Leading Articles

null 14° London Hi 20°C / Lo 12°C

Leading article: A triumph for all of Europe

Wednesday, 23 July 2008

The arrest of Radovan Karadzic has caused rejoicing in the streets of Bosnia and Croatia, where his brand of violent nationalism resulted in tens of thousands of dead and hundreds of thousands displaced. It should also be the cause of some congratulation in Brussels and Western Europe. It was the Serbs who, under a new pro-Western government, who finally and belatedly arrested the man so reviled by his enemies after 12 years in disguise. But it was the lure of membership of the European Union, and the steady demand by European leaders that Serbia first bring its war criminals to justice, that drove them to it.

Far from the usual image of a butcher, Karadzic is a man of many parts: poet, psychiatrist, psychologist to the Red Star Belgrade football team. As populist leader of the Bosnian Serbs, he was also responsible, on the indictment by the Hague Tribunal on war crimes, of complicity in genocide, extermination, murder, wilful killing, persecution, deportation, taking of hostages and other inhumane acts. Nato ended his run in 1995 – not before time it should be said, but failed to bring the man to book.

Its soldiers conducted dozens of raids to apprehend him. They burst into Serbian Orthodox monasteries and scoured mountain caves in remote eastern Bosnia. They stormed the homes of his children. They even searched the sewage tank at his wife's house. Through it all there were those, like Carla del Ponte, the former UN chief prosecutor, who insisted that the war crimes fugitive was hiding in the Serbian capital, Belgrade, under the protection of hardliners in the security services. His whereabouts must have been well known to the authorities. What was preventing his arrest was only political will.

In the event, Karadzic was captured not in some remote romantic Montenegran hideout of the kind which might have been conjured in his cliché-ridden nationalist poetry. He was arrested on a Belgrade bus just days after the formation of a pro-Western coalition government pledged to pursue EU membership. He had been living in the city, albeit disguised with a bushy white beard, and walking freely around the place, apparently for a considerable time. It all suggests the decisive factor behind his capture was political resolve.

So what changed? The journey out of the nationalist mindset has been an exceeding slow one for the Serbs. The architect of the Balkans wars, Slobodan Milosevic, was ousted in 2000 and replaced by a fragile coalition government whose prime minister was assassinated in 2003 after sending Milosevic to the Hague. Even today, one in three Serbs still vote for parties which consider Karadzic a hero and hold that the international court in The Hague is biased against Serbs. But the national psyche was rocked in 2005 when a video of Bosnian Serb soldiers shooting captives from Srebrenica shocked television viewers in the former Yugoslavia. In 2006, Serbs voted in a referendum to replace the Milosevic-era constitution with a new one. Under it a coalition government was elected which earlier this year reached stalemate over what to do with the exhausted Serbian economy.

The faction led by the centre-left President, Boris Tadic, saw the answer in membership of the European Union, which would give Serbia open access to a huge new market. Serbia, the largest of the republics of the former Yugoslavia and the first to break away from it, was being left behind. Neighbouring Slovenia had joined the EU in 2004. Croatia began entry talks the following year, after tipping off UN investigators to the whereabouts of a Croatian war crimes suspect. The arrest of Karadzic and other indicted war criminals was one of the main conditions of Serbian progress towards EU membership.

When the rift between pro-Western President Tadic and a nationalist prime minister over EU membership became unbridgeable – providing evidence of the old political saw that there is little permanence in a Balkan alliance – the President called an election. Earlier this month he won it, only just, and installed a new prime minister, whose power base is, ironically, the Socialist Party of Serbia once led by Slobodan Milosevic. Within two weeks. Radovan Karadzic had been tracked down and arrested.

What this Byzantine saga reveals is the influence of the European Union at its deepest level. The lumbering behemoth, for all its superstructure of political controversy, has a profoundly benign influence on the cultural as well as economic polity of the region. The arrest of Karadzic shows how the EU works as a "soft power". The lure of membership leads those who want to join into changes which are social and legal as well as political. A place in the European family depends on embracing European values of justice and human rights.

For Serbia, the arrest of Karadzic signals a definitive break with the nationalism of the past. It augurs the coming in from the cold of a nation which has pursued a policy of unrepentant and truculent isolationism for almost two decades. Serbia has put pragmatism before pride in its pursuit of prosperity. The journey is not complete. The arrest of the most ruthless of its war criminals, General Ratko Mladic, must follow soon. It should not be too difficult to track him down – the Serbian state was paying him a military pension for almost 10 years of the time he was supposed to be on the run.

When that has happened, the EU can begin implementing a free-trade and partnership pact with Serbia. Once the country is fully co-operating with the war crimes tribunal, Serbia can formally be recognised as a candidate for EU membership, perhaps as early as the end of this year. That will herald the increasing stabilisation of the entire Balkan region. And that will be a triumph of real magnitude for the European Union.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

12 Comments

I am glad to learn that Serbian leaders have moved against the likes of Karadzic &, hopefully, Mladic and toward inclusion in the EU but would anyone be so fervent in their desire for justice if the accused were soldiers or politicians of Canada? UK? USA? If the plaintiffs were Afghani? Iraqi?The American president has recently congratulated Serbian leaders on working with the War Crimes Commission in The Hague although the same president has refused to allow the same court to have any authority over USAmerican soldiers if accusations were to be brought against them or their political master/s. A fine point perhaps but possibly a sharp, piercing one some day, no?

