Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Why should Muslims put up with being stereotyped?
Like everyone, we are creatures of many parts. But we are not allowed such complexities
Monday, 28 April 2008
Looking back at what I did this week, a parade of identities walks past, each one a part of the whole, none the whole of me. A passionate Londoner, I declared against Boris Johnson. With Billy Bragg at the Barbican on St George's Day, I was graciously invited by him to feel part of "progressive" Englishness and, funnily, in that hall, I did.
On to the launch of Quilliam, a think tank set up by reformed radical Ed Hussain, and felt part of a new worldwide ummah of open-minded Muslims. At The School of Oriental and African Studies, I joined a panel and an engaged audience to discuss racism. From deep within stirred the old, anti-racist activist. I read words by James Baldwin at a moving gathering organised by the Stop the War Coalition, and united with other kindred spirits who still fight for Iraq.
Performing my show at the Oxford Playhouse, I returned to my Afro-Asian roots. Attended a concert of classical European music in a church hall, being just myself I guess. Was also a mum, wife, friend and neighbour.
Like all other humans, I am a creature of multiple and changeable parts. However, British Muslims are not permitted such complexities. We must be only Muslim (definition highly specified), walking rule books in uniform, freakishly religious, and preferably demanding and noisy.
Authoritarian Muslim "leaders" impose these orders. But so too do many of the influential and powerful for whom there is no such thing as a complicated or comfortable Muslim who skilfully negotiates various allegiances. Institutional gatekeepers trade in archetypes: those who vociferously refuse accommodation and defiant apostates are easy. Ardent opponents of all things western are sought-after enemies; facile supporters of western duplicities are best friends.
Not welcome are Muslims who defy the classification system – too much toil and trouble when everyone wants simple clarity. Are you with us or against us? Do you have faith or are you a democrat? Do you think Salman Rushdie was right in his Satanic Verses or do you want him dead? Do you support an Islamic state in the west or do you want the west to allow you an Islamic state within? TV is the worst culprit, but quangos and think tanks are not far behind.
They know best what makes a real Muslim. Huma Qureshi, who has great hair and style, says she was auditioned for a BBC series on Muslim women and rejected because "they wanted a really authentic, well-covered one". In her memoir, TV journalist Yasmin Hai writes of her irritation with executives who always want on screen "some mad Mullah types".
At a major arts conference, organisers refused to invite a devout Muslim artist because she paints faces and to them was a heretic. Millions of Muslims are expected to pick a single identity and plump it up with artificial injections of absolute loyalty, causing a distortion both grotesque and unpalatable. Muslims who are content in their faith and are of this land and its history belong but are told they cannot make such claims. They have lived in a democracy, imbibed its principles but have been refused full membership. This Thursday, the day of the local elections, some of us are launching a new organisation to help turn around the invented, destructive and man-made divide splitting Muslims and their state.
British Muslims for Secular Democracy (BMSD) believes the separation of state and faith gives us all a safe and mutual space. Most members are not atheists. We can see clearly how religion is poisoning political governance and that politics contaminates religion. Muslims must be free to choose how they practise their religion or even just to be "cultural" Muslims. Diversity has been the constant companion to our faith since its inception. Most important of all, we hope to speak to young British Muslims who have lost trust and their bearings. Obvious and subtle anti-Muslim racism and the failures of their own communities have alienated too many. Self-exclusion and exclusion are blades of the same scissors.
Denied democratic entitlements, stereotyped and used, they feel an anger that is ripe for exploitation. I know this question is not allowed (much is not allowed) but what made Mohammad Sadiq Khan, educated and a loving father, into a bomber? Sorry, it wasn't simply some wicked Mullah. Something far more unsettling is going on. As Zulf, BMSD supporter and medical student, put it: "Nobody understands. We are not stupid, just so disappointed all the time, never allowed to be ourselves, told do this, do that, never free. When will our rights be respected by the community and country?" When indeed?




Comments
30 Comments
In fact, the whole situation is about the absence of constructive dialogue,not only between elites and governmental officials, but also amongst Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals, students, parents, and all other segments of any societies. Absence of dialogue spawns ignorance of the other , if we assume there is "other". And, ignorance creates fear .
