- Saturday 25 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Tuesday 4 December 2012
Relax, Facebook’s Photo Sync is an opt-in feature. If you’re worried about privacy, simply don’t use it
Facebook won't be taking user's photos without permission.
OH MY GOD! Facebook wants to mine our photos for data! How will we ever defend ourselves from this free-to-use, private-by-default, opt-in service?! Calm down people, it’s just Facebook catching up with the competition again.
With every month that passes, another Facebook privacy scandal is born. This time it’s centred around the new Photo Sync feature Facebook have baked into their Android and iOS apps, making it possible to auto upload all the photos you take directly into a private photo album within your Facebook gallery.
This sort of feature is nothing new. Google+ has supported instant photo uploading since its inception over 16 months ago. Dropbox, the popular cloud storage service, has also been providing photo upload functionality in its mobile apps since April of this year. In both cases the features have been well received and are used regularly by many users.
On the whole, I expect a majority of Facebook users will ignore the new feature and go about their daily social media routine as normal. I’ve already seen a dozen people do this, as the update presented itself at the top of their news feeds. In each case, the person acknowledged the new feature, tapped ‘cancel’, and went about their business as before.
Some users on the other hand, will embrace the new feature and allow Facebook to collect their photos and store them in a private folder, ready to be shared at a later date or discarded over time. Serial sharers, social media addicts and photographers will likely embrace the new features with open arms. Just as they did on Google plus well over a year ago.
Then there are the conspiracy theorists, who will naturally be outraged by the idea, and insist that “Facebook just want to mine your uploaded photos for data!”, “Facebook will know who your location and determine who you’re hanging out with by scanning the faces of the people in your photos!”, “Facebook will use brands it identifies in photos to target ads at you!”
Ladies, gentlemen, and conspiracy theorists, please pay attention to this next bit. Facebook already knows all of this information. Their apps see your location whenever you interact with them. You add the people you know to your friends lists on a regular basis. You already proactively ‘like’ your favourite brands and services.
If you are genuinely worried about how Facebook will use the photos that you upload, then spend the time to actually read the terms of service and privacy policies that are in place to explain this in mind-numbing detail. If Facebook are doing anything untoward with your data, then they must, by law, disclose this in the policies they provide.
With half of the Internet already potentially using their services, privacy snafus are something Facebook endeavours to avoid at all cost. Especially after their previous miss-steps concerning user data.
If you don’t want all of you photos to be uploaded automatically, then don’t use the feature. It is an opt-in service. If you have already opted in, then go into your settings and simply opt-out. It’s as simple as that. Manage your photo uploads manually, Facebook is already receiving the same signals from you based on dozens of different features you already use.
If you want your online social activity to be as private as possible, simply stop using free, ad-supported social networks altogether. It’s either that, or we all start paying to use social networks, and have our governments enforce privacy audits. No, I didn’t think you’d fancy doing that. Free and ad-supported doesn’t sound so bad when you put it that way, does it?
-
This week's big questions: How best to react to Woolwich? Has Miliband got what it takes? And is Stephen King right about ebooks?
Ian Rankin -
What, let gays get married? We must be bonkers
Mark Steel -
Dogma will always lead to murder. In the end, scepticism is the only answer
A C Grayling -
The Daily Cartoon
-
Stop laying into GPs. We don't deserve it
Dr Clare Gerada
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Making reading fun for kids
Nook is donating eReaders to volunteers at high-need schools and participating in exclusive events throughout the campaign.
Introducing the 'Get Reading' campaign
Get the latest on The Evening Standard's campaign to get London's children reading.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Alex Masters
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
Day In a Page
Johnny Marr talks relationships and reunions
In pictures: After the flood
Death becomes her: A very modern mortician
School of chop: Learning the art of butchery
The man who's eaten everywhere
A Berliner in 1963 – but did John F Kennedy once admire Adolf Hitler?