Commentators

null 14° London Hi 22°C / Lo 13°C

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Spare me the tears over the white working class

Even those who claim to speak for immigrants flock to indulge them

Maybe it's because I'm a foreigner that I rage so when witnessing attacks on immigrants. Something stirs deep inside, not bloodlines, not tribal kinships, not even the politics of race, but a wakeful sense of history and lived experience.

The same defensive emotions rise within white working-class writers when their culture is threatened. Their kith and kin, it seems, have turned against incomers as self pity overwhelms them.

A new government report finds that they feel "betrayed" and abandoned. Ruined by "ethnic minorities" they cry into their antimacassars and threaten to vote for fascists. The British working classes include people of every shade. But only white grievances matter. Nobody seeks to find out what life is like for the incomers living in the fog of nativist bitterness.

Parliamentarians, the media, even the people who claim to speak for immigrants – such as Baroness Warsi and Trevor Phillips – are flocking to indulge the always-wretched and complaining classes. And so it becomes a matter of honour for me to oppose them. Once again. A foolhardy step. You saw the rush to defend Karen Matthews when her daughter went missing. It was class prejudice, they trilled, until the woman was found guilty of kidnapping her own daughter.

We are thankfully free to question Muslim, Asian, Arab, African, Caribbean, Polish, Lithuanian, Russian behaviour in Britain. And some behave abominably. The British middle and upper classes are rightly fair game. But not the white working classes.

Criticise them and they, who detest PC, bring down the wrath of Alf Garnett on your head. Their culture is proud; they are noble; what they believe – however stupid or vicious – must be awesome. Oh, and they are never to be called racist, not even the scum who drop shit and firebombs through letter boxes of asylum-seekers on estates.

Michael Collins's The Likes of Us is testimony to this self justification. Collins is superb on the tender history of his own family in south London, but then, as the broadcaster Laurie Taylor noted, this "poetic hooligan ... puts up his fists, looking around for someone to clout". And true to class he hits on blacks and Asians, even proffering an intellectual alibi for the killers of Stephen Lawrence.

One writer, Liz Jones, of white working-class stock, sees through the cultural protectionism. Responding to beer-swilling blokes in Wibsey Working Men's Club, in Bradford, who said on television that they had lost their place as the backbone of the nation because Asians were overtaking them, she wrote: "A snail with special needs would overtake this lot ... It is patronising and not remotely useful to treat the white working class as though they are all helpless, giant toddlers in need of conservation."

Defenders of this faith claim they are never allowed to speak on immigration. They have done little else since the first boats sailed in from the Caribbean. Whenever times were hard, immigrants were the natural scapegoats. At boom times, they were brutally envied: too rich, too hardworking, taking jobs and gals from British men, or scroungers on benefits.

You couldn't win then; even less so today. Working-class white men provoked race riots through the Fifties and Sixties; they kept "darkies" out of pubs and clubs and work canteens. Who were the supporters of Oswald Mosley and Enoch Powell? The disempowered have used us to vent their natural-born hatred against the powerful.

We ordinary immigrants didn't cause the credit crunch. We didn't privatise the nation's assets and pay ourselves shockingly high bonuses. We did not outsource jobs and bring down wages. We didn't cut back on public housing and run down the infrastructure. We didn't make the British choose benefits over work. We are blameless citizens and residents.

There is a remarkable side to this story that has been erased by the culture of intolerable complaint. White "lower" class women were more accepting of "coloureds" than the men. They fell in love, had families, faced down bigots. Despite racism in some trades unions, schools, health services and local authorities, genuine co-operation evolved as people grew to trust one another. Britain is a more integrated place than was in the Sixties, and many of us would not live elsewhere.

Like others who came to stay, I hope one day we can truly belong, our rights and responsibilities no different from those who arrived and laid claims long before us on these mongrel, oft-invaded isles. Perhaps there will be brief respite when Britain will not blame the outsider for all its woes. Alas not yet, certainly not over this hard and cold coming year.

y.alibhai-brown@independent.co.uk

More from Yasmin Alibhai-Brown

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]charlesmorin wrote:
Thursday, 22 January 2009 at 04:21 am (UTC)
This article is racist.

It should be refered to the police.
A certain class of scorn and bile
[info]classlesshuman wrote:
Thursday, 22 January 2009 at 10:37 pm (UTC)
Maybe the recent publication of the Runnymede Trust is worth considering by such commentators.
...the candid scorn for poor white people and their perceived 'culture' is rampant and deeded to be socially acceptable...
More:
http://www.runnymedetrust.org/news/62/30/The-white-working-class-Britain-s-forgotten-race-victims.html

I read with interest that the writer of this article is:

"Known for her sharp commentary on issues of multiculturalism, race and religion"

it is with some curiousity that I now notice that they are not known for sharp commentary
on 'class'. In Britain surely 'Class' is a subject akin the the Weather. Oh well some
news articles show little class but do are good example of scorn and bile.
Hateful Bigotry
[info]jrs1 wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 08:01 am (UTC)
Nasty, hateful, inaccurate, racist, 50 years out of date, woefully badly written, almost completely devoid of any logic or compassion.

The note on the "add comments" box warns.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission.

