Books

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

How to get a book deal

Tim Clare spent years trying to be published. Now he's written about the secret of his success

Happy ending: perseverance paid off for writer Tim Clare

Katie Utting

Happy ending: perseverance paid off for writer Tim Clare

If you want to be a footballer, or a heart surgeon, or an astronaut, there are clear prerequisites and cut-off points – before you proceed you must acquire such-and-such a qualification, if you haven't achieved such-and-such by the age of 20 your chances of a career are zero. By stark contrast, becoming a professional author calls for a highly subjective skillset, recognises no age limit, and can even co-exist alongside other jobs. With most other vocations, there comes a stage where you can say: "Well, it was a pretty dream, but it's impossible now," and finally let go, safe in the knowledge that no amount of "hairshirty" exertions would ever be enough.

Most people who put pen to paper and attempt a book are perfectly aware of the horrendous odds they face, but becoming a novelist has little to no start-up costs, and offers theoretically limitless profits. Anybody could be plucked from the doldrums of their shabby, average job and hoisted into a life of status, meaning, and comfort.

Magical thinking thrives in unpredictable environments. Even for industry stalwarts, the dense mesh of variables that governs whether a book sells in barrowloads or slumps into ignominious obscurity makes publishing a baffling business – which, of course, is part of its attraction. To the uninitiated would-be writer, the book industry can seem variously like a glamorous dream factory, an unfeeling monolith honeycombed with toff cabals, and a kind of clapped-out Zeppelin piloted by monkeys that randomly distributes food parcels.

The fact is, there is no one-size-fits-all prescription for getting published. The only general advice possible is to embed yourself as deep as you can in the belly of the beast, then use every means at your disposal to get your work read by the people with their hands on the purse strings. Of course, this policy presumes that you have spent years honing your craft, know your market, and have produced a manuscript that showcases your skills firing on all cylinders. Yes, the occasional purblind idiot may blunder across the minefield unscathed, but most will get blown to smithereens. Think of talent as your insurance policy.

For all the supposed allure of the distant finish line, in my experience, writing a novel is a long, lonely path, lined with signposts pointing in contradictory directions. I spent years working on an elaborate fantasy novel that didn't quite hang together, then lost my job, split up with my girlfriend, moved back in with my parents, and had a nervous breakdown. For the next 18 months, I watched as my best mates started achieving things that, just a couple of years before, were nothing but whimsical fantasies. I played video games, ate breakfast at two in the afternoon, and listened to my recently retired dad shuffling round the house like Marley's Ghost. Eventually, partly at the behest of my therapist, I began to write about what I was going through – the tight knot of jealousy in my stomach, my heart-to-heart chats with my father. Writing about my feelings spurred me into action which in turn gave me more to write about, until soon I'd wrestled some of my darkest demons and decided that I could live without the glory of being "someone who writes stories". At which point I showed what I'd written to an agent, who showed it to a publisher, who said no and then my agent kept on showing it to publishers until one said: "This is very good. I will give you money for it." Simple.

Tenacity and flexibility make a formidable team. Take pleasure in creative failure – it's a sign you're pushing yourself – but learn from it too. I had to bash my head against a brick wall several times before I thought: "Hey, maybe I should change direction." Getting published is about practising until you're really good, then persevering until you're really lucky.

Tim Clare's 'We Can't All Be Astronauts', published by Ebury Press, £10.99

What not to do: A beginner's guide

1. Don't believe you dilute your vision by reading others' work.

2. Don't be afraid to lose faith in your original draft. To edit is not to scorn your infallible muse.

3. Don't submit your work with supporting material. Self-portraits in green crayon do not scream "I am creative".

4. Don't approach editors somewhere they could not reasonably be expecting to field submissions. Catching them off-guard will not get you a better deal.

5. The Writers' Handbook and Writers' and Artists' Yearbook are both produced by publishers. Ignore them at your peril.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Hey, what a great idea!
[info]floppsiefrog wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 01:59 am (UTC)
Tim Clare should negotiate a film deal for his story in addition to the merchandlising rights for colouring books, games, t-shirts and action figures. He could also consider milking the lecture circuit to bang on about the misery of failure to make the growing army of losers feel a whole lot happier with their lives. The next step in his meteoric rise from obscurity could be as the host of a television chat show to enable those who are least likely to succeed to reveal their innermost secrets. Of course, a website dedicated to the frustration of crushed ambition would be a useful complement, as would a glossy monthly magazine "The Audacity of Depression". Finally, he should plan a series of sequels to his book "We Can't All be Celebrities" and "Thank Heavens For Dumb Publishers".
Thanks!
[info]asheb wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 08:35 pm (UTC)
"I showed what I'd written to an agent, who showed it to a publisher, who said no and then my agent kept on showing it to publishers until one said: "This is very good. I will give you money for it." Simple."

Yeah, great...Thanks for that.
Is that the SECRET to his success...seriously?

