Art

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Body art. Literally

An American sculptor's work made of human skin is coming to Britain. Andrew Johnson reports

Andrew Krasnow with his 'Palette' made of skin from people who donated their bodies to medical science

Andrew Krasnow with his 'Palette' made of skin from people who donated their bodies to medical science

Some will find it shocking, macabre, echoing the worst allegations of Nazi atrocities. An American artist has spent the past 20 years making sculptures out of human skin, and is to exhibit his work in public in the UK for the first time later this year.

Welcome to the world of Andrew Krasnow, who has tackled one of the great taboos in art. Günther von Hagens may have caused controversy with his Body Worlds exhibition of human corpses, but Krasnow goes a step further.

His works include human skin lampshades – a direct response to the belief that similar items made from the skin of Holocaust victims were found at Buchenwald concentration camp.

Using skins from white men who donated their bodies to medical science, he has created freak versions of mundane items including flags, boots and maps of America – in effect using skin like leather. His work, he says, is a commentary on human cruelty and America's ethics and morality.

The exhibition in London in July will include a new sculpture made out of the final piece of skin Krasnow obtained in a job lot 20 years ago – a defaced $10 bill, in keeping with his questioning of US values. It has been made especially for the GV Art gallery, which will host the exhibition.

Not surprisingly, the work attracts controversy. The only time it has been shown before in Britain, late last year, it was by appointment only. Now the gallery has been licensed by the UK's Human Tissue Authority to display a complete exhibition.

Krasnow's human-skin American flags were created just before the first Gulf War for the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati, although they were never displayed after Republican politicians Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich denounced his work.

"The objective was to express my concerns about the war and that it would not be conducted in a way that was moral and ethical," he said. "Since that question wasn't permitted in a museum, the work became more complex, with all the inherent contradictions of what it means to be an American or, for that matter, to be human."

Gallery owner Robert Devcic said Krasnow uses only white skin because much of the suffering in the Americas has been caused by white people. "He uses skin to make the point that suffering is universal," he said. "It is tanned using the same process that you'd use for an animal skin."

Martin Kemp, emeritus professor of art history at Oxford University, said Krasnow was not trying to be sensationalist. "He has not overtly pushed the sense of spectacle or sensation, unlike, say, Damien Hirst," he said. "He is working with deep and disturbing resonances. As an artist, he is pretty much out there on his own."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

It's ethical art only if it emphasizes cruelty, not glorifying it!
[info]nooraza wrote:
Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 07:47 am (UTC)
I hope Mr. Krasnow is not like the German 'artist' who are using dead bodies for art; including from Chinese prisoners executed unjustly in Chinese prison! If Mr. Krasnow's art is about emphasizing the unacceptable cruelty of the Nazis towards their victims especially the Jewish victims in the Holocaust, then it would teach something valuable about such unfortnate history - that such cruelty is evil. And that the rise of Neo-Nazi in Germany, Greece, Northern Ireland and whole Europe, should be stopped!
only one question
[info]lee_ji_me wrote:
Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 08:45 am (UTC)
why?
Bodies donated for science or organ transplants
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC)