The most basic thing to do is to de-construct the elements of fear emanating from the absence of well-established bridges amongst students, parents, and the like. I do not really think that any person could be compartmentalized into separate identities, because identity entails different destinations. I could be an Egyptian as it is my nation, so affiliated also to Arab, African civilizations, but also I am culturally oriented to Muslim , American, European, Latin, and Asian cultures, each of which overlaps with the other.
In fact, you can extricate knowledge from one source of culture or one civilization. Civilization is a confluence of different human experiences that are lumped together to remind us that we all humans. If someone tries to assume that he could gain all knowledge from one source, so one closes all other ways to develop and creates a separated enclave that no only creates fear, but also hatred, arrogance, and the like.
Thanks
Posted by Amr | 30.04.08, 08:11 GMT
Hey Eddie,
"And yet, when the Western powers liberate Iraq from a fascistic dictator who based his politicas on the jew-hater hitler (and killed 1.5million muslims) muslims march up and down making an awful lot of noise" (sic) - very imaginative way of describing the mainly US/UK initiated chaos and genocide in Iraq. So I assume that you clearly justify the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians by mainly US trigger-happy troops and Al-Qaeda terrorist. Actually it's for the oil - but I think that strategy's somewhat backfired against all neo-con expectations with oil being around $120 a barrel!
Based on the 5 years of hell that Iraq is enduring, what took Saddam 30 years to achieve in liberating Iraqis from their Earthly worries is being accomplished far more quickly by the Western liberators!
Posted by Bemused Onlooker | 29.04.08, 21:24 GMT
I had no idea that being opposed to YAB made one a fan of Linda Lee-Potter. Just as I had no idea that being opposed to the proliferation of imported superstitions made one a Little Englander. Things aren't often what they seem in the religious hinterlands of the noosphere, so I must bow to the intervention of a senior cleric (is that the word I'm looking for?).
What does he mean, though:'white' or 'passing as'?
Posted by Rich Whiteman | 29.04.08, 15:26 GMT
'R. Bishop' - now there's a name suggesting a penchant for intellectual self-abuse. Sure your surname isn't 'Sole'?
Posted by Jason | 29.04.08, 13:25 GMT
"Rich Whiteman" - now there's a name to go with a meaningless post. Are you 'white', though, Mr Man, or just 'passing as' ?
And thank you all you other Daily Mail/Daily Express readers, for your considered contributions.
Posted by R Bishop | 29.04.08, 12:51 GMT
This is beyond parody. It's cruel. When YAB grows up she's going to be so embarrased.
I won't buy the Indy until she goes.
Posted by Rich Whiteman | 29.04.08, 11:39 GMT
It is NOT a myth that there are many muslims who are a danger to our society - it is a fact. And stereotypes, let's not forget, are based on truth.
When I predicted a major attack on the UK or US transport system by muslims 10 years ago I was called a racist and a scaremonger. (though not islamophobic as that word was 'invented' 10 years ago by 'islamophiliacs' from the race religions industry with the specific intention of linking race and religion! The very think the muslims now moan about!). No-one would call me that any more - except perhaps the anti-white anti-debate Yasmin Alibi-Brawn.
All problems muslims are facing were created by muslims. End of. All islamists and jihadists should leave Britain - and the muslim 'community' should sort itself out. Of course it won't - far easier to blame 'the west, the jews, the 'islamophobics', the media, the weather, the cat, the dog, the goat....
Pathetic.
Posted by Eddie | 29.04.08, 08:54 GMT
Dear Ms Alibhai-Brown: Thank you for your wonderful and much-needed article. We should have an organization like yours here in the USA, where similar misconceptions abound.
Posted by Harry Siitonen | 29.04.08, 03:37 GMT
Sounds suspiciously like BDSM to me!
Posted by John | 29.04.08, 01:52 GMT
I have been reading your articles for some time and i notice that you have problems being a Muslem living in England and i am not sure whether you as a person and your attitude is the problem. I have many Muslim friends who live in England and they are doing very well and i notice when i visit them that they have assimilated in the English way of life having many English friends and their only complain about England is the weather... With due respect, may i ask you: If you are not happy being a Muslim living in England why are you still in that country? why don't you stick to your Afro-Asian roots and move to an Asian Islamic country ??
Sam from Sweden
Posted by Sam from Sweden | 29.04.08, 01:06 GMT
30 Comments