What a load of old b******! I wrote a novel (comedy fiction) a couple of years ago and am still ploughing through the minefield that is finding a literary agent. After several months of "We found your book very funny but are unable to offer you representation" letters, it looks like the way forward really is writing a sob story as the only things that seem to sell at the moment are depressive tales of abuse or repression or breakdowns (yawwwn).

Now how about the Independent publishes an ACTUAL article on the secrets of publishing success.
... a bundle
[info]davidtrochos wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 09:12 pm (UTC)
asheb- you missed the key sentence:
"The only general advice possible is to embed yourself as deep as you can in the belly of the beast, then use every means at your disposal to get your work read by the people with their hands on the purse strings."
Take a close look at Tim's bio to see how much effort he put into following that strategy.
What a waste of a story
[info]jasondeen wrote:
Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 09:33 pm (UTC)
This story says nothing other than 'try hard and continue to do so' = it gives no information on how to actually get published.
His agent did all the work - however the hard part for many is actually getting an agent.

No disrespect to Tim for getting his book publish - that is indeed a difficult task. however this article is worthless and shame on the Independent for publishing it - it seems more like a blatant PR write up for Tim.
[info]donedonedone wrote:
Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 05:11 pm (UTC)
i agree with jasondeen, this article seems like a PR write up that brings little more to the table than a bottle of BP garage pinot.
i did however seek out Mr Clare's "bio", and in doing so found the original version of this article on his blog, which i found brought slightly more to the table...
Lets say, BP garage pinot and a large, tasy, home made carrot cake.

so maybe this article has been the victim of an editors careful craft-knife.

still perhaps a blatant PR write up.
but one not so pointless as i'd first thought.

how dull of the indie to snip this into such a ho-hum read.
Point-missing
[info]davidtrochos wrote:
Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 10:23 pm (UTC)
This article is indeed a "blatant PR write up," but that's a key part of the point. Tim worked hard cultivating media contacts which allow him such luxuries, and make him more attractive to agents and publishers.
True that
[info]donedonedone wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 07:38 am (UTC)
Full agreement with david.
The Literary Pouting-Machine
[info]fredscribe1 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 01:15 pm (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I am not enamoured of the mass-market 'troubles I've seen' sort of book; it is not a novel, and novels built on imagination are harder to market. Here in Ireland, it certainly helps to be young, with friends in the media and a couple of arts' programmes with whose producers or presenters one is friendly. It helps too if you can get close friends to go on-air and say you are the greatest thing since Shakespeare. Chick-lit is in, big time, and I am reminded of the Irish literary agent who declared that the problem with the manuscripts being sent to them was that they were too literary. Yes, that's right. Literary. As perhaps War and Peace is literary. If you are a woman you are more likely to be taken on: call me sexist, but a quick glance over any Irish literary agent's website will confirm this. In short, there are so many variables, and at the same time they are so compacted and similar, that it is ridiculous to imagine that mere talent or imagination or even hard work sells your novel. A friend of mine once remarked, himself a writer, how a US agent had once told him that any book with the words suffering or survivor in it was a winner. So Moby-Dick might have had a chance with him, then. Selling your book is a dreadful affair. In some Sunday newspapers in Ireland, if you are a pretty girl with a book coming out, you will get a huge magazine spread, provided you show lots of leg and pout. I offered one prominent Sunday newspaper (I was bringing a novel out at the time) a photo-shoot of me in my undies, pouting, to advertise the forthcoming book. Sadly, and inexplicably, they refused. Clearly they were sexist. We may all long for the days when an ageing editor from a prominent publishing house would take us to his club to discuss editorial changes and a contract, but those days are over. It's about selling cornflakes now. And pouting.
Re: The Literary Pouting-Machine
[info]popo876 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 08:44 pm (UTC)
'If you are a woman you are more likely to be taken on: call me sexist, but a quick glance over any Irish literary agent's website will confirm this.'

Okay, sure - you're sexist. You gladly adopt sexism as a means of explaining your otherwise illogical dearth of recognition, rather than face up to the less palatable possibility that it is because you are not very talented. Like many disempowered, frustrated artists before you, you would sooner cover the world in leather than buy a pair of shoes. Could it be - and this, you understand, is a mere whimsical hypothesis - could it be that good taste does exist in sections the publishing industry, that not all the reading public are drag-knuckle dolts, and that, in fact, you have struggled because you are not a very good writer? Could it be that all the time you spend railing at industry strawmen would have been better spent honing your craft? Could it be that the media hasn't warmed to you because people find your prejudice and sense of entitlement repugnant and dull?
Re: The Literary Pouting-Machine
[info]fredscribe1 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 09:51 pm (UTC)
I am flattered that one should consider my 'dearth of recognition' as 'illogical.' It is not surprising, however, that when certain buttons are pushed one can expect certain results, as in this case. The only real difficulty I have with this comment is that it confirms so readily so many of one's prejudices.
Re: The Literary Pouting-Machine
[info]davidtrochos wrote:
Friday, 12 June 2009 at 07:43 pm (UTC)
What are you intending by the juxtaposition of "I" and "one" here?

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date