Leading article: Africans must deny Mugabe his moment of glory in Egypt
Monday, 30 June 2008
Robert Mugabe is moving at lightning speed to ensure that his fraudulent re-election as Zimbabwe's president wins the crucial endorsement of fellow African leaders. Hence the decision to race from the coronation ceremony in Zimbabwe – even before the election results are declared – to the African Union summit in Egypt, where the old gambler intends to bounce Africa's leaders into accepting his victory.
If all goes to plan, dissenting voices at the summit will be muffled, enabling Mugabe to return home in glory. Vowing defiance of Western colonialists, this will be the cue to throw paltry and insincere concessions in the direction of Zimbabwe's opposition Movement for Democratic Change, purely for the sake of publicity.
This dismal scenario is not far-fetched. African leaders have proved loath to criticise the guerrilla leader who toppled Ian Smith's white Rhodesia, and feelings of racial and political solidarity have traditionally trumped concerns over Zimbabwe's breathtaking collapse under Mugabe's brutal but cack-handed rule.
Yet there is still hope that this dreadful vision may be confounded, Mugabe deprived of a diplomatic triumph and his iron grip on power shaken. A misplaced instinct for solidarity among African leaders is breaking down, not before time. Kenya's leaders have spoken out against the nonsense of an election in which only one candidate took part and the opposition was driven from the field by terror. Botswana has also made known its deep unhappiness over the state of its neighbour. Pan-African observers of the Zimbabwe election have declined to bless the poll, insisting it was neither free nor fair. Clearly, they were swayed by the defiance of many Zimbabweans who refused to vote, spoiled their ballot papers, or even cast votes for the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, though he had by then withdrawn as a candidate.
Until now, Mugabe has been able to rely on nods and winks from Thabo Mbeki in South Africa, the only country with real leverage over Zimbabwe. It would be too much to expect a change of heart from Mbeki at this late stage; but sharp criticism of the Mugabe regime from the new ANC leader, Jacob Zuma, as well as from Archbishop Desmond Tutu and, in recent days, from Nelson Mandela, shows that black South Africans no longer feel as bound by ties of loyalty to Zimbabwe's boss as they did. Of course, neither Tutu, Mandela nor Zuma will be attending the African Union summit, so their voices will have no direct impact on discussions. But we must hope the growing chorus of protest against the Harare regime from within Africa itself will have an effect on the deliberations.
This is indeed Africa's moment, for good or ill. If the summit allows the bloodstained charade of Mugabe's election to pass unnoticed, hopes for the continent's democratic development will have been radically set back. Similarly, if the summit denies Mugabe the fig leaf of legitimacy that he craves, his regime will be embarrassed and forced on the defensive.
Resolution of Zimbabwe's crisis is urgent. Discussion of its government as a tyranny often misses the point. This is not an otherwise economically "normal" country, disfigured by a politically repressive regime. It is a country where the economy is collapsing with such terrifying speed that a large proportion of the population faces only two options: flight, or death by starvation. It is still not too late to salvage something of Zimbabwe's vanished prosperity and prevent its further descent into hopeless turmoil. But it depends on Mugabe's speedy exit from the stage. If the Egyptian summiteers disappoint him, that day may come sooner than we think. The African Union must do the right thing.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
28 Comments
Forget Africa they have made their position absolutely clear. The rule of law does not apply. There's plenty of other important stuff all over the world to be getting on with so let's get on with it.
Posted by CHARLIE | 01.07.08, 22:32 GMT
I am simply baffled by the way Mr.Mugabe is behaving, the country for which he has faught for is disintegrating, the people are suffering and fleeing the country and he is enjoying the presidency obtained by fradulant means.
My disappointment is even greater by the continued silence of fellow African leaders. If Zimbabwe was ruled by a white,Hispanic or an asianin the same manner as Mr Mugabe, these very African leaders would be gunning for their throat. Why this double standard? It is not difficult to understand.
I therefore recomend that all presidents and other executive heads of state must undergo a stringent psychatric examination before they are allowed to take office.
Posted by surendra | 01.07.08, 18:26 GMT
I am simply baffled by the way Mr.Mugabe is behaving, the country for which he has faught for is disintegrating, the people are suffering and fleeing the country and he is enjoying the presidency obtained by fradulant means.