You should apply the same to your appallingly bad "journalists".
extreme left wing
[info]bob198766543 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 09:50 am (UTC)
this woman is the most underhanded racist writer i have ever had the pleasure of reading. The more your journalists of this nature spout the bile they do the bigger the race divide will get no wonder with people like this writing for your paper there are segregated cities and ghettoes and not the multiracial utopia that all the left wing idealist wanted. The hatred of the white male is unbeleivable, considering the lazy white man built the country in which you and no doubt the 35 members of your family are now residing in and probably rinsing of benefit. Even stooping as low as to taunt us about how the big bad immigrants stole our jobs and our women, please my love realise that know that we are the most well trained and highly educated people in the world in most industries. Employers are starting to wake up to this as well now, especially when polish chocolate makers come here and try to build houses for a quarter of the price of a highly skilled Englishman, When everything goes wrong the employer has to fork out for the Englishman to come and put it all right. Serves the greedy bosses right. Try to save money like this and it will end up costing you. Also please realise that 98% of marriages are still same nationality and race. White Englishmen are very proud and up standing people and no one not even this bile spouter will change that. Then again i think that annoys her.
You not only are complicit, you are guilty of what you accuse others of
[info]mares2 wrote:
Monday, 9 February 2009 at 08:45 pm (UTC)
For you infer that the indigenous British have less rights, and less entitlement to their jobs, housing and benefits, and immigrants have more of a right. You throw up racism in the past, and then try and infer that working poor indigenous British who speak out on behalf of their own rights, have to be racist and/or xenophobic for doing so. You perpetuate negative stereotypes, that they are lazy, or took things for granted, and are thereby not being discriminated against. You are the one guilty of what you accuse them of.

You had nothing to do with the rights and freedoms you, as an immigrant benefit from, you gladly claim them for yourself, but then denigrate the indigenous when they expect to be protected by those same rights and freedoms. To you, they are automatically guilty, while you demand that you and other immigrants not be lumped in with immigrants who commit murders, terrorism, rape and other violence. If the indigenous acted as you do, you would label them again, racist and xenophobic. You hypocritically demand the right to do, what you would deny indigenous British people the right to do.

Frankly, you sought to stir the pot, to show that you could get away with being guilty of hatred and racism, in the hopes that you would be attacked so you could play the victim. You are very much part of the cause of the economic problems in this country, and I hope that you are ultimately held accountable.
'Foreigner'
[info]skyapple201 wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 03:40 pm (UTC)
I just wonder how long it will take for one to feel not being a foreigner but a full member of the society. I've been here for only severl years.
Agreed
[info]dairyflat wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 03:37 am (UTC)
As a white working class man the article reads well to me. I get sick of my fellows moaning about poor them. Get motivated and do something with yourselves. Stop blaming others for your OWN problems.
Yasmin's article will upset some only because it is so TRUE.
Re: Agreed
[info]jrs1 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 March 2009 at 03:09 pm (UTC)
Do you think the same of non whites who believe that they are undervalued and discriminated against?

It upsets because it is a grotesquely racist FABRICATION. Replace the word white with black, and read it back to yourself.
Re: Agreed
[info]dairyflat wrote:
Tuesday, 3 March 2009 at 09:42 pm (UTC)
You may have misunderstood my post. I am not talking about non-whites nor am I attempting to. I am talking about my own white working class community. Some, not all, of whom are without motivation and a desire to better themselves.

In my friend's neighboour home are three generations who have no job between them. Recently one of the younger ones told us that "work is for losers". I'd like to be able to counter that kind of emptiness.
Re: Agreed
[info]londongirl1988 wrote:
Saturday, 11 April 2009 at 12:29 pm (UTC)
What you call owning a corner shop work. Oh please mate you claim to be white working class but obviously don't know or speak for white working class people.
FAO Mrs Alibhai Brown
[info]pob1 wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)


Contrast this with your recent essay on the racism of the Royal Family and British aristocracy.

I wonder why you find it easier to berate some of the poor for their racism rather than people who are insulated by their wealth and oppurtinites against some of the negative effects of Globalization. Free movement of Labour (immigration) CAN and DOES reduce the pressure on employers for better pay and conditions. Perhaps Mrs Alibhai Brown, this is because you are also insulated from this. It is not easy for people without an Oxford education to make a substantial living simply writing about 'race' for the chattering classes.

And FAO regarding one of the the ethnic slurs : 'mongrel'. Who ever said that to be a member of a nation, in this case, the English, one has to be racially pure? No one Mrs Alibhai Brown should be found quoting, I am sure.

Thank you

.....
[info]templatesites wrote:
Tuesday, 7 April 2009 at 09:36 am (UTC)
Good article, many thanks for writing.

Matthew Anderson - Director for Working From Home businesses
Yasmins Rant above
[info]ronpom wrote:
Tuesday, 21 April 2009 at 02:36 pm (UTC)

It seems that you dont pick on women Yasmin ? The "oversize toddlers" in working mens clubs being your target.
Even though our biggest employers of the working classes (councils of all types) and the NHS, employ vastly more women than men typically 70 or 80:20, or worse. so it was not really an anti white working class jibe Yasmin, but an anti man rant. jUST fashionable PC, easier to be a rebellious muslim than ( anti working class man)

If any reader wants to check the validity of anti man policy ask your council how many registrars (Birthe Marriages Deaths) they have . Theyre almost uniquely women. Something about controlling all of life perhaps.

Respect to Beer swilling oversize toddlers everywhere. (You'll miss us when we've gone)

Columnist Comments

steve_richards

Steve Richards: There's trouble when the spin doctor becomes part of the story

It was only a matter of time before Andy Coulson became a news story

andreas_whittam_smith

Andreas Whittam Smith: Forget regulation – the banks are back to business as usual

It was supposed to be "never glad confident morning again" for capitalism

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The true driving force is cash

The realities behind the energy debate


Loading...