Leading article: Killing exposes the true face of modern Russia
The Kremlin's outrage over Natalia Estemirova's murder rings hollow
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
Uncovering the truth is a lethal business in Russia and its republics. Another independent human rights activist, Natalia Estemirova, was assassinated this week. She was abducted from near her home in Grozny, the Chechen capital, on Wednesday. Her body was found in the neighbouring state of Ingushetia later that day; she had been shot in the head. Ms Estemirova's death adds to the growing tally of courageous activists and independent journalists who have been assassinated in Russia in recent years.
Ms Estemirova knew the risks of revealing evidence of human rights abuses in modern Russia as much as anybody. She had experienced threats on more than one occasion. But that does not make her killing any less appalling – or any less damning of the political culture that prevails in her homeland.
There was stern condemnation of the killing from the Russian authorities this week. President Dmitry Medvedev declared his "outrage" at the crime, and the Chechen President, Ramzan Kadyrov, vowed that he would lead the investigation into Ms Estemirova's death. But there were similar promises following the murder of the investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who was shot in her Moscow apartment building in 2006, and still no one has been convicted of that murder. Two Chechen men were acquitted of involvement in the crime in February after a farce of a trial. With each unsolved killing, the question grows more insistent: does there exist any genuine desire on the part of either the Russian or Chechen authorities to see the perpetrators of these crimes brought to justice?
Many powerful people in Grozny and Moscow had reason to want Ms Estemirova silenced. She had uncovered numerous human rights abuses by the Chechen authorities – cases of torture, disappearances and extra-judicial killing. She had recently completed an investigation for Human Rights Watch into the Chechen authorities' practice of burning the homes of those suspected of having links to rebel groups. She speaks of these crimes in her final article, which we publish today.
Ms Estemirova was also adept at persuading victims and witnesses to testify in court cases – a considerable skill in a region cowed by the fear of official retribution. No one seriously doubts that she was targeted because of her work in exposing government abuses.
The Kremlin likes to portray Chechnya as a success story of modern Russia – a region being rapidly rebuilt after two decades of terrible conflict. The former Russian president and now Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, declared in front of the Chechen parliament following the 2005 election that "peace has come to the republic". But this "peace" has been achieved by putting the region under the control of a brutal gangster regime. Human rights are routinely abused by the security forces, there is impunity for lawbreakers, and brave individuals such as Ms Estemirova – who tell the world what is really going on – end up dead.
The Kremlin might put on a show of concern about such high-profile killings, but it has shown no inclination to force its Chechen subordinates to change their ways. The Russian government's tight control of the national media show its essential antithesis to the kind of open, democratic society Ms Estemirova was fighting for. Her murder exposes the true face of Chechnya, and modern Russia, and it is not a pretty sight.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Don't hear the media championing his cause... hypocrites!
To Bintle Bontle Boo,
To see a man with tonsils
Whom he hardly even knew.
That you can only see these two outcomes is as absurd as you appear silly. Please explain why you think it's impossible for Russia to govern without terrorizing its own citizens, or why you think that if they stopped terrorizing their own citizens that this would lead to Bin Laden ruling Chechnya with nukes? Silly you.
The truth is that the vast majority of the aggression from the Russian army during the occupation was directed at civilians cowering in bombed out towns, not at the bandits, who lived far away from the towns and actually would have been relatively easy to round up, if concerted effort were made.
All of this was a largely successful attempt to drive these civilians in refugee camps, where starvation and disease killed them in their thousands. That and the Russian army having a little fun. (Nothing like a bit of rape and pillage when you are stuck in a boring war.)
Suggest this book if you want to be educated (unlikely I know). Like Natalia, the writer was also killed for telling the truth.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0226
My point is that implementation of Putin's policy may sometimes be brutal, but it is not his policy to be brutal - he is not silly.
What you are saying is that those crimes are not bad fulfilment of policy, but policy itself - and I disagree....Now, how much pleasure do you get from calling me silly? The fact is that even if I really am silly, it is not clever to call me silly as long as I sincerely want smth. good both for Russia and for Chechnya...and for UK aswell. Thank you for reading.
Even during Soviet time, people were afraid to go to the Chechen Republic because there kidnapped. And with 1991 up to 2001 тамбыл a dawn кримминала. And at you Putin is guilty.