My disappointment is even greater by the continued silence of fellow African leaders. If Zimbabwe was ruled by a white,Hispanic or an asianin the same manner as Mr Mugabe, these very African leaders would be gunning for their throat. Why this double standard? It is not difficult to understand.
I therefore recomend that all presidents and other executive heads of state must undergo a stringent psychatric examination before they are allowed to take office.
Posted by surendra | 01.07.08, 18:21 GMT
Let them fix their own problems. They don't need civilized whites to help. I for one.... say to hell with them. The US and UK need to let the UN handle this.
Posted by Robert | 01.07.08, 16:41 GMT
Jonathan, i agree with your post at 15.53 but your post at 15.16 was so unbelievably inaccurate it was embarrassing to read.
Now here are the 'facts'. Yes former President MOI of Kenya was in power for 24 years but he left in 2002 when his constitutional term in office expired.
Kenya's new President elected in 2002 and was re-elected last year is President Mwai KIBAKI.
Joseph KABILA is the President of the DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO.
The violence in Kenya in which only ONE THOUSAND or so people died not the THOUSANDS that you talk about was due to the dispute surrounding the election and not some attempt to remove a British stooge.
Please get your facts right next time
Posted by Mlevi1 | 01.07.08, 16:12 GMT
The whites control over 80% of the arable land --not that the Independent has any problem with that!-- and over 90% of the natural resources--still waiting for the Independent to write a blistering article, or any article at all, about that.
Of a neccessity if Zimbabwe's economy is to provide properity for all and not just for the whites --another issue the Independet sidesteps-- then the whites MUST give up nearly all their wealth, since they're less than 5% of the population.
Mugabe is doing that.
Britain has responded with sanctions, but ironically, the whites, who one would think stand the most to lose from scanctions, are cheering them. Why? Because they see hardship on Zimbabwe as their ticket back into power, and to do it in such a way where they can say "See, we didn't IMPOSE ourselves this time. The people CHOSE us!"
Keep dreaming you fools. The dominoes are falling. Today it's Zimbabwe, tomorrow it's South Africa, then Namibia, then Kenya. White rule is over.
Posted by Jonathan | 01.07.08, 15:53 GMT
This is, as many before have noted, absolute rubbish. It is a given that any man, given too much control for too much time, will turn as rotten as Mugabe has. The fact that he has barely tainted the other apples in the African basket is surprising. However, it is pleasing to note that this time, the "evil dictator" in question does not have the support of the West.
Posted by Randall Norton | 01.07.08, 15:52 GMT
The election committe of Zimbabwe must have learned a tremendous amount regarding vote counting after the first election. Over 3 weeks to count the votes after the first election, and less than 24 hours to declare the winner in the second. Just astounding! Mugabe is Zimbabwe's problem. Let the people of Zimbabwe deal with their own situation. When they have had enough, they will rise up and defeat their oppressors, just as they have done in the past. Self-determination should be allowed to unfold, that way, they don't have anyone to blame for their problems except themselves.
Posted by william | 01.07.08, 15:40 GMT
Really, it's a sham that we Africans cann't solve our own problems. Today our leaders in the region cann't tell Mugabe in his face that he has expired. The truth is they're the same. In my country Guebuza is not saying a word about it. Hence automatically wants to do the same. Our way out is to vote him out next year before it is too late. Mbeki is a batch of sham to say the least. Anyway, he's no longer in the hearts of South Africans let alone the party,ANC. Mbeki is no longer the right candidate for mediation. Odinga Raila is still fresh and had identical problem. Hence he can be a better person for that post. It could be Mandela but the old man needs rest. But still can be included in the team for consultation purposes as well as Des Tutu. Please I beg to air my views. Tom Muchanga.
Posted by Tom Muchanga | 01.07.08, 15:39 GMT
Mr Mugabe is no deferant from the great majority of the post-colonial leaders of the world.
The only deferance from the obliging majority is that they are serving apurpose or accepting unfair western trading pollicises in there unfotunat countries.
Posted by Essam | 01.07.08, 15:22 GMT
28 Comments