonwhite" people should be held to low standards that would not be tolerated in fellow whites. They believe that anyone labeled (rightly or wrongly) "nonwhite" is not an individual but part of the collective property of a racial/ethnic/religious group.
Posted by AD Powell | 05.07.08, 04:34 GMT
You will probably regard me as an "Anti-religious bigot", since I think that all religions are a particularly vicious combination of moral and physical blackmail.
But, Ms. Brown, IF you want a "modern" secularised form of islam (what one might call CofE islam?) then good luck to you.
I don't think you will succeed, because (some of) the verses of the "Recital" are much too explicit in their misogyny, hatred of jews, and intolerance of other religions for that, but good luck anyway!
Posted by G. Tingey | 04.07.08, 20:34 GMT
Sadly, Yasmin tries to have her cake and eat it. One the one hand she castigates religions from a liberal platform, while failing to perceive that the essence of these faiths is not consonant with liberal ideas at all, so that, as religion beats an ever louder drum in the public market place, wolves begin to appear from under the sheep's clothing.
Then she sheds her own woolly coat in the last paragraph. She 'holds her faith dear' and identifies - without further examination - those who would be 'anti-religious' with bigotry. Do not those who are deeply suspicious of, and often hostile to, religion have a point, Yasmin? And is not the Muslim faith in actual fact and practice something very different from the one you hold dear?
Maybe the kindly adherents of all 'faiths' would be in for a shock if they did but stop and take an unblinkered look at what is going on in the name of 'religion'.
Posted by Ian Smith | 04.07.08, 18:52 GMT
I think if I hear someone else say 'its not the religion its the culture', I will throw up.
I thought the excuse for sending all these children to sectarian religious schools that are being pushed on us, was that their Christian/ Hindu/Muslim/ (add as you like there are hundreds) 'ETHOS' was supposed to make all the children better human beings and improve our society? Oh and pass exams. Now I wonder why this word - ethos - was sundenly spun onto us?
Is someone here actually prepared to explain what the difference is between religion and culture, and while they are about it ETHOS. Or will the religionists just use each one about the same topic, depending on which one suits them at the time?
Now we are all having so much religious speak pushed down our throats remember what everyone used to say, back in the bad old days? All religionists are hypocrites.
Posted by Feminist | 04.07.08, 15:12 GMT
Never agreed with Alibhai-Brown before (and probably never again!) but she is right on faith schools - just remember Northern Ireland. There are schools in Bradford which are almost 100% Asian or white,which bodes badly for the future.
Posted by Prestonian | 03.07.08, 13:52 GMT
Most writers are using the stereotypying method as a way of justifying their hatred towards certain religion. The biggest number of Muslims are not from the middle east or south Asia regions but from the far east Asia e.g. Malaysia, Indonesia and China. The writer is using her own bias experiences to come out with ridicoulous notion of saying that Islam supports forced marriage, gender discrimination etc. It's all culture based, not religion based. It's the writer's culture but she mistaken it as a teaching of Islam. Have you ever go to the far east? We, muslims women, work alongside men and the only gender segregated schools are the christian based schools. Some say ignorance is a bliss but, in this case, it shows the stupidity of the writer. Next time lash it out on your culture, not on your 'so-called' religion.
Posted by Mahar | 03.07.08, 00:54 GMT
Miss Alibhai-Brown touches on the politicalisation of Islam. She mentions that it is now common to see groups of "overt" Muslims socializing apart from the rest of the students in universities. Islam has universally become an incredibly political religion in the last two decades and the more political elements of it are gaining ground by suggesting or stating the more religious Muslims are not pure or true.
How many of the young women that are now wearing the head dress (or more) do so out of social pressure? We see in Turkey now a movement to remove that country from the secular list. The female citizens of Saudi Arabia have had their social life further resticted in the last two decades from an already doctrinaire position.
Politicians are increasingly enjoying religion to practice their art. Acknowledge them for what they are. I now tend to view young women covering their head in the same light and feel sorry that they are being used as pawns.
Posted by Sattahip Wally | 01.07.08, 21:58 GMT
No to faith schools! State schools need more funding. Damn this spineless but sometimes earnest govt. These policies can be dangerous for all our futures. Oh and I am a fellow muslim too.
I actually fear the muslim schools more then CofE or Jewish schools.
Posted by Maria | 01.07.08, 18:35 GMT
77 Comments