Leading article: This election should be about Europe, not MPs' expenses
It would be regrettable if the public cast their ballots solely out of anger
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
This really ought to be Europe's moment. The great issues of the day, from the financial crisis, to energy security, to climate change are all, to a significant degree, European issues. The banking meltdown did not respect national boundaries. Nor will the effects of global warming. And those who doubt Europe's economic interconnectedness should pay heed to the meltdown of General Motors. The auto giant's European arm owns car plants from Cheshire to Hungary and employs tens of thousands of workers. We all have an interest in the manner in which this corporate behemoth breaks up.
It makes every sense to tackle such challenges through close co-operation with our European peers. On the world stage, Europe's influence is growing too. In Barack Obama, America has an avowedly multi-lateralist President, keen for Europe to relieve the US of some of its duties as the world's policeman.
For the European Union this is a golden opportunity. And for the 375 million electors of Europe, this week's European Parliamentary elections are an important chance to shape the direction and priorities of the EU. The European Parliament may wield less direct power than its national counterparts, but as the primary voice in Brussels of the European citizenry, it certainly matters.
Yet the British electorate is showing depressingly little interest in the European nature of these elections. The focus of the debate has been on Westminster, not Brussels. It is true the British public has always had a tendency to use European elections to kick whichever party is in power in Westminster. European manifestos have never been closely studied documents. But this year the tendency to vote out of protest is likely to be especially pronounced thanks to the public's volcanic anger over the Westminster expenses scandal.
And it is not only the Government which is in for a pummelling on Thursday. The polls suggest that all three of the main parties are likely to see their vote squeezed, with fringe parties such as the UK Independence Party and the British National Party enjoying a spike in their support. It has even been suggested that UKIP might grab the second largest share of the vote.
The public's anger over the manner in which MPs have been greedily maximising their allowances is understandable. But it would be deeply regrettable if people went into the polling booths on Thursday intent solely on demonstrating their anger over MPs expenses. For one thing this would be to waste an opportunity to influence European decision-making on a host of crucial issues, from EU enlargement to environmental regulation. For another, it is all very well to protest against the major parties but it also matters who benefits from votes of disaffection.
A vote for the BNP would do nothing but put wind in the sails of a party with nothing to offer but vicious bigotry. As for UKIP, it would make no sense to punish the perceived venality of the mainstream parties by voting for a party which has experienced its own well-documented financial scandals in recent years. And UKIP's policies are no more credible than its claims to the moral high ground. All the party offers is isolation and increasing irrelevance for Britain internationally.
When it comes to the mainstream parties, they are a rather mixed bag on Europe. The Conservatives might not go as far as UKIP in terms of seeking to remove Britain from the European mainstream, but David Cameron's efforts to pull his MEPs out of the centre-right bloc of the European Parliament, reflect the Tories' stubborn unwillingness to work within the existing structures and alliances of the European Union. Mr Cameron has proved himself an admirable reformer of his party in several respects, but when it comes to Europe he is still worryingly content to pander to its most regressive instincts.
Labour, to its credit, has pushed from within the European Parliament for the economic liberalisation that the EU requires to increase the prosperity of all, despite the protectionist instincts of many of its colleagues in the social democratic bloc of Brussels. But it is the Liberal Democrats who have been the most consistently constructive British party on the European Union, a stance which has given their honest criticisms of Brussels' shortcomings all the more credibility.
Yet party considerations aside, the imperative this week is participation. Decisions taken in the cockpit of European democracy will affect all our lives. We hope that Britons will be able briefly to raise their eyes this week from the row over MPs' expenses and cast their vote with some of the grave challenges facing us all, as Europeans, in mind.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
I, for one, completely forgot for several years that I HAD a mortgage, and recently my wife reminded me that I have a second house which is, apparently, in Penge.
If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone. As for the cost of cleaning a moat, or buying a chandelier, or putting up some shelves, for heaven's sake, it's hardly Ferdinand Marcos territory, is it?
So Alan Johnson didn't claim his full entitlement....is this really grounds for making him a replacement PM if Gordon goes down with the ship? Has the whole world gone mad? It's a disgrace.
What we get with the EU would not change if the UK solidly returned UKIP MEPs
What kind of "democracy" is that?
The alternative viewpoint would be that parties opposed to the increasingly undemocratic nature of the EU are gaining support precisely because of that opposition. Remember the Tories (the only party not to have disgracefully reneged on the promised Constitreaty referendum) are apparently on 30% in the poll.
I don't think you should worry your head too much about people voting 'for the wrong reasons'. I have far more faith in our voters, and also expect other EU voters elsewhere in Europe to voice their disapproval of the denial of democracy which has been allowed to happen with the Lisbon Treaty by electing more sceptical MEPs where they are given the choice.
It will probably be the Lib Dems but only because I've eliminated the rest. And that doesn't feel like the best reason to vote.
i thought UKIP were one-issue til i looked at their website...
Check it out, it may help ...
This would be understandable if you were reading the Telegraph or the FT, but you are not.
The EU's climate strategy, if its worth the name, revolves around carbon trading, a cynical device to enable the growth party to get back on track while people in third world countries take the strain by cutting their emissions.
In the last few years, and to their undying shame, the Independent, Ruth Kelly and Jim Fitzpatrick have all agued that aviation can grow whilst CO2 emissions are cut "elsewhere".
That's someone else's "elsewhere" BTW, not theirs, and certainly not the buffoon in charge of the EU Commission who told the Telegraph:
'Mr Barroso hails cheap air travel as "a great thing for our civilisation" and expresses grave concerns over fashionable plans, floated by Mr Miliband, for personal carbon rationing.'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh
Go to the concurrent article in today's The Independent - 'Cut emissions or acidity will kill coral reefs' - and you will see where the growth party is heading.
As I understand it a vote for the Lib Dems on Thursday for example, could result in a Lib Dem MEP being elected to the European Parliament. The Lib Dems presumably form part of a grouping of like minded MEPs from other countries which would then decide, along with the other groupings, whether legislation put before it by the EU Commissioners or the Council of Ministers would be passed or not.
It is not possible, as far as I know, for the EU Parliament to initiate legislation. If so, the MEPs we elect only have a secondary role to play when decisions are taken about which issues the EU will try to resolve.
Participation in the EU elections then, it seems to me, is not so much about the almost infinitesimally small influence that a vote would have; but about keeping the EU legitimate and therefore alive.