Leading Articles

null -1° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Leading article: The green lining to this chaos

Sunday, 12 October 2008

There are two responses to the financial crisis that are wrong. One is to say that we can forget all that goody-goody guff about the environment now that people are worrying about how to pay next week's bills. The other is to say that our culture of consumption has been exposed as unsustainable and that we must abandon capitalism for a life that is closer to nature. Today we outline a middle way.

What started as a technical problem in capital markets is now moving quickly into the so-called real economy of jobs, homes and living standards. One subplot in this extraordinary story starts with defaulting banks in a country with a population the size of Coventry and ends (for the moment) with council workers across England worrying about whether they will be paid next week. While we wait for the scale of the recession to become clear over the coming months, many people may assume that green issues will slip down the news priorities.

The Independent on Sunday does not accept that they should. Today we publish the first comprehensive listing of those often unsung heroes of the environmental movement, the IoS Green List. It builds on the success of our Pink List, which celebrates the contribution that gay and lesbian people make to British life, and which was itself a reverse tribute to another list of a more material kind in a rival newspaper.

We hope that the Green List will allow us to recognise the remarkable contribution made by environmentalists in meeting the greatest challenge of our times: saving the ecosystem of our planet from the depredations of human activity. For many of those featured on our list, this will be the first time that their efforts – often deeply unfashionable and pursued for years without thought of personal reward – have been appreciated and marked. In no case do we think this is more true than in that of this year's winner, John Stewart, interviewed by Cole Moreton about his journey from the 2B London bus to the campaign against Heathrow expansion.

Readers may quibble with our rankings, and we hope that you will. We want to provoke a debate about what makes a good environmentalist and how you can evaluate the contribution made by any one person. So please take issue with us and argue that we have recognised the wrong people in the wrong order. Help us to make next year's List even better.

Join the debate, too, about our contention that now is the time, of all times, to focus people's attention on green issues. We believe that it is precisely while advanced democratic capitalism is going through one of its phases of "corrective" destruction that visionary leaders can best seize the chance to re-order its priorities. There is a green dimension to the financial crisis, in that it was triggered by steep price rises in oil and food, as production of both tested the limits of sustainability.

The argument here is one of balance, which is why we do not agree with the anti-capitalists who see the economic crisis as a chance to impose their utopia, whether of a socialist or eco-fundamentalist kind. Most of us in this country enjoy long and fulfilling lives thanks to liberal capitalism: we have no desire to live in a yurt under a workers' soviet.

Heathrow airport is a test case. We understand the conventional economic case, and we are not opposed to air travel as such. But there comes a point when the growth of carbon-based air travel has to be halted and probably reversed if the global ecosystem is to remain capable of sustaining human life at present numbers. It may be easier to adjust to new rules if they are introduced at a time of economic stringency. Now might be the time to say no more runways and that slots on existing runways will go to the highest bidder in a free market, so that the cost starts to reflect the damage done to the environment.

The Independent on Sunday is in favour of market forces, and recognises that they work effectively only when they are well regulated (and on the basis of sound money, which, as we have been forcefully reminded in recent weeks, requires governments to act as lenders of last resort). Market forces cannot respond to the costs of environmental degradation unless governments put a price on – above all – carbon.

To that extent only, we agree with the anti-capitalists: that now is the time to rethink the values that underlie our economic system. As Geoffrey Lean, our Environment Editor, reports today, the United Nations is already working on a plan for green growth, harnessing the power of market forces for environmental sustainability.

In the argument for better regulation of markets in the public interest – which must include mitigating climate change – we hope that the stars of our Green List will light the way.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Green politics does have dangers. The idea that you can green wash problems of the environment away is very appealing to the very same companies that are reaping rewards by their damage. The best way to remove carbon is the construction of large scale carbon sinks - reducing the output of carbon based power stations by replacing them with dangerous & costly nuclear power plants is not the answer, and trying to curtail the use of coal based power stations on a global basis is a high road to nowhere. It is not sustainable to keep things as they are but changes must represent adaptions to the natural environment or they are doomed to failure. It is impossible to prevent climatic shift now, it is vain to assume you can alter things set in motion centuries ago by radical action today. Intelligent adaption is better than denial & knee jerk reaction.

