Leading Articles

null -1° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Leading article: Libraries should be about books

Thursday, 9 October 2008

Perhaps the peculiarly hybrid name of his department – Culture, Media and Sport – has clouded his judgement. But the Secretary of State, Andy Burnham, will today add his voice to calls by chief librarians for a revolution to modernise public libraries and "bring them into the 21st century". In Mr Burnham's words, this means banishing the image of libraries as "solemn and sombre places patrolled by fearsome and formidable staff" and making them "come alive for generations to come".

The Society of Chief Librarians recently spelt out what this might mean in practice, citing the north London borough of Camden as a pioneer of "diversification". In Camden, a ban on mobile phones is being lifted and visitors will be allowed to bring snacks and drinks. The provision of computer games is among other options under consideration. And, yes, the silence rule will be lifted.

In other words, the public library of the future is envisaged as a cross between one of those big book stores with its own coffee bar and an internet café. Books will be relegated to the sidelines, rather than being what a library is all about. In fact, many started "diversifying" their offerings long ago by lending out CDs and DVDs and scaling back their stacks of books. Many already provide Web access and, increasingly, the silence rule is being broken. In many of our towns and cities, Mr Burnham's "solemn and sombre place" became a period piece long ago.

We quite understand that libraries need to justify their existence and that serving local people is the reason for their existence. We also appreciate that, outside urban areas, internet access and DVD loans might well constitute welcome public services that are not offered elsewhere. But we would argue that a major reason why the number of people visiting libraries has been falling has little to do with the absence of non-book options, and a lot to do with the long hours people work and the unpredictability of the days and times many libraries now open.

The clientele is bound to consist mostly of "regulars", if the library is open only two days a week between 10am and 4pm. There are also positive reasons why fewer people frequent libraries: books are comparatively cheaper and more accessible than they used to be, and many people now have internet access at home.

But at a time when, as we also report today, young people are reading fewer and fewer books, it seems perverse that the very places that were always most conducive to reading are losing the qualities that make them unique.

By all means make novels and reference books available also on screen, as the reading survey recommends, but do not sacrifice the peace and quiet. Amid the noise of the 21st century, the old-fashioned library remains a welcome repository of calm. Just try opening the doors wider, and for longer.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

18 Comments

The Mac Doggies sponsored library with all new laminated books ideal for toddlers & the clumsy. Super sized education for the twentieth century. You know it makes sense.

Posted by RSBridgman | 10.10.08, 17:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Why is it that librarians have to put up with the same old stereotypes? Would a politician be allowed to call policemen or social workers 'fearsome and formidable'?
And in response to Joe's comment...I'm sorry to say it, but if people say they'll be in an out of the library in 5 minutes..they probably won't be! There are rules in place to make it fair for everybody else and they have to be stuck to.

Posted by Catherine | 10.10.08, 08:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Andy Burnham always has been an idiot. I can't wait till he's voted out of office.

Posted by Technomist | 09.10.08, 23:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

LIbraries should do what only they can do - not ape Starbucks, WH Smiths or Waterstones. That is, provide, in a calm and peaceful atnmosphere a very wide range of books, including by non-English speaking writers (whether or not in translation) and by authors/on topics beyond those currently fashionable and promoted. Bookshops alas DO NOT do this. This serves the needs both of people needing to study and to extend their horizons. I am tired of the desire to acquire education and culture being dubbed 'elitist'.

Posted by Mary | 09.10.08, 21:43 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

LIbraries should do what only they can do - not ape Starbucks, WH Smiths or Waterstones. That is, provide, in a calm and peaceful atnmosphere a very wide range of books, including by non-English speaking writers (whether or not in translation) and by authors/on topics beyond those currently fashionable and promoted. Bookshops alas DO NOT do this. This serves the needs both of people needing to study and to extend their horizons. I am tired of the desire to acquire education and culture being dubbed 'elitist'.

Posted by Mary | 09.10.08, 21:43 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Not only the lending is affected; our remarkable reference library resource nationwide has been given away, often at 50 pence an item or less, in library sales over the last twenty years, likewise in the name of making libraries accessible.

" Have you tried the Internet?" has replaced it.

Posted by Joe McDarby | 09.10.08, 20:59 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

In an ideal World libraries would not need income generating resources to boost their funding, which is perennially cut. This is the reason alot of Public Libraries have HAD to 'diversify' in order to survive at all.
Access to the Internet is invaluable to those unable to afford it at home. They can search for, and apply for jobs online, seek out advice and yes use the books for both information and knowledge and for the sheer pleasure of reading.
If libraries were purpose built, all tastes could be catered for but in reality many libraries are located in old, sometimes inadequate buildings. Staff have to do the best they can to serve the needs of the whole community, not just for an elitist sector. Computer games do encourage youngsters in...some of whom may never have set foot in a library before. Don't judge libraries on just one visit - ask about all the services they provide and you may be in for a pleasant surprise.

Posted by Zanzibar | 09.10.08, 17:18 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Fact of the matter is that if you make something more accessible and inclusive you dumb it down. Look at universities these days - everyone's a winner and no-one knows anything. Look at our dumb media always trying to get ratings. Elitism is good and has value - accessible and inclusive farcical institutions do not.

Posted by Sudsy | 09.10.08, 14:37 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"But at a time when, as we also report today, young people are reading fewer and fewer books, it seems perverse that the very places that were always most conducive to reading are losing the qualities that make them unique."

The young people you find reading books in Libraries aren't the majority "reading fewer and fewer books". The majority are put off by current brand of Libraries and "increasing the number of books" or having "better trained staff" would cost many millions but do extremely little to help the situation.

As long as there are still places in libraries kept free from eating, drinking and noise (as the minister suggested there would still be) this is an excellent idea.

The concluding sentance reads "Just try opening the doors wider,"

I believe that is exactly what is being suggested!

Posted by Tim Harborne | 09.10.08, 14:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I fully agree. Although I would not describe the staff as fearsome or formidable, but rather as jobsworths. I recently enterd my local library five minutes before it was due to close. to be told 'We're closing'. When I pointed out that there were still many people in there, and that I would be in and out in under five minutes, I was met with the response 'No, we're closing.'

Posted by Joe | 09.10.08, 14:25 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

18 Comments

Columnist Comments

deborah_orr

Deborah Orr: One more inquiry isn't going to help

I don't believe a public inquiry into the Baby P case is necessary

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: It will take time, but we'll recover

If officialdom seems over-optimistic in its forecasts, the markets seem too pessimistic

janet_street_porter

Janet Street-Porter: Mother does not always know best

One of the most sensitive subjects for writers is the mother-daughter relationship

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Never mind the baby, just get back to work

The next thing will be an exciting new scheme known as the 'workhouse'