Books

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 5°C

Oops, we did it again - Why we make mistakes

Why do we make stupid mistakes? A new book says people have design faults that inevitably lead to slip-ups – but we can train ourselves to avoid them.

By Sophie Morris

The science of screw-ups: proof-reading errors, forgetting facts in interviews and even mistakes made by anaesthetists are three examples used by Joseph Hallinan in his cult book

ALAMY

The science of screw-ups: proof-reading errors, forgetting facts in interviews and even mistakes made by anaesthetists are three examples used by Joseph Hallinan in his cult book

We all make mistakes." That truism is usually meant kindly, but being on the receiving end of it can be downright frustrating. Try as we might, we repeat the same simple, preventable errors every day.

Joseph T Hallinan, an American Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, thinks he knows why – humans are pre-programmed to make blunders. His book, Why We Make Mistakes, attracted winning reviews on its publication last month, with one critic predicting that it would change the face of mainstream behavioural science. Subtitled "How We Look Without Seeing, Forget Things in Seconds, and Are All Pretty Sure We Are Way Above Average", Hallinan's book is, according to its author, "a field guide to human error. People can look at it and see the mistakes they make, and find some of the reasons behind those mistakes."

The examples he uses are mostly of the forehead-slapping, Homer Simpson variety: why do names and facts escape us at crucial moments, such as in interviews? Why do we forget computer passwords, fall for optical illusions, and stash jewellery in a "safe" place when we go on holiday, only to forget which spice jar holds our rocks?

It's down to human design, not personality or intelligence, Hallinan argues. The very way we think, see and remember sets us up for mistakes. We are subconsciously biased, quick to judge by appearances and overconfident of our own abilities. Most of us believe we are above average at everything – a statistical impossibility that leads to slip-ups.

The former Wall Street Journal reporter began to shape his theory while researching a story on anaesthetists, who, it turns out, have a terrible safety record. Hallinan describes how their statistics were vastly improved by simple change to their equipment that cancelled out human error; the introduction of a valve that could only turn one way to deliver anaesthetic to a patient.

Taking examples from aviation, consumer behaviour, geography and football, Hallinan fuses economics, neuroscience and psychology, an approach that owes an obvious debt to Malcolm Gladwell (The Tipping Point, Blink and Outliers), and Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner (Freakonomics). When his book is published in the UK this summer, it will be titled Errornomics, a nod to Levitt and Dubner.

All these books use economics and sociology to explain events considered out of our control. The preferred methodology is to then deconstruct common perceptions, revealing human behaviour to be structured and predictable. But Hallinan's book offers the possibility of decoding all that is wrong with our lives, righting the wrongs and scheming to rule the world. He offers solutions. After all, the best way to avoid making mistakes, he says, is to understand why we make them.

So is this just self-help cloaked in statistical analysis and sociology? "I guess [that] depends on your view of self-help and whether you think it's a good or a bad thing," Hallinan says. "I could see how they could fit there, because there's a need in a lot of people to try to help themselves navigate through life, and my book and Freakonomics and Outliers help people navigate through life."

Hallinan went beyond sociology and economics and important nuggets in the areas of marketing and even ophthalmology. "Personally," he says, "one of the most surprising things I learnt was how bad our vision is and how many tricks our eyes play on us." In one Cornell University experiment he cites, subjects were asked to seek directions from a stranger, but a pair of actors carrying a door would pass between the two conversants in the middle of the exchange. As the door passed, the person giving directions would swap with someone else – and their interlocutor rarely noticed that they finished the conversation with a different person.

Even Hallinan is vulnerable to the avoidable mis-step. A reader of his website recently pointed out an inaccuracy missed by the author and his editors. "It was a mistake we cite in the book," Hallinan says. "And a classic proofreaders' error – a dropped word in a sentence. I didn't notice it, my editors didn't notice it, and nobody else looking at the website noticed it, but one reader in Ohio did. The reason this one reader succeeded where others failed is that he is a slow reader and reads word by word, rather than scanning pages as most of us do."

What was the dropped word? "Make," Hallinan says. "The sentence should have read, 'Why do we make mistakes?' A crucial error, in this case."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]lefalcon wrote:
Monday, 16 March 2009 at 03:10 pm (UTC)
Fascinating article. Of course mistakes can have terrible consequences. However certain mistakes, like some mentioned in this article, are fascinating for another reason. They show how in daily life we intuit much more than we dare imagine. For some people this is a severe fault because we would like to think of ourselves as being more observant, and more in control of our lives. For others this is a trade-off because, based on previous experience, such intuitions may be right more than 80% of the time, and they give us more time to focus on the 'bigger picture'. Yet others may be interested in fine-tuning such intuitions to the point where they are closer to 100% accurate. To be more careful all the time is time consuming and not very practical. One would have to develop a certain sensitivity to occasions that warrant more attention.
Horrible Title
[info]baldassaro wrote:
Monday, 16 March 2009 at 04:16 pm (UTC)
I've always been put off reading Freakonomics by its vile title. If this comes out as "Why We Make Mistakes", I'll buy and read it. If it's issued as "Errornomics" I wouldn't have it in the house...
Re: Horrible Title
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Monday, 16 March 2009 at 06:36 pm (UTC)
"Freaknomics" is a pile of bull, you haven't missed a thing. One of the most poorly-written books I ever bought. I threw it away in a dustbin in an airport halfway through - it's lame trash.
Re: Horrible Title
[info]fourpie wrote:
Monday, 16 March 2009 at 08:37 pm (UTC)
I totally agree with you. Both are awful names. Very bad marketing idea to give things off-putting names.
To err is human
[info]hanif001 wrote:
Monday, 16 March 2009 at 09:46 pm (UTC)
British version of quality mantra:
"Get it right, first time, every time"

Japanase version of quality:
"Make a mistake, but learn from it and dont repeat it, improve your quality by 10% every year"

Obviously, the former is not realistic neither does it take into account the ways humans make mistakes as part of life. Goes some way to explain why the Japanese overtook the British (and the West) in engineering and consumer product design/manufacturing from the 1980s and onwards.
Why not ergonomics?
[info]doctoryoung wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 03:42 pm (UTC)
Human error is indeed a fascinating subject, and at one level I welcome this book as an effort to make the topic more widely accessible. However I'm disappointed that the author addresses a whole scientific discipline without (apparently) referring to it by name - this comes under the remit of ergonomics. Ironically, the UK title - 'Errornomics' - is so close yet so far!

I write more about this on my blog at http://humancentreddesign.blogspot.com
Mistakes
[info]manaf wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 10:06 pm (UTC)
Humans make mistakes due to thinking too little or failing to think at all, sometimes due to carelessness, or simply laziness. Some of us make more mistakes because they are driven most of the time by their emotions rather than reason. Now the only problem in humans is that focusing all the time is so exhausting and almost impossible thus we tend to switch off and make mistkes consequently. The most successful race will be able to flexibly live with reason and achieve ultimate happiness, because I do believe it starts in the mind.

Best,
Manaf Abdulghani

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date