Posted by kevin | 12.10.08, 23:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The green way will be seen to be the winner out of this mess as consumerism and consumption are seen to be shallow and disatisfying stimulates to our lives. People will have to be far more simplistic in their aspirations, capitalism in a very different form will exist but the ability and want to earn money will ebb away as more is taken in taxation.

I believe the fact that the politicians have yet to grasp these implications meerly highlights how lacking they are as leaders.

Not only will our financial systems change immense pressure will be exerted on parliament to be much smaller with democratic representation more at a local level.

The greed of the city may well be unpalatable for many but the averice, corruption and hypocrisy that eminates from the passages of Whitehall cannot be tolerated for much longer.

As we watch our pensions collapse and witness the civil servant lot rise at our expense clamours will be heard for change.

Posted by JamesC | 12.10.08, 20:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I really don't want to rain on your green parade, and I sincerely hope there is good to be salvaged from this chaos.
But some omens are not good.
The Australian Treasury has been modelling the impact of the financial crisis and concludes that prices of fossil fuels will fall by 40% and that they will be so cheap relative to the alternatives as to long delay any large scale switch.
The new Australian opposition leader is earning plaudits for economic realism by urging the postponement of the introduction of a carbon trading scheme on the grounds that business can no longer afford it.
Faced with a financial crisis, it seems the climate crisis can wait.
Of course it can't, but if the big coal producers like Australia prefer affluence to climate stability, we are in deep trouble.

Posted by Chris | 12.10.08, 11:56 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Yes, we should have sound money. This means a complete reform of the banking system that takes away control of the money supply from the International Bankers. This latest manipulated boom bust gives us a chance to do just that.

However, the politicians are just trying to keep the bankers scheme going by transferring all of the debts onto the unsuspecting public who are too busy shopping and watching sport on TV. This will guarantee that money will remain very unsound.

The bankers must be laughing their heads off - the big boys who never get mentioned in the newspapers I mean.

Posted by scousekraut | 12.10.08, 11:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

This is journalism at its most responsible. Thank you.

Posted by Angela K | 12.10.08, 11:03 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Now that nationalisation is no longer a dirty word, a government that is currently pumping hundreds of billions into the failing private banking sector might be persuaded that investing relatively modest sums to kick start the green technology sector might not be such a bad idea.

Since the free market ideology is now tarnished they may even find the courage to tell the energy company lobbyists, airlines and the CBI where to get off.

And it is just possible they might start supporting their green words with green actions. Wishful thinking I expect, but we live is strange times.





Posted by John | 12.10.08, 10:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

It's not a given that economic crisis will lead to carbon reductions. For example, it might tempt energy policymakers to go for the quick guaranteed returns of coal burning rather than the more uncertain lead times of sustainable energy projects. That's why artciles like this are important: we will lose the oportunity if we don't work for it.

Posted by Runesmith | 12.10.08, 09:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The level of consumer consumption and waste, particularly food, has has been quite obscene. It was estimated that one third of all food bought in this country was thrown away and on average people we were eating one third more than they needed. On top of that is a mass of packaging thrown away as a generation of parents have come to rely on convenience meals.

The media gives the impression that some people are struggling to afford enough to eat. The reality is that we are wasting less, perhaps cutting back on treats and some even considering cooking for themselves for the first time. This is good news all round.

Posted by Sean | 12.10.08, 09:46 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

One of the reasons I like The Independent is that it is an indomitable green campaigner. The present crisis may have a silver lining, global warming may decline.

Posted by Ashok Mehta | 12.10.08, 08:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Columnist Comments

deborah_orr

Deborah Orr: One more inquiry isn't going to help

I don't believe a public inquiry into the Baby P case is necessary

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: It will take time, but we'll recover

If officialdom seems over-optimistic in its forecasts, the markets seem too pessimistic

janet_street_porter

Janet Street-Porter: Mother does not always know best

One of the most sensitive subjects for writers is the mother-daughter relationship

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Never mind the baby, just get back to work

The next thing will be an exciting new scheme known as the 'workhouse'