I wonder if these people who donate their bodies for science or organ donation, know that they will be turned into lampshades?
Re: Bodies donated for science or organ transplants
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 05:43 pm (UTC)
That is precisely what concerned me; for someone who claims he is questioning morality and ethics he does not seem concerned that using body parts left for medical research and turning them into lampshades may not ethical. Also I find the fact that he only uses white skin a little racist; if he only used black skin everyone would be up in arms about this.
So why are we giving a platform to someone little more than a racist grave robber?
Re: Bodies donated for science or organ transplants
[info]elmo20 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 05:44 pm (UTC)
Surely we should be questioning the science community for putting bodies up for auction in the first place!?
it's not like he stole the bodies or aquired them illegally..
The fact that someone can buy bodies is surely the more disturbing fact..
Re: Bodies donated for science or organ transplants
[info]silverlakeguy wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 06:34 am (UTC)
First of all, you really shouldn't speak of something you know nothing about. That's a wild accusation... a "racist grave robber." In truth, you're judging a man based on a blurb, published by a writer who doesn't quote Mr. Krasnow directly. Let's be fair. He's an artist, expressing a point of view as bluntly and graphically as possible. That's what makes those people artists.
Re: Bodies donated for science or organ transplants
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 07:11 pm (UTC)
He uses only the skins of white men, that sounds pretty racist to me. If he used only the skins of black men every one would be up-in-arms about it. That is racism plain and simple.
Secondly, these people donated their bodies to medical science, not an eccentric artist. Do you think these people expected to be turned into a lampshade to make a point that (in the artist's view) his race are not very nice? Whilst he did not dig up a grave he acquired body parts for a purpose for which they were not intended - it may not be grave robbing but it is a form of desecration, albeit with the assistance of the medical professionals who should have a duty to their patients both before and after death. He may believe he is making a point on ethics but he has acted deeply unethically to do so and it seems that currently everyone is ranting on about the BNP getting a handful of votes whilst here is a man also with a racist viewpoint and gimmicky show and we should respect him as being a deep feeling and expressive person - sorry, I don't buy it, a racist is a racist by any name, and turning dead people into wallets and lampshades makes him as bad as the Nazis he feels he is protesting against.
Unfortunately these days being an artist means having some kind of gimmick and a pretentious sales pitch, gone are the days when craft and creativity were the artist's fortes. Mr Krasnow has failed to impress me with his.
Re: Bodies donated for science or organ transplants
[info]culturedropout wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 02:59 am (UTC)
Hey - I aspire to one day being a lampshade, thank you very much! It's all just compost once it's no longer alive, so someone might as well enjoy it. If someone really wanted a leather jacket, I'd rather they made one from my donated remains than from the skin of a murdered animal, for instance.
thought provoking
[info]cm070537 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC)
Having been fortunate enough to see Krasnow's skin works during their UK exhibition late last year, I can say without hestitation that this is immensely powerful art. The immediate impact of these works is of course visceral but in no way does it feel exploitative or sensationalist (c/f Günther von Hagen ). With its references to the abuse of native Americans and the cruelty of American imperialism across the globe, I came away thinking more about man's lost humanity than the materials he uses to deliver his message. A case in point is the lamp shade series with its references to the Nazi horrors. In fact there are no lampshades, simply bands of human skin in red, white and blue. Despite his own family connection to the Holocaust, Krasnow is making a clear statement that pain and suffering are universal and that we are complicit in the horrors that take place across the globe on a daily basis. Surely the use of white skin says more about the identifying the perpertrators than avoiding issues of race. Looking at this installation it is imposible not to consider how life is so very fragile and that we are all the same under the skin. The ethics of using human tissue in art is an issue that we should not shy away from. I believe that this work is also a condemnation of American consumerism which has lead to the commoditisation of the human body and the semi-legal body parts trade. That the artist could even acquire such materials says it all! Perhaps this is why Krasnow's work is of even greater importance as it sheds light on an "industry" that has escaped public scrutiny for so long. We can only hope that the next showing of Krasnow's work will prompt a debate into not only the ethics of such work but also the ownership of the body after death. A final word of caution: perhaps it is best to view this work before rushing to judgement. Having seen it myself , I can say that it is work that stays with you long after you have you have encountered it.
In very bad taste
[info]jonsummys wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 11:18 am (UTC)
I'm not concerned by the macabre nature of the skin creations, but as has been commented on already the use of bodies donated to medical science for use in "art" is incredibly unethical and insensitive.

Those people wanted to help others by furthering medical knowledge after they had no further need for their body. Providing art materials for a conman, sorry, I mean modern artist (there's a difference you know, or so I'm told) is not helping people. Indeed it may make people rethink whether or not to donate their bodies to medical science if they're just going to end up as a lampshade. Bravo Herr Krasnow; profiteering, attention-seeking hypocrite.
I can see his point but..
[info]rachieblackwell wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 01:17 pm (UTC)
Surely there is a more imaginative way of putting this point across, yes this gets publicity but what has the world come to if this can be called art. I dont know why anyone would want to see this but out of morbid curiousity, this is the art worlds version of the films saw and hostel. I suppose this truelly reflects what we have become in our global culture if this is the produce of our creativity. It makes me sad, :o(

Rachie
xXx
art literlly
[info]cjoeyspeak wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 11:56 pm (UTC)
"What VULGAR and TOTALY DISGUSTING Statement to make! White is only USED, because the White population has created much HARM! Is this person another mighty-mental midget?
These are the kind's of remarks that create CHOAS! He should walk the streets of the South Bronx and beyond to FEEL! He speaks from a BOOK LEARNED PERSPECTIVE! A FOOL will ALWAYS be a FOOL!
Respectively,
j A. santangelo
jsantangelo@webtv.net
cjoeyspeak
Dont knock it till......
[info]mowfalmighty wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
I must say i thought the Von Hagen Body Worlds exhibition in brick lane was absolutely brilliant; enlightening, informative, funny, sad, poignant, mind blowing, life affirming..... the list goes on. Of course there are always those who seem offended for some reason.
I would agree with cm070537; we need to view the exhibit for ourselves before jumping to conclusions.
Call That Art
[info]catfishspy wrote:
Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 09:06 am (UTC)
Upload your photo and our unique system lets you choose your Photos on canvas photos to canvas canvas Prints and canvas Art and see your product come to life.
[info]xelandria wrote:
Monday, 15 June 2009 at 09:18 am (UTC)
I don't see what's so unethical about it.. It's meant to be confronting and is most certainly not glorifying the use of human body parts as art. If anybody bothered to read the article it's meant to question peoples ideas of morality and challenge the self righteous nature of Western society. Also, honestly...when will people get past the idea that once a person is dead, they just become matter? Yeah I'm sure the 'soul' of the dead person is highly offended that their leftovers have been turned into art rather than being left to rot into a disgusting shapeless form and then disintegrate into nothing.

Most popular