Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Spare me the tears over the white working class
Even those who claim to speak for immigrants flock to indulge them
Maybe it's because I'm a foreigner that I rage so when witnessing attacks on immigrants. Something stirs deep inside, not bloodlines, not tribal kinships, not even the politics of race, but a wakeful sense of history and lived experience.
The same defensive emotions rise within white working-class writers when their culture is threatened. Their kith and kin, it seems, have turned against incomers as self pity overwhelms them.
A new government report finds that they feel "betrayed" and abandoned. Ruined by "ethnic minorities" they cry into their antimacassars and threaten to vote for fascists. The British working classes include people of every shade. But only white grievances matter. Nobody seeks to find out what life is like for the incomers living in the fog of nativist bitterness.
Parliamentarians, the media, even the people who claim to speak for immigrants – such as Baroness Warsi and Trevor Phillips – are flocking to indulge the always-wretched and complaining classes. And so it becomes a matter of honour for me to oppose them. Once again. A foolhardy step. You saw the rush to defend Karen Matthews when her daughter went missing. It was class prejudice, they trilled, until the woman was found guilty of kidnapping her own daughter.
We are thankfully free to question Muslim, Asian, Arab, African, Caribbean, Polish, Lithuanian, Russian behaviour in Britain. And some behave abominably. The British middle and upper classes are rightly fair game. But not the white working classes.
Criticise them and they, who detest PC, bring down the wrath of Alf Garnett on your head. Their culture is proud; they are noble; what they believe – however stupid or vicious – must be awesome. Oh, and they are never to be called racist, not even the scum who drop shit and firebombs through letter boxes of asylum-seekers on estates.
Michael Collins's The Likes of Us is testimony to this self justification. Collins is superb on the tender history of his own family in south London, but then, as the broadcaster Laurie Taylor noted, this "poetic hooligan ... puts up his fists, looking around for someone to clout". And true to class he hits on blacks and Asians, even proffering an intellectual alibi for the killers of Stephen Lawrence.
One writer, Liz Jones, of white working-class stock, sees through the cultural protectionism. Responding to beer-swilling blokes in Wibsey Working Men's Club, in Bradford, who said on television that they had lost their place as the backbone of the nation because Asians were overtaking them, she wrote: "A snail with special needs would overtake this lot ... It is patronising and not remotely useful to treat the white working class as though they are all helpless, giant toddlers in need of conservation."
Defenders of this faith claim they are never allowed to speak on immigration. They have done little else since the first boats sailed in from the Caribbean. Whenever times were hard, immigrants were the natural scapegoats. At boom times, they were brutally envied: too rich, too hardworking, taking jobs and gals from British men, or scroungers on benefits.
You couldn't win then; even less so today. Working-class white men provoked race riots through the Fifties and Sixties; they kept "darkies" out of pubs and clubs and work canteens. Who were the supporters of Oswald Mosley and Enoch Powell? The disempowered have used us to vent their natural-born hatred against the powerful.
We ordinary immigrants didn't cause the credit crunch. We didn't privatise the nation's assets and pay ourselves shockingly high bonuses. We did not outsource jobs and bring down wages. We didn't cut back on public housing and run down the infrastructure. We didn't make the British choose benefits over work. We are blameless citizens and residents.
There is a remarkable side to this story that has been erased by the culture of intolerable complaint. White "lower" class women were more accepting of "coloureds" than the men. They fell in love, had families, faced down bigots. Despite racism in some trades unions, schools, health services and local authorities, genuine co-operation evolved as people grew to trust one another. Britain is a more integrated place than was in the Sixties, and many of us would not live elsewhere.
Like others who came to stay, I hope one day we can truly belong, our rights and responsibilities no different from those who arrived and laid claims long before us on these mongrel, oft-invaded isles. Perhaps there will be brief respite when Britain will not blame the outsider for all its woes. Alas not yet, certainly not over this hard and cold coming year.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
It should be refered to the police.
...the candid scorn for poor white people and their perceived 'culture' is rampant and deeded to be socially acceptable...
More:
http://www.runnymedetrust.org/news/62/3
I read with interest that the writer of this article is:
"Known for her sharp commentary on issues of multiculturalism, race and religion"
it is with some curiousity that I now notice that they are not known for sharp commentary
on 'class'. In Britain surely 'Class' is a subject akin the the Weather. Oh well some
news articles show little class but do are good example of scorn and bile.
The note on the "add comments" box warns.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission.
You should apply the same to your appallingly bad "journalists".
You had nothing to do with the rights and freedoms you, as an immigrant benefit from, you gladly claim them for yourself, but then denigrate the indigenous when they expect to be protected by those same rights and freedoms. To you, they are automatically guilty, while you demand that you and other immigrants not be lumped in with immigrants who commit murders, terrorism, rape and other violence. If the indigenous acted as you do, you would label them again, racist and xenophobic. You hypocritically demand the right to do, what you would deny indigenous British people the right to do.
Frankly, you sought to stir the pot, to show that you could get away with being guilty of hatred and racism, in the hopes that you would be attacked so you could play the victim. You are very much part of the cause of the economic problems in this country, and I hope that you are ultimately held accountable.
Yasmin's article will upset some only because it is so TRUE.
It upsets because it is a grotesquely racist FABRICATION. Replace the word white with black, and read it back to yourself.
In my friend's neighboour home are three generations who have no job between them. Recently one of the younger ones told us that "work is for losers". I'd like to be able to counter that kind of emptiness.
Contrast this with your recent essay on the racism of the Royal Family and British aristocracy.
I wonder why you find it easier to berate some of the poor for their racism rather than people who are insulated by their wealth and oppurtinites against some of the negative effects of Globalization. Free movement of Labour (immigration) CAN and DOES reduce the pressure on employers for better pay and conditions. Perhaps Mrs Alibhai Brown, this is because you are also insulated from this. It is not easy for people without an Oxford education to make a substantial living simply writing about 'race' for the chattering classes.
And FAO regarding one of the the ethnic slurs : 'mongrel'. Who ever said that to be a member of a nation, in this case, the English, one has to be racially pure? No one Mrs Alibhai Brown should be found quoting, I am sure.
Thank you
Matthew Anderson - Director for Working From Home businesses
It seems that you dont pick on women Yasmin ? The "oversize toddlers" in working mens clubs being your target.
Even though our biggest employers of the working classes (councils of all types) and the NHS, employ vastly more women than men typically 70 or 80:20, or worse. so it was not really an anti white working class jibe Yasmin, but an anti man rant. jUST fashionable PC, easier to be a rebellious muslim than ( anti working class man)
If any reader wants to check the validity of anti man policy ask your council how many registrars (Birthe Marriages Deaths) they have . Theyre almost uniquely women. Something about controlling all of life perhaps.
Respect to Beer swilling oversize toddlers everywhere. (You'll miss us when we've gone)