Leading Articles

null 0° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Leading article: Collision course in Turkey

Tuesday, 29 July 2008

It is hard to think of a nation more familiar than Turkey with the tensions between East and West, between religion and nationalism, between autocracy and democracy. But those opposing forces seem to be reaching a new intensity of late. The ruling Islamic party is at risk of being outlawed by the Constitutional Court. Another court is hearing a case against a collection of ex-army officers accused of plotting to overthrow the government by force.

But this battle for Turkey's soul is not merely taking place in court rooms. There is blood on the streets too. Two bombs exploded in Istanbul yesterday, killing 17 people. The main suspects are Kurdish separatists. The country's stock markets have taken a battering as investors grow nervous about the future direction of the country. A sense of crisis is building.

The irony is that the governing AK Party, despite its roots in the Islamist movement, has done a good job of contradicting the popular notion that political Islam can never settle within a secular and democratic state. Under the leadership of the Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the AK Party won a hefty mandate from the Turkish people in fair elections last year. It has pursued liberal economic policies and pluralist social policies. No one disputes that the AK Party enjoys broad democratic consent.

What it lacks is the consent of the fiercely secular governing classes and the military. This is the background to the attempt by the Turkish chief prosecutor to have the AK Party banned on the grounds that it is attempting to subvert Turkey's secular constitution.

The case might be regarded as being, in one respect, commendable. It shows that the Turkish government is subject to the rule of law. But it is also hard to avoid the conclusion that the secularists have overplayed their hand. The moves by the AK Party to lift the ban on female students wearing headscarves do not add up to a secret plot to Islamise the state.

Of course, Turkey is not the only nation to face a constitutional crisis, the threat of a coup, or a separatist insurgency. But Turkey is globally pivotal in a number of ways – and it matters. Most obviously, it matters to the future of the Middle East. Military incursions into the Kurdish-ruled north of Iraq threaten to plunge that country into fresh turmoil. A democratic government is far less likely than a military junta to embark on an invasion of its south-eastern neighbour. Turkey also matters to Europe. Much is rightly made of the potential prize of incorporating this fast-growing economy into the EU. And just as valuable is the leverage the possibility of entry offers to progressive politicians within the country. If Turkey is to emerge from this crisis as a stable and democratic nation, it will need all the help its friends can muster.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Any political party, whether hardcore or mild or moderate or a little resembling, which is 'Islamist' is illegal in the democratic and secular republic of Turkey.

No political grouping may attach themselves to any religion or vice versa.

The western world's neo-con think-tanks can pump all the propaganda of how mildly Islamic governments can be a role model for Middle Eastern countries. However that is not our example.

The Turkish example is as follows: Fight to the death against invading forces of foreign countries, make an honorable peace, start revolutions to free your country of religious dogma and backwardness, build an economy free of foreign rule, create independent and free thinking citizens instead of religious subjects, always aim to modernize and keep up with civilization.

This is the Turkish example, not some mildly Islamist party sneaking in religious attire like headscarves and trying to pass them as beacons of democracy.

Posted by Mehmet Kara | 30.07.08, 13:38 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Turkey is a country of laws. The Constitutional Court is the equivalent of the Supreme Court in the USA. Turkish Constitution does not give the political party with the most votes the right to break the law. AKP clearly gambled with secularism and it seems that they have lost the bet. The Republic's chief prosecutor has challenged them in the top court and we will hear their decision this week. AKP used the accession talks with the EU as a means to restrict the power of the military in politics. They never really intended to join EU. EU and the USA are committed to use this mildly Islamic (somewhat secular), semi-democratic Turkey as the role model for the rest of the Middle East. Well, the Turkish people will not allow that. We will not be used to sacrifice the Republic's secular principles so that EU and the USA can achieve their goals in the region. Middle East should take the secular Turkey as a role model, not the so called "mildly Islamic" version.

Posted by Selim | 30.07.08, 09:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The AK party might be banned for allowing women wearing headscarves to college, among other actvities it has done to help peolpe practse Islam openly.The military and judiciay should take a second look at their definition of 'secularism'.If it has the power to ban a party which is elected by the people(that too 47% of popular vote),it wont be long before the people of Turkey take on the judiciary and military in the streets, leading to a civil war.

Posted by Imdad | 29.07.08, 14:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

From Maxim
I am sorry, nice arguments but not very convincing. These 70 mio Turks do not like us , "the Christian Club" should further throw Europe out of balance ( if it is possible).
I also very well understand the last sentence of this article i.e. as a stable and democratic nation, it will need all the help its friends can muster ! This clearly means that we still should give more subsidies and this is not Macedonia nor Montenegro but a large country bordering a number of potential troublesome countries ( Syria: the axis of evil - Iraq: on a tightrope - Iran: to be bombed sooner or later by our friends and allies) : that's the queston. Moreover, let's not forget that Turkey has arbitrarily diverted a large part of the Tiger and Euphrates which are Syria's and Iraq's lifelines. Lots of problems ahead. By the way, what about the closure of the border between Turkey and Armenia, without justification. Let's first settle the Balkan problems: after we shall see !

Posted by Maxim | 29.07.08, 14:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Good to know that having a democratic government deters a country from attacking another country. What a pity the United States and Britain weren’t democracies, when they illegally attacked Iraq in 2003. Good, too, to know that fast-growing economies should be invited to join the EU. But if that’s going to be the case, why start with Turkey? Wouldn’t it be better to offer EU membership to China and India? After all, both of those countries are every bit as European as Turkey is.

Posted by penruddock | 29.07.08, 11:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Lets get one thing clear; the AKP have won the power struggle in Turkey. The so-called Securlarists have had plenty of time (probably over 50 years or so) to prove to the people they are competent at governing and they have failed. The country has remained under-developed and backwards during this period because the huge expenditure on arms instead of trying to develop the country into functioning modern, liberal democracy. The main beneficiaries being foreign arms suppliers and the indigenous oligarchs
It must be noted that in the eyes of the people they failed a long time ago so therefore had to resort to the current and familiar oppressive tactics to maintain power. The AKP have successfully challenged this status quo because the CIA now no longer needs the Turkish military bases; it can service all its military, aggressive needs directly from in Iraq therefore cutting off the payroll sustaining the secularists elite.

Posted by Mustafa Hulusi | 29.07.08, 11:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

This leader is extremely disappointing. It contains at least 2 claims demonstrating inadequate understanding of the situation in Turkey: the closure case against the AKP is about the issue of headscarves in universities; those on trial for promoting a coup are all ex-army officers. The closure case against the AKP comes in the context AKP's broad attempts at stealth Islamicisation: closing pig farms on 'health' grounds, restricting alcohol in some municipalities, packing the public sector and private firms with state connections with religious conservatives. This last process has extended to major transfer of private assets to AKP people, including the Prime Minister's son. The supposed coup planners are a strange mixture of nationalists on left and right including academics, journalists, business people and lawyers. The closure of a political party is not something to be welcome, but it happens in democracies and there are circumstances in which it is the lesser evil.

Posted by BritishInIstanbul | 29.07.08, 10:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Columnist Comments

deborah_orr

Deborah Orr: One more inquiry isn't going to help

I don't believe a public inquiry into the Baby P case is necessary

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: It will take time, but we'll recover

If officialdom seems over-optimistic in its forecasts, the markets seem too pessimistic

janet_street_porter

Janet Street-Porter: Mother does not always know best

One of the most sensitive subjects for writers is the mother-daughter relationship

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Never mind the baby, just get back to work

The next thing will be an exciting new scheme known as the 'workhouse'