Create a work of art that's worth £60,000? There's nothing to it
Rob Sharp is a freelance journalist specialising in arts and culture. He was on staff at The Independent from July 2007 to December 2011, first as a features writer, and then as the paper’s arts correspondent. He has written for a wide range of newspapers and magazines. For more information visit his website, www.robsharp.com or email him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Saturday 01 October 2011
With its black square surrounding a blank canvas, the British minimalist Bob Law's 1969 work Nothing To Be Afraid Of V, expected to sell this month for £60,000, might seem the ultimate case of artistic daylight robbery. Not according to some art critics, who leapt to Law's defence yesterday.
Law, who died in 2004 and is described as the "founding father of British minimalism" by the London auctioneer Bonhams, attracted derision during his life. In 1971, The Daily Mirror ran a picture of his work with the headline: "What the blankety-blank is this?" In 1977, the Scottish broadcaster Fyfe Robertson, speaking on prime-time BBC television, said his work "could barely be described as art". Now the critics are hitting back.
"It's a bit like trying to kill Bambi, having a go at Bob Law," said Andrew Graham-Dixon, art critic with BBC Two's The Culture Show. "I always thought he was an interesting British contributor to the artistic moment known as minimalism. If people don't want to look at it, they don't have to; they can sod off. I suspect whoever buys it for £60,000 will make money out of it. He's a good egg."
Graham-Dixon's fellow critic Sarah Kent said: "The painting coming up for auction is very abstract, but he also did incredibly beautiful landscape drawings. People might argue that he was a conceptualist who didn't know the ideas behind the work, but that's to misunderstand him completely."
Law was born in Middlesex in 1934. In 1960 he showed work at the Institute of Contemporary Art, and was represented throughout the 1970s and 1980s by London's influential Lisson Gallery, which currently shows Anish Kapoor. Public collections holding his work include the British Museum and New York's Guggenheim.
Some, however, will never be convinced. "I see no merit in it," said the Evening Standard's art critic, Brian Sewell. "I find it intellectually insulting. It seems to me that there are so many contemporary painters saying they don't have to create an image. They can abandon the ancestral characteristics of art and say this is a picture and then give you a blank canvas. It's bloody lazy."
Bonhams is due to auction the work on 13 October.
BBC Trust agrees to axe channel from TV in favour of digital moveTV
Final Top Gear reviewTV
FestivalsFive ways to avoid the portable toilets
Jurassic WorldThe results are completely brilliant
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
- 2 Iain Duncan Smith's expenses credit card is suspended after he runs up £1,000 debt to taxpayer
- 3 German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
- 4 French woman dies in freak bungee jumping accident
- 5 Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck to divorce and end their 10-year marriage
Top Gear: Former co-host James May to present new BBC2 car show
The Rolling Stones announce biggest ever touring rock exhibition with Saatchi Gallery
Glastonbury 2015: The best bits you missed from Lionel Richie and the Dalai Lama to The Libertines' secret set
Glastonbury 2015: The picture of a man crowd surfing in a wheelchair is brilliant, but it wasn't taken at Glastonbury
Fifty Shades of Grey author EL James' Twitter Q&A didn't exactly go as planned
The moment a Queen's Guard soldier lost it and drew his gun at annoying tourist
Greece crisis: IMF was pushed around by Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy – and now it is being humiliated
Greece crisis: The wider lesson is that it’s time to abandon this failed experiment in currencies
'I wish the BBC would stop calling it Islamic State' – David Cameron unleashes frustration at broadcaster
Pentagon accuses Russia of 'playing with fire' over nuclear threats towards Nato
They are neither a 'state' nor 'Islamic': Why we shouldn't call them Isis, Isil or IS