- Thursday 20 June 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
- Offers
Sunday 5 December 2010
David Randall: Phone masts may harm earth's trees, but calls from ET look more likely
Four corners of the world
Do your local trees look a bit peaky? Are there cracks in the bark, with parts of the leaves dying? The blame, according to Dutch research, is radiation from mobile phone networks and Wi-Fi. Ecologists in the city of Alphen aan den Rijn found abnormalities on trees that could not be accounted for by any known disease or fungus. So experts at Wageningen University were called in, and they subjected 20 ash trees to various kinds of radiation for three months. Sure enough, those exposed to Wi-Fi signals showed symptoms of radiation sickness.
What's really worrying is that five years ago, only about 10 per cent of urban trees in Holland suffered from radiation poisoning. Today, 70 per cent of them do. And, if radiation from such networks can harm a 40ft tree, what might it be doing to small animals, birds and insects? On a well-ordered planet, further research would be undertaken, results published and relevant action taken. But here, you know what will happen: research funded by telecoms firms will challenge or muddy the findings, governments will declare the science "inconclusive", we'll all go on using mobiles and Wi-Fi and get used to sick-looking trees, and a marked lack of small urban birds.
The only consolation I can offer to tree lovers is this news from Brazil: satellite images have shown that the rate of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is at its lowest for 22 years. Some 2,490 square miles were cleared last year – less than a quarter of that felled in 2004. Thank heaven there aren't many phone masts in the rainforest.
* The mystery of the week is undoubtedly what a retired French electrician called Pierre Le Guennec is doing with £54m-worth of Picassos. He says he was given them by the artist, or his wife (his tale varies), back in the 1970s, not long before old Pablo went off to the great studio in the sky. He then kept them in a box in his garage, as you tend to do with multimillion-pound art stashes.
Scepticism abounds, with some suggesting the works may not be genuine, others that Pierre purloined them while fitting an alarm system to the great man's villa. What no one has yet suggested is the more obvious explanation for how an electrician acquires goodies: "I know the quote looks steep, Mr Picasso, but you won't find a better price around Mougins." A day later: "It's not looking good, Pablo. That ground floor ring looks dodgy. It's gotta be replaced." A week of disruption and power outages later: "I know it's more than I said, but there's the new junction box, extra cabling, that socket in the bedroom your wife wanted, the rewiring in your den..." It would have been worth a few old sketches just to get rid of him.
* The upcoming auction of the coffin of President Kennedy's assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, has generated disappointingly little by way of conspiracy theories. Where are the online postings from wackos around the world claiming that: a) this is not his coffin; b) it can't be because he's not dead; c) he's really living in Bolivia; d) the position of Oswald's casket indicates that there must have been at least three other coffins; f) there is no e) because the government covered it up; and g) the coffin's size makes it almost certain it is not Oswald's but Patrolman Tippet's?
* Finally, news from outer space. A study led by an astronomer at Yale University has concluded that we have been seriously underestimating the number of stars in the universe. There are actually some 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, it calculates. The number is a suspiciously round one, but the chances of life being found elsewhere do seem to have been rather increased.
How will you make today delicious?
Tell us how you plan to make today delicious and you could win a £50 M&S gift card.
Win a Nook® Simple Touch eReader
Find out how Nook® is supporting the Evening Standard's Get Reading campaign - and your chance to win one.
Free reading festival for families
Follow The Standard's campaign to get London's children reading - and experience this unique event at Trafalgar Square on 13 July.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
iJobs General
FX Options Front Office Java / C# Developer
£500 - £600 per day: Orgtel: FX Options Front Office Java / C# Developer - Ba...
Project Manager - Front Office - Regulatory IT
£600 - £700 per day: Orgtel: Project Manager - Front Office - Regulatory IT C...
Lighting Design Engineer
£33000 - £35000 Per Annum: The Green Recruitment Company: The Green Recruitmen...
Are you an Primary NQT looking for your first role in Essex?
£21000 - £22000 per annum: Randstad Education Chelmsford: NQTs required now fo...
Day In a Page
Babies behind bars
Sonic youth: The high-pitched sound alarm
The art of living in small spaces
'Teaching bright children isn't rocket science'
Can technology lure us back to the high street?


