Leading article: The bishop is embracing a lost cause
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
Ear-splitting rows are part of the warp and woof of the Church of England – the price paid for a Church that has always claimed to be national and inclusive rather than dogmatic.
Claims that the Bishop of Rochester's dramatic call for homosexuals to "repent" marks a milestone towards a formal divorce in the Church between liberals and evangelicals, therefore, must be approached with caution. In many ways, the battle fought in the Church today over same-sex relations is still far more decorous and charitable than most of the Anglicans' earlier feuds.
In the 19th century, evangelicals engaged in pitched battles with High Church "ritualist" opponents in London churches, using stones and cudgels. There is no sign yet of Dr Nazir-Ali or his supporters resorting to such tactics with gay or outspokenly pro-gay vicars.
History suggests that almost every generation throws up a symbolic issue that conservative Christians then seize on as the ultimate challenge to tradition and orthodoxy. "No pasaran!" they declare: "They shall not pass!"
Yet even the most conservative Anglicans today would probably be embarrassed to revisit those lost battles. How many want to maintain now, as did their ancestors, that the world was created in seven days or the Pope was the anti-Christ? Little more than a century ago such beliefs were perfectly normal in the Church of England. Now they appear ludicrous.
Some conservative Christians no doubt believe they are on safer ground in sounding the tocsin against the monstrous regiment of homosexuals, partly because a large proportion of society remains homophobic. They know that many socially conservative people who would not dream of going to church will, nevertheless, lend noisy approval to such a campaign.
They need to be careful. Society is changing fast in its understanding of the workings of the human heart. "Out" gay cabinet ministers would have been inconceivable a few years ago, as would the presence of a prime minister's wife at Gay Pride. Conservative Christians like Dr Nazir-Ali, in other words, need to think twice before embracing a cause that only embarrasses future generations of believers.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Lucky bastard!
Their needs are the same as when the good news was first announced, and any change in society does not alter this.
This is an institution with perceived wealth, power and influence (i.e., it's a church that has as its titular head 'Supreme Governor of the Church of England' a monarch who is also titular head of the British civil government). His official pronouncements should be guiding people spiritually, but he prefers to command folks about civil matters.
He is compromising his office, effectively, but he cannot avoid this, because his almost literalist interpretation of religion paints him into a theological box, which exists to protect the status quo, rather than bestow light and comfort.
As for homophobia being normal, why do you care? This is the question I've never had satisfactorily explained to me by homophobes. What does it matter to you if I, in the privacy of my own home, choose to have sex with another man? I am sure there are other relationships you do not understand or would not wish to participate in. There must be men and women to whom you have strong antipathies, but does that breed hatred and terror of their wives and husbands?
What IS normal about homophobia? Because to me, it genuinely seems insane.
Keep up the good work Mr Nazir-Ali !