Posted by coalbanks | 24.07.08, 02:17 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"Pragmatism before pride" - exactly: economic and cultural domination by the US and western European nations has relentlessly ground Serbia down and now Karadic must face the victors' "justice". Being cynical and disgusted at this whole affair doesn't make one a lover of Karadic, but merely someone who recognises that there is no "good" and "bad" sides in this world - merely squabbling gangs. Membership of the most corpulent, arrogant and overbearing gang in the playground, as we do (and as the new Serbian regime aspires to) is nothing to be proud of.

Posted by Jonny Cowee | 23.07.08, 18:01 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

When we rejoice on such detention of an executor, one of the terminators of this Balcan war, there are many Europeans like you and me, waiting for the detention of those who caused this war too.

those who planned, intrigued, wanted, armed, and let so many innocents die.

most of them are rejoicing today and will never be prosecuted by any law, but you who these are.

peace on earth
claudio

Posted by claudio p. enisman | 23.07.08, 15:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Stuart, if the EU had taken a more robust stand during the actual conflict then no doubt people would be complaining about the EU taking on the powers of the UN, and trying to dominate people.

The EU can't win with you, if it tries to do something positive its a fascist superstate, if it does nothing its ineffectual and pointless. Typical British whinging from the wings, you would think that the Iraq debacle might make British people think twice about lecturing everyone else on "democracy and freedom", but apparently not.

The UN was responsible for the command decisions that were made in screbrenica, the actual responsibility of course lies with the bosnian serbs who murdered the men in the first place. Also I was talking about the families of people mudered, and those who sufferened injury but survived. Are you saying this is not a positive thing that this man will face trial?

Posted by Paul | 23.07.08, 14:22 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

...now for al those old Nazis that are given leave to roam free in the EU despite other EU countries demanding extradition and punishment for documented war crimes...

Austria is sheltering at least one...

Oh but then they only orchestrated decimation and mass enslavement of entire races didn't they...

Bigger the crime: less action taken...

Nice one EU, you are the greatest thing since the third Reich!

Posted by naziWarCrime | 23.07.08, 14:05 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details



'A Triumph for all of Europe' - It's a 'done deal' already to pave their entry into the EU and at the same time give the rest of us that missing 'EU feel good factor' and just to add to the feeling, I saw mention yesterday that 'Mandelson' is being called St.Peter!!

It all seems rather EU-ish to base their triumph on the back of two 'suspect characters' who wouldn't know a moral scruple from their bent exploits of the past.

However, look 'not too closely' of the rest of the EU 'masters' and you will realise that 'like attracts like' so forgive me being cynical but, as mentioned on other posts, when the same laws and rules are applied to all inside and outside the EU who have committed crimes, viz. Bliar and Bush and a complete clean out is genuinely shown and seen to be done within their own tight knit circle then you can never convince me the EU is representative of their so called Member States populations.

Posted by EU Triumph on the back of suspect characters! | 23.07.08, 13:22 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Stuart, it all depends on what you consider to be "Europe". During the horrors of the 1990-1996 it was ineffectual UN peacekeepers hamstrung by a poorly drafted and unclear UN directive that were witness to the worst monstrosities of the war. The present EU is much stronger and more able to promote peace through political and economic means than any projection of military might. Through the EU, countries have open trade access to hundreds of millions of people and wealth has always been a powerful tool. The EU, for all it's faults (and it has many) is becoming a positive force in this world, a wonderful, european, liberal counterpoint to the growing authoritarianism and unilateralism prevalent today (witness US, China, the growing Russian bear). If it were not for the EU there would be -no- other point of view on the world stage, no example of multilateralism and cooperation for other countries. Yes it has it's problems but the global benefits far outweigh them in my opinion.

Posted by Mark Sedodn | 23.07.08, 12:28 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Does the international community have any information about where the people responsible for the invasion of Iraq might be found? Having been directly responsible for the deaths of over 600,000 Iraqi civilians, they must surely be next on the list.

And it is misleading to describe Milosevic as the 'architect of the Balkan wars.' That title belongs to the German government, who bounced the EU into recognising Croatia in 1990, thus precipitating the breakup of Yugoslavia.

Posted by George Hale | 23.07.08, 12:07 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Paul, if Europe had an innate ability to promote peace, then Srebrenica would not have happened in the first place. Europe spent too much time solemnly remembering Auschwitz and not enough time properly briefing the so-called peacekeeping soldiers whose orders prevented them doing anything to stop the massacre: Europe is great on noble ambition but much less so when it comes to delivering substance. And the people whose lives were destroyed by this man are dead and gone, in case you hadn't noticed.

Posted by Stuart Thom | 23.07.08, 11:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think its a good day for Europe, more so for the people of the Balkans. It does show the innate ability of the EU to promote a more tolerant and peaceful Europe. Unfortunately in Britain, it seems that most people's idea about the EU comes from watching one too many WWII documentaries about Nazis, and failing to realize that not all foreigners are necessarily evil. Still, that aside, its good that the people whose lives were destroyed by this man may get to see him face justice.

Posted by Paul | 23.07.08, 07:17 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

12 Comments

Columnist Comments

bruce_anderson

Bruce Anderson: No cavalry can save Brown now

Even the Leader of the Opposition is telling the PM to get a grip on his party

johann_hari

Johann Hari: How to tune in to Muslims and the Deep South

Music is the key to two of the most politically charged places on earth

yasmin_alibhai_brown

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Men are victims of the workplace too

My husband has moved to working four days a week, and it's changed our lives


Most popular in Opinion