EU ruling could change Premier League viewing
An EU ruling allowing television viewers to by-pass UK broadcasters and watch cheaper foreign satellite coverage of Premier League football would threaten the nation's grass roots sport, it was warned today.
The ruling came a step closer today when an Advocate-General at the European Court of Justice advised judges to back the right of Karen Murphy to use a Greek decoder in her Portsmouth pub to screen matches.
She faced a fine and costs totalling nearly £8,000 after the Football Association Premier League (FAPL) took her to court for breaching the League's power to grant exclusive broadcasting rights within the UK.
But Ms Murphy took her case to the EU Court and today Advocate-General Julie Kokott said blocking her right to use far cheaper Greek decoders to screen matches breached EU single market rules.
The Advocate-General's "opinion" is not legally-binding, but the full panel of EU judges follows such advice in about 80% of cases.
And if they do so in the final verdict later this year, it could mean a major rethink for the premier League and its current exclusive agreements with Sky Sports and ESPN.
This afternoon Tory MEP and European Parliament spokeswoman on sport Emma McClarkin said it would also have "significant and detrimental" effects on the funding of grass roots sport in the UK:
"This opinion is far more complicated than a simple David versus Goliath battle: money generated from television rights to sports are funnelled back into grass roots development, particularly in cricket and rugby.
"These are national football leagues that are being broadcast, and they should be subjected to national territorial rights agreements."
Miss McClarkin said the European Commission had already made clear that sport should be treated as a separate issue when it comes to EU cross-border rules, and said today's opinion "failed to recognise the specificity of sport".
She went on: "This could have consequences on the quality of national sport broadcasting.
"Once again, we are seeing the European Court of Justice taking the most federalist interpretation of the law, and this time the consequences will be very far-reaching for television and sports rights owners and for all levels of sport."
Latest in Sport
Chelsea vs Tottenham combined XI: Hugo Lloris or Thibaut Courtois? Willian or Christian Eriksen? Who makes the final cut?
Manchester United vs Sunderland match report: Wayne Rooney scores twice but referee Roger East sends off Wes Brown instead of John O'Shea
Scotland vs Italy match report: Italians stun Murrayfield as Scots clinch defeat from the jaws of victory
AP McCoy on Arsenal: 'If I was performing that bad I'd have retired a long time ago'
Manchester United player ratings: Just how bad was Angel Di Maria to be withdrawn at half-time?
- 1 The black and blue dress: Makers considering a white and gold version
- 2 Husband and wife die holding hands within hours of each other after 67 years of marriage
- 3 PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
- 5 Saudi Muslim cleric claims the Earth is 'stationary' and the sun rotates around it
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
'Cash for access' scandal: Sir Malcolm Rifkind says 'unrealistic' for MPs to live on £67,000 salary
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Russia's roadmap for annexing eastern Ukraine 'leaked from Vladimir Putin's office'